IP Library Granted Patent US 12,430,355
Granted Patent B2
US 12,430,355 · App. 17/571,393 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Method and data service for converting and outputting animal related data

Inventors: Tammy Beckham (Manhattan, KS); Matthew Coats (Washington, DC); John Korslund (Riverdale, MD); Michelle Colby (Washington, DC); James Wall (College Station, TX); Keith Biggers (College Station, TX); Melissa Berquist (College Station, TX); Austin Riddle (College Station, TX); Paul Bilnoski (College Station, TX); Derek Overby (Covington, LA); Graham Booker (College Station, TX); Lindsey Holmstrom (Manhattan, KS)
G06F16/26A01K29/005G06F16/29G06Q10/10G06Q50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,430,355
App. No.
17/571,393
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and computerized method for monitoring and analyzing animal related data. In one embodiment, the system includes a processor and memory operable to identify a parameter related to animal management for species in a biological environment, aggregate animal related data from different sources about the parameter of the species, identify a baseline for the parameter, correlate the animal related data against the baseline to obtain correlated data, and analyze said correlated data to assess said animal management.

Claims (19)

1. A method comprising:

receiving data associated with livestock from one or more data sources, the received data including geographical data expressed as an address;

converting the received data from a proprietary format to an agnostic format, the received data being converted by:

translating the geographical data into coordinate geographical information, responsive to a determination that the geographical information is in address format; and

generating a unique identifier that is applied to the data for the livestock in agnostic format, the unique identifier being operable to link the data to the livestock, and the unique identifier being generated based on a concatenation of an identifier for a producer, an identifier for a veterinarian, an identifier for a health authority, and a producer generated identification number, said identifiers for the producer, veterinarian, and health authority being designated to ensure the unique identifier is only associated with the livestock; and

outputting for display a graphical user interface (GUI) map representation of the geographic data in agnostic format, the GUI map representation being operable to access at least a subset of the received data for the livestock according to a permission level of a data consumer accessing the data.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether the received data includes a predetermined set of data for the livestock; and

rejecting the data from the one or more data sources upon determining that the received data does not include the predetermined set of data for the livestock.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising outputting a notice responsive to a determination that the received data does not include the predetermined set of data for the livestock.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined set of data comprises a minimum number of data elements required by a data consumer group membership to enable accurate analysis of livestock.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein translating the geographical data into coordinate geographical information further comprises retaining the address associated with the geographical data, and linking the address to the coordinate geographical information.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

applying a permission to a data consumer based on the data consumer's membership in a group assigned a predefined level of detail to which access is permitted to the data in agnostic format; and

controlling what level of detail is output for representation according to the permission for the data consumer.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising changing the predefined level of detail for a group responsive to receipt of an input that indicates an emergency condition exists, to permit data consumers in the group full access to the data for the livestock in agnostic format.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein:

data consumers in a first group are restricted to data aggregated on a county-level absent an input that indicates an emergency condition exists, and

responsive to receipt of the input, granting data consumers in the first group full access to the data beyond the county-level.

Continuity (5)
Continuation 15933910 · Mar 23, 2018
Continuation In Part 15144645 · May 2, 2016
Provisional Application 62475446 · Mar 23, 2017
Provisional Application 62155751 · May 1, 2015
Related Publication 20220138219A1 · May 5, 2022
References Cited (31)
US 7993266B2 · Colston, Jr. et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8234129B2 · Michon et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8560339B2 · Khan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8626521B2 · Brown et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8882664B2 · Ebert et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9489495B2 · Li et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9594878B2 · Silva et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9727702B2 · Kass-Hout et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9746985B1 · Humayun · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10188048B2 · Nelson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10642958B1 · Perlin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030177025A1 · Curkendall · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20060036619A1 · Fuerst et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20100169122A1 · Ruoff et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100274573A1 · Feied et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110099120A1 · Grossman et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120124027A1 · Hnatio · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130054654A1 · Sterling · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130275316A1 · Teng · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140167917A2 · Wallace et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160063188A1 · Thornberry et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160117471A1 · Belt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180218057A1 · Beckham et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180366221A1 · Crehore et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200004746A1 · Randall et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200373018A1 · Segal · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 102288183A · 2011 [cited by examiner]
GB 2451801A · 2009 [cited by examiner]
Asset, “Epidemic threshold” Feb. 26, 2017; available at https://web.archive.org/web/20170226122238/https://www.asset-scienceinsociety.eu/pages/epidemic-threshold (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Machine Translation of CN-102288183-A, downloaded Feb. 2015 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Norstrom, “Geographic Information System (GIS) as a Tool in Surveillance and Monitoring of Animal Diseases” Acta vet. scand. 2001, Suppl. 94, 79-85 (Year: 2001). [cited by examiner]