IP Library Granted Patent US 12,596,131
Granted Patent B2
US 12,596,131 · App. 17/781,249 · Granted Apr 7, 2026

System and methods for lab automation data sharing

Inventor: John Lanpheer (San Diego, CA)
Assignees: Gen-Probe Incorporated; Grifols, S.A.
G01N35/00871G01N35/00623G16H10/40G01N2035/00881
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,596,131
App. No.
17/781,249
Granted
Apr 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for sharing system information data in a network of two or more diagnostic instruments for performing assays is provided. The system information data includes operating information for the diagnostic instruments in the network. The method includes: sending a system information metadata packet to at least a first diagnostic instrument in the network, wherein the system information metadata packet, is associated with system information data on a second diagnostic instrument in the network and comprises one or more attributes of a system information data packet containing the associated system information data; receiving a request from the first diagnostic instrument to send the system information data packet, and in response to the request from the first diagnostic instrument to send the system information data packet, sending the system information data packet containing the associated system information data to the first diagnostic instrument.

Claims (19)

1 . A method for sharing system information data in a network of two or more diagnostic instruments for performing assays, wherein the system information data comprises operating information for the diagnostic instruments in the network, the method comprising:

receiving a system information metadata packet by a first diagnostic instrument in the network, wherein the system information metadata packet is associated with system information data on a second diagnostic instrument in the network and comprises one or more attributes of a system information data packet containing the associated system information data;

determining from the system information metadata packet that the first diagnostic instrument needs the associated system information data contained in the system information data packet by comparing the one or more attributes of the system information metadata packet with local data;

in response to determining from the system information metadata packet that the first diagnostic instrument needs the associated system information data contained in the system information data packet, sending a request to the second diagnostic instrument to send the system information data packet;

receiving the system information data packet containing the associated system information data from the second diagnostic instrument;

in response to receiving the system information data packet containing the associated system information data from the second diagnostic instrument, updating the local data based on the associated system information data from the second diagnostic instrument; and

operating the first diagnostic instrument to perform an assay using the updated local data.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the system information data further comprises information about at least one of the following: users, master lots for assay reagents, controls, calibrators, assay reagent kits, assay cartridges, and external quality control (EQC) definitions.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the one or more attributes of the system information metadata packet with local data comprises comparing a first time with a second time, wherein the first time represents when the system information data was last changed and the second time represents when the local data was last changed.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein comparing a first time with a second time comprises normalizing the first time by adding an offset corresponding to the second diagnostic instrument, wherein the offset is calculated based on a difference in clock time for the second diagnostic instrument and an estimated travel time from the second diagnostic instrument to the first diagnostic instrument.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein multiple values for the difference in clock time and the estimated travel time are determined from repeating the calculation and the offset is calculated based on an average of the multiple values for the difference in clock time and the estimated travel time.

6 . A network of analyzers for performing assays, each analyzer in the network of analyzers comprising a processor and instructions stored on a non-transient computer readable medium which, when executed, cause the processor to:

receive a system information metadata packet by a first analyzer in the network of analyzers, wherein the system information metadata packet is associated with system information data on a second analyzer in the network of analyzers and comprises one or more attributes of a system information data packet containing the associated system information data;

determine from the system information metadata packet that the first analyzer needs the associated system information data contained in the system information data packet by comparing the one or more attributes of the system information metadata packet with local data;

in response to determining from the system information metadata packet that the first analyzer needs the associated system information data contained in the system information data packet, send a request to the second analyzer to send the system information data packet;

receive the system information data packet containing the associated system information data from the second analyzer;

in response to receiving the system information data packet containing the associated system information data from the second analyzer, update the local data based on the associated system information data from the second analyzer; and

operate the first analyzer to perform an assay using the updated local data.

7 . The network of claim 6 , wherein the system information data comprises information about at least one of the following: users, master lots for assay reagents, controls, calibrators, assay reagent kits, assay cartridges, and external quality control (EQC) definitions.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2026
From: BIOTHERANOSTICS, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED; GEN-PROBE PRODESSE, INC.; CYTYC CORPORATION; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; GYNESONICS, INC.; BOLDER SURGICAL, LLC; FAXITRON BIOPTICS, LLC; HEALTH BEACONS, INC.; HOLOGIC, INC.
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 075462/0440 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2022
From: LANPHEER, JOHN
To: GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 060598/0203 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62947979 · Dec 13, 2019
Provisional Application 62942539 · Dec 2, 2019
Related Publication 20220412999A1 · Dec 29, 2022
References Cited (96)
US 5357095A · Weyrauch et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 6581012B1 · Aryev et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7556771B2 · Nakamura et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7732212B1 · Nakata et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7860727B2 · Showalter · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7883015B2 · Ackermann et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8065764B2 · Kramer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8318499B2 · Fritchie et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8719053B2 · Showalter et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8728007B2 · Azer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9127313B2 · Brown et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9201083B2 · Wakamiya · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9377452B2 · Bartel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9477814B2 · Wan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9835640B2 · Raicu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9852016B2 · Griffith et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9880528B2 · Mastrototaro et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9927941B2 · Steimle et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9953141B2 · Scott · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10024734B2 · Tirinato et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10181010B2 · Patel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10557862B2 · Glavina et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10867274B2 · Jones et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10970301B2 · Schiefner · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11032324B2 · Buckley · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11355220B2 · Scott et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11474533B2 · Forsberg et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11562514B2 · Tarnawski · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12155663B2 · Yada · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020082957A1 · Krassi · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050159982A1 · Showalter et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050186114A1 · Reinhardt et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060148063A1 · Fauzzi et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060178776A1 · Feingold et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070176790A1 · Klabunde et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080024301A1 · Fritchie et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080235055A1 · Mattingly et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090089004A1 · Vook et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090151479A1 · Bartel et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090204660A1 · Chappell · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100001854A1 · Kojima et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110238704A1 · Koike et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110246215A1 · Postma et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110296011A1 · Dare · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120110173A1 · Luna · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120275956A1 · Wakamiya et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120324091A9 · Raleigh · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130055373A1 · Beacham · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130124607A1 · Griffith · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130124718A1 · Griffith · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130124752A1 · Griffith · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130145299A1 · Steimle et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130274139A1 · Burd et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130326109A1 · Kivity · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130346109A1 · Gunn · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140252088A1 · Cong et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150104796A1 · Goemann-Thoss et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150314246A1 · Lehtonen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160161516A1 · Fritchie et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160356801A1 · Glavina et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170082585A1 · DeWitte et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170231508A1 · Edwards et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180032954A1 · Barnes et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180225139A1 · Hahn et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180226139A1 · Scott et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190072575A1 · Oosterbroek et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190107548A1 · Bohnsack et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20230334423A1 · Barnes · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 101910838A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 103392181A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP H08329160A · 1996 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003315345A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 3127156U · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007518479A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008224384A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 4939231B2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014062760A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015114122A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005066872A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006081103A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016040985A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016071993A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016195896A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018210721A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Beckman Coulter Inc., Automated Chemistry Analyzer, AU2700 ® User's Guide, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 1-377, Beckman Coulter Inc., USA. [cited by applicant]
Abbott, i-STAT ® 1 System Manual, Abbott Point of Care, 2017, pp. 1-606, Abbott of Point Care Inc., USA. [cited by applicant]
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Procleix ® TIGRIS System, Operator's Manual, vol. I: Operating the Instrument, 2010, pp. 1-155, Gen-Probe and Novartis Diagnositcs, USA. [cited by applicant]
Breese et al., “Labrat LIMS: An Extensible Framework for Developing Laboratory Information Management, Analysis, and Bioinformatics Solutions for Microarrays,” ACM, 2003, pp. 103-108, SAC Melbourne FL., USA. [cited by applicant]
Krunićet al., “Software for automatic control of laboratory analysis,” 21st Telecommunications forum TELFOR, 2013, pp. 1023-1026, Serbia, Belgrade. [cited by applicant]
Sparkes et al., “AutoLabDB: a substantial open source database schema to support a high-throughput automated laboratory,” BioInformatics, 2012, vol. 28(10):1390-1397, Oxford University Press, UK. [cited by applicant]
CIPO Examiner's Report, Canadian Application No. 3,163,473, Apr. 29, 2025. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 17, 2022 in International Application No. PCT/US2020/062703 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
European Examination Report dated Apr. 18, 2024 in European Application No. 20 828 718.5 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Canadian First Examiner Report dated Apr. 4, 2024 in Canadian Application No. 3,163,473 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 17, 2021 in International Application No. PCT/US2020/062703 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
APO Examiner's Report No. 1, Australian Application No. 2020398164, Nov. 10, 2025. [cited by applicant]