IP Library Granted Patent US 12,427,322
Granted Patent B2
US 12,427,322 · App. 17/701,132 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Devices, systems and methods for improving conductive communication between external devices and implantable medical devices

Inventors: Frank Lee (San Leandro, CA); Thanh Tieu (Simi Valley, CA); Robert Williams (San Jose, CA); Suyashree Bhonsle (Menlo Park, CA); Jinto Zacharias (Los Angeles, CA); Matthew G. Fishler (Scotts Valley, CA); Suresh Gurunathan (Palo Alto, CA); Benjamin T. Persson (Saratoga, CA)
Assignee: Pacesetter, Inc.
A61N1/37217A61B5/0028A61B5/0031A61B5/6869A61N1/362A61N1/3756A61N1/3956
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,427,322
App. No.
17/701,132
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are external devices, and methods for use therewith, that are configured to communicate with one or more implantable medical devices (IMDs) implanted within a patient using conductive communication, wherein the external device includes or is communicatively coupled to at least three external electrodes that are in contact with the patient. Certain such methods involve the external device identifying, for each IMD, of the plurality of IMDs, which one of the plurality of communication vectors is a preferred communication vector for communicating with the IMD, based on respective indicators of conductive communication quality that are determined for the plurality of communication vectors. Certain embodiments involve determining when there should be a reassessment of which one of the plurality of communication vectors is the preferred communication vector for communicating with an IMD, and in response thereto, identifying an updated preferred communication vector for communicating with the IMD.

Claims (79)

1. A method for use by an external device that is configured to communicate with each of a plurality of implantable medical devices (IMDs) implanted within a patient using conductive communication, wherein the external device includes or is communicatively coupled to at least three external electrodes that are in contact with the patient, the method comprising:

determining for each IMD of the plurality of IMDs a respective indicator of conductive communication quality for each communication vector of a plurality of communication vectors that can be used by the external device to communicate with the IMD, wherein each of the plurality of communication vectors comprises a different combination of the at least three external electrodes that are in contact with the patient;

identifying which one of the plurality of communication vectors is a universally preferred communication vector that provides for at least a minimally acceptable level of communication quality between the external device and each of the plurality of IMDs, wherein the identifying is based on the respective indicators of conductive communication quality that are determined for each IMD of the plurality of IMDs using each of the plurality of communication vectors; and

communicating with each of the plurality of IMDs using the universally preferred communication vector, after the universally preferred communication vector is identified.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

while or after communicating with the plurality of IMDs using the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs, determining whether there should be a reassessment of which one of the plurality of communication vectors is the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs; and

in response to determining that there should be the reassessment, repeating the determining and the identifying steps.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining that there should be the reassessment occurs in response to at least one of the following:

detecting the indicator of conductive communication quality associated with the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs falling below a corresponding threshold for at least one of the plurality of IMDs;

detecting a loss of conductive communication with at least one of the plurality of IMDs; or

detecting a specified period of time elapsing since the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs was most recently identified.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that at least one of the indicators of conductive communication quality for communicating with at least one of the plurality of IMDs has fallen below a corresponding threshold; and

providing instructions to a user of the external device to modify at least one of where or how one or more of the at least three external electrodes contact the patient, in response to the determining that the at least one of the indicators of conductive communication quality for communicating with the at least one of the plurality of IMDs has fallen below the corresponding threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the external device comprises an external programmer; and

at least one of the plurality of IMDs comprises a leadless cardiac pacemaker, an insertable cardiac monitor, or a non-vascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the respective indicator of conductive communication quality for each communication vector, of the plurality of communication vectors that can be used to communicate with each of the plurality of IMDs, includes for each communication vector:

determining a plurality of different measures of conductive communication quality and/or surrogates thereof for the communication vector; and

combining the plurality of different measures of conductive communication quality and/or the surrogates thereof to produce the respective indicator of conductive communication quality for the communication vector.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the plurality of different measures of conductive communication signal quality and/or the surrogates thereof that are determined for each communication vector, of the plurality of communication vectors that can be used to communicate with each of the plurality of IMDs, are indicative of at least two of the following:

a noise floor associated with the communication vector;

a measure of amplitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs using the communication vector;

a measure of amplitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device;

a magnitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs after rectification and integration thereof;

a magnitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device after rectification and integration thereof;

a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs;

a SNR of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device;

a total energy of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs, after rectification and integration thereof;

a total energy of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device, after rectification and integration thereof;

a bit-error-rate (BER) associated with at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs; and

a BER associated with at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein when there are multiple different communication vectors that provide at least the minimally acceptable level of communication quality for all the plurality of IMDs, the identifying which one of the plurality of communication vectors is the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs comprises identifying which one of the plurality of communication vectors has a highest sum or average of the indicators of conductive communication quality.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that only one of the plurality of communication vectors, which can be used to communicate with each of the plurality of IMDs, provides for at least the minimally acceptable level of communication quality between the external device and each of the plurality of IMDs; and

wherein the identifying step includes identifying, as the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with each of the plurality of IMDs, the only one of the plurality of communication vectors that provides for at least the minimally acceptable level of communication quality between the external device and each of the plurality of IMDs.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining for each of the IMDs a respective indicator of conductive communication quality for each communication vector of the plurality of communication vectors;

determining that multiple different communication vectors of the plurality of communication vectors, which can be used to communicate with each of the plurality of IMDs, provides for at least the minimally acceptable level of communication quality between the external device and each of the plurality of IMDs; and

wherein the identifying step includes identifying, as the ene universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs, the one of the plurality of communication vectors that provides for a highest sum or average of the indicators of communication quality between the external device and the plurality of IMDs.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the identifying the one of the plurality of communication vectors that provides for the highest level sum or average of the indicators of communication quality between the external device and the plurality of IMDs, comprises identifying which one of the plurality of communication vectors provides for the highest sum of the indicators of communication quality between the external device and the plurality of IMDs.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the identifying the one of the plurality of communication vectors that provides for the highest sum or average of the indicators of communication quality between the external device and the plurality of IMDs, comprises identifying which one of the plurality of communication vectors provides for the highest average of the indicators of communication quality between the external device and the plurality of IMDs.

13. An external device configured to communicate with each of a plurality of implantable medical device (IMD) implanted within a patient using conductive communication, the external device comprising:

a conductive communication receiver;

switches between the conductive communication receiver and at least three external electrodes that are configured to be placed in contact with the patient; and

a controller configured to

control the switches to thereby control which communication vector, of a plurality of communication vectors that can be used to communicate with each of the plurality of IMDs, is coupled to the conductive communication receiver, wherein each of the plurality of communication vectors comprises a different combination of the at least three external electrodes;

determine for each IMD of the plurality of IMDs a respective indicator of conductive communication quality for each communication vector, of the plurality of communication vectors that can be used by the external device to communicate with the IMD;

identify which one of the plurality of communication vectors is a universally preferred communication vector that provides for at least a minimally acceptable level of communication quality between the external device and each of the plurality of IMDs, based on the respective indicators of conductive communication quality that are determined for each IMD of the plurality of IMDs using each of the plurality of communication vectors; and

use the universally preferred communication vector to communicate with each of the plurality of IMDs, after the universally preferred communication vector is identified.

14. The external device of claim 13 , wherein the controller is also configured to determine when there should be a reassessment of which one of the plurality of communication vectors is the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs.

15. The external device of claim 14 , wherein the controller is configured to determine that there should be the reassessment in response to at least one of the following:

the controller detecting the indicator of conductive communication quality associated with the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs falling below a corresponding threshold for at least one of the IMDs;

the controller detecting a loss of conductive communication with at least one of the plurality of IMDs; or

the controller detecting a specified period of time elapsing since the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs was most recently identified.

16. The external device of claim 13 , wherein in order to determine the respective indicator of conductive communication quality for each communication vector, of the plurality of communication vectors that can be used to communicate with each IMD of the plurality of IMDs, the controller is configured to:

determine, for each communication vector, a plurality of different measures of conductive communication quality and/or surrogates thereof for the communication vector; and

combine the plurality of different measures of conductive communication quality and/or the surrogates thereof to produce the respective indicator of conductive communication quality for the communication vector.

17. The external device of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of different measures of conductive communication signal quality and/or the surrogates thereof that are determined for each communication vector, of the plurality of communication vectors that can be used to communicate with each IMD if the plurality of IMDs, are indicative of at least two of the following:

a noise floor associated with the communication vector;

a measure of amplitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs using the communication vector;

a measure of amplitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device;

a magnitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs after rectification and integration thereof;

a magnitude of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device after rectification and integration thereof;

a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs;

a SNR of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device;

a total energy of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs, after rectification and integration thereof;

a total energy of at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device, after rectification and integration thereof;

a bit-error-rate (BER) associated with at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by the external device from one of the plurality of IMDs; and

a BER associated with at least a portion of a conductive communication signal received by one of the plurality of IMDs from the external device.

18. The external device of claim 13 , wherein in order to identify which one of the plurality of communication vectors is the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with each of the plurality of IMDs when there are multiple different communication vectors that provide at least the minimally acceptable level of communication quality for all the plurality of IMDs, the controller is configured to identify which one of the plurality of communication vectors has a highest sum or average indicator of conductive communication quality.

19. A method for use by an external device that is configured to communicate with each implantable medical device (IMD), of a plurality of IMDs implanted within a patient, using conductive communication, wherein the external device includes or is communicatively coupled to at least three external electrodes that are in contact with the patient, the method comprising:

for each IMD, of the plurality of IMDs, determining a respective indicator of conductive communication quality for each communication vector, of a plurality of communication vectors that can be used to communicate with the IMD, wherein each of the plurality of communication vectors comprises a different combination of the at least three external electrodes that are in contact with the patient;

identifying, based on the respective indicators of conductive communication quality that are determined, a universally preferred communication vector for communicating with each the plurality of IMDs;

communicating with each of the plurality of IMDs using the one universally preferred communication vector that is identified; and

determining that there should be a reassessment of which one of the plurality of communication vectors is the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs, and in response thereto, repeating the determining and the identifying steps to thereby identify an updated universally preferred communication vector for communicating with the plurality of IMDs.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the determining that there should be a reassessment of which one of the plurality of communication vectors is the universally preferred communication vector for communicating with each of the plurality of IMDs occurs in response to at least one of the following:

for at least one of the plurality of IMDs, detecting the indicator of conductive communication quality associated with the ene universally preferred communication vector for communicating with at least one of the plurality of IMDs falling below a corresponding threshold; or

detecting a loss of conductive communication with at least one of the plurality of IMDs.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2022
From: LEE, FRANK; TIEU, THANH; WILLIAMS, ROBERT; BHONSLE, SUYASHREE; ZACHARIAS, JINTO; FISHLER, MATTHEW G.; GURUNATHAN, SURESH; PERSSON, BENJAMIN T.
To: PACESETTER, INC.
Reel/Frame 059405/0927 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation In Part 17222279 · Apr 5, 2021
Continuation In Part 17222242 · Apr 5, 2021
Provisional Application 63033737 · Jun 2, 2020
Provisional Application 63005628 · Apr 6, 2020
Related Publication 20220212019A1 · Jul 7, 2022
References Cited (32)
US 8942818B2 · Markowitz · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9168383B2 · Jacobson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9592393B2 · Stahmann et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9867990B2 · Cinbis · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10213610B2 · Maile et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10722720B2 · Stahmann · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10946202B2 · Maile et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301435A1 · Albert et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140221859A1 · Albert · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150174414A1 · Stahmann et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150196769A1 · Stahmann et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160059007A1 · Koop · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160271406A1 · Maile et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180021583A1 · Ciciarelli et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180078777A1 · Wu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180140853A1 · Maile et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180178022A1 · Koop et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180200525A1 · Schilling et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180207433A1 · Koop et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190201701A1 · Balczewski et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20220212019A1 · Lee et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240165414A1 · Fishler et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,242, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 12, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,242, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Non-final Office Action dated May 23, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,279. [cited by applicant]
Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,242, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,279. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,279, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 29, 2022, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,279, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Response to Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 10, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,279, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 10, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,242, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Response to Restriction dated Apr. 13, 2023, U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,242, filed Apr. 5, 2021. [cited by applicant]