IP Library Granted Patent US 12,554,234
Granted Patent B2
US 12,554,234 · App. 18/418,518 · Granted Feb 17, 2026

Systems and methods for holistic low carbon intensity fuel and ethanol production

Inventor: David Whikehart (Findlay, OH)
Assignee: Marathon Petroleum Company LP
G05B13/042C10G9/00C10G47/36C10L1/02C10L1/04C10L3/06C12M21/12C12M41/48C12P7/06E21B43/12E21B43/25G01N33/225G01N33/28G05B19/4189G06Q30/018G06Q50/06G06Q50/40G08C17/02C10G2300/1011C10G2300/4043C10L2200/0469C10L2200/0476C10L2230/14C10L2270/10C10L2290/24C10L2290/58G05B2219/45076G06Q10/083Y02P20/151
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,554,234
App. No.
18/418,518
Granted
Feb 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods to provide low carbon intensity (CI) ethanol through one or more targeted reductions of carbon emissions based upon an analysis of carbon emissions associated with a combination of various options for feedstock procurement, feedstock refining, processing, or transformation, and ethanol distribution pathways to end users. Such options are selected to maintain the total CI (carbon emissions per unit energy) of the ethanol below a pre-selected threshold that defines an upper limit of CI for the ethanol.

Claims (113)

1 . A process to provide low carbon intensity (CI) fuel, the process comprising:

selecting a CI threshold to define a limit for CI of a fuel to be provided to an end user location;

selecting one or more distribution pathways to transport a quantity of the fuel from a facility to the end user location, the one or more distribution pathways selected to reduce carbon emissions associated therewith, thereby to maintain the CI of the fuel below the CI threshold;

determining the CI of the fuel as a function of carbon emissions per unit energy associated with transporting the quantity of the fuel to the end user location by use of the selected distribution pathway and a determined CI of the fuel at the facility; and

outputting the fuel through the selected one or more distribution pathways as low CI fuel.

2 . The process according to claim 1 , wherein the fuel includes ethanol, wherein the processing the feedstock into fuel includes:

milling the feedstock to form a grist,

combining the grist with hot water for a specified time interval to form a mash,

adding one or more enzymes to the mash to aid in the development of saccharides,

cooling the mash,

adding yeast to the cooled mash to ferment the mash,

distilling the mash to a distillate and a combination of solids and leftover liquids,

filtering the distillate, and

denaturing the filtered distillate.

3 . The process according to claim 1 , wherein the one or more distribution pathways provides transport of the quantity of fuel to a fuel blending site whereby the quantity of fuel is blended with a refined transportation fuel.

4 . The process according to claim 1 , wherein one or more of the one or more transportation pathways and the one or more distribution pathways uses one or more of electric power generated from wind energy, electric power generated from solar energy, electric power generated by a hydroelectric generator, electric power generated by a geothermal power generator, or renewable diesel, and the one or more transportation pathways is selected from one or more of the group of rail, vehicle, or barge.

5 . The process according to claim 2 , wherein the function of carbon emissions per unit energy associated with procuring the selected feedstock at the source includes carbon emissions per unit energy of the selected feedstock and carbon emissions per unit energy for providing the feedstock at the source.

6 . The process according to claim 2 , wherein the at least one feedstock from at least one of the one or more sources is selected from the group of a corn, sugar cane, beets, wheat, other grains including starch or sugar, or other organic matter including sugar or starch, and wherein the one or more sources of feedstock includes a farm or co-located farm.

7 . A system to operate a facility for distribution of a low carbon intensity (CI) fuel therefrom, the system comprising:

one or more controllers to control one or more various fuel production processes to be operated at one or more fuel production facilities, the one or more controllers including one or more processors and memory storing instructions, the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, to:

(I) determine a feedstock CI for each of one or more available feedstock from one or more available feedstock sources to be supplied to the one or more fuel production facilities via one or more available feedstock transportation pathways,

(II) for each one or more available feedstock:

(a) determine a feedstock transportation CI for one or more available feedstock transportation pathways,

(b) determine a production process CI for one or more production processes to process the feedstock into a fuel,

(c) determine a utilities CI for one or more utilities available for use by the one or more production processes,

(d) determine a set of combinations, the set of combinations including:

(1) one or more available feedstock,

(2) one or more available feedstock transportation pathways,

(3) one or more production processes of one or more fuel production facilities,

(4) one or more utilities, and

(f) determine a total CI for each of the set of combinations,

(III) determine a final selection from the set of combinations including a total CI less than or equal to a threshold CI, the threshold CI being defined as a limit of CI in providing fuel that qualifies the fuel as a low CI fuel, the CI of the fuel comprising a function of the total carbon emissions per unit energy of the fuel,

(IV) in response to the final selection, transmit a feedstock request based on the selected one or more available feedstock and the selected one or more feedstock transportation pathways, and

(V) in response to a determined reception of the selected one or more available feedstock at the one or more fuel production facilities, initiate, at the one or more controllers, the selected one or more production processes of the one or more production processes, and the selected one or more utilities to operate the selected one or more production processes, thereby to transform the selected one or more available feedstock to fuel.

8 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the determination of the feedstock CI includes one or more of:

(a) a volume of each of the one or more available feedstock,

(b) a type of feedstock of each of the one or more available feedstock,

(c) an indirect land use change (ILUC) determination,

(d) a type of fuel utilized by equipment at the feedstock source,

(e) a type of fertilizer utilized for the feedstock, or

(f) a location of each of the one or more available feedstock.

9 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the determination of the total CI includes a feedstock storage CI, and wherein the memory further has instructions to:

(a) determine the feedstock storage CI based on:

(1) a time each of a one or more stored feedstock has been stored in each of one or more feedstock storages, and

(2) a time and power associated with regulating the temperature of each of the one or more stored feedstock.

10 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the determination of the total CI is based on fuel storage tank CI, and wherein the memory further has instructions to:

(a) determine the fuel storage tank CI based on:

(1) a time the fuel will be stored in each of the one or more fuel storage tanks,

(2) a time and power associated with regulating the temperature of each of the one or more fuel storage tanks, and

(3) an estimated volume associated with emissions associated with each of the one or more fuel storage tanks.

11 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the one or more production processes includes one or more options of one or more:

(a) to provide electrical power for the fuel production facility through renewable sources, the renewable sources comprising wind, solar, hydroelectric, geothermal, and hydrogen,

(b) to employ renewable fuels in boilers and fired heaters of the fuel production facility, the renewable fuels comprising renewable diesel or renewable natural gas, or

(c) to sequester carbon dioxide produced during the one or more production processes.

12 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the determination of the final selection from the set of combinations is based on:

(a) the total CI,

(b) a time of availability of each of the one or more available feedstock,

(c) a time for delivery to the fuel production facility by the one or more feedstock transportation pathway,

(d) a time to process one or more available feedstock utilizing the one or more ethanol production processes.

13 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the memory further has instructions to:

(a) in response to the determined reception of the selected one or more available feedstock at the fuel production facility:

(1) determine actual feedstock CI for the selected one or more available feedstock,

(2) determine actual feedstock transportation CI for the selected one or more feedstock transportation pathways,

(3) in response to a determination of an increase of the combined CI of the actual feedstock CI and actual feedstock transportation CI in relation to the combination of the determined feedstock CI and the determined feedstock transportation CI:

(A) select one or more different production processes, one or more different utilities, and one or more different fuel distribution pathways to maintain total CI.

14 . The system according to claim 13 , wherein the memory further has instructions to:

(a) in response to determination of completion of the selected one or more production processes:

(1) determine an actual production process CI for the selected one or more production processes,

(2) determine an actual utility CI for the selected one or more utilities,

(3) in response to a determination of an increase of the combined CI of the actual production process CI and the actual utility CI in relation to the combination of the determined production process CI and determined utilities CI:

(A) select one or more different fuel distribution pathways to maintain total CI.

15 . The system according to claim 14 , wherein the memory further has instructions to:

(a) in response to determination of completion of the selected one or more fuel distribution pathways:

(1) determine actual CI for:

(A) the selected one or more available feedstock,

(B) a completed one or more feedstock transportation pathways,

(C) a completed one or more production processes,

(D) one or more utilities used to operate the completed one or more production processes, and

(E) a completed one or more fuel distribution pathway,

(2) determine actual total CI based on:

(A) an actual fuel yield,

(B) an actual feedstock volume,

(C) the actual CI for the completed one or more feedstock transportation pathways,

(D) the actual CI for the completed one or more production processes,

(E) the actual CI for the one or more utilities used to operate the completed one or more production processes, and

(F) the actual CI for the completed one or more fuel distribution pathways, and

(3) transmit an audit report including the actual CI for each selection and the actual total CI.

16 . A fuel integration controller for distribution of a low CI fuel, the fuel integration controller comprising:

an input/output in signal communication with a first computing device, such that the fuel integration controller is configured to:

(a) determine a fuel CI for the fuel at a facility and a selection of one or more distribution pathways, each selection based on:

(1) the determined fuel CI

(2) a determination of fuel distribution CI of one or more fuel distribution pathways based on delivery distance and fuel type used in the one or more fuel distribution pathway, and

(3) a determination of one or more total CIs less than the threshold CI, the total CIs based on varying combinations of the determinations of CI, and

(b) in response to the selection of one or more fuel distribution pathways that maintain the total CI less of the fuel than or equal to the threshold CI, transmit a deliver the fuel via the selection of the one or more fuel distribution pathways.

17 . The fuel integration controller according to claim 16 , wherein the facility includes offsetting practices, and wherein the offsetting practices include one or more:

to provide electrical power for the facility through renewable sources, the renewable sources comprising wind, solar, hydroelectric, geothermal, or hydrogen fuel cells,

to employ renewable fuels in the facility, the renewable fuels comprising renewable diesel or renewable natural gas, or

to sequester carbon dioxide produced by the facility.

18 . The process according to claim 1 , further comprising selecting a feedstock that is procured at a source, the feedstock being selected to reduce carbon emissions associated therewith, thereby to maintain the CI of the fuel below the CI threshold;

selecting one or more transportation pathways to transport the feedstock from the source to the facility, the one or more transportation pathways selected to reduce carbon emissions associated therewith and thereby maintain the CI of the fuel below the CI threshold;

selecting one or more fuel production processes at the facility to reduce carbon emissions, thereby to maintain the CI of the fuel below the CI threshold, the one or more fuel production processes selected from a group including, powering at least a portion of fuel production equipment with electricity generated proximate the one or more fuel production processes through a renewable source, burning renewable natural gas as part of the one or more fuel production processes, generating steam through renewable natural gas-fed boilers, and sequestering carbon dioxide produced during the one or more fuel production processes; and

processing the feedstock into fuel via the one or more fuel production processes at the facility, wherein the determined CI of the fuel at the facility is determined as a function of carbon emissions per unit energy associated with procuring the selected feedstock at the source, carbon emissions per unit energy associated with transporting the feedstock from the source to the facility by use of the selected transportation pathway, carbon emissions per unit energy associated with processing the feedstock into fuel together with operating the one or more fuel production processes.

19 . The process according to claim 1 , wherein the facility is a fuel storage facility.

20 . The process according to claim 1 , wherein the end user location includes a fuel blending site where the fuel is blended into a refined transportation fuel to create a final transportation fuel.

21 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the instructions include determine an fuel distribution CI for each of one or more available fuel distribution pathways, wherein the set of combinations including one or more available fuel distribution pathways, and wherein the instructions further include in response to determination of completion of the selected one or more fuel production processes, transmit a delivery request of the fuel via the selected one or more fuel distribution pathways.

22 . The fuel integration controller according to claim 16 , wherein the fuel integration controller determines the determined fuel CI by:

determining a selection of one or more available feedstock based on a determination of feedstock CI of one or more blends of the one or more available feedstock based on volume and type of feedstock and based on a CI associated with procuring a feedstock;

determining a selection of one or more feedstock transportation pathways based on a determination of feedstock transportation CI of one or more feedstock transportation pathways based on delivery distance and fuel type of the feedstock transportation pathway;

determining a selection of one or more production processes based on a determination of production process CI of one or more production processes based on type of production process, volume of the one or more feedstocks, type of the one or more feedstocks, and length of time of each of the one or more production processes; and

determining a selection of one or more utilities based on a determination of utility CI of one or more utilities based on type of utility utilized the one or more production processes and a distance the one or more utilities travel to the one or more production processes; and

in response to the selections:

initiate transportation of the selected one or more feedstocks via the selected one or more feedstock transportation pathways; and

initiate transformation of the selected one or more feedstocks into the fuel having a total CI less than or equal to the CI threshold via the selected one or more production processes using the selected one or more utilities.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2024
From: WHIKEHART, DAVID
To: MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP
Reel/Frame 066195/0569 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17392622 · Aug 3, 2021
Provisional Application 63113186 · Nov 12, 2020
Provisional Application 63198626 · Oct 30, 2020
Provisional Application 63066912 · Aug 18, 2020
Provisional Application 63061162 · Aug 4, 2020
Related Publication 20240160162A1 · May 16, 2024
References Cited (106)
US 5193594A · Johansson · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5271526A · Williams · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5430295A · Le Febre · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 6966326B2 · Murray · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7797205B2 · Song et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8354065B1 · Sexton et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8506656B1 · Turocy · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8597380B2 · Buchanan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9080111B1 · Huff · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10605411B2 · Robbins et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11132008B2 · Miller · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164406B2 · Meroux et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11204271B2 · Williams et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11270393B2 · Whikehart et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11320095B2 · Rady et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11334794B2 · Celano et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11378234B2 · Rady · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11397087B1 · Mishra · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11448773B2 · Bennett · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11550273B2 · Whikehart et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11578638B2 · Thobe · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11635735B2 · Whikehart et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11715950B2 · Miller et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11720526B2 · Miller et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11789414B2 · King et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11899416B2 · Whikehart et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11921476B2 · Whikehart · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11994259B2 · Freeman et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12092270B2 · Freeman et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12092998B2 · Whikehart et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12092999B2 · Whikehart et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20050022446A1 · Brundage · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050058016A1 · Smith · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090305360A1 · Breneman · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090322544A1 · McDowell · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100332273A1 · Balasubramanian et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110093121A1 · Kaplan · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120271677A1 · Rhodes, III · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140218242A1 · Platzer · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140222698A1 · Potdar et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140324727A1 · Hoda · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170160118A1 · Williams et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180068359A1 · Preston et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200291316A1 · Robbins et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200372375A1 · Pathak et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133670A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210156521A1 · Laschinger et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210192388A1 · Cunningham · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210254793A1 · Rady · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220041974A1 · Whikehart et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220042406A1 · Whikehart et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220044336A1 · Whikehart et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220083017A1 · Whikehart · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220267810A1 · Lyubovsky · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220343229A1 · Gruber et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220398448A1 · Jayaraman et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230015077A1 · Kim · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230078852A1 · Campbell et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230082127A1 · Whikehart et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230205148A1 · King et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230259080A1 · Whikehart et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230259088A1 · Borup et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230408990A1 · King et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240045403A1 · Wilbek et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240126223A1 · Whikehart · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240133524A1 · Freeman · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240230035A9 · Freeman · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240263749A1 · Freeman · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240319688A1 · Whikehart · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240319689A1 · Whikehart · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240353072A1 · Freeman · 2024 [cited by applicant]
AU 2020101782 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 110029645 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 111062568 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3739295 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
IN 12812008 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006083273 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021100004 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021152205 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022149501 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022157589 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023038579 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023137304 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023164683 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
“Blockchain Database for Sustainable Biofuels: A Case Study”, Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB) and Bioledger, Mar. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Riverol, C et al., A Non-linear Autoregressive Eternal Inputs (NARX) model for estimating the mixing volumes between batches in TRANSMIX, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 127, 2018, 161-163. [cited by applicant]
Cheng, Lifei et al., Logistics for world-wide crude oil transportation using discrete event simulation and optimal control, Computers and Chemical Engineering 28, 2004, 897-911. [cited by applicant]
Bush, Amy et al., Iterative Optimization and Simulation of Barge Traffic on an Inland Waterway, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, Jan. 2004, 1751-1756. [cited by applicant]
Smith, Laurence Douglas et al., Simulation of alternative approaches to relieving congestion at locks in a river transport system, The Journal of the Operational Research Society , vol. 60, No. 4, Apr. 2009, 519-533. [cited by applicant]
Martins, Marcella Scoczynski Ribeiro et al., Discrete Event Simulation for Petroleum Transfers Involving Harbors, Refineries and Pipelines, Rio Pipeline 2009 Conference & Exposition, Sep. 2009. [cited by applicant]
Elgowainy, Amgad et al., Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Petroleum Products at U.S. Refineries, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 7612-7624. [cited by applicant]
Argonne National Laboratory, General Motors Corporation, Well-to-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems, North American Analysis, vol. 1, Apr. 2001. [cited by applicant]
Gordon, Deborah, et al., Know Your Oil, Creating a Global Oil-Climate Index, 2015 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. [cited by applicant]
BP, BP sets ambition for net zero by 2050, fundamentally changing organisation to deliver, Feb. 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]
BP, from IOC to IEC, Second quarter 2020 financial results and strategy presentation, Aug. 2020. [cited by applicant]
BP p.l.c. Group results, Second quarter and half year 2020, London, Aug. 4, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Brinkman et al., Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems—A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions, May 2005. [cited by applicant]
El-Houjeiri, Hassan M. et al., Oil Production Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimator, Jun. 5, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Argonne National Laboratory, Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle-Fuel Pathways: A Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment of Current (2015) and Future (2025-2030) Technologies, ANL/ESD… [cited by applicant]
Forman, Grant S. et al., U.S. Refinery Efficiency: Impacts Analysis and Implications for Fuel Carbon Policy Implementation, Environmental Science & Technology, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Malins, Chris et al., Crude Oil Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculation Methodology for the Fuel Quality Directive, The International Council on Clean Transportation to the European Commission Directorate-General for Clima… [cited by applicant]
Nimana, Balwinder et al., Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from Canada's oil sands-derived transportation fuels, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Ramachandran, Srikkanth et al., Well to wheel analysis of low carbon alternatives for road traffic, Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3313. [cited by applicant]
Toyota Motor Corporation, Well-to-Wheel Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Automotive Fuels in the Japanese Context, Nov. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Vineyard, Donald, et al., A Comparison of Major Petroleum Life Cycle Models, Clean Technol Environ Policy. Apr. 2017; 19(3): 735-747. doi:10.1007/s10098-016-1260-6. [cited by applicant]
Lloyd's Register, Using technology to trace the carbon intensity of sustainable marine fuels, Feb. 15, 2023. [cited by applicant]