IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,421,830
Granted Patent B1
US 12,421,830 · App. 18/651,581 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Methods and systems to stimulate rock surrounding a wellbore using ultrasound at a preferred frequency

Inventors: Chao Liu (Brookshire, TX); Murtadha J. AlTammar (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
E21B43/003E21B28/00E21B2200/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,421,830
App. No.
18/651,581
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and systems are disclosed. The method may include obtaining, using a rock characterization system, a plurality of characteristics for a rock penetrated by a wellbore, and determining, using a model of poroelasticity and the plurality of characteristics, a preferred ultrasonic frequency at which to insonify the rock. The method may further include deploying an ultrasonic stimulation tool in the wellbore, where the ultrasonic stimulation tool comprises at least one ultrasonic transducer, and activating the ultrasonic stimulation tool at the preferred ultrasonic frequency.

Claims (38)

1. A method, comprising:

obtaining, using a rock characterization system, a plurality of characteristics for a rock penetrated by a wellbore;

determining, using a model of poroelasticity and the plurality of characteristics, a preferred ultrasonic frequency at which to insonify the rock;

deploying an ultrasonic stimulation tool in the wellbore, wherein the ultrasonic stimulation tool comprises at least one ultrasonic transducer; and

activating the ultrasonic stimulation tool at the preferred ultrasonic frequency,

wherein the preferred ultrasonic frequency is based, at least in part, on maximizing a peak pore pressure at a distance beyond a wall of the wellbore.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating, using a pumping system, a pressure differential between a wellbore fluid pressure and a pore fluid pressure of the rock, wherein the pressure differential is sufficient to flush pore fluid and dislodge fines from the rock into the wellbore; and

pumping the dislodged fines to a distant location.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising deploying a plurality of hydraulic packers configured to isolate a portion of the wellbore, wherein the ultrasonic stimulation tool is located within the portion.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the model of poroelasticity comprises Biot's model of poroelasticity.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein Biot's model determines the preferred frequency from rock characteristics comprising Lamé parameters, Biot's coefficient, Biot's modulus, pore fluid density, rock porosity, and a fluid mobility.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rock characterization system comprises a coring system.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the preferred ultrasonic frequency further comprises a range of preferred frequencies.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the preferred ultrasonic frequency is based, at least in part, on a spatial integral of the peak pore pressure over an annulus beyond the wall of the wellbore.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein deploying the ultrasonic stimulation tool comprises lowering the ultrasonic stimulation tool into the wellbore using a wireline.

10. An ultrasonic stimulation tool comprising:

a cylindrical housing having a first end and a second end;

a first hydraulic packer mounted on the cylindrical housing proximal the first end and a second hydraulic packer mounted on the cylindrical housing proximal the second end;

a fluid channel penetrating the first hydraulic packer;

a pumping system fluidly connected to the fluid channel; and

an ultrasonic transducer mounted on the cylindrical housing and disposed between the hydraulic packer proximal to each end, configured to emit radiated ultrasonic waves at a preferred frequency upon command from a well logging system,

wherein the preferred frequency is determined, using a model of poroelasticity, from characteristics of a rock, and

wherein the preferred ultrasonic frequency is based, at least in part, on maximizing a peak pore pressure at a distance beyond a wall of the wellbore.

11. An ultrasonic stimulation system, comprising:

a rock characterization system configured to obtain a plurality of characteristics for a rock penetrated by a wellbore;

a computer system configured to determine, using a model of poroelasticity and the plurality of characteristics, a preferred ultrasonic frequency at which to insonify the rock;

an ultrasonic stimulation tool comprising at least one ultrasonic transducer, configured to emit radiated ultrasonic waves at the preferred frequency upon receipt of a command from a well logging system;

wherein the preferred ultrasonic frequency is based, at least in part, on maximizing a peak pore pressure at a distance beyond a wall of the wellbore; and

a well logging system configured to transmit a command to activate the ultrasonic stimulation tool.

12. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

a pumping system configured to generate a pressure differential between a wellbore fluid pressure and a pore fluid pressure of the rock, wherein the pressure differential is sufficient to flush pore fluid and dislodge fines from the rock into the wellbore.

13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising a plurality of hydraulic packers.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the model of poroelasticity comprises Biot's model of poroelasticity.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the rock characteristics comprise Lamé parameters, Biot's coefficient, Biot's modulus, pore fluid density, rock porosity, and a fluid mobility.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the rock characterization system comprises a coring system.

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the preferred ultrasonic frequency further comprises a range of preferred frequencies.

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the preferred ultrasonic frequency is based, at least in part, on a spatial integral of the peak pore pressure over an annulus beyond the wall of the wellbore.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2024
From: LIU, CHAO
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069146/0453 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2024
From: ALTAMMAR, MURTADHA J.
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069146/0522 →
References Cited (39)
US 3990512A · Kuris · 1976 [cited by examiner]
US 5109922A · Joseph · 1992 [cited by examiner]
US 5265461A · Steiger et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 7059403B2 · Arnoldo Barrientos et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7063144B2 · Abramov et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7770638B2 · Kabishcher et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8387743B2 · Oraby · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8614929B2 · Rasolofosaon et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9567819B2 · Cavender et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9580997B2 · Levitov · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10513909B2 · Brodsky · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10612348B2 · Kamler et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10669796B2 · Saltykov · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10677052B2 · Storm, Jr. et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 12031431B2 · Valero · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12105242B2 · Bai · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20010011590A1 · Thomas · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20080066534A1 · Reid · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080306692A1 · Singer · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090120633A1 · Webb · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20180135385A1 · Brodsky · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180363441A1 · Tutuncu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190271202A1 · Saltykov · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20220050224A1 · Bai · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230383649A1 · Valero · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240192391A1 · Liu · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250052141A1 · Almani · 2025 [cited by examiner]
CN 104329064A · 2015 [cited by examiner]
CN 107152265A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
RU 2765786C1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2009086279A2 · 2009 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2013148623A1 · 2013 [cited by examiner]
WO 2018021949A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
M.A. Borr, “Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. II. High Frequency Range,” The Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, vol. 28, No. 2, 1956 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
M.A. Biot, “Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low-Frequency Range,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 28, No. 2, 1956 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Sergio Calcedo, “Feasibility Study of Ultrasound for Oil Well Stimulation on the Basis of Wave-Properties Considerations,” SPE-107083, 2007 SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires… [cited by applicant]
A. Venkitaraman, et al., “Ultrasonic Removal of Near Wellbore Damage Caused by Fines and Mud Solids,” SPE 27388, Society of Petroleum Engieers, 1995 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
M.S. Mullakaev, et al., “Development of ultrasonic equipment and technology for well stimulation and enhanced oil recovery,” Elsevier B.V., 2014 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
C. Perez-Arancibia, et al., “Modeling and simulation of an acoustic well stimulation method,” Wave Motion, 2017 (18 pages). [cited by applicant]