IP Library Granted Patent US 12,378,946
Granted Patent B1
US 12,378,946 · App. 19/021,432 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Vehicular wind turbine system for drag reduction

Inventor: John Michael Kourtoff (Toronto, CA)
Assignee: PURUS POWER CORPORATION
F03D9/32B62D35/001F03D1/04F03D9/25F05B2240/923F05B2240/931F05B2240/941
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,378,946
App. No.
19/021,432
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

A passive vehicle drag reduction system including an airflow capture inlet, a flow consolidating conduit, an air driven rotor assembly, and one or more flow exhaust conduits. The airflow capture inlet defines an airflow capture inlet direction. The flow consolidating conduit is close sided. The air driven rotor assembly has a rotor assembly inlet and an air driven rotor. The rotor assembly inlet defines a rotor airflow inlet direction. The air driven rotor has a laterally extending rotation axis transverse to the rotor airflow inlet direction and one or more air redirecting blades defining one or more rotor airflow outlet directions substantially parallel to the rotation axis. Each of the one or more flow exhaust conduits has a redirecting exhaust outlet located laterally of the air driven rotor assembly. The redirecting exhaust outlet defines an exhaust outlet airflow direction that is substantially parallel to the airflow capture inlet direction.

Claims (33)

1. A passive vehicle drag reduction system comprising:

an airflow capture inlet having an air entry window, the airflow capture inlet defining an airflow capture inlet direction;

a flow consolidating conduit that extends from a consolidating conduit upstream end at the airflow capture inlet, to a consolidating conduit downstream end;

an air driven rotor assembly having a rotor assembly inlet located downstream of the consolidating conduit downstream end, and an air driven rotor,

the rotor assembly inlet defining a rotor airflow inlet direction,

the air driven rotor having a laterally extending rotation axis transverse to the rotor airflow inlet direction, a plurality of air driven blades, and one or more air redirecting blades interior of the plurality of air driven blades, the air redirecting blades defining one or more rotor airflow outlet directions substantially parallel to the rotation axis; and

one or more flow exhaust conduits downstream of the air driven rotor assembly.

2. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the airflow capture inlet has an inlet upstream end and an inlet downstream end, and the inlet downstream end is located at a higher elevation than the inlet upstream end.

3. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the airflow capture inlet comprises a flow directing floor, and the air entry window overlies the flow directing floor.

4. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the airflow capture inlet comprises a flow directing floor, the airflow capture inlet is formed as an open sided conduit, and the flow directing floor and the air entry window form opposing sides of the open sided conduit.

5. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the airflow capture inlet comprises a flow directing floor, the flow consolidating conduit includes a conduit floor, and the conduit floor is contiguous with the flow directing floor.

6. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 5 , wherein the flow directing floor is concave and the conduit floor is convex.

7. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the flow consolidating conduit includes one or more flow partitions that subdivide a cross-sectional area of the flow consolidating conduit into two or more flow paths,

each flow partition and each flow path extending between the consolidating conduit upstream end and the consolidating conduit downstream end,

each flow partition having a partition downstream end located upstream of the consolidating conduit downstream end,

each flow path adjacent each flow partition merging at each partition downstream end into a merged flow path.

8. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 7 , wherein the cross-sectional area of the flow consolidating conduit decreases between the consolidating conduit upstream end and the consolidating conduit downstream end toward the consolidating conduit downstream end.

9. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of air driven blades have a radially inward discharge direction.

10. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein each of the flow exhaust conduits has a redirecting exhaust outlet that includes one or more outlet redirecting blades curved in an exhaust outlet airflow direction that is parallel to the airflow capture inlet direction.

11. The passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more flow exhaust conduits extend from an exhaust conduit upstream end to an exhaust conduit downstream end, and have a cross-sectional area, the cross sectional-area increasing between the exhaust conduit upstream end and the exhaust conduit downstream end toward the consolidating conduit downstream end.

12. A vehicle having the passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle comprises an aircraft, a watercraft, a rail transport vehicle, an automobile, a truck, or a motorcycle.

13. A vehicle comprising:

a vehicle body and the passive vehicle drag reduction system of claim 1 , the vehicle body having a front portion defining a first forward projection area, wherein the air entry window defines a second forward projection area that is at least 10% of the first forward projection area.

14. The vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the airflow capture inlet has an inlet upstream end and an inlet downstream end, and the inlet downstream end is located at a higher elevation than the inlet upstream end.

15. The vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the airflow capture inlet comprises a flow directing floor, and the air entry window overlies the flow directing floor.

16. The vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the airflow capture inlet comprises a flow directing floor, the airflow capture inlet is formed as an open sided conduit, and the flow directing floor and the air entry window form opposing sides of the open sided conduit.

17. The vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the airflow capture inlet comprises a flow directing floor, the flow consolidating conduit includes a conduit floor, and the conduit floor is contiguous with the flow directing floor.

18. The vehicle of claim 17 , wherein the flow directing floor is concave and the conduit floor is convex.

19. The vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the flow consolidating conduit includes one or more flow partitions that subdivide a cross-sectional area of the flow consolidating conduit into two or more flow paths,

each flow partition and each flow path extending between the consolidating conduit upstream end and the consolidating conduit downstream end,

each flow partition having a partition downstream end located upstream of the consolidating conduit downstream end,

each flow path adjacent each flow partition merging at each partition downstream end into a merged flow path.

20. The vehicle of claim 19 , wherein the cross-sectional area of the flow consolidating conduit decreases between the consolidating conduit upstream end and the consolidating conduit downstream end toward the consolidating conduit downstream end.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 15, 2025
From: KOURTOFF, JOHN MICHAEL
To: PURUS POWER CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 069874/0148 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 18884199 · Sep 13, 2024
Continuation 18618165 · Mar 27, 2024
References Cited (79)
US 1345022A · Oliver · 1920 [cited by applicant]
US 1646723A · Bonetto · 1927 [cited by applicant]
US 3934923A · Lissaman et al. · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4076448A · Sanders, Jr. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4084918A · Pavlecka · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4168759A · Hull et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4227855A · Flynn et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4359311A · Benesh · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4512714A · Kaesser · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5083899A · Koch · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5977649A · Dahill · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6465899B2 · Roberts · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6638005B2 · Holter et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6838782B2 · Vu · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6849964B2 · Becherucci et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6857492B1 · Liskey et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7329965B2 · Roberts et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7695050B2 · Neale · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8197178B1 · Chen · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8360713B2 · Carosi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8362636B2 · Ling · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8556571B2 · Cassidy · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8618683B2 · Diaz · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8864455B2 · Perry · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8907511B2 · Bowyer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8961103B1 · Wolff · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9371818B1 · Monto · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9573697B2 · Criado et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9744927B2 · Karimirozbahani · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9863403B2 · Gaither · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9926912B2 · Deshpande et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10767631B2 · Ouchi · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11124063B2 · Albrecht · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11187207B1 · Perkins · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11215160B2 · Huang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11230329B1 · White · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11286907B1 · Rebek · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11434870B2 · Suma et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11767090B2 · Mundon et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020139894A1 · Sorensen · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050230980A1 · Brunet · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20080061559A1 · Hirshberg · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080164700A1 · Bagepalli et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100001532A1 · Grumazescu · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110027084A1 · Rekret · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110033288A1 · Pezaris · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110037261A1 · Champ et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110204634A1 · Skala · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110291420A1 · Gu · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120056428A1 · Bennett et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130064660A1 · Hong · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20180001943A1 · Schellekens et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200055403A1 · Overstreet · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210062789A1 · Parker · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210122249A1 · Maury et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210138910A1 · Estefan Bellan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220355673A1 · Balakrishnan · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220409454A1 · Bekoscke et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230226935A1 · Barrera · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230339332A1 · Maury et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CA 3092026A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 3060653A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 104389741A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 3829112A1 · 1990 [cited by applicant]
DE 19648632A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
DE 102005041600B3 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
DE 202009001926U1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102015002670A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3786445A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 4273394A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011091476A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013041632A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020068124A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023020866A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Cho S-Y, “An experimental study of the optimal design parameters of a wind power tower used to improve the performance of vertical axis wind turbines.” Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2018; 10(9). doi: 10.1177/16878… [cited by applicant]
Schlueter-Kuck KL, “Coherent structure colouring: identification of coherent structures from sparse data using graph theory.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2017; 811: pp. 468-486. doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.755. [cited by applicant]
Schmid, Peter J. “Chapter Six—Data-driven and operator-based tools for the analysis of turbulent flows,” Editor(s): Paul Durbin, Advanced Approaches in Turbulence, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 243-305, ISBN 9780128207741, doi:10… [cited by applicant]
Inhabitat, “The MAGLEV: The Super-powered Magnetic Wind Turbine,” (2007) , Available online: https://inhabitat.com/super-powered-magnetic-wind-turbine-maglev/, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
CIP0, “International Search Report and Written Opinion,” mailed Dec. 17, 2024, PCT Application No. PCT/CA2024/050826, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,503,175