IP Library Granted Patent US 12,447,439
Granted Patent B2
US 12,447,439 · App. 17/990,187 · Granted Oct 21, 2025

Dry sorbent injection with recirculation

Inventor: Pramodh Nijhawan (Knoxville, TN)
Assignee: Industrial Accessories Company
B01D53/508B01D53/502B01D53/78B01D53/81B01J20/043C01F11/464B01D2251/304B01D2251/604B01D2251/606B01D2257/302
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,447,439
App. No.
17/990,187
Granted
Oct 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein is a dry sorbent injection system and process for removing sulfur oxides from a flue gas. The process generally comprises treating the flue gas with a dry sorbent material to convert the sulfur oxides to sodium sulfate particulates. The sodium sulfate particulates may then be introduced into a mix tank with water to form sodium sulfate solution. The sodium sulfate solution may then be reacted with a calcium hydroxide slurry to produce a reaction mixture comprising calcium sulfate precipitate and a sodium hydroxide solution. The calcium sulfate (gypsum) may be recovered, and the sodium hydroxide solution may be recirculated to pre-treat the flue gas by removing at least a portion of the sulfur dioxide and/or cooling the flue gas stream.

Claims (31)

1. A process for removing sulfur oxides from a flue gas, the process comprising:

treating the flue gas with a dry sorbent material that reacts with at least a portion of the sulfur oxides to produce sodium sulfate particulates;

introducing the sodium sulfate particulates and water into a mix tank, and dissolving the sodium sulfate particulates in the water to form a sodium sulfate solution;

introducing the sodium sulfate solution and a calcium hydroxide slurry into a reaction tank, and reacting at least a portion of the sodium sulfate solution with at least a portion of the calcium hydroxide slurry to produce a reaction mixture comprising a calcium sulfate precipitate and a sodium hydroxide solution; and

pre-treating at least a portion of the flue gas with at least a portion of the sodium hydroxide solution to remove at least a portion of the sulfur dioxide from the flue gas before treating the flue gas with the dry sorbent material.

2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the flue gas is substantially free of fly ash.

3. The process of claim 1 , wherein the calcium hydroxide slurry is formed by introducing calcium hydroxide particulates and a second source of water into a second mix tank.

4. The process of claim 1 , wherein the calcium hydroxide slurry in the second mix tank has a total solids concentration of about 20% by weight or less.

5. The process of claim 1 , wherein:

(i) the sodium sulfate solution in the mix tank has a total dissolved solids concentration of about 20% by weight or less; and/or

(ii) the reaction mixture has a total solids concentration of about 15% by weight or less.

6. The process of claim 1 , wherein the flue gas has a temperature of about 100° C. to about 300° C. before treating with the dry sorbent material.

7. The process of claim 1 , further comprising recovering at least a portion of the calcium sulfate precipitate to produce a gypsum product having a calcium sulfate concentration of at least 99% by weight.

8. A process for removing sulfur dioxide from a thermal oxidizer flue gas, the process comprising:

treating the flue gas with a dry sorbent material to recover sodium sulfate;

reacting at least a portion of the sodium sulfate and a calcium hydroxide slurry to produce a reaction mixture comprising a solids portion comprising precipitated calcium sulfate and a liquids portion comprising sodium hydroxide solution;

recovering the solids portion as a gypsum product, wherein the gypsum product comprises at least 99% by weight calcium sulfate; and

pre-treating at least a portion of the flue gas with at least a portion of the sodium hydroxide solution to remove at least a portion of the sulfur dioxide from the flue gas before treating the flue gas with the dry sorbent material.

9. The process of claim 8 , wherein the flue gas is substantially free of fly ash.

10. The process of claim 8 , wherein the calcium hydroxide slurry is formed by introducing calcium hydroxide particulates and a source of water into a mix tank.

11. The process of claim 8 , wherein the flue gas has a temperature of about 100° C. to about 300° C. before treating with the dry sorbent material.

12. The process of claim 8 , wherein recovering the solids portion comprises removing liquid from the solids portion such that the gypsum product has a liquids content of less than about 5% by weight.

13. A process for removing sulfur dioxide from a flue gas, the process comprising:

treating the flue gas with a dry sorbent material to recover sodium sulfate;

reacting at least a portion of the sodium sulfate and a calcium hydroxide slurry to produce a reaction mixture comprising calcium sulfate precipitate and a sodium hydroxide solution; and

pre-treating the flue gas with at least a portion of the sodium hydroxide solution to remove at least a portion of the sulfur dioxide from the flue gas before treating the flue gas with the dry sorbent material.

14. The process of claim 13 , wherein the flue gas is substantially free of fly ash.

15. The process of claim 13 , wherein the calcium hydroxide slurry is formed by introducing calcium hydroxide particulates and a source of water into a mix tank.

16. The process of claim 13 , wherein the flue gas has a temperature of about 100° C. to about 300° C. before treating with the dry sorbent material.

17. The process of claim 13 , further comprising recovering at least a portion of the calcium sulfate precipitate to produce a gypsum product having a calcium sulfate concentration of at least 99% by weight.

18. The process of claim 13 , further comprising diluting the sodium hydroxide solution with water to provide a diluted stream comprising about 20% by weight or less of sodium hydroxide before pre-treating the flue gas stream.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2022
From: NIJHAWAN, PRAMODH
To: INDUSTRIAL ACCESSORIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 061830/0424 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63281196 · Nov 19, 2021
Related Publication 20230158449A1 · May 25, 2023
References Cited (38)
US 3107142A · Schoeffel et al. · 1963 [cited by applicant]
US 3505008A · Frevel et al. · 1970 [cited by applicant]
US 3989797A · Brady et al. · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4239737A · Ermini · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4385039A · Lowell et al. · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4542000A · Alexander et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4588569A · Cyran et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4783325A · Jones · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4795619A · Lerner · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4956162A · Smith et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5002741A · Hooper · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5096680A · Lindbauer et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 6143263A · Johnson et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6214308B1 · Keener et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 7854911B2 · Maziuk, Jr. et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8695516B2 · Nijhawan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9174165B1 · Dube · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9593023B2 · Vandendoren · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10343111B2 · Byers et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20110014106A1 · Pfeffer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110303133A1 · Nijhawan · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140205521A1 · Neumann et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160290637A1 · Noman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170120188A1 · Thijssen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190015778A1 · Sindram et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 112850745A · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020169760 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Machine translation of Wu et al (CN 112850745) (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Wu, et al., “A model for dry sodium bicarbonate duct injection flue gas desulfurization”, Advances in Environmental Research, 2004, 8(3-4), pp. 655-666 (abstract attached). [cited by applicant]
Dal Pozzo, et al., “Experimental Investigation of the Reactivity of Sodium Bicarbonate toward Hydrogen Chloride and Sulfur Dioxide at Low Temperatures”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 16, pp. 6316-6324. [cited by applicant]
Keener, et al., “Kinetics of the sodium bicarbonate-sulfur dioxide reaction”, Chemical Engineering Science, 1993, 48(16), pp. 2859-2865 (abstract attached). [cited by applicant]
Walawska, et al., “Flue Gas Desulfurization by Mechanically and Thermally Activated Sodium Bicarbonate”, Polish Journal of Chemical Technology, 2014, 16(3), pp. 56-62. [cited by applicant]
Pilat, et al., “Pilot Scale SO2 Control by Dry Sodium Bicarbonate Injection and an Electrostatic Precipitator”, Environmental Progress, 2007, 26(3), pp. 263-270. [cited by applicant]
Prada, et al., “Flue Gas Desulfurization Assessment by Modeling and Experimental Work of an Optimized Fixed-Bed NaHCO3 Reactor”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 40, pp. 18717-18730 (abstract attached). [cited by applicant]
Erdos, et al., “Application of the Active Soda Process for Removing Sulphur Dioxide from Flue Gases”, JAPCA, 1989, 39, pp. 1206-1209. [cited by applicant]
Keener, et al., “Study of the Reaction of S02 with NaHCO3 and Na2CO3”, JAPCA, 1984, 34, pp. 651-654. [cited by applicant]
Zach, et al., “The Influence of SO2 and HCI Concentrations on the Consumption of Sodium Bicarbonate during Flue Gas Treatment”, Energy Fuels, 2021, 35(6), pp. 5064-5073 (abstract attached). [cited by applicant]
Zarebska, et al., “Purification of flue gases from combustion of solid fuels with sodium sorbents (Oczyszczanie gazw ze spalania paliw staych z SO2 sorbentami sodowymi)”, Przemysl Chemiczny, 2015, 94(3), pp. 382-386 (ab… [cited by applicant]