IP Library Granted Patent US 12,419,992
Granted Patent B2
US 12,419,992 · App. 16/631,942 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Cartilage matrix

Inventors: Alexander Huber (Chesapeake, VA); Paresa Taghavie-Moghadam (Virginia Beach, VA)
Assignee: Matney Legal Group PLLC
A61L27/3612A61L27/3687A61L27/3817A61L27/3852A61L27/3895A61L2300/406A61L2300/414
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,419,992
App. No.
16/631,942
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides a cartilage matrix having a high decellularization level and a low glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content. The cartilage matrix exhibits desirable characteristics, for example, cohesiveness, tackiness and malleability, for use in cartilage repair. Also provided is a method of preparing the cartilage matrix, comprising decellularizing a cartilage to generate a decellularized cartilage, and deglycosylating the decellularized cartilage.

Claims (21)

1. An implant comprising a composition, wherein the composition comprises a cartilage matrix putty comprising dehydrated, deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles and water, wherein the cartilage matrix putty is prepared according to a method comprising:

(a) incubating a cartilage in a decellularization solution comprising a detergent, whereby a decellularized cartilage matrix is generated in the form of particles;

(b) deglycosylating the decellularized cartilage matrix particles, comprising treating the particles with a deglycosylation solution comprising a glycolytic enzyme, a proteolytic enzyme, an acid, hydrazine, or a combination thereof, and dehydrating the deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles; and

(c) rehydrating the dehydrated, deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles with a solution comprising water to yield a homogenous cartilage matrix putty;

wherein the cartilage matrix putty is cohesive, and wherein cohesive is defined as:

when a sample of the cartilage matrix putty consisting of the dehydrated, deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles and 1 mL water per 2 grams of the dehydrated, deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles is placed in an aqueous environment the sample of the cartilage matrix putty retains at least 95% of its weight after 180 minutes in the aqueous environment.

2. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the cartilage is selected from the group consisting of an articular cartilage, a costal cartilage, an auricular cartilage, and a nasal cartilage.

3. The implant of claim 1 , further comprising cartilage particulates.

4. A package comprising the implant of claim 1 .

5. A package comprising the implant of claim 3 .

6. A method of treating a tissue or organ defect in a subject, comprising placing the implant of claim 1 at the tissue or organ defect.

7. A method of treating a tissue or organ defect in a subject, comprising placing the implant of claim 3 at the tissue or organ defect.

8. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the particles have a diameter no greater than 150 μm.

9. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the deglycosylation solution comprises pepsin.

10. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the deglycosylation solution has a pH lower than 2.

11. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the acid is trichloroacetic acid or trifluoromethanesulfonic acid.

12. The implant of claim 1 , whereby the dehydrating comprises freeze-drying.

13. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the decellularization solution further comprises an endonuclease.

14. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles have been treated to within 10-300 μm from the surface of the deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles.

15. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles have a specific surface area of from about 20-20,000 cm 2 /g.

16. The implant of claim 1 , wherein the deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles comprise less than about 6 wt % of calcium based on the dry weight of the deglycosylated, decellularized cartilage matrix particles.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 2, 2021
From: LIFENET HEALTH; SKIN AND WOUND ALLOGRAFT INSTITUTE, LLC
To: TRUIST BANK
Reel/Frame 055815/0623 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2020
From: HUBER, ALEXANDER; TAGHAVIE-MOGHADAM, PARESA, DR.
To: LIFENET HEALTH
Reel/Frame 051736/0400 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62535151 · Jul 20, 2017
Related Publication 20200222588A1 · Jul 16, 2020
References Cited (37)
US 7824711B2 · Kizer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8318212B2 · Malinin · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9186380B2 · Shi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20040112781A1 · Hofverberg · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20070014773A1 · Matheny et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070082058A1 · Masinaei · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090024223A1 · Chen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090024229A1 · Chen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100119577A1 · Min et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130338792A1 · Schmieding et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140341964A1 · McKay · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160235892A1 · Detamore et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 102188748A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016024025A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017008035A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Su et al. (Development of porous medical implant scaffolds via laser additive manufacturing), Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 22(2012) s181-s187 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Erten et al. (Detergent-free decellularization of bovine costal cartilage for chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells in vitro), Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016, 6, 94236-94246 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Wang et al. (Endogenous regeneration of critical-size chondral defect in immunocompromised rat xiphoid cartilage using decellularized human bone matrix scaffolds), Tissue engineering Part A, vol. 18, Nov. 21 and 22, (Ye… [cited by examiner]
Cheng et al. “Decellularized and cell-derived extracellular matrices as scaffolds for orthopaedic tissue engineering”, Biotechnology Advances, 32, 462-484 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Gupta et al. “Microsphere-based osteochondral scaffolds carrying opposing gradients of decellularized cartilage and demineralized bone matrix”, Biomaterials Science & Engineering1955-1963 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
“Demineralized Bone Definition”, Spine Health (Year: 1999). [cited by examiner]
Tofighi et al. “New cartilage of synthetic, bioresorbable and injectable calcium phosphate bone substitute materials: alpha-bsm, beta-bsm and gamma-bsm”, Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterial and Tissue Engineering, ISSN,… [cited by examiner]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/043144, dated Jan. 21, 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2018/043144, dated Oct. 15, 2018, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kheir, E., et al., “Development and characterization of an acellular porcine cartilage bone matrix for use in tissue engineering.” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 99A(2), Nov. 19, 2011, pp. 283-294… [cited by applicant]
Schneider, C., et al., “Systematic comparison of protocols for the preparation of human articular cartilage for use as scaffold material in cartilage tissue engineering.” Tissue Engineering: Part C, vol. 22(12), Dec. 1,… [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18 835 229.8, dated Mar. 15, 2021, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Axelsson et al., “Glycosaminoglycans In Normal and Osteoarthrotic Human Temporomandibular Joint Disks”, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 50:112-119 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Bos et al., Structural and Mechanical Comparison of Human Ear, Alar, and Septal Cartilage, PRS Global Open, 2018, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Elliott et al. “Changes With Age In the Glycosaminoglycans of Human Articular Cartilage”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 38:371-377 (1979). [cited by applicant]
Erten et al., “Detergent-Free Decellularization of Bovine Costal Cartilage for Chrondrogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Vitro”, RSC Advances, 6;94236-94246 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Herwig et al.“Chemical Changes of Human Knee Joint Menisci in Various Stages of Degeneration”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 43:635-640 (1984). [cited by applicant]
Mankin et al., “Biochemical and Metabolic Abnormalities in Articular Cartilage from Osteo-Arthritic Human Hips”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 52-A(3): 424-434 (1970). [cited by applicant]
Maroudas et al., “Further Studies on the Composition of Human Femoral Head Cartilage”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 39:514-523 (1980). [cited by applicant]
Muir et al., “The Distribution of Collagen in Human Articular Cartilage with Some of its Physiological Implications”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 52B(3):554-563 ((1970). [cited by applicant]
Rains et al., “Mechanical Properties of Human Tracheal Cartilage”, Tracheal Cartilage Mechanics, pp. 219-225 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., “Cartilage Engineering Using Chondrocyte Cell Sheets and Its Applicaiton in Reconstruction of Microtia”, Int. J. Clin Exp Pathol, 8(1):73-80, (2015). [cited by applicant]