IP Library Granted Patent US 12,629,821
Granted Patent B2
US 12,629,821 · App. 17/850,765 · Granted May 19, 2026

Systems and methods for prevention of surgical mistakes

Inventors: Joëlle Barral (Mountain View, CA); Martin Habbecke (Palo Alto, CA); Daniele Piponi (Oakland, CA); Thomas Teisseyre (Pacifica, CA)
Assignee: Verily Life Sciences LLC
B25J9/163A61B34/25A61B34/30G05B13/028G05B13/04G06N20/00G16H40/63G16H50/20G16H50/50G16H50/70A61B2034/254A61B34/32A61B34/37
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,629,821
App. No.
17/850,765
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus, system and process for guiding a surgeon during a medical procedure to prevent surgical mistakes are described. The system may include a machine learning medical procedure server that generates one or more machine learning medical procedure models using, at least, medical procedure data captured during medical procedures performed at a plurality of different medical procedure systems. The system may also include a medical procedure system communicably coupled with the machine learning medical procedure server that receives a selected machine learning medical procedure model from the machine learning medical procedure server, and utilizes the selected machine learning medical procedure model during a corresponding medical procedure to control one or more operations of the medical procedure system.

Claims (40)

1 . A method for preventing surgical mistakes, the method comprising:

controlling one or more operations of a medical procedure system during a medical procedure;

wherein controlling the one or more operations of the medical procedure system comprises:

determining at least one expected object expected to be visible during a current step of the corresponding medical procedure;

providing an image of a field of view during the current step as input to a machine learning medical procedure model trained to identify objects; and

in response to determining that the at least one expected object was not identified by the machine learning medical procedure model in the image of the field of view during the current step, preventing a movement of a medical tool coupled with the medical procedure system based on the current step and the determination that the at least one expected object is not visible.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one expected object includes at least one of an anatomical structure and a medical tool.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying the current step of the medical procedure.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein identifying the current step of the medical procedure includes identifying the current step of the medical procedure using one or more sensors of a medical tool.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning medical procedure model is trained to identify at least one of anatomical structures and medical tools visible during the current step of the medical procedure.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the medical procedure system analyzes the medical procedure using the machine learning medical procedure model in real time during the medical procedure.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the one or more operations of the medical procedure system comprises controlling motion of a medical tool coupled with the medical procedure system during the medical procedure.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the medical tool comprises a robotically assisted medical device controlled by a medical professional performing the medical procedure.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the one or more operations of the medical procedure system comprises:

preventing a requested motion of a medical tool based on one or more characteristics of the requested motion;

generating a graphical user interface that requests an acknowledgement of a medical professional to allow the requested motion; and

enabling the medical tool to move in accordance with the requested motion.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

tracking, by the medical procedure system, sensor data generated during the corresponding medical procedure from medical tool sensors coupled with the medical procedure system; and

providing the tracked sensor data for generating or refining a machine learning medical procedure model.

11 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon that, in response to execution by one or more processors of a medical procedure system, cause the medical procedure system to perform actions for preventing surgical mistakes, the actions comprising:

controlling one or more operations of a medical procedure system during a medical procedure;

wherein controlling the one or more operations of the medical procedure system comprises:

determining at least one expected object expected to be visible during a current step of the corresponding medical procedure;

providing an image of a field of view during the current step as input to a machine learning medical procedure model trained to identify objects; and

in response to determining that the at least one expected object was not identified by the machine learning medical procedure model in the image of the field of view during the current step, preventing a movement of a medical tool coupled with the medical procedure system based on the current step and the determination that the at least one expected object is not visible.

12 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the at least one expected object includes at least one of an anatomical structure and a medical tool.

13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the actions further comprise identifying the current step of the medical procedure.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein identifying the current step of the medical procedure includes identifying the current step of the medical procedure using one or more sensors of a medical tool.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning medical procedure model is trained to identify at least one of anatomical structures and medical tools visible during the current step of the medical procedure.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the medical procedure system analyzes the medical procedure using the machine learning medical procedure model in real time during the medical procedure.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein controlling the one or more operations of the medical procedure system comprises controlling motion of a medical tool coupled with the medical procedure system during the medical procedure.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the medical tool comprises a robotically assisted medical device controlled by a medical professional performing the medical procedure.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein controlling the one or more operations of the medical procedure system comprises:

preventing a requested motion of a medical tool based on one or more characteristics of the requested motion;

generating a graphical user interface that requests an acknowledgement of a medical professional to allow the requested motion; and

enabling the medical tool to move in accordance with the requested motion.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the actions further comprise:

tracking, by the medical procedure system, sensor data generated during the corresponding medical procedure from medical tool sensors coupled with the medical procedure system; and

providing the tracked sensor data for generating or refining a machine learning medical procedure model.

Assignments (1)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 1, 2026
From: VERILY LIFE SCIENCES LLC
To: VERILY HEALTH INC.
Reel/Frame 075367/0775 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15686840 · Aug 25, 2017
Provisional Application 62383838 · Sep 6, 2016
Related Publication 20220324102A1 · Oct 13, 2022
References Cited (30)
US 5791907A · Ramshaw et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 7966269B2 · Bauer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8560047B2 · Haider et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9129054B2 · Nawana et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20070270685A1 · Kang et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20110166703A1 · Byrne et al. · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130331730A1 · Fenech et al. · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140142591A1 · Alvarez et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150306763A1 · Meier et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150332196A1 · Stiller et al. · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160228204A1 · Quaid et al. · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160331474A1 · Lacal et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170084036A1 · Pheiffer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170165013A1 · Itkowitz · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170334066A1 · Levine · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190333638A1 · Elidan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 101821743A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 104914726A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105144171A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
ES 2534140B1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017151904A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017216645A2 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Office Action mailed Oct. 21, 2022, in corresponding Chinese application No. 201780054318.X (Chinese version), 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC mailed Jul. 15, 2020, issued in European Application No. 17767971.9, filed Sep. 1, 2017, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2017/049971, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Dec. 7, 2017, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed Feb. 26, 2020, issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2019-510306, filed Sep. 1, 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chui, Chee-Kong, Binh P. Nguyen, and Rong Wen. “Development of a cognitive engine for balancing automation and human control of surgical robotic system.” In 2014 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Am… [cited by applicant]
Berthet-Rayne, Pierre, Maura Power, Hawkeye King, and Guang-Zhong Yang. “Hubot: A three state Human-Robot collaborative framework for bimanual surgical tasks based on learned models.” In 2016 IEEE International Conferen… [cited by applicant]
Lin, Henry C., Izhak Shafran, David Yuh, and Gregory D. Hager. “Towards automatic skill evaluation: Detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions.” Computer Aided Surgery 11, No. 5 (2006): 220-230. (Year… [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report mailed Jun. 15, 2022, issued in corresponding European Application No. EP 21 21 4576 filed Sep. 1, 2017, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]