IP Library Granted Patent US 12,579,261
Granted Patent B2
US 12,579,261 · App. 18/678,569 · Granted Mar 17, 2026

Managing inference models in view of reconstructability of sensitive information

Inventors: Ofir Ezrielev (Beer Sheva, IL); Tomer Kushnir (Omer, IL); Amihai Savir (Newton, MA)
Assignee: Dell Products L.P.
G06F21/554G06F21/6218G06F2221/034
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,579,261
App. No.
18/678,569
Granted
Mar 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems, and devices for providing computer-implemented services are disclosed. To provide the computer-implemented services, inference models may be deployed to locations. Prior to deploying an inference model to a location, it may be determined whether the location is trustworthy. If the location is determined to not be trustworthy, an input data attack resistant inference model may be selected and deployed. The input data attack resistant inference model may be trained to impart reconstruction resistance to sensitive information during inference generation based on a schema for weighting the sensitive information for reconstruction resistance. The training process may decrease a likelihood of the inferences generated by the input data attack resistant inference model being usable to reconstruct the sensitive information.

Claims (66)

1 . A method for managing use of inference models, the method comprising:

identifying an occurrence of an inference model deployment event for a location;

based on the occurrence, making a determination regarding whether the location is trustworthy;

in a first instance of the determination in which the location is not trustworthy:

selecting, from a model repository, an input data attack resistant inference model, the input data attack resistant inference model being trained to impart reconstruction resistance to, at least, input features during inference generation based on a schema for weighting, at least, the input features for reconstruction resistance;

initiating deployment of a prediction head portion of the input data attack resistant inference model to the location and a shared body portion of the input data attack resistant inference model to a second location that is trustworthy;

obtaining, at the location, an inference model result using the prediction head portion and the shared body portion; and

providing computer-implemented services based on the inference model result.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the schema for weighting, at least, the input features for reconstruction resistance indicates a reconstruction score threshold for an input feature of the input features based on a level of sensitivity for the input feature, the level of sensitivity being based on a level of impact of undesired access to the input feature.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the reconstruction score threshold indicates an acceptable degree of reconstructability for the input feature and the reconstruction score threshold decreases as the level of sensitivity for the input feature increases.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the level of sensitivity increases as information content of the input feature increases.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the information content is based on at least one of variability of the input feature, and public accessibility of information regarding the input feature.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the schema for weighting, at least, the input features for reconstruction resistance indicates a reconstruction score threshold for a portion of derived data based on at least one of the input features.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the portion of the derived data is not used as input to the input data attack resistant inference model and is not output by the input data attack resistant inference model.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

prior to identifying the occurrence of the inference model deployment event:

obtaining a multipath inference model comprising:

a first inference generation path comprising the prediction head portion and the shared body portion; and

a second inference generation path comprising a reconstruction head portion and the shared body portion, the second inference generation path being trained to infer input features ingested by the second inference generation path;

obtaining, using the schema, a set of reconstruction score thresholds associated with at least the input features;

performing, based on the set of the reconstruction score thresholds, an untraining process for the second inference generation path to reduce an ability of the second inference generation path to infer the input features and to update the shared body portion;

performing a first training process for the first inference generation path while the updated shared body portion is frozen to obtain an updated prediction head portion; and

using the updated prediction head portion and the updated shared body portion as the input data attack resistant inference model.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein obtaining the multipath inference model comprises:

freezing the shared body portion; and

while the shared body portion is frozen:

performing a second training process using a second training data set to obtain the second inference generation path.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein while the shared body portion is frozen, values of weights of hidden layers of the shared body portion are not modified during the second training process.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the values of the weights of the hidden layers of the shared body portion are set during a previously performed training process completed prior to the shared body portion being frozen and the previously performed training process using a first training data set to obtain the first inference generation path.

12 . The method of claim 8 , wherein obtaining the set of the reconstruction score thresholds comprises:

obtaining a test data set comprising instances of the input features;

performing, using the test data set, an input feature sensitivity analysis process to obtain levels of sensitivity for, at least, the input features; and

assigning reconstruction score thresholds to, at least, each input feature of the input features based on the levels of sensitivity.

13 . The method of claim 8 , wherein performing the untraining process comprises:

performing a third training process using a second training data set to obtain an updated shared body portion and to reduce the ability of the second inference generation path to infer, at least, the input features;

freezing the updated shared body portion; and

while the updated shared body portion is frozen:

performing a fourth training process using the second training data set to increase the ability of the second inference generation path to infer, at least, the input features and obtain an updated reconstruction head portion.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein performing the untraining process further comprises:

making a determination, using the updated shared body portion and the updated reconstruction head portion, regarding whether a reconstruction score for a first input feature of the input features falls below a reconstruction score threshold associated with the first input feature; and

in an instance of the determination in which the reconstruction score falls below the reconstruction score threshold:

concluding that the updated shared body portion is to be used to update the first inference generation path.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second location has access to input data for the inference model and the location does not have access to the input data.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the model repository comprises:

at least one input data attack resistant inference model; and

at least one non-input data attack resistant inference model.

17 . A non-transitory machine-readable medium having instructions stored therein, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations for managing use of inference models, the operations comprising:

identifying an occurrence of an inference model deployment event for a location;

based on the occurrence, making a determination regarding whether the location is trustworthy;

in a first instance of the determination in which the location is not trustworthy:

selecting, from a model repository, an input data attack resistant inference model, the input data attack resistant inference model being trained to impart reconstruction resistance to, at least, input features during inference generation based on a schema for weighting, at least, the input features for reconstruction resistance;

initiating deployment of a prediction head portion of the input data attack resistant inference model to the location and a shared body portion of the input data attack resistant inference model to a second location that is trustworthy;

obtaining, at the location, an inference model result using the prediction head portion and the shared body portion; and

providing computer-implemented services based on the inference model result.

18 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the schema for weighting, at least, the input features for reconstruction resistance indicates a reconstruction score threshold for an input feature of the input features based on a level of sensitivity for the input feature, the level of sensitivity being based on a level of impact of undesired access to the input feature.

19 . A data processing system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor to store instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations for managing use of inference models, the operations comprising:

identifying an occurrence of an inference model deployment event for a location;

based on the occurrence, making a determination regarding whether the location is trustworthy;

in a first instance of the determination in which the location is not trustworthy:

selecting, from a model repository, an input data attack resistant inference model, the input data attack resistant inference model being trained to impart reconstruction resistance to, at least, input features during inference generation based on a schema for weighting, at least, the input features for reconstruction resistance;

initiating deployment of a prediction head portion of the input data attack resistant inference model to the location and a shared body portion of the input data attack resistant inference model to a second location that is trustworthy;

obtaining, at the location, an inference model result using the prediction head portion and the shared body portion; and

providing computer-implemented services based on the inference model result.

20 . The data processing system of claim 19 , wherein the schema for weighting, at least, the input features for reconstruction resistance indicates a reconstruction score threshold for an input feature of the input features based on a level of sensitivity for the input feature, the level of sensitivity being based on a level of impact of undesired access to the input feature.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 11, 2024
From: EZRIELEV, OFIR; KUSHNIR, TOMER; SAVIR, AMIHAI
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.
Reel/Frame 067689/0501 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250371142A1 · Dec 4, 2025
References Cited (18)
US 12216758B2 · Liu · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20200059481A1 · Sekar · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230216691A1 · Li · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Borji, Ali, “A fresh perspective on machine unlearning, with a real-world solution!” Medium, Oct. 11, 2023, Web Page <https://medium.com/@aliborji/a-fresh-perspective-on-machine-unlearning-with-a-real-world-solution-203… [cited by applicant]
Sekhari, Ayush, et al. “Remember what you want to forget: Algorithms for machine unlearning.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021): 18075-18086 (12 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Shaik, Thanveer, et al. “Exploring the landscape of machine unlearning: A survey and taxonomy.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06360 (2023) (24 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Bharati, Subrato, et al. “Federated learning: Applications, challenges and future directions.” International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems 18.1-2 (2022): 19-35. (35 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Liu, Yang, et al. “Vertical Federated Learning: Concepts, Advances, and Challenges.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2024) (20 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Gabrielli, Edoardo, Giovanni Pica, and Gabriele Tolomei. “A survey on decentralized federated learning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04604 (2023) (31 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Holohan, Naoise. “Random Number Generators and Seeding for Differential Privacy.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03543 (2023). [cited by applicant]
Bornman, Nicholas, et al., “Random number generation and distribution out of thin (or thick) air.” Journal of Optics 22.7 (2020): 075705 (18 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Franco, Javier, et al. “A survey of honeypots and honeynets for internet of things, industrial internet of things, and cyber-physical systems.” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 23.4 (2021): 2351-2383 (34 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Ardito, Cesare G. “Contra generative AI detection in higher education assessments.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05241 (2023) (20 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Caiado, Antǒnio Junior Alves, and Michael Hahsler. “AI Content Self-Detection for Transformer-based Large Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17289 (2023) (12 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Weber-Wulff, Debora, et al. “Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 19.1 (2023): 26. (46 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Quidwai, Mujahid Ali, et al., “Beyond black box ai-generated plagiarism detection: From sentence to document level.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08122 (2023) (9 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Ren, Jie, et al. “Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02333 (2024) (33 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhong, Haonan, et al. “Copyright protection and accountability of generative ai: Attack, watermarking and attribution.” Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. 2023 (5 Pages). [cited by applicant]