IP Library Granted Patent US 12,469,016
Granted Patent B2
US 12,469,016 · App. 18/494,257 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

Systems and methods for routing electronic transactions using predicted authorization approval

Inventors: Dennis A. Kettler (Mason, OH); Ryan Clapp (Loveland, OH)
Assignee: Worldpay, LLC
G06Q20/10G06Q20/12G06Q20/352G06Q20/40G06Q30/06G06Q40/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,469,016
App. No.
18/494,257
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for routing electronic payment transactions includes receiving transaction-related information from a merchant, extracting transaction routing criteria from the received transaction-related information, dynamically identifying one or more eligible payment networks based on extracted transaction routing criteria, predicting a likelihood of authorization acceptance for each identified network based on the transaction-related information, dynamically identifying one or more breakeven transaction amounts for each identified eligible payment network, each breakeven transaction amount defining a point at which two or more eligible payment networks have the same expenses for a given transaction amount, the expenses including costs associated with a low predicted likelihood of authorization acceptance, and routing signature debit transactions from the merchant to a least cost PIN-less debit network selected from the eligible payment networks based on identification of a desired breakeven transaction amount for the PIN-less debit network.

Claims (82)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving transaction-related information from a merchant;

identifying one or more eligible payment networks based on the transaction-related information;

identifying one or more pseudo-networks corresponding to the one or more eligible payment networks;

selecting a payment network from among the one or more eligible payment networks based on the one or more pseudo-networks and based on a likelihood of authorization acceptance for each of the one or more eligible payment networks; and

routing a signature debit transaction from the merchant to a least cost PIN-less debit network using the selected payment network wherein the method improves the functioning of one or more transaction routing servers by routing the signature debit transaction to a least cost PIN-less debit network using the selected payment network, and wherein the one or more pseudo-networks are one or more artificial network configured to simulate routing options within one or more payment environments.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the transaction-related information includes one or more of:

a bank identification number (“BIN”);

one or more available payment network IDs;

one or more merchant categories;

an issuer regulatory status;

a transaction amount;

a preferred status;

a primary account number;

an issuer identification number;

a payment card number;

a mode of payment including a swiping of a card, keying in an identification related to the payment network, a contactless mode of payment, or a mode of payment that utilizes a chip; and

whether an address verification system was utilized.

3 . The method of claim 1 wherein each pseudo-network comprises a modification of a network to account for a change in regulatory exemption status or a change in preferred status.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

sorting the one or more eligible payment networks according to one or more of breakeven transaction amounts, absolute cost, availability of volume discount, and availability of preferred rates.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating a display of routing and settlement across the one or more eligible payment networks, and user-configurable displays of regulated versus exempt issuers.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating, for the merchant, a display of first grouping of networks to which a set of transactions were routed relative to a second grouping of networks to which the set of transactions could have been routed, for an overall cost savings to the merchant.

7 . The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

generating a plurality of user elements enabling a merchant user to reveal a group of transaction routing decisions according to issuer, regulatory exemption status, and preference or preferred rate status.

8 . A device comprising:

a memory configured to store instructions; and

one or more processors of a transaction routing server configured to execute the instructions to perform operations comprising:

receiving transaction-related information from a merchant;

identifying one or more eligible payment networks based on the transaction-related information;

identifying one or more pseudo-networks corresponding to the one or more eligible payment networks;

selecting a payment network from among the one or more eligible payment networks based on the one or more pseudo-networks and based on a likelihood of authorization acceptance for each of the one or more eligible payment networks; and

routing a signature debit transaction from the merchant to a least cost PIN-less debit network using the selected payment network wherein the operations improve the functioning of one or more transaction routing servers by routing the signature debit transaction to a least cost PIN-less debit network using the selected payment network, and wherein the one or more pseudo-networks are one or more artificial network configured to simulate routing options within one or more payment environments.

9 . The device of claim 8 , wherein the transaction-related information includes one or more of:

a bank identification number (“BIN”);

one or more available payment network IDs;

one or more merchant categories;

an issuer regulatory status;

a transaction amount;

a preferred status;

a primary account number;

an issuer identification number;

a payment card number;

a mode of payment including a swiping of a card, keying in an identification related to the payment network, a contactless mode of payment, or a mode of payment that utilizes a chip; and

whether an address verification system was utilized.

10 . The device of claim 8 , wherein each pseudo-network comprises a modification of a network to account for a change in regulatory exemption status or a change in preferred status.

11 . The device of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise:

sorting the one or more eligible payment networks according to one or more of breakeven transaction amounts, absolute cost, availability of volume discount, and availability of preferred rates.

12 . The device of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise:

generating a display of routing and settlement across the one or more eligible payment networks, and user-configurable displays of regulated versus exempt issuers.

13 . The device of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise:

generating, for the merchant, a display of first grouping of networks to which a set of transactions were routed relative to a second grouping of networks to which the set of transactions could have been routed, for an overall cost savings to the merchant.

14 . The device of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise:

generating a plurality of user elements enabling a merchant user to reveal a group of transaction routing decisions according to issuer, regulatory exemption status, and preference or preferred rate status.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a device, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving transaction-related information from a merchant;

identifying one or more eligible payment networks based on the transaction-related information;

identifying one or more pseudo-networks corresponding to the one or more eligible payment networks;

selecting a payment network from among the one or more eligible payment networks based on the one or more pseudo-networks and based on a likelihood of authorization acceptance for each of the one or more eligible payment networks; and

routing a signature debit transaction from the merchant to a least cost PIN-less debit network using the selected payment network wherein the operations improve the functioning of one or more transaction routing servers by routing the signature debit transaction to a least cost PIN-less debit network using the selected payment network, and wherein the one or more pseudo-networks are one or more artificial network configured to simulate routing options within one or more payment environments.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the transaction-related information includes one or more of:

a bank identification number (“BIN”);

one or more available payment network IDs;

one or more merchant categories;

an issuer regulatory status;

a transaction amount;

a preferred status;

a primary account number;

an issuer identification number;

a payment card number;

a mode of payment including a swiping of a card, keying in an identification related to the payment network, a contactless mode of payment, or a mode of payment that utilizes a chip; and

whether an address verification system was utilized.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein each pseudo-network comprises a modification of a network to account for a change in regulatory exemption status or a change in preferred status.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise:

sorting the one or more eligible payment networks according to one or more of breakeven transaction amounts, absolute cost, availability of volume discount, and availability of preferred rates.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise:

generating a display of routing and settlement across the one or more eligible payment networks, and user-configurable displays of regulated versus exempt issuers.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise:

generating, for the merchant, a display of first grouping of networks to which a set of transactions were routed relative to a second grouping of networks to which the set of transactions could have been routed, for an overall cost savings to the merchant; and

generating a plurality of user elements enabling a merchant user to reveal a group of transaction routing decisions according to issuer, regulatory exemption status, and preference or preferred rate status.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2023
From: KETTLER, DENNIS; CLAPP, RYAN
To: VANTIV, LLC
Reel/Frame 065351/0617 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 26, 2023
From: VANTIV, LLC
To: WORLDPAY, LLC
Reel/Frame 065360/0590 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17452525 · Oct 27, 2021
Continuation 16855624 · Apr 22, 2020
Continuation 15839185 · Dec 12, 2017
Related Publication 20240054461A1 · Feb 15, 2024
References Cited (7)
US 8886563B2 · Sakata et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10002348B1 · Doctor et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10387850B1 · Srinivasan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20070233597A1 · Petersen et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20120265680A1 · Lynch et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140214651A1 · Prasadh · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150339651A1 · Hampapur et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]