IP Library Granted Patent US 12,423,621
Granted Patent B2
US 12,423,621 · App. 18/214,476 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Methods and systems for causative chaining of prognostic label classifications

Inventor: Kenneth Neumann (Lakewood, CO)
Assignee: KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
G06N20/00G06F16/906G16H10/60G16H50/50G16H70/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,423,621
App. No.
18/214,476
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for causative chaining of prognostic label classifications includes a classification device configured to receive training data including a plurality of first data entries, each including at least a first element of physiological state data and at least a correlated first prognostic label and a plurality of second data entries, each including at least a second prognostic label and at least a correlated third prognostic label, and to record at least a first biological extraction. The system includes a prognostic label learner configured to generate at least a first prognostic output as a function of the first training set and the at least a physiological test sample, and a causal link learner configured to generate at least a second prognostic output causally linked to the first prognostic output as a function of the second training set and the at least a first prognostic output.

Claims (44)

1. A system for causative chaining of prognostic label classifications, the system comprising:

at least a computing device; and

a memory communicatively connected to the at least a computing device, wherein the memory contains instructions configuring the at least a computing device to:

receive a plurality of biological extractions from a user;

receive a list of significant categories of physiological state data;

generate a first prognostic output as a function of at least a physiological test sample using a prognostic label learner, wherein generating the first prognostic output using the prognostic label learner comprises:

training the prognostic label learner using a first training set, wherein the first training set comprises a plurality of physiological state data correlated to a first prognostic label; and

generating the first prognostic output as a function of the at least a physiological test sample and the first training set using the prognostic label learner;

generate a second prognostic output as a function of the first prognostic output and the plurality of biological extractions using a causal link learner, wherein the second prognostic output represents a cause of the at least a first prognostic output;

transmit the first prognostic output and the second prognostic output to a user output device through a graphical user interface, wherein a plurality of prognostic labels of the first prognostic output and the second prognostic output are translated into display data comprising multimedia;

display, through the graphical use interface, a follow-up suggestion inquiring for an additional biological extraction to employ a refinement of the prognostic labels of the first prognostic output and the second prognostic output, wherein the additional biological extraction is selected to eliminate a diagnosis;

retrain the prognostic label learner as a function of the additional biological extraction; and

generate a third prognostic output to display through the graphical user interface, wherein prognostic labels of the third prognostic output are displayed according to rank by significance scores which are calculated as a function of the significant categories of physiological state data.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the second prognostic output comprises a fundamental prognostic label.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the memory further instructs the computing device to determine that the second prognostic output comprises a fundamental prognostic label by identifying a prognostic label of the second prognostic output in a fundamental label listing.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first prognostic output comprises a current medical condition associated with the user.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of physiological state data comprises a description of treatments associated with the user.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the third prognostic output comprises a prediction of a future status of a medical condition associated with the user.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the prognostic label learner comprises a first machine-learning model.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the second prognostic output is causally linked to the first prognostic output.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein generating the second prognostic output comprises selecting the second prognostic output from a plurality of second prognostic outputs.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the selection of the second prognostic output comprises an indication of a degree of importance of the second prognostic output.

11. A method for causative chaining of prognostic label classifications, the method comprising:

receiving a plurality of biological extractions from a user;

receiving, using at least a computing device, a list of significant categories of physiological state data;

generating, using the at least a computing device, a first prognostic output as a function of at least a physiological test sample using a prognostic label learner, wherein generating the first prognostic output using the prognostic label learner comprises:

training the prognostic label learner using a first training set, wherein the first training set comprises a plurality of physiological state data correlated to a first prognostic label; and

generating the first prognostic output as a function of the at least a physiological test sample and the first training set using the prognostic label learner; and

generating, using the at least a computing device, a second prognostic output as a function of the first prognostic output and the plurality of biological extractions using a causal link learner, wherein the second prognostic output represents a cause of the at least a first prognostic output, wherein generating the second prognostic output using the causal link learner comprises:

training the causal link learner using second training set, wherein the second training set comprises a second prognostic label correlated to the first prognostic output; and

generating the second prognostic output as a function of the first prognostic output, the plurality of biological extractions, and the second training set using the prognostic label learner;

transmitting, using the at least a computing device, the first prognostic output and the second prognostic output to a user output device through a graphical user interface, wherein a plurality of prognostic labels of the first prognostic output and the second prognostic output are translated into display data comprising multimedia;

displaying, using the at least a computing device, through the graphical use interface, a follow-up suggestion inquiring for an additional biological extraction to employ a refinement of the prognostic labels of the first prognostic output and the second prognostic output, wherein the additional biological extraction is selected to eliminate a diagnosis;

retraining the prognostic label learner as a function of the additional biological extraction; and

generating, using the at least a computing device, a third prognostic output to display through the graphical user interface, wherein prognostic labels of the third prognostic output are displayed according to rank by significance scores which are calculated as a function of the significant categories of physiological state data.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the second prognostic output comprises a fundamental prognostic label.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the method further includes determining, using the at least a computing device, that the second prognostic output comprises a fundamental prognostic label by identifying a prognostic label of the second prognostic output in a fundamental label listing.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first prognostic output comprises a current medical condition associated with the user.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of physiological state data comprises a description of treatments associated with the user.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the third prognostic output comprises a prediction of a future status of a medical condition associated with the user.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the prognostic label learner comprises a first machine-learning model.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the second prognostic output is causally linked to the first prognostic output.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein generating the second prognostic output comprises selecting the second prognostic output from a plurality of second prognostic outputs.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the selection of the second prognostic output comprises an indication of a degree of importance of the second prognostic output.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 29, 2025
From: NEUMANN, KENNETH
To: KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 071548/0046 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16779051 · Jan 31, 2020
Continuation In Part 16430387 · Jun 3, 2019
Related Publication 20230351256A1 · Nov 2, 2023
References Cited (26)
US 7433853B2 · Brockway et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 9375142B2 · Schultz et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9532721B2 · Batchinsky et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9764136B2 · McIntyre et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20040103001A1 · Mazar · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050209785A1 · Wells · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20080033899A1 · Barnhill · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080103403A1 · Cohen · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090030290A1 · Kozuch · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100205124A1 · Ben-Hur · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20140201126A1 · Zadeh · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150220838A1 · Martin · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160235372A1 · Schneider et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170091937A1 · Barnes · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170175169A1 · Lee et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180000428A1 · Swiston · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180315489A1 · Jaruzel, II et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180330059A1 · Bates et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190026655A1 · Xie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190038202A1 · Wall · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190110754A1 · Rao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 108198620A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109346169A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2001026026 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al., Jun. 22, 2017 Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future; https://svn.bmj.com/content/2/4/230. [cited by applicant]
Banaee et al.; Data Mining for Wearable Sensors in Health Monitoring Systems: A Review of Recent Trends and Challenges; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3892855/. [cited by applicant]