IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,392,839
Granted Patent B2
US 12,392,839 · App. 17/718,705 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Direct current spectroscopy (DCS) technique for in-operando cell diagnostics and anisotropic resistance monitoring

Inventors: Kai Narita (Pasadena, CA); Julia R. Greer (Pasadena, CA)
Assignee: California Institute of Technology
G01R31/392G01R31/385
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,392,839
App. No.
17/718,705
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of interrogating an electrochemical cell includes: applying a positive direct current to the electrochemical cell for a first time period, wherein the positive direct current is characterized by a first magnitude; applying a negative direct current to the electrochemical cell for a second time period, wherein the negative direct current is characterized by a second magnitude; wherein the first and second time periods have a combined duration of less than 2 seconds; wherein the second magnitude is equal to or within 50% of the first magnitude; recording cell resistance data of the electrochemical cell during each time period; and analyzing the cell resistance data to determine at least one of: (i) state of charge of the electrochemical cell; (ii) state of health of the electrochemical cell; and (iii) the resistance anisotropy of the cell.

Claims (77)

1. A method of interrogating an electrochemical cell comprising:

applying a positive direct current to the electrochemical cell for a first time period, wherein the positive direct current is characterized by a first magnitude;

applying a negative direct current to the electrochemical cell for a second time period, wherein the negative direct current is characterized by a second magnitude;

wherein the first and second time periods have a combined duration of less than 2 seconds;

wherein the second magnitude is equal to or within 50% of the first magnitude;

recording cell resistance data of the electrochemical cell during each time period; and

analyzing the cell resistance data to determine at least one cell parameter selected from the group consisting of:

(i) state of charge of the electrochemical cell;

(ii) state of health of the electrochemical cell; and

(iii) the resistance anisotropy of the cell;

wherein analyzing the state of health of the battery comprises correlating resistance measured at a first measurement time step to at least one of: SEI (solid electrolyte interphase) resistance, charge transfer resistance, contact resistance, grain boundary resistance of solid electrolyte, bulk resistance of solid electrolyte, interfacial resistance, activation resistance, Ohmic resistance, diffusion resistance, polarization resistance, and any combination of these;

wherein each of the first measurement time step and the second measurement time step is individually determined by the formula FX3a:

f= ½ *π*t   (FX3a);

wherein t is the first measurement time step or the second measurement time step; and

wherein f is a frequency determined by an AC impedance spectroscopy corresponding to the respective t; and

wherein the first measurement time step is equal to or within 20% of the SEI time constant of the electrochemical cell; and wherein the second measurement time step is equal to or within 20% of the charge transfer time constant of the electrochemical cell.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the first magnitude and the second magnitude is less than or equal to C/2 of the electrochemical cell.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the duration of the first time period is a function of the rate limiting process of the electrochemical cell.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the second time period has a duration equal to or within 50% of a duration of the first time period.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the steps of application of the positive and negative direct currents comprises applying a square wave direct current profile.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cell resistance data includes cell overpotential data, and wherein the analyzing step comprises dividing overpotential at each datapoint by the applied current, and wherein the overpotential is defined as the difference between the equilibrium potential of the net redox reaction in the cell just prior to the time period and the evolved voltage.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the steps of applying and the step of recording data collectively occur in 1 second or less.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyzing step comprises:

determining the state of charge of the electrochemical cell by correlating cell resistance data to state of charge via a predetermined relationship; or

determining the state of health of the electrochemical cell by correlating resistance anisotropy to state of health via a predetermined relationship.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the steps of applying the positive current and applying the negative current are performed sequentially in any order.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the constant positive direct current is applied prior to applying the constant negative direct current.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the constant negative direct current is applied prior to applying the constant positive direct current.

12. The method of claim 9 , comprising resting the electrochemical cell for a third time period between the steps of applying.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the third time period has a duration that is equal to or within 50% to the duration of the first time period and/or the second time period.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the duration of the third time period is sufficient to allow the cell to reach a stationary state.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the third time period is greater than a time constant of the electrochemical cell's response to the negative direct current and/or to the positive direct current.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the state of health of the battery further comprises correlating resistance measured at a second measurement time step to a second source of resistance of the electrochemical cell.

17. The method of claim 1 comprising determining an SEI resistance, R SEI .

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the SEI resistance, R SEI , is determined using formula FX1a:

R

SEI

=

|

V

1

-

V

0

|

I

;

(

FX1a

)

wherein I is the first magnitude or the second magnitude, V 0 is cell voltage immediately prior to application of the respective positive or negative direct current, and V 1 is cell voltage in response to the respective applied positive or negative direct current at a first measurement time step being equal to the time constant of the SEI of the electrochemical cell.

19. The method of claim 1 comprising determining a charge transfer resistance, R CT .

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the charge transfer resistance, R CT , is determined using formula FX2a:

R

CT

=

|

V

2

-

V

1

|

I

;

(

FX2a

)

and

wherein I is the first magnitude or the second magnitude, V 1 is cell voltage in response to the respective applied positive or negative direct current at a first measurement time step being equal to the time constant of the SEI of the electrochemical cell, V 2 is cell voltage in response to the respective applied positive or negative direct current at a second measurement time step being equal to the time constant of the charge transfer resistance of the electrochemical cell.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of analyzing comprises determining at least the resistance anisotropy of the cell.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cell resistance data comprises a first cell resistance data and a second cell resistance data; and wherein the method further comprises determining the first cell resistance data based on the applied positive direct current and determining the second cell resistance data based on the applied negative direct current.

23. The method of claim 22 , wherein the step of analyzing further comprises:

comparing the first cell resistance data to the second cell resistance data; and/or

comparing the first state of charge and/or a first state of health to the second state of charge and/or a second state of health.

24. The method of claim 1 , wherein the electrochemical cell is actively charging or discharging while said method is performed.

25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the electrochemical cell is part of a moving vehicle or component while said method is performed.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 17, 2024
From: NARITA, KAI; GREER, JULIA R.
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 067449/0562 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63173863 · Apr 12, 2021
Related Publication 20220336933A1 · Oct 20, 2022
References Cited (81)
US 5680031A · Pavlovic · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 8346495B2 · Gering · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8521497B2 · Gering · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9419313B2 · Paik et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9599584B2 · Yazami et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10036779B2 · Sazhin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10910858B2 · Taylor et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20190165432A1 · Park · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2015014764 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021023346 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Eddahech et al., Behavior and state-of-health monitoring of Li-ion batteries using impedance spectroscopy and recurrent neural networks, 2012, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 42, 487-494 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Ovejas et al., State of charge dependency of the overvoltage generated in Li-ion cells, 2019, Journal of Power Sources, 418, 176-185 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Barai et al., A study of the influence of measurement timescale on internal resistance characterization methodologies for lithium-ion cells, 2018, Scientific Reports, 1-13 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Pinson et al., Theory of SEI Formation in Rechargeable Batteries: Capacity Fade, Accelerated Aging and Lifetime Prediction, , 2013 , Journal of the Electrochemical Society 160, A243-A250 (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Horowitz, Paul; Hill, Winfield, The Art of Electronics (3rd edition),2015 Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521809266. p. 40-55. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Alvin et al. (Apr. 2020) “Revealing the intercalation mechanisms of lithium, sodium, and potassium in hard carbon,” Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2000283, doi:10.1002/aenm.202000283. [cited by applicant]
An et al. (2016) “The state of understanding of the lithium-ion-battery graphite solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and its relationship to formation cycling,” Carbon 105, 52-76, doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008. [cited by applicant]
Andre et al. (2013) “Comparative study of a structured neural network and an extended Kalman filter for state of health determination of lithium-ion batteries in hybrid electric vehicles,” Engineering Applications of Ar… [cited by applicant]
Atalay et al. (Oct. 2020) “Theory of battery ageing in a lithium-ion battery: Capacity fade, nonlinear ageing and lifetime prediction,” J. Power Sources, 478, 229026, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229026. [cited by applicant]
Attia et al. (2019) “Electrochemical kinetics of SEI growth on Carbon Black: Part I. Experiments,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, E97-E106, doi:10.1149/2.0231904jes. [cited by applicant]
Attia et al. (May 2020) “Revisiting the t [cited by applicant]
Bao et al. (Jul. 2021) “Lithium-Ion Battery Real-Time Diagnosis with Direct Current Impedance Spectroscopy,” Energies 14(15), 4396. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154396. [cited by applicant]
Barai et al. (2018) “A study of the influence of measurement timescale on internal resistance characterisation methodologies for lithium-ion cells,” Scientific Reports 8:21, doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18424-5. [cited by applicant]
Bayya et al. (2017) “Battery State Estimation using AC analysis,” Energy Procedia 117, 739-744. [cited by applicant]
Bonora et al. (1996) “Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy as a tool for investigating underpaint corrosion,” Electrochim. Acta 41, 1073-1082, doi:10.1016/0013-4686(95)00440-8. [cited by applicant]
Chattopadhyay et al. (2012) “In situ X-ray study of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation on graphene as a model Li-ion battery anode,” Chem. Mater. 24, 3038-3043, doi:10.1021/cm301584r. [cited by applicant]
Christopherson (2015) “Battery Test Manual for Electric Vehicles,” Idaho National Laboratory, Revision 3, document No. INL/EXT-15-34184. [cited by applicant]
Colclasure et al. (2011) “Modeling detailed chemistry and transport for solid-electrolyte-interface (SEI) films in Li-ion batteries,” Electrochim. Acta 58, 33-43, doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.067. [cited by applicant]
Coleman et al. (2007) “State-of-Charge Determination From EMF Voltage Estimation: Using Impedance, Terminal Voltage, and Current for Lead-Acid and Lithium-Ion Batteries,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 54 (2007) 2550-2557. [cited by applicant]
Dahn et al. (1995) “Mechanisms for lithium insertion in carbonaceous materials,” Science 270, 590-593, doi:10.1126/science.270.5236.590. [cited by applicant]
Danner et al. (2016) “Thick electrodes for Li-ion batteries: A model based analysis,” J. Power Sources 334, 191-201, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.143. [cited by applicant]
Das et al. (2019) “Electrochemical kinetics of SEI growth on carbon black: Part II. Modeling,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, E107-E118, doi:10.1149/2.0241904jes. [cited by applicant]
Du Pasquier et al. (1998) Erratum: “Differential scanning calorimetry study of the reactivity of carbon anodes in plastic Li-ion batteries” J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 1413-1413, doi:10.1149/1.1838474. [cited by applicant]
Eddahech et al. (2012) “Behavior and state-of-health monitoring of Li-ion batteries using impedance spectroscopy and recurrent neural networks,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 42, 487-494. [cited by applicant]
Edge et al. (Mar. 2021) “Lithium ion battery degradation: What you need to know,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 8200, doi:10.1039/D1CP00359C. [cited by applicant]
Fly et al. (Jun. 2020) “Rate dependency of incremental capacity analysis (dQ/dV) as a diagnostic tool for lithium-ion batteries,” J. Energy Storage 29, 101329, doi:10.1016/j.est.2020.101329. [cited by applicant]
Guan et al. (2015) “Simulation and experiment on solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) morphology evolution and lithium-ion diffusion,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A1798-A1808, doi:10.1149/2.0521509jes. [cited by applicant]
Guo et al. (2011) “Cyclability study of silicon-carbon composite anodes for lithium-ion batteries using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy,” Electrochim. Acta 56, 3981-3987, doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.014. [cited by applicant]
Guo et al. (May 2020) “Li2O Solid electrolyte interphase: Probing transport properties at the chemical potential of lithium,” Chem. Mater. 32, 5525-5533, doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00333. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al. (2018) “Molecular probes reveal chemical selectivity of the solid-electrolyte interphase,” J. Phys. Chem. C, 122, 20632-20641, doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06564. [cited by applicant]
Hasa et al. (Aug. 2020) “Electrochemical reactivity and passivation of silicon thin-film electrodes in organic carbonate electrolytes,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 40879-40890, doi:10.1021/acsami.0c09384. [cited by applicant]
He et al. (Jan. 2020) “The intrinsic behavior of lithium fluoride in solid electrolyte interphases on lithium,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 73-79, doi:10.1073/pnas.1911017116. [cited by applicant]
Heiskanen et al. (2019) “Generation and evolution of the solid electrolyte interphase of lithium-ion batteries,” Joule 3, 2322-2333, doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.018. [cited by applicant]
Horstmann et al. (2019) “Review on multi-scale models of solid-electrolyte interphase formation,” Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 13, 61-69, doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2018.10.013. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al. (2019) “Evolution of the solid-electrolyte interphase on carbonaceous anodes visualized by atomic-resolution cryogenic electron microscopy,” Nano Lett. 19, 5140-5148, doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01515. [cited by applicant]
Jüttner (1990) “Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of corrosion processes on inhomogeneous surfaces,” Electrochim. Acta 35, 1501-1508, doi:10.1016/0013-4686(90)80004-8. [cited by applicant]
Keil et al. (2017) “Calendar aging of NCA lithium-ion batteries investigated by differential voltage analysis and Coulomb tracking,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A6066-A6074, doi:10.1149/2.0091701jes. [cited by applicant]
Kindermann et al. (2017) “A SEI modeling approach distinguishing between capacity and power fade,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, E287-E294, doi:10.1149/2.0321712jes. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al. (2013) “Estimation of Battery State of Health Using Probabilistic Neural Network,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9:2, 679-685. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. (2014) “A thermal-electrochemical model that gives spatial-dependent growth of solid electrolyte interphase in a Li-ion battery,” J. Power Sources 268, 482-490, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.050. [cited by applicant]
Lu et al. (2014) “Chemistry, impedance, and morphology evolution in solid electrolyte interphase films during formation in lithium ion batteries,” J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 896-903, doi:10.1021/jp4111019. [cited by applicant]
Naoi et al. (2005) “Disordered carbon anode for lithium-ion battery: I. An interfacial reversible redox action and anomalous topology changes,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, A1047, doi:10.1149/1.1896531. [cited by applicant]
Narita (May 2021) “3D Architected Battery Electrodes for Exploring Battery Kinetics from Nano to Millimeter,” Thesis (Ph.D.), California Institute of Technology, 154 pp. doi:10.7907/dr3b-2d27. [cited by applicant]
Narita et al. (Feb. 2021) “3D Architected Carbon Electrodes for Energy Storage,” Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2002637, doi:10.1002/aenm.202002637. [cited by applicant]
Ng et al. (2009) “Enhanced coulomb counting method for estimating state-of-charge and state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries,” Applied Energy 86, 1506-1511. [cited by applicant]
Ng et al. (2009) “An enhanced coulomb counting method for estimating state-of-charge and state-of-health of lead-acid batteries,” INTELEC 2009—31st International Telecommunications Energy Conference, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Noël et al. (2016) “Hybrid organic/inorganic materials depth profiling using low energy cesium ions,” J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 27, 908-916, doi:10.1007/s13361-016-1353-9. [cited by applicant]
Ogihara et al. (2006) “Disordered carbon negative electrode for electrochemical capacitors and high-rate batteries,” Electrochim. Acta 52, 1713-1720, doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2006.01.082. [cited by applicant]
Oswald et al. (2017) “Peak position differences observed during XPS sputter depth profiling of the SEI on lithiated and delithiated carbon-based anode material for Li-ion batteries,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 401, 408-413, doi:1… [cited by applicant]
Ovejas et al. (2019) “State of charge dependency of the overvoltage generated in commercial Li-ion cells,” J. Power Sources 418, 176-185, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.046. [cited by applicant]
Peled et al. (2017) “Review—SEI: Past, present and future,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1703-A1719, doi:10.1149/2.1441707jes. [cited by applicant]
Piller et al. (2001) “Methods for state-of-charge determination and their applications,” J. Power Sources 96, 113-120. [cited by applicant]
Pinson et al. (2013) “Theory of SEI formation in rechargeable batteries: Capacity fade, accelerated aging and lifetime prediction,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, A243. doi:10.1149/2.044302jes. [cited by applicant]
Placke et al. (2015) “Assessment of surface heterogeneity: A route to correlate and quantify the 1st cycle irreversible capacity caused by SEI formation to the various surfaces of graphite anodes for lithium ion cells,”… [cited by applicant]
Remmlinger et al. (2011) “State-of-health monitoring of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles by on-board internal resistance estimation,” J. Power Sources 196, 5357-5363. [cited by applicant]
Safari et al. (2011) “Aging of a commercial graphite/LiFePO4 cell,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, A1123, doi:10.1149/1.3614529. [cited by applicant]
Saleh et al. (2012) “Diagnosing Degradation within PEM Fuel Cell Catalyst Layers Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 159, B546-B553, doi:10.1149/2.098205jes. [cited by applicant]
Shi et al. (2012) “Direct calculation of Li-ion transport in the solid electrolyte interphase,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15476-15487, doi:10.1021/ja305366r. [cited by applicant]
Single et al. (2017) “Revealing SEI morphology: In-depth analysis of a modeling approach,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, E3132-E3145, doi:10.1149/2.0121711jes. [cited by applicant]
Smith et al. (2011) “A high precision coulometry study of the SEI growth in Li/graphite cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, A447, doi:10.1149/1.3557892. [cited by applicant]
Snihir et al. (2006) “Battery open-circuit voltage estimation by a method of statistical analysis,” J. Power Sources 159:2, 1484-1487. [cited by applicant]
Spotnitz et al. (2003) “Abuse behavior of high-power, lithium-ion cells,” J. Power Sources 113, 81-100, doi:10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00488-3. [cited by applicant]
Steinhauer et al. (2017) “Investigation of the solid electrolyte interphase formation at graphite anodes in lithium-ion batteries with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy,” Electrochim. Acta 228, 652-658, doi:10.1016… [cited by applicant]
Tan et al. (Mar. 2021) “A Growing appreciation for the role of LiF in the solid electrolyte interphase,” Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100046. doi:10.1002/aenm.202100046. [cited by applicant]
Van Heuveln (1994) “Analysis of Nonexponential Transient Response Due to a Constant-Phase Element,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 141, 3423-3428, doi:10.1149/1.2059348. [cited by applicant]
Vetter et al. (2005) “Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries,” J. Power Sources 147, 269-281, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006. [cited by applicant]
Waldmann et al. (2014) “Temperature dependent ageing mechanisms in Lithium-ion batteries—A Post-Mortem study,” J. Power Sources 262, 129-135, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.112. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. (2018) “Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries,” npj Comput. Mater. 4, Article No. 15. doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0064-0. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al. (2015) “Electrode side reactions, capacity loss and mechanical degradation in lithium-ion batteries,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A2026-A2035, doi:10.1149/2.0291510jes. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (2001) “Understanding solid electrolyte interface film formation on graphite electrodes,” Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 4, 206-209, doi:10.1149/1.1414946. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (2014) “A study of gadolinia-doped ceria electrolyte by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy,” J. Power Sources 247, 947-960, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.036. [cited by applicant]