IP Library Granted Patent US 12,453,897
Granted Patent B2
US 12,453,897 · App. 18/106,142 · Granted Oct 28, 2025

System, apparatus, and method for monitoring athletic or exercise performance

Inventors: Derek McWilliams (New York, NY); Jeremy Landis (New York, NY); Bren Cavallo (New York, NY); Dallas Simpson (New York, NY); Christopher Blaich (New York, NY)
Assignee: SoulCycle Inc.
A63B24/0062A63B71/0622A63B2024/0068A63B2071/0625A63B2225/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,453,897
App. No.
18/106,142
Granted
Oct 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In some embodiments, apparatuses and methods are provided herein useful to monitor athletic performance. In some embodiments, one or more control circuits and sensors are used to analyze performance as it compares to music tempo that is played during an exercise session or class, which may be done both directly and/or indirectly. In one embodiment, athletic performance during an exercise period is monitored and compared to the tempos of music played, where the music tempo is identified by one of measuring the actual tempo of the music played and/or obtaining the tempo from a database or otherwise associating the selection(s) played with an identified tempo of the music itself. In another embodiment, the music tempo is indirectly identified or analyzed, such as by analyzing the performance or cadence of a group of exercisers and comparing the performance parameters sensed to obtain a benchmark tempo from which to compare individual users.

Claims (39)

1. A system for evaluating athletic performance during an exercise period, the system comprising:

an exercise station;

a sensor communicatively coupled to the exercise station and configured to measure a performance parameter, wherein the exercise station comprises a pair of pedals and a flywheel, and wherein the performance parameter is one or more of a pedal cadence, a rotational speed of the flywheel, or a power output; and

a display unit configured to display a performance metric, wherein the display unit displays the performance metric at an end of the exercise period, the performance metric corresponding to a percentage difference between a target parameter and the performance parameter during the exercise period;

wherein the exercise station is a stationary bike, the sensor is a power meter, and the performance parameter is a power output measured during one or more sustained regions of the exercise period, and the target parameter is a target power output calculated at least in part based on a tempo of an audio selection played during each of the one or more sustained regions of the exercise period.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sensor is communicably coupled to a processor, the sensor being configured to transmit the performance parameter to the processor during the exercise period.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the processor is communicably coupled to the display unit, the processor being configured to:

calculate the target parameter during the exercise period,

transmit the target parameter to the display unit during the exercise period,

calculate the performance metric at the end of the exercise period, and

transmit the performance metric to the display unit at the end of the exercise period.

4. The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a memory storing a plurality of files, wherein a first portion of at least one of the files is an audio file associated with a sustained region of the exercise period;

an input/output interface configured to receive performance data measured at the exercise station and to store the received performance data in the memory; and

a processor communicably coupled to the sensor, wherein the processor is configured to:

calculate the target parameter for the sustained region of the exercise period based on the tempo of the audio selection of the first portion of the audio file;

compare the performance parameter received from the exercise station with the target parameter; and

determine, based on the comparison, the performance metric of the exercise station.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the input/output interface is communicably coupled to at least a second sensor associated with a second exercise station.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the input/output interface is configured to receive performance data measured by the sensor and second sensor.

7. The system of claim 4 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

identify an upper threshold parameter value and a lower threshold parameter value based at least in part on a data set including performance data measured at a plurality of exercise stations during the first portion of the exercise period, and

calculate an expected parameter for the first portion of the exercise period based on the upper and lower threshold parameter values.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

calculate the target parameter for the sustained region of the exercise period based on the expected parameter.

9. A method of evaluating athletic performance, the method comprising:

providing a stationary bike having a non-transitory computer readable medium, a display unit, and a processor, wherein the processor;

executes an audio file stored in the non-transitory computer readable medium during an exercise period, the audio file being associated with at least one tempo;

measures a performance parameter associated with the stationary bike during the exercise period via a power meter sensor coupled to the stationary bike, the power meter configured to measure a performance parameter, and wherein the performance parameter is a power output;

calculates a target parameter based at least in part on the tempo of the audio file being played, wherein the target parameter is a target power output;

compares the target parameter to the measured performance parameter;

calculates a performance metric based at least in part on the comparison between the target parameter and the measured performance parameter; and

communicates, at the end of the exercise period, a performance summary to the display unit, the performance summary including the performance metric.

10. The method of claim 9 , further including:

recommending one or more audio files to a user of the stationary bike based at least in part on the performance metric.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the performance summary further includes one or more of average revolutions-per-minute during the exercise period, distance ridden during the exercise period, and power generated during the exercise period.

12. The method of claim 9 , further including measuring a plurality of performance parameters associated with a plurality of exercise stations during the exercise period.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the calculating the target parameter is further based on the plurality of performance parameters measured at the plurality of exercise stations.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the display unit is an electronic user device associated with a user of the exercise station.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 9, 2023
From: MCWILLIAMS, DEREK; LANDIS, JEREMY; CAVALLO, BREN; SIMPSON, DALLAS; BLAICH, CHRISTOPHER
To: SOULCYCLE INC.
Reel/Frame 062637/0104 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16924913 · Jul 9, 2020
Provisional Application 62872537 · Jul 10, 2019
Related Publication 20230330486A1 · Oct 19, 2023
References Cited (38)
US 6287239B1 · Hernandez · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 7537546B2 · Watterson · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7542816B2 · Rosenberg · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7728214B2 · Oliver et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8101843B2 · Turner · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8369537B2 · Bieber · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8529407B2 · Nurmela · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8608621B2 · Ogg et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8645373B2 · Knight et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8727947B2 · Tagliabue · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8808144B2 · Ogg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8996332B2 · Kahn · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9079060B2 · Hong · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9174085B2 · Foley · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9183822B2 · Macpherson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9449084B2 · Chong et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9536560B2 · Jehan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9568994B2 · Jehan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9675866B2 · Sako · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9767777B1 · Macpherson · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10421002B2 · Smith · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10478708B2 · Bleich · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10674958B2 · Bleich · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11291886B2 · Hansen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11596834B2 · McWilliams · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20090227429A1 · Baudhuin · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20160342199A1 · Smith · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160342201A1 · Jehan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160342686A1 · Garmark · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160342687A1 · Garmark · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160343363A1 · Garmark · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160343399A1 · Jehan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160343410A1 · Smith · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170235540A1 · Jehan · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180005615A1 · Macpherson · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20210008412A1 · McWilliams · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE 19955720C2 · 2002 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2008030484A2 · 2008 [cited by examiner]