IP Library Granted Patent US 12,595,049
Granted Patent B2
US 12,595,049 · App. 18/744,840 · Granted Apr 7, 2026

Method for controlling a rotorcraft, associated rotorcraft and computer program

Inventor: Robin Moret (Les Pennes Mirabeau, FR)
Assignee: AIRBUS HELICOPTERS
B64C27/57B64C27/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,595,049
App. No.
18/744,840
Granted
Apr 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling a rotorcraft, the rotorcraft comprising at least two combustion engines, at least one regulation system and one transmission system, the at least two engines being mechanically connected to the transmission system respectively by at least two couplings. Such a control method comprises at least identifying an N2-regulated engine, identifying a non-N2′-regulated engine and generating a control setpoint limit for at least one first regulation system of the N2-regulated engine and depending on the speed of rotation N2 of at least one first output shaft of the N2-regulated engine.

Claims (84)

1 . A method for controlling a rotorcraft, the rotorcraft comprising at least two combustion engines, at least one regulation system and one transmission system, the at least two engines being mechanically connected to the transmission system respectively by at least two couplings,

wherein the control method comprises at least the following steps:

identifying at least one engine referred to as an N2-regulated engine from among the at least two engines, the at least one N2-regulated engine being identified as an engine supplied with fuel with a fuel flow rate regulated as a function of the speed of rotation N2 of at least one first output shaft of the at least one N2-regulated engine and supplied by at least one first fuel metering valve controlled as a function of a flow rate setpoint transmitted by at least one first regulation system depending on the speed of rotation N2 of the at least one first output shaft;

identifying an engine referred to as a non-N2′-regulated engine from among the at least two engines, the non-N2′-regulated engine being identified as an engine supplied with fuel with a fuel flow rate that is not regulated as a function of the speed of rotation N2′ of a second output shaft and supplied by a second fuel metering valve being that is either not regulated, or is controlled as a function of a flow rate setpoint transmitted by at least one second regulation system irrespective of the speed of rotation N2′ of the second output shaft;

determining at least one first permissible input torque limit for at least one first coupling of the transmission system connected to the at least one first output shaft;

determining a second permissible input torque limit for a second coupling of the transmission system connected to the second output shaft;

determining a first current operating torque transmitted by the second output shaft to the second coupling of the transmission system;

determining at least one permissible residual combined torque limit for at least one member of a mixing unit of the transmission system, the at least one residual combined torque limit being calculated according to the following formula:

CR 1=Cadm−( C 1* Z )

where Cadm is a permissible combined torque limit for the at least one member of the mixing unit;

C 1 is the first current operating torque transmitted by the second output shaft to the second coupling of the transmission system; and

Z is a reduction coefficient between a speed of rotation of the second coupling and a speed of rotation of the at least one member of the mixing unit;

identifying a critical torque limit as being the lowest of the values from among the at least one first input torque limit, second input torque limit and at least one residual combined torque limit; and

generation of a control setpoint limit of the at least one first regulation system, the control setpoint limit being generated as a function of the critical torque limit.

2 . The control method according to claim 1 ,

wherein, before the identification of a non-N2′-regulated engine, the non-N2′-regulated engine is initially an N2′-regulated engine that is supplied with fuel with a fuel flow rate regulated at N2′ supplied by the second fuel metering valve controlled as a function of a flow rate setpoint transmitted by a second regulation system.

3 . The control method according to claim 2 ,

wherein the identification of a non-N2′-regulated engine is an identification of a fault of the second regulation system.

4 . The control method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the control setpoint limit is generated in order for a second current operating torque transmitted by the at least one first output shaft to the at least one first coupling of the transmission system to be kept equal to or less than the critical torque limit.

5 . The control method according to claim 1 ,

wherein, when the critical torque limit is one of the at least one first input torque limit and second input torque limit, the at least one first regulation system regulates the fuel flow rate supplied by the at least one first fuel metering valve as a function of a first rotational speed setpoint of at least one lift rotor of the rotorcraft.

6 . The control method according to claim 5 ,

wherein, when the critical torque limit is the at least one residual combined torque limit, the at least one first regulation system regulates the fuel flow rate supplied by the at least one first fuel metering valve as a function of a second rotational speed setpoint of the at least one lift rotor of the rotorcraft, the second rotational speed setpoint being less than the first rotational speed setpoint.

7 . The control method according to claim 1 ,

wherein, when the critical torque limit is one of the at least one first input torque limit and second input torque limit, the method comprises the following steps:

generating information representative of a first operating mode; and

displaying, on a display, at least one first limit indicator corresponding to the first operating mode.

8 . The control method according to claim 7 ,

wherein a value of the critical torque limit is assigned to a first limit indicator from among the at least one first limit indicator.

9 . The control method according to claim 1 ,

wherein, when the critical torque limit is the residual combined torque limit, the method may comprise the following steps:

generating information representative of a second operating mode; and

displaying, on a display, at least one second limit indicator corresponding to the second operating mode.

10 . The control method according to claim 7 ,

wherein, when the critical torque limit is the residual combined torque limit, the method comprising the following steps:

generating information representative of a second operating mode;

displaying, on a display, at least one second limit indicator corresponding to the second operating mode, and

wherein the method comprises the following steps;

previously determining threshold values of the at least one first limit indicator and at least one second limit indicator; and

storing the threshold values in at least one memory.

11 . The control method according to claim 1 ,

wherein, the rotorcraft comprising an automatic flight control system and at least one lift rotor provided with blades, the method comprises calculating a collective pitch margin applicable to the blades and controlling a collective pitch of the blades in order to automatically pilot the rotorcraft while complying with the at least one critical torque limit.

12 . The control method of claim 1 ,

wherein identifying the non-N2′-regulated engine comprises detecting a fault of the second regulation system and, in response to the detected fault, determining the residual combined torque limit and generating the control setpoint limit based on the critical torque limit.

13 . The control method of claim 1 ,

wherein identifying the non-N2′-regulated engine comprises detecting that a position or fuel flow permitted by the second fuel metering valve does not correspond to a flow-rate setpoint received from the second regulation system.

14 . An aircraft comprising at least two combustion engines, at least one regulation system and one transmission system, the at least two engines being mechanically connected to the transmission system respectively by at least two couplings,

wherein the rotorcraft comprises a control system configured to implement the control method according to claim 1 .

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a computer program comprising instructions that, when the program is run by the control system of the rotorcraft according to claim 14 , cause the control method to be implemented.

16 . A method for controlling a rotorcraft, the rotorcraft comprising two combustion engines, a regulation system and a transmission system, the two engines mechanically connected to the transmission system respectively by couplings,

wherein the control method comprises the following steps:

identifying one engine referred to as an N2-regulated engine from among the two engines, the one N2-regulated engine identified as an engine supplied with fuel with a fuel flow rate regulated as a function of the speed of rotation N2 of one first output shaft of the one N2-regulated engine and supplied by one first fuel metering valve controlled as a function of a flow rate setpoint transmitted by one first regulation system depending on the speed of rotation N2 of the one first output shaft;

identifying an engine referred to as a non-N2′-regulated engine from among the two engines, the non-N2′-regulated engine being identified as an engine supplied with fuel with a fuel flow rate that is not regulated as a function of the speed of rotation N2′ of a second output shaft and supplied by a second fuel metering valve being that is either not regulated, or is controlled as a function of a flow rate setpoint transmitted by one second regulation system irrespective of the speed of rotation N2′ of the second output shaft;

determining one first permissible input torque limit for one first coupling of the transmission system connected to the one first output shaft;

determining a second permissible input torque limit for a second coupling of the transmission system connected to the second output shaft;

determining a first current operating torque transmitted by the second output shaft to the second coupling of the transmission system;

determining one permissible residual combined torque limit for one member of a mixing unit of the transmission system, the one residual combined torque limit being calculated according to the following formula:

CR

1

=

Cadm

-

(

C

1

*

Z

)

where Cadm is a permissible combined torque limit for the one member of the mixing unit;

C 1 is the first current operating torque transmitted by the second output shaft to the second coupling of the transmission system; and

Z is a reduction coefficient between a speed of rotation of the second coupling and a speed of rotation of the one member of the mixing unit;

identifying a critical torque limit as being the lowest of the values from among the one first input torque limit, second input torque limit and one residual combined torque limit; and

generating a control setpoint limit of the one first regulation system, the control setpoint limit being generated as a function of the critical torque limit.

17 . The control method according to claim 16 ,

wherein, before the identification of a non-N2′-regulated engine, the non-N2′-regulated engine is initially an N2′-regulated engine that is supplied with fuel with a fuel flow rate regulated at N2′ supplied by the second fuel metering valve controlled as a function of a flow rate setpoint transmitted by a second regulation system.

18 . The control method of claim 16 ,

wherein identifying the non-N2′-regulated engine comprises detecting that a position or fuel flow permitted by the second fuel metering valve does not correspond to a flow-rate setpoint received from the second regulation system.

19 . The control method according to claim 16 ,

wherein the control setpoint limit is generated in order for a second current operating torque transmitted by the one first output shaft to the one first coupling of the transmission system to be kept equal to or less than the critical torque limit.

20 . The control method of claim 16 ,

wherein identifying the non-N2′-regulated engine comprises detecting a fault of the second regulation system and, in response to the detected fault, determining the residual combined torque limit and generating the control setpoint limit based on the critical torque limit.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2024
From: MORET, ROBIN
To: AIRBUS HELICOPTERS
Reel/Frame 067911/0631 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 2311651 · Oct 26, 2023 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250136273A1 · May 1, 2025
References Cited (36)
US 7677492B1 · Carter, Jr. · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8966904B2 · Lollini · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 8989921B2 · Nannoni · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9073635B2 · Mezan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9193453B2 · Vallart · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9463874B2 · Vallart · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9676490B2 · Vallart · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 11174016B2 · Carter, Jr. · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11203419B2 · Taheri · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11634235B1 · Hinman · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20070118254A1 · Barnes · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090139202A1 · Agrawal · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110024552A1 · Patt · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120153072A1 · Eglin · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130054053A1 · Greenfield et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130213044A1 · Lollini · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140229036A1 · Vallart · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140246541A1 · Feyzeau · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140283527A1 · Ling et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140302461A1 · Dumur · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160001880A1 · Vallart · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160221685A1 · Vallart et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160318617A1 · Massot · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170025032A1 · Dumar · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170088281A1 · Vallart · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170210480A1 · Lauder · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180178908A1 · Taheri · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190031361A1 · McCullough · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190382124A1 · Massot et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200094952A1 · Cerqueira · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220081122A1 · Gazzino · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220380020A1 · Raynaud · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240425188A1 · Mark · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250052201A1 · Alahyari · 2025 [cited by examiner]
EP 3251955A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
French Search Report for French Application No. FR2311651, Completed by the French Patent Office, Dated Apr. 15, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]