IP Library Granted Patent US 12,558,163
Granted Patent B2
US 12,558,163 · App. 17/719,043 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Method for medical image reconstruction

Inventors: Tyler Alexander (Philadelphia, PA); Jonathan Cohen (Pittsburgh, PA); Andrew Beacham (New York, NY); Remi Prince (New York, NY); Andrew Conklin (Philadelphia, PA)
Assignee: Hoth Intelligence, Inc.
A61B34/10A61B34/20A61B90/37G06T7/0012A61B2034/105A61B2034/107A61B2034/2055A61B2090/373A61B2090/374G06T3/14G06T19/006G06T19/20G06T2207/10081G06T2207/10088G06T2207/10116G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20092G06T2207/30016
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,558,163
App. No.
17/719,043
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure relates to a method including receiving a first set of images, the images being scans from one or more medical instruments; creating a patient-specific image reconstructed model based on the first set of images; defining mapping points on the reconstructed model; receiving a second set of images; defining patient recognition mapping points on the second set of images; overlaying the reconstructed model and the second set of images based on the mapping points and the recognition mapping points; and displaying the overlaid model aligned with the second set of images.

Claims (44)

1 . A method for creating a medical image reconstruction of a target patient on a display device, the method comprising:

receiving, by a first processor, a first set of three-dimensional images, the first set of three-dimensional images being a plurality of scans from one or more medical imaging devices;

creating, by the first processor, a patient-specific image reconstructed model based on the first set of three-dimensional images;

identifying a set of facial features from the reconstructed model;

based on positions of the set of facial features, extracting a virtual face mask from the reconstructed model;

identifying a plurality of mapping points using three-dimensional coordinates on the virtual face mask extracted from the reconstructed model;

receiving, by a second processor, a second set of images, the second set of images captured by one or more cameras on the display device;

determining a plurality of generic model elements in the second set of images;

matching the plurality of mapping points to a subset of the plurality of generic model elements;

overlaying, by the second processor, the reconstructed model and the second set of images based on the matching; and

displaying the overlaid model aligned with the second set of images on the display device.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of images include images of at least one of a brain and skull.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more medical instruments include at least one of computerized tomography scan, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second set of images include images of a head or a face of the target patient.

5 . The method of claim 1 further comprising determining a device trajectory for a planned medical procedure on the overlaid model.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising receiving user input commands from a user of the display device, wherein the input commands direct a modification to the device trajectory.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein one end of the device trajectory is at a Kocher's point, the Kocher's point being a starting point of insertion of external ventricular drain.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the device trajectory guides a user of the display device when the user inserts a catheter into a target region of a brain of the target patient.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of mapping points comprise mapping points extracted from the virtual face mask.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of mapping points are determined by a user of the display device.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of mapping points are identified using a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) device.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of generic model elements include at least one or a portion of an eye, an ear, a nose, a lip, forehead, and an eyebrow.

13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising tracking hands of a user of the display device to determine the plurality of the generic model elements on the second set of images.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second set of images are two-dimensional images.

15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising rotating the overlaid model and the second set of images in concert such that the mapping points remain aligned as the images are rotated on the display device.

16 . The method of claim 15 wherein the rotation is directed by a user command provided to the display device.

17 . A method for assisting a medical procedure being administered to a target patient, the method comprising:

receiving, on an imaging and display device, a first set of images for a target area of the target patient captured prior to the medical procedure;

receiving, on the imaging and display device, a second set of images including the target area of the target patient;

creating a reconstructed model based on the first set of images;

identifying a set of facial features from the reconstructed model;

based on positions of the set of facial features, extracting a virtual face mask from the reconstructed model;

identifying a plurality of mapping points using three-dimensional coordinates on the virtual face mask;

based on a matching of the plurality of mapping points to features within the second set of images, overlaying the reconstructed model onto the second set of images;

determining a planned trajectory of a medical device as the medical procedure is administered based on the first and second sets of images;

monitoring the medical procedure as a user operates the medical device according to the planned trajectory; and

measuring an accuracy of the medical procedure.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the user inserts a catheter into a brain of the target patient along the planned trajectory.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the accuracy is based on whether the catheter aligns with the planned trajectory.

20 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising providing feedback of the accuracy to the user.

21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein the feedback is provided to the user on the imaging and display device in the form of one or more of a color coded indicator and a numeric indicator.

22 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the monitoring of the medical procedure is performed by a sensor attaching to a catheter.

23 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising training the device to recognize the catheter.

24 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the accuracy of the medical procedure is based, at least in part, on a variance between the planned trajectory and a monitored trajectory.

Assignments (4)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNORS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 62514 FRAME 111. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jan 21, 2026
From: ALEXANDER, TYLER; COHEN, JONATHAN; BEACHAM, ANDREW; PRINCE, REMI; CONKLIN, ANDREW
To: HOTH INTELLIGENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 074481/0812 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 13, 2023
From: PRINCE, REMI
To: HOTH INTELLIGENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 064244/0047 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2023
From: ALEXANDER, TYLER; COHEN, JONATHAN; FREEMAN, FREDRIC; MCGOVERN, SHAUN; BEACHAM, ANDREW
To: HOTH INTELLIGENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 062514/0111 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2022
From: ALEXANDER, TYLER; COHEN, JONATHAN; FREEMAN, FREDERIC; MCGOVERN, SHAUN; BEACHAM, ANDREW
To: HOTH INTELLIGENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 061645/0506 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63254339 · Oct 11, 2021
Related Publication 20230116175A1 · Apr 13, 2023
References Cited (34)
US 8199988B2 · Marshall et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9336336B2 · Deichmann et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10037820B2 · Wong · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10178155B2 · Avisar · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10945807B2 · Gibby et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11004271B2 · Cvetko et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11123144B2 · Bustan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20070249911A1 · Simon · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20100249573A1 · Marks · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20150018842A1 · Rahimian et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170148213A1 · Thomas et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170312031A1 · Amanatullah · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20200342675A1 · Leuze · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210022812A1 · Tako et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210027469A1 · Lo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210045701A1 · Unklesbay et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220096853A1 · Bakalo · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220110684A1 · Mensink · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220395328A1 · Wang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220409281A1 · Gormley · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230149087A1 · Chen · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240320935A1 · Pissarenko · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 111160326A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 112733579A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 1624823B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 102007316B1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Parks, Connie L., et al., “Automated Facial Recognition of Computed Tomography-Derived Facial Images: Patient Privacy Implications”, J Digit Imaging (2017) 30:204-214, published online Dec. 26, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Alexander, Tyler , et al., “System and Method for Surgical State Prediction”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/766,177, filed Jul. 8, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Kawka, Michal , et al., “Intraoperative video analysis and machine learning models will change the future of surgical training”, Intelligent Surgery, vol. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 13-15. [cited by applicant]
Lam, Klye , et al., “Machine learning for technical skill assessment in surgery: a systematic review”, npj Digital Medicine vol. 5, Article No. 24 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Luongo, Francisco , et al., “Deep learning-based computer vision to recognize and classify suturing gestures in robot-assisted surgery”, Surgery. May 2021; 169(5):1240-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.016. Epub Sep. 26… [cited by applicant]
Park, Juyoun , et al., “Recognition and Prediction of Surgical Actions Based on Online Robotic Tool Detection”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Feb. 2021, accepted Jan. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Shi, Chang , et al., “Recognition and Prediction of Surgical Gestures and Trajectories Using Transformer Models in Robot-Assisted Surgery”, 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)… [cited by applicant]
Vergouwen, Robin , “Improving surgeons' perform ance with AI”, Incision Blog, Nov. 18, 2020, https://www.incision.care/blog/improving-surgeons-performance-with-ai. [cited by applicant]