IP Library Granted Patent US 12,499,524
Granted Patent B2
US 12,499,524 · App. 17/639,926 · Granted Dec 16, 2025

Enhancement of medical images

Inventors: Qiang Zhang (Oxford, GB); Stefan Piechnik (Oxford, GB); Vanessa Ferreira (Oxford, GB); Evan Hann (Oxford, GB); Iulia Andreia Popescu (Oxford, GB)
Assignee: OXFORD UNIVERSITY INNOVATION LIMITED
G06T5/92A61B5/055G06T5/50A61B5/0044G06T2207/10081G06T2207/10088G06T2207/10104G06T2207/10108G06T2207/10116G06T2207/10132G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084G06T2207/20212G06T2207/30048
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,499,524
App. No.
17/639,926
Granted
Dec 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for enhancing magnetic resonance images to produce contrast-enhanced images without the need to administer contrast agent to a patient. The image processing apparatus utilises a trained machine learning algorithm as an image processor, preferably a generative adversarial network, to produce images from contrast agent-free magnetic resonance images with the produced images having similar appearance and better image quality and better pathological sensitivity and being able to differentiate more pathological conditions than actually acquired contrast-enhanced images.

Claims (47)

1 . A method of producing a computed contrast-enhanced medical image, the method comprising:

receiving an image dataset of a subject comprising a native quantitative mapping image obtained by performing a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging procedure; and

inputting the image dataset to an image processor and processing the image dataset with the image processor to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image processor comprises a machine learning processor trained on a training dataset comprising sets of images, each set of images comprising a contrast agent-free quantitative mapping image having the same quantitative mapping as the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset and a corresponding acquired contrast-enhanced medical image, and

wherein the image dataset of the subject further comprises at least one further magnetic resonance image obtained by a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance modality other than the quantitative mapping of the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset, and the sets of images of the training dataset further comprise at least one further magnetic resonance image obtained by the other contrast agent-free magnetic resonance modality.

2 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one further magnetic resonance image comprises at least one of: a raw magnetic resonance image, an image that is a fusion of raw magnetic resonance images, or an image that is a derivation of raw magnetic resonance images.

3 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one further magnetic resonance image comprises at least one of: a T1 mapping image, a T1-weighted image, a T2-weighted image, a T2*-weighted image, a T2 mapping image, a T2* mapping image, or a cine CMR image.

4 . A method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one further magnetic resonance image comprises at least one of: a STIR image, a tagged-CMR image, a strain-encoded image, a diffusion-weighted image, a diffusion tensor image, an arterial spin labelling image, a PD weighted image, or a fat-water separated image.

5 . A method of producing a computed contrast-enhanced medical image, the method comprising:

receiving an image dataset of a subject comprising a native quantitative mapping image obtained by performing a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging procedure; and

inputting the image dataset to an image processor and processing the image dataset with the image processor to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image processor comprises a machine learning processor trained on a training dataset comprising sets of images, each set of images comprising a contrast agent-free quantitative mapping image having the same quantitative mapping as the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset and a corresponding acquired contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image dataset of the subject further comprises at least one non-magnetic resonance image, and the sets of images of the training dataset further comprise at least one non-magnetic resonance image of the same type as the at least one non-magnetic resonance image of the image dataset.

6 . A method according to claim 5 , wherein the at least one non-magnetic resonance image comprises at least one of: an echocardiogram, a nuclear perfusion image, a CT image, an electrophysiological cardiac map image, or a chest X-ray.

7 . A method of producing a computed contrast-enhanced medical image, the method comprising:

receiving an image dataset of a subject comprising a native quantitative mapping image obtained by performing a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging procedure; and

inputting the image dataset to an image processor and processing the image dataset with the image processor to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image processor comprises a machine learning processor trained on a training dataset comprising sets of images, each set of images comprising a contrast agent-free quantitative mapping image having the same quantitative mapping as the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset and a corresponding acquired contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image dataset comprises further data that is not image data, and the training dataset comprises further training data associated with each set of images of the same type as the further data that is not image data.

8 . A method according to claim 7 , wherein the further data comprises at least one of: imaging metadata, image acquisition parameters, or a non-imaging diagnostic test result.

9 . A method according to claim 8 , wherein the non-imaging diagnostic test result is at least one of: a MR spectroscopy result, a blood test result, an electrocardiogram, the subject's clinical characteristics, or the subject's reason for referral.

10 . A method of producing a computed contrast-enhanced medical image, the method comprising:

receiving an image dataset of a subject comprising a native quantitative mapping image obtained by performing a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging procedure; and

inputting the image dataset to an image processor and processing the image dataset with the image processor to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image processor comprises a machine learning processor trained on a training dataset comprising sets of images, each set of images comprising a contrast agent-free quantitative mapping image having the same quantitative mapping as the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset and a corresponding acquired contrast-enhanced medical image, and wherein

the image dataset is processed with the image processor to produce plural computed contrast-enhanced medical images having different disease sensitivity, and

the method further comprises combining the plural multiple plural computed contrast-enhanced medical images to produce a combined, computed contrast-enhanced medical image.

11 . An image processor adapted to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image, the image processor comprising:

an input for receiving an image dataset of a subject comprising a quantitative mapping image obtained by performing a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging procedure; and

a data processor for processing the image dataset to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the data processor comprises a machine learning processor trained on a training dataset comprising sets of images, each set of images comprising a contrast agent-free native quantitative mapping image having the same quantitative mapping as the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset and a corresponding acquired contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image dataset of the subject further comprises at least one further magnetic resonance image obtained by a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance modality other than the quantitative mapping of the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset, and the sets of images of the training dataset further comprise at least one further magnetic resonance image obtained by the other contrast agent-free magnetic resonance modality.

12 . An image processor according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one further magnetic resonance image comprises at least one of: a T1 mapping image, a T1-weighted image, a T2 weighted image, a T2*-weighted image, a T2 mapping image, a T2* mapping image, or a cine CMR image.

13 . An image processor according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one further magnetic resonance image comprises at least one of: a STIR image, a tagged-CMR image, a strain-encoded image, a diffusion-weighted image, a diffusion tensor image, an arterial spin labelling image, a PD weighted image, or a fat-water separated image.

14 . An image processor adapted to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image, the image processor comprising:

an input for receiving an image dataset of a subject comprising a quantitative mapping image obtained by performing a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging procedure; and

a data processor for processing the image dataset to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the data processor comprises a machine learning processor trained on a training dataset comprising sets of images, each set of images comprising a contrast agent-free native quantitative mapping image having the same quantitative mapping as the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset and a corresponding acquired contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image dataset of the subject further comprises at least one non-magnetic resonance image, and the sets of images of the training dataset further comprise at least one non-magnetic resonance image of the same type as the at least one non-magnetic resonance image of the image dataset.

15 . An image processor according to claim 14 , wherein the at least one non-magnetic resonance image comprises at least one of: an echocardiogram, a nuclear perfusion image, a CT image, an electrophysiological cardiac map, or a chest X-ray.

16 . An image processor adapted to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image, the image processor comprising:

an input for receiving an image dataset of a subject comprising a quantitative mapping image obtained by performing a contrast agent-free magnetic resonance imaging procedure; and

a data processor for processing the image dataset to produce a computed contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the data processor comprises a machine learning processor trained on a training dataset comprising sets of images, each set of images comprising a contrast agent-free native quantitative mapping image having the same quantitative mapping as the quantitative mapping image of the image dataset and a corresponding acquired contrast-enhanced medical image,

wherein the image dataset comprises further data that is not image data, and the training dataset comprises further training data associated with each set of images of the same type as the further data that is not image data.

17 . An image processor according to claim 16 , wherein the further data comprises at least one of: imaging metadata, image acquisition parameters, or a non-imaging diagnostic test.

18 . An image processor according to claim 17 , wherein the non-imaging diagnostic test result is, at least one of: a MR spectroscopy result, a blood test result, an electrocardiogram, the subject's clinical characteristics, or the subject's reason for referral.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2022
From: ZHANG, QIANG; PIECHNIK, STEFAN; FERREIRA, VANESSA; HANN, EVAN; POPESCU, IULIA ANDREIA
To: OXFORD UNIVERSITY INNOVATION LIMITED
Reel/Frame 059738/0629 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 1912701 · Sep 4, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220343475A1 · Oct 27, 2022
References Cited (30)
US 10628930B1 · Periaswamy · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20170061620A1 · Park et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190108634A1 · Zaharchuk · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190122348A1 · Jensen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190150764A1 · Arnold · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 108090871A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019074938A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Kim, Wook, et al. “Contrast CT image generation model using CT image of PET/CT.” 2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Proceedings (NSS/MIC). IEEE, 2018. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Schelbert, Erik B., and Daniel R. Messroghli. “State of the art: clinical applications of cardiac T1 mapping.” Radiology 278.3 (2016): 658-676. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for WO 2021/044153 (PCT/GB2020/052117), dated Nov. 10, 2020, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
UK Search Report for GB 1912701.8, dated Mar. 5, 2020, pp. 1-3. [cited by applicant]
Jiang Liu, Enhao Gong, Thomas Christen, and Greg Zaharchuk: “Contrast-free MRI Contrast Enhancement with Deep Attention Generative Adversarial Network”, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, I SMRM, … [cited by applicant]
Thomas Christen, Enhao Gong, Jia Guo, Michael M. Moseley, and Greg Zaharchuk: “Predicting Contrast Agent Enhancement with Deep Convolution Networks”, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, ISMRM, 2030… [cited by applicant]
Ferreira et al. “Native T1-mapping detects the location, extent and patterns of acute myocarditis without the need for gadolinium contrast agents”, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16, 36 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Dass et al., “Myocardial Tissue Characterization Using Magnetic Resonance Noncontrast T1 Mapping in Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy”, Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012;5:726-733. [cited by applicant]
Abdula et al, “Synthetic late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance for diagnosing myocardial scar”, Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 52:3, 127-132. [cited by applicant]
Ben-Cohen et al. “Cross-Modality Synthesis from CT to PET using FCN and GAN Networks for Improved Automated Lesion Detection”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 78, Feb. 2019, pp. 186-194. [cited by applicant]
Scully et al. Myocardial Extracellular Volume Quantification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography, Current Cardiology Reports (2018) 20: 15. [cited by applicant]
Xiang et al. Deep embedding convolutional neural network for synthesizing CT image from T1-Weighted image, Medical Image Analysis (2018) 31-44. [cited by applicant]
Nie et al. Estimating CT Image from MRI Data Using 3D Fully Convolutional Networks, Deep Learn Data Label Med Appl (2016) 170-178. [cited by applicant]
Han. “MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method” Med Phys Apr. 2017;44(4):1408-1419. [cited by applicant]
Weber, W., Grosu, A. & Czernin, J. “Technology Insight: advances in molecular imaging and an appraisal of PET/CT scanning”. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 5, 160-170 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Judd RM. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. Nov. 16, 2000;3… [cited by applicant]
S. U. Dar, M. Yurt, L. Karacan, A. Erdem, E. Erdem and T. çukur, “Image Synthesis in Multi-Contrast MRI With Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks,” in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, No. 10, pp. 23… [cited by applicant]
P. Isola, J. Zhu, T. Zhou and A. A. Efros, “Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks,” 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017, pp. 5967-5976. [cited by applicant]
Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, Grosse-Wortmann L, He I, Kellman P, Mascherbauer J, Nezafat R, Salerno M, Schelbert EB, Taylor AJ, Thompson R, Ugander M, van Heeswijk RB, Friedrich MG. Clinical recommendations for … [cited by applicant]
Ting-Chun Wang, Ming-Yu Liu, Jun-Yan Zhu, Andrew Tao, Jan Kautz, Bryan Catanzaro, “High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANs”, arXiv:1711.11585v1 [cs.CV] Nov. 30, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Taylor AJ, Salerno M, Dharmakumar R, Jerosch-Herold M. T1 Mapping: Basic Techniques and Clinical Applications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Jan. 2016;9(1):67-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.005. PMID: 26762877. [cited by applicant]
Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, Alexei A. Efros, “Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks”, arXiv:1703.10593v6 [cs.CV] Nov. 15, 2018. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for WO 2021/044153 (PCT/GB2020/052117), dated Mar. 8, 2022, pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]