IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,488,874
Granted Patent B1
US 12,488,874 · App. 19/189,020 · Granted Dec 2, 2025

System and method for emotionally intelligent, personalized AI avatar-based health coaching using multi-domain data and adaptive behavioral intelligence

Inventors: Sky Christopherson (Mesa, AZ); David Christopherson (Tucson, AZ)
Assignee: Gold Inc.
G16H20/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,488,874
App. No.
19/189,020
Granted
Dec 2, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

A programmatically generated AI avatar includes a customizable personality module, acting as the embodied interface for a powerful AI “mind” that delivers personalized coaching to improve user health, well-being, and longevity. The system uses machine learning, large language models, and biometric modeling to synthesize real-time, multi-modal health data—including sleep, nutrition, glucose, mood, and activity—and generate forward-prescribed KHAs. Unlike human coaches, it continuously adapts based on context and behavior, targeting the root cause: metabolic dysfunction—namely by restoring healthy, sustainable body composition through the preservation or building of lean muscle mass and reduction of excess fat. KHAs can also be shared with friends or programmatically generated AI avatars, allowing for coordinated action, emotional support, and accountability through social connection—further reinforcing positive behavior and adherence. The system's reinforcement learning engine incorporates both individual response data and anonymized population-level insights to optimize recommendations over time, learning which interventions are most effective for users with similar physiological and behavioral profiles. First validated with Olympic athletes—resulting in measurable improvements and medal-winning outcomes—this system offers a scalable, emotionally intelligent coaching engine that exceeds human capability, designed for the ultimate purpose of supporting sustainable health, resilience, and human thriving.

Claims (32)

1 . A method of calculating daily calorie needs for a user, comprising:

determining a resting metabolic rate (RMR) based on user characteristics;

calculating a non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) value;

adjusting the NEAT value based on user goals and fitness level;

generating a total daily calorie need based on the adjusted NEAT value; and

rendering the daily calorie need with a programmatically generated AI avatar generated and controlled by a system including:

multi-modal health data acquisition configured to receive real-time physiological, behavioral, and contextual metrics including sleep, nutrition, emotional state, glucose, activity, and social patterns;

a large-language-model (LLM) and biometric-modeling modules to synthesize said data and generate context-aware Key Health Actions (KHAs);

a health-engine vector database of scientific health recommendations accessible to the LLM;

a persona vector database of avatar personality training data coupled to a Personality and Culture Module that generates conversational scripts per user preferences;

a photorealistic renderer implementing mesh geometry, texture mapping, and layered image compositing of face and body features, synchronized in real time with speech;

a voice-synthesis module generating human-like speech from said scripts and lip-syncing animations; and

a reinforcement-learning engine updating the AI Mind and Personality & Culture Module based on user responses and outcomes.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the RMR comprises using the Mifflin-St. Jeor equation.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the NEAT value comprises adding a percentage of the RMR based on the user's goal.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the percentage is 20% for a build goal, 15% for a balance goal, and 10% for a fat loss goal.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the NEAT value based on the user's fitness level.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the adjustment is −5% of RMR for unfit users and +5% of RMR for fit users.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the NEAT value based on the user's daily step count.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the adjustment is 2% of RMR per 1,000 steps per day.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating exercise calories based on metabolic equivalents (METs).

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the METs are adjusted based on the user's age if over 40 years old.

11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the total daily calorie need based on a user-defined goal.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the adjustment is a 10% caloric restriction for balancing performance and fat loss.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the adjustment is a 25% caloric restriction for maximizing fat loss.

14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating macronutrient ratios based on the total daily calorie need.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein calculating macronutrient ratios comprises determining protein needs based on body weight and training factors.

16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein calculating macronutrient ratios comprises determining carbohydrate needs based on brain usage, non-exercise activity, and exercise requirements.

17 . The method of claim 14 , wherein calculating macronutrient ratios comprises determining fat needs as a percentage of total calories.

18 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting calorie and macronutrient calculations based on the user's training volume.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the training volume is calculated using a training volume factor (TF) based on different types and intensities of exercise.

20 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing meal-specific macronutrient recommendations based on the timing and purpose of each meal.

References Cited (8)
US 20140335490A1 · Baarman · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20220022778A1 · Gauthier · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Stephen D. Herrmann et al., 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A third update of the energy costs of human activities, Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 13, Issue 1. [cited by examiner]
Mendes MA, da Silva I, Ramires V, Reichert F, Martins R, Ferreira R, Tomasi E. Metabolic equivalent of task (METs) thresholds as an indicator of physical activity intensity. PLoS One. Jul. 1, 20189; 13(7):e0200701. doi:… [cited by examiner]
Ostendorf et al., Physical activity energy expenditure and total daily energy expenditure in successful weight loss maintainers. Obesity (2019) 27, 496-504. doi:10.1002/oby.22373 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Aristizabal JC, Freidenreich DJ, Volk BM, Kupchak BR, Saenz C, Maresh CM, Kraemer WJ, Volek JS. Effect of resistance training on resting metabolic rate and its estimation by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry metabolic … [cited by examiner]
ApplySci (Feb. 26, 2017) Sky Christopherson on Data not Drugs. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYE8x2Cmb2w (2017). [cited by applicant]
Unpublished U.S. Appl. No. 16/501,720 claiming priority to U.S. Appl. No. 62/761,475 to Sky Christopherson. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (2)
US 12,580,768 US 12,664,007