IP Library Granted Patent US 12,465,425
Granted Patent B2
US 12,465,425 · App. 18/333,939 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

System and method for reducing blade exposures

Inventors: David W. Weir (Menlo Park, CA); Julie L. Berry (San Jose, CA); Melissa D. Lippiatt (San Jose, CA); Daniel P. Saraliev (Soquel, CA); Melody Wu (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
A61B34/00A61B17/285A61B17/320016A61B18/1445A61B34/30A61B2017/003A61B2018/1455A61B2034/305A61B2090/067
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,465,425
App. No.
18/333,939
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques for reducing blade exposures include a computer-assisted device having one or more processors and a drive system comprising one or more drive units configured to be coupled to a cutting instrument. The one or more processors are configured to: measure, using one or more first sensors, a jaw angle between gripping jaws of the cutting instrument; measure, using one or more second sensors, a roll of a shaft of the cutting instrument; correct the jaw angle based on the roll of the shaft; determine a restriction on a cutting operation to be performed using the instrument based on the corrected jaw angle; and perform or prevent the cutting operation according to the restriction.

Claims (41)

1 . A computer-assisted device comprising:

one or more processors; and

a drive system comprising one or more drive units configured to be coupled to a cutting instrument;

wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

measure, using one or more first sensors, a jaw angle between gripping jaws of the cutting instrument;

measure, using one or more second sensors, a roll of a shaft of the cutting instrument;

correct the jaw angle based on the roll of the shaft;

determine a restriction on a cutting operation to be performed using the cutting instrument based on the corrected jaw angle; and

perform or prevent the cutting operation according to the restriction.

2 . The computer-assisted device of claim 1 , wherein the restriction on the cutting operation is to prevent the cutting operation when the corrected jaw angle is greater than a jaw angle threshold.

3 . The computer-assisted device of claim 1 , wherein the jaw angle is measured at the one or more drive units.

4 . The computer-assisted device of claim 1 , wherein to correct the jaw angle, the one or more processors are configured to adjust the measured jaw angle based on a correction model.

5 . The computer-assisted device of claim 4 , wherein the correction model is linear.

6 . The computer-assisted device of claim 1 , wherein to correct the jaw angle, the one or more processors are configured to adjust the measured jaw angle proportional to one or more of an absolute value of a pitch angle of an articulated wrist coupling the shaft to the gripping jaws or an absolute value of a yaw angle of the articulated wrist.

7 . The computer-assisted device of claim 1 , wherein to correct the jaw angle, the one or more processors are configured to adjust the measured jaw angle proportional to an absolute value of the roll of the shaft.

8 . A computer-assisted device comprising:

one or more processors; and

a drive system comprising one or more drive units configured to be coupled to a cutting instrument;

wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

measure, using one or more first sensors, a jaw angle between gripping jaws of the cutting instrument;

measure, using one or more second sensors, a roll of a shaft of the cutting instrument;

correct the jaw angle based on the roll of the shaft;

determine a cutting length based on the corrected jaw angle; and

perform a cutting operation according to the cutting length.

9 . The computer-assisted device of claim 8 , wherein the cutting length is less than a full-length cutting length.

10 . The computer-assisted device of claim 8 , wherein the jaw angle is measured at the one or more drive units.

11 . The computer-assisted device of claim 8 , wherein to correct the jaw angle, the one or more processors are configured to adjust the measured jaw angle based on a correction model.

12 . The computer-assisted device of claim 11 , wherein the correction model is linear.

13 . The computer-assisted device of claim 8 , wherein to correct the jaw angle, the one or more processors are configured to adjust the measured jaw angle proportional to one or more of an absolute value of a pitch angle of an articulated wrist coupling the shaft to the gripping jaws or an absolute value of a yaw angle of the articulated wrist.

14 . The computer-assisted device of claim 8 , wherein to correct the jaw angle, the one or more processors are configured to further adjust the measured jaw angle proportional to an absolute value of the roll of the shaft.

15 . A method comprising:

measuring, by one or more processors and using one or more first sensors, a jaw angle between gripping jaws of an end effector of a cutting instrument;

measuring, by the one or more processors and using one or more second sensors, a roll of a shaft of the cutting instrument;

correcting, by the one or more processors, the jaw angle based on the roll of the shaft;

determining, by the one or more processors, a cutting length based on the corrected jaw angle or a restriction on a cutting operation performed by the cutting instrument based on the corrected jaw angle; and

performing, using a drive system comprising one or more drive units coupled to the cutting instrument, a cutting operation according to the cutting length or the restriction on the cutting operation.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the restriction on the cutting operation is to prevent the cutting operation when the corrected jaw angle is greater than a jaw angle threshold.

17 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the cutting length is less than a full-length cutting length.

18 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the jaw angle is measured at the one or more drive units.

19 . The method of claim 15 , wherein correcting the jaw angle comprises adjusting the measured jaw angle based on a correction model.

20 . The method of claim 15 , wherein correcting the jaw angle comprises adjusting the measured jaw angle proportional to an absolute value of the roll of the shaft.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2023
From: WEIR, DAVID W.; BERRY, JULIE L.; LIPPIATT, MELISSA D.; SARALIEV, DANIEL P.; WU, MELODY
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 063960/0103 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16930239 · Jul 15, 2020
Continuation 15573031
Provisional Application 62176893 · May 15, 2015
Related Publication 20230320786A1 · Oct 12, 2023
References Cited (36)
US 10743897B2 · Weir et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20090125026A1 · Rioux et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090287352A1 · Geist · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110009864A1 · Bucciaglia et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120209314A1 · Weir et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120211546A1 · Shelton, IV · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120215220A1 · Manzo · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120310221A1 · Durant et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120310254A1 · Manzo et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130123783A1 · Marczyk et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140052152A1 · Au et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140114327A1 · Boudreaux et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140288549A1 · Mckenna · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150051733A1 · Nowlin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160089198A1 · Arya et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160324588A1 · Durant et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190206564A1 · Shelton, IV et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200337718A1 · Weir et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 2664199A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 1665449A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
CN 103298425A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103429184A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011092743A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013131149A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014176706A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
KR 20130108367A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007111737A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010109932A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010117685A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012112888A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012166815A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016186999A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP16797003.7 mailed on Dec. 13, 2018, 5 pages (ISRG06220/EP). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20159149.2 mailed on Jun. 17, 2020, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2016/032324, mailed on Aug. 18, 2016, 11 pages (ISRG06220/PCT). [cited by applicant]
Vertut, J, and Coiffet, P., “Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development,” English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. [cited by applicant]