IP Library Granted Patent US 12,623,921
Granted Patent B2
US 12,623,921 · App. 15/733,581 · Granted May 12, 2026

Techniques for managing scale formation in reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) systems and a hybrid filtration architecture implementing the same

Inventor: Stanton Russel Smith (Waltham, MA)
Assignee: CLEAN H2O TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
C02F1/008B01D61/025B01D61/027B01D61/029B01D61/12B01D65/02B01D65/08C02F1/441C02F1/442B01D2311/14B01D2313/18B01D2313/243B01D2315/14B01D2321/02B01D2321/167B01D2321/40C02F2201/005C02F2209/005C02F2209/03C02F2209/44C02F2303/16C02F2303/20C02F2303/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,623,921
App. No.
15/733,581
Granted
May 12, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure is directed to filtering technologies that combine elements of continuous and batch NF/RO based on the constraints of the end-user facility to achieve a target balance between, for instance, recovery and power consumption, and to reduce long term operating cost of a plant. A method for extending batch operation into a second induction period with antiscalant injection is also disclosed herein, with the second induction period allowing for yet higher water recovery.

Claims (14)

1 . A method for operating a filtration system, the filtration system having an inlet fluidly coupled to at least one feed stream, at least one filter membrane fluidly coupled to the inlet to receive feed water from the at least one feed stream and at least one pump to generate a pressure to displace the feed water from the at least one feed stream into the at least one filter membrane and produce an output permeate stream, the method comprising:

prior to adding an antiscalant to the at least one feed stream, causing a first driving signal to be provided to the at least one pump to cause the generated pressure to produce the output permeate stream at a recovery rate that is substantially equal to a first target recovery rate during a first period of time, the first target recovery rate being greater than a maximum non-scaling recovery rate for the at least one filter membrane and less than 100%, wherein the maximum non-scaling recovery rate is a water recovery at which scaling initiates or when super-saturation of a scaling compound of interest first occurs while maintaining the first target recovery rate, determining when a predetermined moment will occur, the predetermined moment associated with when a pre-antiscalant maximum non-scaling recovery state will be reached for the at least one filter membrane; and

in response to determining when the predetermined moment will occur, causing one or a plurality of antiscalant doses to be provided to the at least one filter membrane prior to the pre-antiscalant maximum non-scaling recovery state being reached to increase an amount of time between when a post-antiscalant maximum non-scaling recovery state is reached and when subsequent scaling and/or fouling of the at least one filter membrane occurs; and

causing a second driving signal to be provided to the at least one pump to cause the generated pressure to produce the output permeate stream at a recovery rate substantially equal to a second target recovery rate during a second period of time which exceeds the maximum non-scaling recovery rate for the at least one filter membrane and the first target recovery rate,

wherein the at least one filter membrane is not flushed between the steps of causing the first driving signal and causing the second driving signal.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein causing the one or plurality of antiscalant doses to be provided to the at least one filter membrane includes introducing a plurality of antiscalant doses.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining when the predetermined moment will occur is based on a quality measurement of the output permeate stream.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the pre-antiscalant maximum non-scaling recovery state is detected prior to reaching the maximum non-scaling recovery state.

5 . The method of claim 1 wherein determining when the predetermined moment will occur is based on a constant duration of time.

6 . The method of claim 1 wherein determining when the predetermined moment will occur is based on a concentration of antiscalant within the at least one feed stream.

7 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising a first induction period and a second induction period, the second induction period occurring after the first induction period, the first induction period ending when the pre-antiscalant maximum non-scaling recovery state is reached and the second induction period extending from when the one or plurality of antiscalant doses are provided to the at least one filter membrane to when the post-antiscalant maximum non-scaling recovery state is reached.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the second induction period is equal to or longer than the first induction period.

9 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the second induction period has an overall duration that is at least half an overall duration of the first induction period.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein causing the first driving signal to be provided to the at least one pump exerts a pressure of 90-120 bar on the at least one filter membrane.

Assignments (4)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded May 9, 2025
From: CROSSTEK MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY LLC; CTX LLC
To: CLEAN H2O TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 071077/0522 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2025
From: SMITH, STANTON RUSSEL
To: CROSSTEK MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 071248/0769 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2023
From: CROSSTEK MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY
To: CTX, LLC
Reel/Frame 062801/0429 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 3, 2020
From: SMITH, STANTON RUSSEL
To: CROSSTEK MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 053685/0320 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62991393 · Mar 18, 2020
Related Publication 20210402353A1 · Dec 30, 2021
References Cited (25)
US 5047154A · Comstock · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5198116A · Comstock · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 9815028B2 · Subbiah · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10399878B2 · Ukai · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11117813B1 · Smith · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20040134521A1 · Liberman · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20080230476A1 · Gilron · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090173690A1 · Oklejas, Jr. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20150246831A1 · Jha · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160046509A1 · Ukai · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170203979A1 · Tarquin · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190002304A1 · Piironen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190224624A1 · Kitamura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200197875A1 · Yoon · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200353421A1 · Anditya · 2020 [cited by examiner]
EP 3470378A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2005056166A1 · 2005 [cited by examiner]
WO 2007147198A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 22, 2020, issued in PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/034674, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cabassud, et al., Neural networks; a tool to improve UF plant productivity, Desalination 145 (2002) pp. 223-231. [cited by applicant]
Delgrange, et al., Modelling of ultrafiltration fouling by neural network, Desalination 118 (1998) 213-217. [cited by applicant]
Delgrange-Vincent; et al., Neural networks for long term prediction of fouling and backwash efficiency in ultrafiltration for drinking water production, Desalination 131 (2000) 353-362. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2021, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/247,986, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance mailed May 19, 2021, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 17/247,986, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report from related application 20925933.2 dated Apr. 25, 2024. [cited by applicant]