IP Library Granted Patent US 12,467,932
Granted Patent B2
US 12,467,932 · App. 18/383,367 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

Methods of improving neurodegenerative disorders by targeted delivery of therapeutic agents

Inventors: Ali R. Rezai (Morgantown, WV); Victor Finomore, Jr. (Morgantown, WV); Jeff Carpenter (Morgantown, WV); Marc Haut (Morgantown, WV)
Assignee: West Virginia University Board of Governors on behalf of West Virginia University
G01N33/6896A61K9/50A61N7/00A61N7/02C07K16/18G01N29/34G01N33/53A61N2007/0021A61N2007/0026A61N2007/0039G01N2800/28
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,467,932
App. No.
18/383,367
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of improving a neurodegenerative or cognitive disorder in a human patient suffering therefrom is provided by determining a target site of the human patient's brain that is affected by the neurodegenerative disorder or cognitive disorder and providing a therapy to the human patient. The therapy includes applying a low intensity focused ultrasound (LiFUS) sonication via an ultrasound delivery device to the target site based on an imaging parameter, a microbubble cavitation; an optical parameter, a bodily fluid parameter, or a physiological or anatomical parameter of the human patient's brain. A therapeutic agent is introduced to the target site before, after or during application of the LiFUS sonication.

Claims (39)

1 . A method of improving a neurodegenerative disorder in a human patient suffering therefrom comprising:

determining a target site of the human patient's brain that is affected by the neurodegenerative disorder; and

providing a therapy to the human patient comprising:

applying a focused ultrasound (FUS) sonication via an ultrasound delivery device to the target site based on at least one feedback parameter comprising at least one or more of an imaging parameter; an acoustic microbubble vibration analysis; an optical parameter; a bodily fluid parameter; or a physiological or anatomical parameter; and

introducing a therapeutic agent to the target site before, during, or after application of the FUS sonication.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining step comprises determining one or more regions of the human patient's brain having a beta amyloid protein, a tau protein, Alpha synuclein, lysosomal enzymes, markers of amyloid and tau pathology, neurofilament light chain and other biomarkers detected in blood, CSF, brain, and other tissues and body fluids, and/or another biomarker of the neurodegenerative disorder.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the imaging parameter comprises a PET scan, MRI scans such as: 1—blood sensitive sequences based on gradient recalled echo (GRE) such as T2*-weighted imaging (GRE T2*) scan or a susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) scan, 2—magnetization T1 preparation sequence scan, 3—T2 weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) scan, 4—T1 contrast scan, 5—an arterial spin labeling (ASL) scan, a 6—dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR perfusion scan, 7—connectivity diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) scan, 8—functional MRI; 9—Acoustic radiation force imaging (ARFI); 10—spectroscopy; 11—membrane disruption scans; 12—acoustic radiation force imaging or combinations thereof of the human patient's brain.

4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

determining changes in a concentration of a beta-amyloid protein, a tau protein and/or another biomarker of the neurodegenerative based on the PET scan or an optical coherence tomography scan; and

delivering or adjusting the therapy based on the changes in concentration.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein delivering or adjusting the therapy comprises at least one or more of providing therapy, not providing therapy, changing a frequency of providing the therapy, adjusting the dose of the LiFUS sonication application, adjusting a timing of applying the LiFUS sonication, changing a frequency of application of the LiFUS sonication, terminating application of the LiFUS sonication, continuing application of the LiFUS sonication, changing one or more of the ultrasound delivery device parameters, changing a location of the therapy from the target site to another site of the human patient's brain, changing a dose of an administration of microbubbles, changing a timing of an administration of microbubbles, conducting acoustic microbubble vibration analysis, changing a dose of the therapeutic agent, changing a time of introduction of the therapeutic agent, or changing a frequency of the introduction of the therapeutic agent.

6 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

determining if there is an increase or decrease in a GRE T2* signal as indicated by the GRE T2* scan compared to a threshold value or a GRE T2* signal as indicated by a GRE T2* scan taken prior to therapy; and

delivering or adjusting the therapy based on the increase or the decrease in the GRE T2* signal.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein delivering or adjusting the therapy comprises at least one or more of providing therapy, not providing therapy, changing a frequency of providing the therapy, adjusting the dose of the LiFUS sonication application, adjusting a timing of applying the LIFUS sonication, changing a frequency of application of the LiFUS sonication, terminating application of the LiFUS sonication, continuing application of the LiFUS sonication, changing one or more of the ultrasound delivery device parameters, changing a location of the therapy from the target site to another site of the human patient's brain, changing a dose of an administration of microbubbles, changing a timing of an administration of microbubbles, conducting acoustic microbubble vibration analysis, changing a dose of the therapeutic agent, changing a time of introduction of the therapeutic agent, or changing a frequency of the introduction of the therapeutic agent.

8 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

determining if there is an increase or decrease in a T1 contrast signal as indicated by the T1 contrast scan compared to a threshold value or a T1 contrast signal as indicated by a T1 contrast scan taken prior to therapy; and

delivering or adjusting the therapy based on the increase or the decrease in the T1 contrast signal.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein delivering or adjusting the therapy comprises at least one or more of providing therapy, not providing therapy, changing a frequency of providing the therapy, adjusting the dose of the LiFUS sonication application, adjusting a timing of applying the LIFUS sonication, changing a frequency of application of the LiFUS sonication, terminating application of the LiFUS sonication, continuing application of the LiFUS sonication, changing one or more of the ultrasound delivery device parameters, changing a location of the therapy from the target site to another site of the human patient's brain, changing a dose of an administration of microbubbles, changing a timing of an administration of microbubbles, conducting acoustic microbubble vibration analysis, changing a dose of the therapeutic agent, changing a time of introduction of the therapeutic agent, or changing a frequency of the introduction of the therapeutic agent.

10 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

determining if there is an increase or decrease in a T2 weighted FLAIR signal as indicated by the T2 weighted FLAIR scan compared to a threshold value or a T2 weighted FLAIR signal as indicated by a T2 weighted FLAIR scan taken prior to therapy; and

delivering or adjusting the therapy based on the increase or the decrease in the T2 weighted FLAIR signal.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein delivering or adjusting the therapy comprises at least one or more of providing therapy, not providing therapy, changing a frequency of providing the therapy, adjusting the dose of the LiFUS sonication application, adjusting a timing of applying the LIFUS sonication, changing a frequency of application of the LiFUS sonication, terminating application of the LiFUS sonication, continuing application of the LiFUS sonication, changing one or more of the ultrasound delivery device parameters, changing a location of the therapy from the target site to another site of the human patient's brain, changing a dose of an administration of microbubbles, changing a timing of an administration of microbubbles, conducting acoustic microbubble vibration analysis, changing a dose of the therapeutic agent, changing a time of introduction of the therapeutic agent, or changing a frequency of the introduction of the therapeutic agent.

12 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

determining if there is an increase or decrease in a SWI signal as indicated by the SWI scan compared to a threshold value or a SWI signal as indicated by a SWI scan taken prior to therapy; and

delivering or adjusting the therapy based on the increase or the decrease in the SWI signal.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein delivering or adjusting the therapy comprises at least one or more of providing therapy, not providing therapy, changing a frequency of providing the therapy, adjusting the dose of the LiFUS sonication application, adjusting a timing of applying the LIFUS sonication, changing a frequency of application of the LiFUS sonication, terminating application of the LiFUS sonication, continuing application of the LiFUS sonication, changing one or more of the ultrasound delivery device parameters, changing a location of the therapy from the target site to another site of the human patient's brain, changing a dose of an administration of microbubbles, changing a timing of an administration of microbubbles, conducting acoustic microbubble vibration analysis, changing a dose of the therapeutic agent, changing a time of introduction of the therapeutic agent, or changing a frequency of the introduction of the therapeutic agent.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least on feedback parameter is acoustic microbubble vibration analysis.

15 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

analyzing the acoustic microbubble vibration analysis; and

delivering or adjusting the therapy based on the analysis.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein delivering or adjusting the therapy comprises at least one or more of providing therapy, not providing therapy, changing a frequency of providing the therapy, adjusting the dose of the LiFUS sonication application, adjusting a timing of applying the LIFUS sonication, changing a frequency of application of the LiFUS sonication, terminating application of the LiFUS sonication, continuing application of the LiFUS sonication, changing one or more of the ultrasound delivery device parameters, changing a location of the therapy from the target site to another site of the human patient's brain, changing a dose of an administration of microbubbles, changing a timing of an administration of microbubbles, changing a dose of the therapeutic agent, changing a time of introduction of the therapeutic agent, or changing a frequency of the introduction of the therapeutic agent.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the bodily fluid parameter is urine, blood, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), or other bodily fluid or tissue.

18 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

determining changes in a concentration of a beta-amyloid protein, a tau protein and/or another biomarker of the neurodegenerative disorder in the urine, blood, CSF, or other bodily fluid and/or tissue; or identifying a presence of a biomarker of the neurodegenerative disorder; or combinations thereof; and

delivering or adjusting the therapy based on the changes in the concentration or the identification of the presence of the biomarker.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein delivering or adjusting the therapy comprises at least one or more of providing therapy, not providing therapy, changing a frequency of providing the therapy, adjusting the dose of the LiFUS sonication application, adjusting a timing of applying the LIFUS sonication, changing a frequency of application of the LiFUS sonication, terminating application of the LiFUS sonication, continuing application of the LiFUS sonication, changing one or more of the ultrasound delivery device parameters, changing a location of the therapy from the target site to another site of the human patient's brain, changing a dose of an administration of microbubbles, changing a timing of an administration of microbubbles, conducting acoustic microbubble vibration analysis, changing a dose of the therapeutic agent, changing a time of introduction of the therapeutic agent, or changing a frequency of the introduction of the therapeutic agent.

20 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

applying a neuromodulation signal to a brain region during or after introducing the therapeutic agent and/or applying a LiFUS sonication.

Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63435449 · Dec 27, 2022
Provisional Application 63418733 · Oct 24, 2022
Related Publication 20240173575A1 · May 30, 2024
References Cited (113)
US 5752515A · Jolesz et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6514221B2 · Hynynen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7674229B2 · Hynynen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8086296B2 · Bystritsky · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8401609B2 · Deisseroth et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8764666B2 · Chen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9693692B2 · Junio · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10035027B2 · Deisseroth · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10130828B2 · Vortman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10568687B2 · Chen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10575816B2 · Prus · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10641782B2 · Deisseroth et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10702244B2 · O'Reilly · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10974078B2 · Jordan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10981021B2 · Carthera · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11024096B2 · Leuze et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11291852B2 · Leuze et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11358007B2 · De Picciotto et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11369809B2 · Goetz et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11376074B2 · Levy · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11642528B2 · Junio · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040049134A1 · Tosaya · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050020945A1 · Tosaya · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050240126A1 · Foley et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20080051839A1 · Libbus et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080227139A1 · Deisseroth et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090112133A1 · Deisseroth · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110082326A1 · Mishelevich et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110112394A1 · Mishelevich · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110178442A1 · Mishelevich · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120053391A1 · Mishelevich · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245493A1 · Mishelevich · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120283502A1 · Mishelevich et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120283604A1 · Mishelevich · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120296241A1 · Mishelevich · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130066350A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130079682A1 · Mischelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130144192A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130184728A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130197401A1 · Sato · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130261506A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130281890A1 · Mishelevich · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130284920A1 · Junio · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140094720A1 · Tyler · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140194726A1 · Mishelevich · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150182756A1 · Peyman · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160001096A1 · Mishelevich · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160243381A1 · Alford et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170246481A1 · Mishelevich · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180020921A1 · Deisseroth et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180126191A1 · Loike et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180140871A1 · Konofagou et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180178042A1 · Schneider et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180214716A1 · Goetz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180236255A1 · Etkin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180250402A1 · Junio · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190083065A1 · Shuki · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190187161A1 · Deisseroth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190240499A1 · Leuze et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200030608A1 · Halpern · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200139158A1 · Levy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200289855A1 · Shimokawa et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200342675A1 · Leuze et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200391019A1 · Levy · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210077834A1 · Vortman · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210138276A9 · Kabrams et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210170205A1 · Vortman · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210187331A1 · Zadicario et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210204915A1 · Vortman et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210347869A1 · Goetz et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210361977A1 · Jordan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220118271A1 · Deisseroth et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220143428A1 · Goetz et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220168445A1 · Kaplitt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220288010A1 · Lee et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220359060A1 · Lee et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230030950A1 · Goetz et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230201553A1 · Levy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230270693A1 · Kauvar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
AU 2016322918A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
AU 2020360399A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CA 2997619A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008101128A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015192189A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017048808A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017205531A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018064225A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020150093A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020198686A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021062232A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021067464A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022035765A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022035773A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022212891A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022266000A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023275617A2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023278199A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023278784A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023034820A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023034860A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023105288A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023105290A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023180811A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Nhan, T., et al., “Drug delivery to the brain by focused ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier disruption: quantitative evaluation of enhanced permeability of cerebral vasculature using two-photon microscopy”, J Contro… [cited by applicant]
Burgess, A., et al. “Alzheimer disease in a mouse model: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound targeted to the hippocampus opens the blood-brain barrier and improves pathologic abnormalities and behavior”, Radiology, vol… [cited by applicant]
Chen, K., et al., “Theranostic Strategy of Focused Ultrasound Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening for CNS Disease Treatment”, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Feb. 7, 2019, vol. 10, Article 86, pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
J. F. Jordao, et al., in “Antibodies Targeted to the Brain with Image-Guided Focused Ultrasound Reduces Amyloid-Beta Plaque Load in the TgCRND8 Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease,” PLoS One, May 11, 2010, https://doi.or… [cited by applicant]
Choi, James J., et al., in “Molecules of Various Pharmacologically-Relevant Sizes Can Cross the Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening In Vivo,” Ultrasound Med. Biol., vol. 36, Issue 1, Jan. 1, 2010; pp. 58-67. [cited by applicant]
Raymond, Scott B., et al., “Ultrasound enhanced delivery of molecular imaging and therapeutic agents in Alzheimer's disease mouse models”, PLoS One, May 14, 2008, vol. 3, No. 5, e2175, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
M. Kinoshita, et al., in “Noninvasive Localized Delivery of Herceptin to the Mouse Brain by MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2006; 103:11719-11723. [cited by applicant]
Kinoshita, M., et al., “Targeted delivery of antibodies through the blood-brain barrier by MRI-guided focused ultrasound”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Issue 340, Nov. 22, 2005, pp. 1085-1090. [cited by applicant]
Burgess, A., et al., “Targeted Delivery of Neural Stem Cells to the Brain Using MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound to Disrupt the Blood-Brain Barrier”, PloS one, vol. 6, No. 11, Nov. 2011, pp. e27877 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Sheikov, N., et al., “Cellular Mechanisms of the Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Induced by Ultrasound in Presence of Microbubbles”, Ultrasound in medicine & biology, vol. 30, Issue 7, Jul. 2004, pp. 979-989. [cited by applicant]