IP Library Granted Patent US 12,630,833
Granted Patent B2
US 12,630,833 · App. 18/423,378 · Granted May 19, 2026

Compositions and methods for RNA-encoded DNA-replacement of alleles

Inventors: Joseph Matthew Watts (Cary, NC); Aaron Hummel (Hillsborough, NC); Yongjoo Kim (Chapel Hill, NC); Shai Joshua Lawit (Durham, NC); David Schwark (New Hill, NC)
Assignee: Pairwise Plants Services, Inc.
C12N15/82C12N9/22C12N15/113C12N2310/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,630,833
App. No.
18/423,378
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

This invention relates to recombinant nucleic constructs comprising Type II CRISPR-Cas effector proteins, reverse transcriptases and extended guide nucleic acids and methods of use thereof for modifying nucleic acids in plants.

Claims (44)

1 . A method of modifying a target nucleic acid, the method comprising: contacting the target nucleic acid with

(a) a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein;

(b) a reverse transcriptase; and

(c) an extended guide nucleic acid, wherein the extended guide nucleic acid comprises:

(i) a Type II CRISPR nucleic acid; and

(ii) an extended portion comprising a primer binding site and a reverse transcriptase template (RT template),

wherein the extended portion of the extended guide nucleic acid comprises an RT template and a primer binding site, optionally wherein the extended portion is fused to either the 5′ end or 3′ end of the Type II CRISPR nucleic acid and/or the RT template of the extended portion is 5′ of the primer binding site,

wherein the target nucleic acid is double stranded comprising a first strand and a second strand, the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a double stranded nuclease that cuts the first strand and the second strand of the target nucleic acid resulting in a double stranded break, and the primer binding site binds to the first strand of the target nucleic acid, which is the target strand and same strand to which the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is recruited, thereby modifying the target nucleic acid,

wherein the primer binding site has length of about eight nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides, and

wherein the RT template has a length of about seven to about 100 nucleotides.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the primer binding site is at least 45 nucleotides in length, or about 45 nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the RT template is a length of about seven nucleotides to about 40 nucleotides.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the extended portion of the extended guide RNA is linked to the Type II CRISPR nucleic acid and/or the tracrRNA via a linker, optionally wherein the linker is 1 to 100 nucleotides in length.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein when the extended portion is located 5′ of the crRNA, the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is modified to reduce or eliminate self-processing RNAse activity.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising contacting the target nucleic acid with a Dna2 polypeptide and/or a 5′ flap endonuclease (FEN), optionally wherein the FEN and/or Dna2 polypeptide is overexpressed (in the presence of the target nucleic acid), and/or optionally wherein the FEN is a fusion protein comprising an FEN domain fused to the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein and/or wherein the Dna2 polypeptide is a fusion protein comprising an Dna2 domain fused to the or Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein.

7 . A method of modifying a target nucleic acid, the method comprising: contacting the target nucleic acid with

(a) a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein;

(b) a reverse transcriptase, and

(c) an extended guide nucleic acid, wherein the extended guide nucleic acid comprises:

(i) a Type II CRISPR nucleic acid; and

(ii) an extended portion comprising a primer binding site and a reverse transcriptase template (RT template),

wherein the extended portion of the extended guide nucleic acid comprises an RT template and a primer binding site, optionally wherein the extended portion is fused to either the 5′ end or 3′ end of the Type II CRISPR nucleic acid and/or the RT template of the extended portion is 5′ of the primer binding site,

wherein the target nucleic acid is double stranded comprising a first strand and a second strand, the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a double stranded nuclease that cuts the first strand and the second strand of the target nucleic acid resulting in a double stranded break, and the primer binding site binds to the first strand of the target nucleic acid, which is the target strand and same strand to which the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is recruited,

wherein the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector fusion protein and/or the reverse transcriptase is a reverse transcriptase fusion protein, wherein the Type II CRISPR-Cas fusion protein, the reverse transcriptase fusion protein and/or the extended guide nucleic acid is fused to one or more components that recruit the reverse transcriptase to the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein, optionally the one or more components recruit via protein-protein interactions, protein-RNA interactions, and/or chemical interactions, thereby modifying the target nucleic acid,

wherein the primer binding site has length of about eight nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides, and

wherein the RT template has a length of about seven to about 100 nucleotides.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector fusion protein comprising a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein domain fused to a peptide tag and the reverse transcriptase is a reverse transcriptase fusion protein comprising a reverse transcriptase domain fused (linked) to an affinity polypeptide that binds to the peptide tag, optionally wherein the target nucleic acid is contacted with two or more reverse transcriptase fusion proteins, optionally wherein the peptide tag comprises a GCN4 peptide tag, a c-Myc affinity tag, an HA affinity tag, a His affinity tag, an S affinity tag, a methionine-His affinity tag, an RGD-His affinity tag, a FLAG octapeptide, a strep tag or strep tag II, a V5 tag, and/or a VSV-G epitope and/or the affinity polypeptide is an antibody, an affibody, an anticalin, a monobody and/or a DARPin, optionally wherein the antibody is an scFv antibody.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the peptide tag comprises 2 or more copies of the peptide tag.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the extended guide nucleic acid is linked to an RNA recruiting motif, and the reverse transcriptase is a reverse transcriptase fusion protein comprising a reverse transcriptase domain fused to an affinity polypeptide that binds to the RNA recruiting motif, optionally wherein the target nucleic acid is contacted with two or more reverse transcriptase fusion proteins, optionally wherein the extended guide RNA is linked to two or more RNA recruiting motifs, optionally wherein the RNA recruiting motif and corresponding affinity polypeptide are a telomerase Ku binding motif and the affinity polypeptide of Ku; a telomerase Sm7 binding motif and the affinity polypeptide of Sm7; an MS2 phage operator stem-loop and the affinity polypeptide MS2 Coat Protein (MCP), a PP7 phage operator stem-loop and the affinity polypeptide PP7 Coat Protein (PCP); an SfMu phage Com stem-loop and the affinity polypeptide Com RNA binding protein; a PUF binding site (PBS) and the affinity polypeptide Pumilio/fem-3 mRNA binding factor (PUF); and/or a synthetic RNA-aptamer and the corresponding aptamer ligand.

11 . A method of modifying a target nucleic acid, the method comprising: contacting the target nucleic acid with

(a) a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein;

(b) a reverse transcriptase;

(c) an extended guide nucleic acid, wherein the extended guide nucleic acid comprises:

(i) a Type II CRISPR nucleic acid; and

(ii) an extended portion comprising a primer binding site and a reverse transcriptase template (RT template); and

(d) a 5′-3′ exonuclease,

wherein the extended portion of the extended guide nucleic acid comprises an RT template and a primer binding site, optionally wherein the extended portion is fused to either the 5′ end or 3′ end of the Type II CRISPR nucleic acid and/or the RT template of the extended portion is 5′ of the primer binding site,

wherein the target nucleic acid is double stranded comprising a first strand and a second strand, the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a double stranded nuclease that cuts the first strand and the second strand of the target nucleic acid resulting in a double stranded break, and the primer binding site binds to the first strand of the target nucleic acid, which is the target strand and same strand of the target nucleic acid to which the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is recruited, thereby modifying the target nucleic acid,

wherein the primer binding site has length of about eight nucleotides to about 100 nucleotides, and

wherein the RT template has a length of about seven to about 100 nucleotides.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the 5′-3′ exonuclease is fused to a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein, optionally wherein the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a Type II CRISPR-Cas fusion protein.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein (a) the 5′-3′ exonuclease is a fusion protein comprising the 5′-3′ exonuclease fused to a peptide tag and the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a fusion protein comprising a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein domain fused to an affinity polypeptide that is capable of binding to the peptide tag, (b) the 5′-3′ exonuclease is a fusion protein comprising the 5′-3′ exonuclease fused to an affinity polypeptide that is capable of binding to the peptide tag and the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein is a fusion protein comprising a Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein domain fused to a peptide tag, or (c) the 5′-3′ exonuclease is a fusion protein comprising the 5′-3′ exonuclease fused to an affinity polypeptide that is capable of binding to an RNA recruiting motif and the extended guide nucleic acid is linked to an RNA recruiting motif.

14 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the 5′-3′ exonuclease is a RecE exonuclease, a RecJ exonuclease, a T5 exonuclease or a T7exonuclease.

15 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising contacting the target nucleic acid with a Dna2 polypeptide and/or a 5′ flap endonuclease (FEN), optionally wherein the FEN and/or Dna2 polypeptide is overexpressed in the presence of the target nucleic acid, and/or optionally wherein the FEN is a fusion protein comprising an FEN domain fused to the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein and/or wherein the Dna2 polypeptide is a fusion protein comprising an Dna2 domain fused to the Type II CRISPR-Cas effector protein.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 17090334 · Nov 5, 2020
Provisional Application 62930836 · Nov 5, 2019
Related Publication 20240158804A1 · May 16, 2024
References Cited (131)
US 5459252A · Conkling et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5604121A · Hilder et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5625136A · Koziel et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5641876A · Mcelroy et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6040504A · Rice et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7141424B2 · Shin et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7166770B2 · Hohn et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7579516B2 · Boudreau · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 9790490B2 · Zhang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9982053B2 · Pantaleo et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10421972B2 · Lira et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11293019B2 · Park · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11447770B1 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20140123341A1 · Azhakanandam · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170219596A1 · Tanenbaum et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170247671A1 · Yung et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180155716A1 · Zhang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180170985A1 · Tremblay et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180298392A1 · Cotta-Ramusino · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180327785A1 · Cigan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190010441A1 · Kindaichi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190010481A1 · Joung et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190100775A1 · Donohoue et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190136249A1 · Sakai et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190161760A1 · Hummel · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190203216A1 · Jacobsen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190218547A1 · Lee et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190256900A1 · Zhang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210147862A1 · Hummel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210301272A1 · Xu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220145334A1 · Kim et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220356469A1 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230049737A1 · Zhang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230078265A1 · Liu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230090221A1 · Liu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230357766A1 · Liu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240218358A1 · Kim et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240417753A1 · Liu et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
EP 0255378A2 · 1988 [cited by applicant]
EP 0342926A2 · 1989 [cited by applicant]
EP 0452269A2 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020530287A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2022526908A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 9307278A1 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
WO 9942587A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 0173087A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015026886A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017189308A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018022634A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018049168A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018136783A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018202199A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019161290A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019217941A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019217943A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020191153A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020191234A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020191241A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020191243A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020191249A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020191171A9 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021092130A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Rocha et al. (Published: 2004,. In Proceedings. Fourth IEEE Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (pp. 149-155), IEEE). (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Anzalone et al. (Published online :Oct. 21, 2019, Journal: Nature 574: 149-178). (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Chen et al. (Published:2016, Journal: Molecular Therapy vol. 24(9): 1508-1510). (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Balakrishnan et al. “Flap Endonuclease 1” Annual Review of Biochemistry, 82:119-138 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report corresponding to EP 20884787.1, dated Nov. 23, 2023 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report corresponding to European Patent Application No. 20879965.0 (7 pages) (dated Nov. 8, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Gilbreth et al. “Structural Insights for Engineering Binding Proteins Based on Non-Antibody Scaffolds” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 22(4):413-420 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Grissa et al. “CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats” Nucleic Acids Research, 35:W52-W57 (2007). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/057121 (21 pages) (mailed Feb. 8, 2021). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/058082 (16 pages) (mailed Feb. 8, 2021). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/058235 (28 pages) (mailed May 3, 2022). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCTU.S. Pat. No. 2020059045, mailed Feb. 9, 2021, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jankowsky et al. “Specificity and non-specificity in RNA-protein interactions” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 16(9):533-544 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al. “CRISPR-assisted editing of bacterial genomes” Nature Biotechnology, 31(3):233-239 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Levin et al. “Dynamic interactions between transposable elements and their hosts” Nat. Rev Genet, 12:1-31 2011. [cited by applicant]
Mali et al. “Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology” Nature Methods, 10(10):957-963 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Mohr et al. “A Reverse Transcriptase-Cas1 Fusion Protein Contains a Cas6 Domain Required for Both CRISPR RNA Biogenesis and RNA Spacer Acquisition” Molecular Cell, 72(4):700-714 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Ran et al. “Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system” Nature Protocols, 8(11):2281-2308 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Sha et al. “Monobodies and other synthetic binding proteins for expanding protein science” Protein Science, 26:910-924 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Sundararaman et al. “Resources for the Comprehensive Discovery of Functional RNA Elements” Mol Cell, 61:903-913 2016. [cited by applicant]
Tak et al. “Inducible and multiplex gene regulation using CRISPR-Cpf1-based transcription factors” Nature Methods, 14(12):1163-1166 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Tanenbaum et al. “A protein tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging” Cell 159, 635-646 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Vob et al. “Chemically induced dimerization: reversible and spatiotemporal control of protein function in cells” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 28:194-201 (2015). [cited by applicant]
“New Kid On The Block: Prime Editing as a Precision Gene Editing Tool”, A Comprehensive Guide on CRISPR Methods, Chapter 4. Retrieved from: https://www.synthego.com/guide/crispr-methods/prime-editing on Dec. 17, 2022, 3… [cited by applicant]
“New Kid On The Block: Prime Editing as a Precision Gene Editing Tool”, A Comprehensive Guide on CRISPR Methods, Chapter 4. Retrieved from: https://www.synthego.com/guide/crispr-methods/prime-editing on Sep. 14, 2023, 7… [cited by applicant]
“Science”, Prime Medicine. Retrieved from: https://primemedicine.com/science/ on Dec. 17, 2022, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Adikusuma, Fatwa , et al., “Optimized nickase- and nuclease-based prime editing in human and mouse cells”, Nucleic Acids Research, 49(18), 2021, 10785-10795. [cited by applicant]
Anzalone, Andrew V., et al., “Programmable large DNA deletion, replacement, integration, and inversion with twin prime editing and site-specific recombinases”, bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.01.466790, 20… [cited by applicant]
Anzalone, Andrew V., et al., “Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA”, Nature 576, 2019, 149-157. [cited by applicant]
Anzalone, Andrew V., et al., “Supplementary Information for Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA”, Nature 576, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Baba, Misato , et al., “Further increase in thermostability of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase by mutational combination”, Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 551-557 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Bandyopadhyay, Anindya , et al., “CRISPR-Cas12a (Cpf1): A Versatile Tool in the Plant Genome Editing Tool Box for Agricultural Advancement”, Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 11, Article 584151 (2020) (17 pages). [cited by applicant]
Barrangou, Rodolphe , “Diversity of CRISPR-Cas immune systems and molecular machines”, Genome Biology, 16(247), 2015, 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Briner, Alexandra E., et al., “Lactobacillus buchneri Genotyping on the Basis of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR) Locus Diversity”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 80(3), 2014, 9… [cited by applicant]
Cofsky, Joshua C., et al., “CRISPR-Cas12a exploits R-loop asymmetry to form double-strand breaks”, eLife. 9: e55143, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Epstein, Benjamin E., et al., “Engineering a Self-Inactivating CRISPR System for AAV Vectors”, Mol. Ther., 24: S50, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Gaudelli, Nicole M., et al., “Programmable base editing of A⋅T to G⋅C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage”, Nature. 551(7681), 2017, pp. 464-471. [cited by applicant]
Jiang, Yuan-Yuan , et al., “Prime editing efficiently generates W542L and S6211 double mutations in two ALS genes in maize”, Genome Biology, 21:257 (2020) (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Jiang, Fuguo , et al., “Structures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage”, Science. 351 (6275): 867-871, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Kim, Y. Bill , et al., “A novel mechanistic framework for precise sequence replacement using reverse transcriptase and diverse CRISPR-Cas systems”, bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.13.520319, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Kim, Hui Kwon , et al., “Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells”, Nature Biotechnology. 39: 198-206 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Li , et al., “CRISPR-Cas12a has both cis-and trans-cleavage activities on single-stranded DNA”, Cell research, 28(4), 2018, 491-493. [cited by applicant]
Li , et al., “Supplementary Information—CRISPR-Cas12a has both cis-and trans-cleavage activities on single-stranded DNA”, Cell research, 28(4), 2018, 491-493. [cited by applicant]
Lin, Qiupeng , et al., “Prime genome editing in rice and wheat”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 38, pp. 582-585 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Mali, Prashant , et al., “RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9”, Science, 339(6121), 2013, 823-826. [cited by applicant]
Ming, Meiling , et al., “CRISPR-Cas12b enables efficient plant genome engineering”, Nature Plants, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 202-208 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Nelson, James W., et al., “Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency”, Nat Biotechnol. 40(3): 402-410, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Orlova, Marianna , et al., “Reverse transcriptase of Moloney murine leukemia virus binds to eukaryotic release factor 1 to modulate suppression of translational termination”, Cell, 115(3), 2003, 319-331. [cited by applicant]
Rocha, K. , et al., “Design of Specie-Specific Primers for Virus Diagnosis in Plants with PCR”, Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, 2004, pp. 149-155. [cited by applicant]
Xu, Rongfang , et al., “Development of Plant Prime-Editing Systems for Precise Genome Editing”, Plant Communications 1, 100043 (2020) (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Yamano, Takashi , et al., “Structural Basis for the Canonical and Non-canonical PAM Recognition by CRISPR-Cpf1”, Mol Cell 67(4), 2017, 633-645.e3. [cited by applicant]
Yan, Winston X., et al., “Functionally diverse type V CRISPR-Cas systems”, Science 363, 2019, 88-91. [cited by applicant]
Zhong , et al., “Cpf1 proteins excise CRIS PR RNAs from mRNA transcripts in mammalian cells”, Nature chemical biology, 13(8), 2017, 839-841. [cited by applicant]
Zhong , et al., “Supplementary Information—Cpf1 proteins excise CRIS PR RNAs from mRNA transcripts in mammalian cells”, Nature chemical biology, 13(8), 2017, 839-841. [cited by applicant]
Jeon, et al., “Direct observation of DNA target searching and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas12a”, Nature Communications 9:2777, 2018 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Swarts, et al., “Cas9 versus Cas12a/Cpf1: Structure-function comparisons and implications for genome editing”, WIREs RNA, 9(5):e1481 (2018). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to PCT/US2024/061211; mailed Apr. 14, 2025 (22 pages). [cited by applicant]
Li, et al., “Base editing with a Cpf1-cytidine deaminase fusion”, Nature Biotechnology, 36:324-327, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Schubert, et al., “Optimized design parameters for CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a homology-directed repair”, Scientific Reports 11:19482, 2021 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
Tong, et al., “The Versatile Type V CRISPR Effectors and Their Application Prospects”, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 8:622103, 2021 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Allen, et al., “Using Synthetically Engineered Guide RNAs to Enhance CRISPR Genome Editing Systems in Mammalian Cells”, Frontiers in Genome Editing, 2:617910 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Ma, et al., “MiCas9 increases large size gene knock-in rates and reduces undesirable on-target and off-target indel edits”, Nature Communications, 11:6082 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Yu, et al., “Exploiting preQ1 riboswitches to regulate ribosomal frameshifting”, ACS Chemical Biology, 8:733-740 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Ageely, et al., “Gene editing with CRISPR-Cas12a guides possessing ribose-modified pseudoknot handles”, Nature Communications, 12(6591), 2021. [cited by applicant]
Mackay, et al., “The prospects for designer single-stranded RNA-binding proteins”, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18(3):256-261, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Sato, et al., “IPknot: fast and accurate prediction of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots using integer programming”, Bioinformatics, 27(13):185-i93, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Song, et al., “Generation of a more efficient prime editor 2 by addition of the Rad51 DNA-binding domain”, Nature Communications, 12(5617), 2021. [cited by applicant]
Theimer, et al., “Examining the effects of 2′ -OH substitutions on the structure and stability of the [cited by applicant]
Wyatt, et al., “RNA pseudoknots: Stability and loop size requirements”, Journal of Molecular Biology, 214 (2):455-470, 1990. [cited by applicant]