IP Library Granted Patent US 12,423,987
Granted Patent B2
US 12,423,987 · App. 17/506,099 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

System and method for determining object characteristics in real-time

Inventors: Raajitha Gummadi (Manchester, NH); Abhayjeet S. Juneja (Manchester, NH)
Assignee: DEKA Products Limited Partnership
G06V20/58G06T5/20G06T7/62G06T7/70G06T2207/10028G06T2207/20032G06T2207/30252
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,423,987
App. No.
17/506,099
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

System and method for object detection. Images from cameras are provided to an inference engine to detect objects in real time, providing the images to an inference engine to detect the non-background and background pixels of the objects in the images, determining the position and size of the objects in the images based on contemporaneously gathered LiDAR data and the relationship of non-background to background pixels.

Claims (37)

1. A method for determining a size and a location of an object surrounding an autonomous vehicle (AV) in real time comprising:

receiving two-dimensional (2D) sensor data from a sensor associated with the AV;

associating a first confidence score with each of the 2D sensor data;

determining a bounding box, a classification, and a second confidence score representing the object located within the 2D sensor data;

receiving point cloud data temporally and geographically associated with the bounding box;

classifying pixels in the bounding box as non-background pixels or background pixels; and

determining the location and the size of the object based on a relationship between an amount of the non-background pixels and the background pixels and the point cloud data;

wherein the point cloud data are independent of the 2D sensor data.

2. The method as in claim 1 wherein the sensor comprises a camera.

3. The method as in claim 1 wherein determining the bounding box, the classification, and the confidence score comprises providing the sensor data to a real-time object detection inference engine.

4. The method as in claim 3 wherein the real-time object detection inference engine comprises a one-stage object detector.

5. The method as in claim 1 wherein classifying the pixels as the non-background pixels and the background pixels comprises providing the sensor data to a semantic segmentation inference engine.

6. The method as in claim 5 wherein the semantic segmentation inference engine comprises an encoder-decoder engine.

7. The method as in claim 1 further comprising filtering the background pixels and the non-background pixels.

8. The method as in claim 7 wherein filtering comprises a median filter.

9. The method as in claim 7 wherein filtering comprises a mode filter.

10. The method as in claim 1 wherein the sensor comprises four long range cameras.

11. A system for determining a size and a location of at least one object surrounding an autonomous vehicle (AV) in real time comprising:

a bounding box processor configured for:

receiving two-dimensional (2D) sensor data and a first confidence score respectively associated with each of the 2D sensor data from a sensor associated with the AV; and

determining a bounding box, a classification, and a second confidence score representing the object located within the 2D sensor data;

a class processor configured for classifying pixels in the bounding box as non-background pixels or background pixels; and

a 3D positioner configured for:

receiving point cloud data temporally and geographically associated with the bounding box; and

determining the location and the size of the object based on a relationship between an amount of the non-background pixels and the background pixels and the point cloud data;

wherein the point cloud data are independent of the 2D sensor data.

12. The system as in claim 11 wherein the sensor comprises a camera.

13. The system as in claim 11 wherein the bounding box processor is configured for providing the sensor data to a real-time object detection inference engine.

14. The system as in claim 13 wherein the real-time object detection inference engine comprises a one-stage object detection engine.

15. The system as in claim 11 wherein the 3D positioner is configured for providing the sensor data to a semantic segmentation inference engine.

16. The system as in claim 15 wherein the semantic segmentation inference engine comprises an encoder-decoder engine.

17. The system as in claim 11 further comprising a filter configured for filtering the background pixels and the non-background pixels.

18. The system as in claim 17 wherein the filter comprises a median filter.

19. The system as in claim 17 wherein the filter comprises a mode filter.

20. The system as in claim 12 wherein the sensor comprises four long range cameras.

21. Method of claim 1 wherein the first confidence score is based on LiDAR reflectivity.

22. System of claim 1 wherein the first confidence score is based on LIDAR reflectivity.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2021
From: GUMMADI, RAAJITHA; JUNEJA, ABHAYJEET S.
To: DEKA PRODUCTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Reel/Frame 058431/0814 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63104593 · Oct 23, 2020
Related Publication 20220129685A1 · Apr 28, 2022
References Cited (39)
US 8559673B2 · Fairfield et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9251598B2 · Wells et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9535423B1 · Debreczeni · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10108867B1 · Vallespi-Gonzalez et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10310087B2 · Laddha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10762396B2 · Vallespi-Gonzalez et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11216971B2 · Xu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20120083960A1 · Zhu et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140180914A1 · Abhyanker · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20180326982A1 · Paris et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190147245A1 · Qi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190317217A1 · Day · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190318177A1 · Steinberg · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200309957A1 · Bhaskaran · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200394824A1 · Kanzawa · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200394848A1 · Choudhary · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200410716A1 · Seo · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210150230A1 · Smolyanskiy · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230351724A1 · Hou · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 3644276A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016170333A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
C. R. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su and L. J. Guibas, “Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data,” 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018, pp. 918-9… [cited by examiner]
R. Barea et al., “Integrating State-of-the-Art CNNs for Multi-Sensor 3D Vehicle Detection in Real Autonomous Driving Environments,” 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand, … [cited by examiner]
C. R. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas, “Frustum pointnets for 3D object detection from RGB-D Data,” 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 2018. doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00102 … [cited by examiner]
M. Hofmann, P. Tiefenbacher and G. Rigoll, “Background segmentation with feedback: The Pixel-Based Adaptive Segmenter,” 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Provide… [cited by examiner]
G. B. Coleman and H. C. Andrews, “Image segmentation by clustering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 67, No. 5, pp. 773-785, May 1979, doi: 10.1109/PROC.1979.11327. (Year: 1979). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report & Written Opinion mailed Sep. 13, 2021, issued in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/024445, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bansal, M. et al., “ChaufferNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worst”, Dec. 7, 2018, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dubrofsky, E., “Homography Estimation by Elan Dubrofsky, B.Sc., Carleton University, 2007, A Master's Essay Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in The Faculty of Grad… [cited by applicant]
Fairfield, N. et al., “Traffic light mapping and detection”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shaghai, 2011, pp. 5421-5426 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Waslander, S. et al., “Lesson 3: Handling an Intersection Scenario With Dynamic Objects, Computer Science Software Development, a course that is part of the Self-Driving Cars Specialization, Motion Planning for Self-Dri… [cited by applicant]
Waslander, S. et al., “Lesson 2: Handling an Intersection Scenario Without Dynamic Objects, Computer Science Software Development, a course that is part of the Self-Driving Cars Specialization, Motion Planning for Self-… [cited by applicant]
Kammel, S. et al. (2009) Team AnnieWAY's Autonomous System for the DARPA Urban Challenge 2007. In: Buehler M., Iagnemma K., Singh S. (eds) The DARPA Urban Challenge. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 56. Spring… [cited by applicant]
Kearney, J. et al. “Traffic Generation for Studies of Gap Acceptance”, The University of Iowa, DSC 2006 Europe—Paris—Oct. 2006 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Van Der Horst, et al., “Time-To-Collision and Collision Avoidance Systems”, 6th ICTCT workshop Salzburg, Proceedings, Jan. 1994 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Stanford Driving Software Website, “Software Infrastructure for Stanford's Autonomous Vehicles”, posted Feb. 6, 2016, last updated Aug. 20, 2016 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/stanforddriving/). [cited by applicant]
Urmson, Chris et al., “Autonomous Driving in Urban Environments Boss and the Urban Challenge”, Journal of Field Robotics (2008), pp. 426-466 (41 pages). [cited by applicant]
Liu, Changliu et al. “Speed Profile Planning in Dynamic Environments Via Termporal Optimization”, Conference Paper, DOI: 10.1109/IVS.2017.7995713, Jun. 2017 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee issued Jul. 21, 2021 in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/024445, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]