Method to manage cable TV leakage when leaks are no longer detectable
Systems and methods improve the actionability of leaks in cable networks. One or more leakage detection confidences (LDCs) are determined to assess the reliability of newer leakage data which conflicts with existing leak records. When confidences fail to exceed predetermined thresholds, records of leaks which failed to be redetected are maintained as actionable and relied upon for the creation of work orders and deployment of technicians to make repairs. Further fail safe conditions may include device health metrics and weather events.
1 . A method of maintaining cable infrastructure involving a leak which was detected on an earlier driveout of one or more earlier driveouts and which was not redetected on a later driveout, the method comprising
detecting leaks and corresponding leak locations with leakage detection equipment as one or more vehicles traverse a network during the one or more earlier driveouts;
tracking what leaks are detected and where they are detected on the later driveout as a vehicle traverses the network along a driveout path;
determining for the later driveout a first leakage detection confidence (LDC) as a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected to (ii) number of leaks expected based on the one or more earlier driveouts;
comparing the first LDC with a first threshold; and
deploying a technician to repair the leak if one or more fail safe conditions are met, the one or more fail safe conditions comprising: the first LDC fails to exceed the first threshold.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first LDC is a driveout LDC which is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout to (ii) number of leaks expected on the later driveout.
3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the first threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks expected on the later driveout.
4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: a detector which collected leakage data on the later driveout receives a fail rating for device health.
5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising
determining for the later driveout a second LDC; and
comparing the second LDC with a second threshold,
wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: the second LDC fails to exceed the second threshold,
wherein the first LDC is a driveout LDC which is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout to (ii) number of leaks expected on the later driveout,
wherein the second LDC is a node LDC which is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout which are within a node on a driveout path and (ii) number of leaks within the same node expected on the later driveout.
6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein
the first threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks expected on the later driveout, and
the second threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks within the same node expected on the later driveout.
7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: a detector which collected the leakage data on the later driveout receives a fail rating for device health.
8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: no redetection is attributed or attributable to a weather event or weather condition.
9 . A method of maintaining cable infrastructure, comprising
detecting leaks and corresponding leak locations with leakage detection equipment as one or more vehicles traverse a network during one or more earlier driveouts;
tracking what leaks are detected and where they are detected on the later driveout as a vehicle traverses the network along a driveout path;
(a) for each leakage record of one or more existing leak records, identifying those for which there was no redetection on the later driveout but a plurality of fail-safe conditions are satisfied, the plurality of fail-safe conditions comprising
a driveout leakage detection confidence (dLDC) fails to exceed a first threshold, and
one or more of (i) a detector which collected leakage data on the later driveout receives a fail rating for device health, and (ii) a node leakage detection confidence (nLDC) for a node associated with the leakage record fails to exceed a second threshold; and
(b) deploying a technician to repair a leak indicated by a leakage record identified in step (a),
wherein the dLDC is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout to (ii) number of leaks expected on the later driveout based on the one or more earlier driveouts, and
wherein the nLDC is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout which are within a node on the driveout path and (ii) number of leaks within the same node expected on the later driveout based on the one or more earlier driveouts.
10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein
the first threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks expected on the later driveout, and
the second threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks within the same node expected on the later driveout.
11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: no redetection is attributed or attributable to a weather event or weather condition.
12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions include both of (i) the detector which collected leakage data on the later driveout receives a fail rating for device health, and (ii) the nLDC for the node associated with the leakage record fails to exceed the second threshold.
13 . A method of maintaining cable infrastructure, the method comprising
detecting leaks and corresponding leak locations with leakage detection equipment as one or more vehicles traverse a network during one or more earlier driveouts;
tracking what leaks are detected and where they are detected on a later driveout as a vehicle traverses the network along a driveout path;
for a leak which was detected on an earlier driveout of the one or more earlier driveouts and which was not redetected on the later driveout, determining for the later driveout a first leakage detection confidence (LDC) as a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected to (ii) number of leaks expected based on the one or more earlier driveouts;
comparing the first LDC with a first threshold; and
maintaining or changing a record of the leak to actionable status for deployment of a technician to repair the leak if one or more fail safe conditions are met, the one or more fail safe conditions comprising: the first LDC fails to exceed the first threshold.
14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the first LDC is a driveout LDC which is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout to (ii) number of leaks expected on the later driveout.
15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the first threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks expected on the later driveout.
16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: a detector which collected leakage data on the later driveout receives a fail rating for device health.
17 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising
determining for the later driveout a second LDC; and
comparing the second LDC with a second threshold,
wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: the second LDC fails to exceed the second threshold,
wherein the first LDC is a driveout LDC which is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout to (ii) number of leaks expected on the later driveout,
wherein the second LDC is a node LDC which is a ratio of (i) number of leaks detected on the later driveout which are within a node on a driveout path and (ii) number of leaks within the same node expected on the later driveout.
18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein
the first threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks expected on the later driveout, and
the second threshold has a value which is determined based on the number of leaks within the same node expected on the later driveout.
19 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: a detector which collected the leakage data on the later driveout receives a fail rating for device health.
20 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the one or more fail safe conditions further comprise: no redetection is attributed or attributable to a weather event or weather condition.