IP Library Granted Patent US 12,637,521
Granted Patent B2
US 12,637,521 · App. 18/644,757 · Granted May 26, 2026

Low-viscosity antigen binding proteins and methods of making them

Inventors: Joon Hoi Huh (Culver City, CA); Riki Stevenson (Ventura, CA); Pavel Bondarenko (Thousand Oaks, CA); Andrew Nichols (Calabasas, CA); Da Ren (Thousand Oaks, CA); Neeraj Jagdish Agrawal (Natick, MA); Richard Smith (Belmont, CA)
Assignee: AMGEN INC.
C07K16/40C07K16/2869C07K2317/21C07K2317/24C07K2317/52C07K2317/55C07K2317/90C07K2317/92C07K2317/94G01N11/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,637,521
App. No.
18/644,757
Granted
May 26, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention concerns a method for preparing antigen binding proteins specific for PCSK9 with reduced viscosity. The method proceeds by replacing residues in high viscosity variable domain subfamilies with residues in correlating low viscosity subfamilies. The method further comprises substituting residues in the Fc domain with residues associated with low viscosity and adding charged residues to the C-terminus of the Fc domain. The present invention further concerns antigen binding proteins produced by this method.

Claims (16)

1 . A method of reducing the viscosity of an antibody of the VH3|3-33 germline subfamily, which comprises making viscosity- reducing substitutions 1X 4 , 17X 5 , and 85X 6 in the

VH3 amino acid sequence of the antibody wherein X 4 is selected from D and E, X 5 is selected from G, A, V, I, L, and M, and W, and X 6 is selected from G, A, V, I, L, and M; and

wherein the amino acids are numbered according to the Aho numbering system.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the viscosity-reducing substitutions comprise 1E, 17G, and 85A.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody comprises a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 160, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 158.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody comprises a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 144, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 142.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody comprises a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 128, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 126.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody comprises a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 120, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 118.

7 . An antibody of the VH3|3-33 germline subfamily, which comprises

a VH3 sequence comprising viscosity- reducing substitutions 1X 4 , 17X 5 , and 85X 6 , wherein X 4 is selected from D and E, X 5 is selected from G, A, V, I, L, and M, and X 6 is selected from G, A, V, I, L, and M;

wherein the amino acids in subparagraphs a, b, and e are numbered according to the Aho numbering system.

8 . The antibody of claim 7 , wherein the viscosity-reducing substitutions comprise 1E, 17G, and 85A.

9 . The antibody of claim 7 , comprising a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 160, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 158.

10 . The antibody of claim 7 , comprising a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 144, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 142.

11 . The antibody of claim 7 , comprising a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 128, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 126.

12 . The antibody of claim 7 , comprising a heavy chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 120, except for substitutions 1E, 17G, and 85A, and a light chain amino acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 118.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2024
From: HUH, JOON; STEVENSON, RIKI; BONDARENKO, PAVEL; NICHOLS, ANDREW; REN, DA; AGRAWAL, NEERAJ JAGDISH; SMITH, RICHARD
To: AMGEN INC.
Reel/Frame 068014/0804 →
Continuity (6)
Division 17346156 · Jun 11, 2021
Division 16338292
Provisional Application 62546469 · Aug 16, 2017
Provisional Application 62430773 · Dec 6, 2016
Provisional Application 62401770 · Sep 29, 2016
Related Publication 20240343832A1 · Oct 17, 2024
References Cited (96)
US 4816397A · Boss · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4816567A · Cabilly · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 8545849B2 · Borras et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9695233B2 · Duerr et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10294303B2 · Yie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10570198B2 · Borras et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20130064825A1 · Chan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130189277A1 · Walsh · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140017244A1 · Duerr et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170275370A1 · Yie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190276546A1 · Yie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200095310A1 · Regula et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210047434A1 · Chan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 0173494A2 · 1986 [cited by applicant]
EP 0171496B1 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
EP 3026061A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
GB 2177096B · 1989 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015527064A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014009465A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011017330 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012125495A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012154999A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017112824A2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Yadav. Establishing a Link Between Amino Acid Sequences and Self-Associating and Viscoelastic Behavior of Two Closely Related Monoclonal Antibodies, Pharm Res., 28(7):1750-1764. (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Armstrong, G.B., et al., “A framework for the biophysical screening of antibody mutations targeting solvent-accessible hydrophobic and electrostatic patches for enhanced viscosity profiles”, Computational and Structural… [cited by applicant]
EPO Communication issued to EP Application No. 17794111.9, dated Mar. 27, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion issued to Singapore Application No. 10201912565Q, Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, dated Mar. 10, 2025. [cited by applicant]
BR Application 112019006486-9 Office Action, 6 pages, (Oct. 5, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Chaudhri, et al., Antibodies: Insights from Coarse-Grained Modeling, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 117, No. 5, 7 (Feb. 2013). [cited by applicant]
CN Application No. 201780073880.7, Office Action (Jul. 22, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Dudgeon, et al. General strategy for the generation of human antibody variable domains with increased aggregation resistance; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Early Editio… [cited by applicant]
IN Application 201917016348, Office Action, Mar. 27, 2023. [cited by applicant]
JP Application 2019-516945 Office Action (Nov. 4, 2022) 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action BR 202103596 (Aug. 4, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Office Action JP 2022-043944 (Jul. 24, 2023). [cited by applicant]
Yamauchi, Shape and size of proteins in hydrodynamics, Kagaku To Seibutsu, 1982, vol. 20, No., 5, pp. 296-304. [cited by applicant]
Ye, J. et al., “Characterization of a Silencer Regulatory Element in the Human Interferon-γ Promoter,” J Biol Chem., 269(41):25728-25734 (1994). [cited by applicant]
Carraway, K. L. and Koshland, Jr., D. E., “Carbodiimide modification of proteins,” Methods Enzymol., 25:616-623 (1972). [cited by applicant]
Chaudhri et al., “The Role of Amino Acid Sequence in the Self-Association of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: Insights from Coarse-Grained Modeling,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 117 (5), pp. 1269-1279 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Cheng et al., Linking the Solution Viscosity of an IgG2 Monoclonal Antibody to its Structure as a Function of pH and Temperature, J. Pharm Sci. (2013), 102:4291-4304. [cited by applicant]
Chothia et al., “Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 196 (4), pp. 901-917 (1987). [cited by applicant]
Chothia, C. et al., “Structural repertoire of the human VH segments,” J. Mol. Biol., 227(3):799 817 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Connolly et al., Weak Interactions Govern the Viscosity of Concentrated Antibody Solutions: High-Throughput Analysis Using the Diffusion Interaction Parameter, Biophys. J. (2012), 103:69-78. [cited by applicant]
Diebolder, C. A. et al., “Complement is Activated by IgG Hexamers Assembled at the Cell Surface,” Science, 343(6176):1260-1263 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Edelman, G. M. et al., “The covalent structure of an entire gamma immunoglobulin molecule,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 63(1):78-85 (1969). [cited by applicant]
Ewert, S. et al., “Biophysical properties of human antibody variable domains,” J. Mol. Biol., 325:531-553 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Ewert, S. et al., “Stability improvement of antibodies for extracellular and intracellular applications: CDR grafting to stable frameworks and structure-based framework engineering,” Methods, 34(2):184-199 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Ewert, S. et al., “Structure-based improvement of the biophysical properties of immunoglobulin VH domains with a generalizable approach,” Biochemistry, 42:1517-1528 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Ford, C. F. et al., “Fusion tails for the recovery and purification of recombinant proteins,” Protein Expression and Purification, 2(2-3):95-107 (1991). [cited by applicant]
Grussenmeyer et al., “Complexes of polyoma virus medium T antigen and cellular proteins”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 82 (23), pp. 7952-7954 (1985). [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., Structure-Activity Relationship for Hydrophobic Salts as Viscosity-Lowering Excipients for Concentrated Solutions of Monoclonal Antibodies, Pharm Res (2012), 29(11):3102-3109. [cited by applicant]
Honegger et al., “Yet Another Numbering Scheme for Immunoglobulin Variable Domains: An Automatic Modeling and Analysis Tool”, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 309 (3), pp. 657-670 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Hopp et al., “A Short Polypeptide Marker Sequence Useful For Recombinant Protein Identification And Purification”, Biotechnology, vol. 6, pp. 1204-1210 (1988). [cited by applicant]
Horton et al., “Molecular Biology of PCSK9: Its Role in LDL Metabolism”, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 32 (2), pp. 71-77 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Jefferis, R. and Lefranc, M-P., Human immunoglobulin allotypes: possible implications for immunogenicity, mAbs, 1:332-338 (2009). [cited by applicant]
JP Patent Application No. 2019-516945 Office Action (Jun. 7, 2022). [cited by applicant]
JP-2019-516945 Office Action issued Sep. 14, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Kabat et al., “Sequences of proteins of immunological interest”, 5th Ed., U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Table of Contents (1991). [cited by applicant]
Kanai et al., “Reversible self-association of a concentrated monoclonal antibody solution mediated by Fab-Fab interaction that impacts solution viscosity”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 97 (10), pp. 4219-4227… [cited by applicant]
Ketchem et al., Mitigation of monoclonal antibody viscosity by modification of protein surface charge, Ninth Annual PEGS Summit, Apr. 29-May 3, 2013, Boston, MA (2013). [cited by applicant]
Ketchem, R. R. et al., “Mitigation of monoclonal antibody viscosity by modification of protein surface charge,” Abstracts of Papers; ACS National Meeting & Exposition, American Chemical Society, US, 243rd , p. 1, (2012)… [cited by applicant]
Lemaigre et al., “Transcriptional control of genes that regulate glycolysis and gluconeogenesis in adult liver”, Biochem J., vol. 303, pp. 1-14 (1994). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Concentration Dependent Viscosity of Monoclonal Antibody Solutions: Explaining Experimental Behavior in Terms of Molecular Properties, Pharm. Res. 31 (2014), 3161-3178. [cited by applicant]
Loeken, “Effects of mutation of the CREB binding site of the somatostatin promoter on cyclic AMP responsiveness in CV-1 cells”, Gene Expr., vol. 3 (3), pp. 253-264 (1993). [cited by applicant]
Mcgehee Jr. et al., “Differentiation-specific element: a cis-acting developmental switch required for the sustained transcriptional expression of the angiotensinogen gene during hormonal-induced differentiation of 3T3-L… [cited by applicant]
Morrison et al., “Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 81 (21), pp. 6851-6855 (1984). [cited by applicant]
Neergaard et al., Viscosity of High Concentration Protein Formulations of Monoclonal Antibodies of The IgG1 And IgG4 Subclass—Prediction Of Viscosity Through Protein-Protein Interaction Measurements, Eur. J. Pharm Sci. … [cited by applicant]
Nilsson et al., “Expression and Purification of Recombinant Insulin-like Growth Factors from [cited by applicant]
Nilsson et al., “Immobilization and Purification of Enzymes with Staphylococcal Protein A Gene Fusion Vectors”, The EMBO Journal, vol. 4 (4), pp. 1075-1080 (1985). [cited by applicant]
O'Reilly, M. A. et al., “Identification of an activating transcription factor (ATF) binding site in the human transforming growth factor-beta 2 promoter,” J. Biol. Chem., 267(28):19938-19943 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Paul, William E. (Ed.), Fundamental Immunology, 2nd Ed., Raven Press, New York, Ch. 7, pp. TOC, 139-165 (1989). [cited by applicant]
Piper et al., “The crystal structure of PCSK9: a regulator of plasma LDL-cholesterol”, Structure, vol. 15 (5), pp. 545-552 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Ropartz, C., Schanfield, M. S., Steinberg, A. G., “Review of the notation for the allotypic and related markers of human immunoglobulins,” WHO meeting on human immunoglobulin allotypic markers, Held Jul. 16-19, 1974, Ro… [cited by applicant]
Rothlisberger, D. et al., “Domain interactions in the Fab fragment: a comparative evaluation of the single-chain Fv and Fab format engineered with variable domains of different stability,” J. Mol. Biol., 347:773-789 (20… [cited by applicant]
Seidah et al., The proprotein convertases are potential2011 targets in the treatment of dyslipidemia, J Mol Med (Berl) (2007), 85(7), 685-696. [cited by applicant]
Shukla et al., “Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies—application of platform approaches,” J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci., vol. 848 (1), pp. 28-39 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Singh et al., Dipole-Dipole Interaction in Antibody Solutions: Correlation with Viscosity Behavior at High Concentration, Pharm Res (2014), 31(9):2549-2558. [cited by applicant]
Smith et al., “Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in [cited by applicant]
Takeda et al., “Construction of chimaeric processed immunoglobulin genes containing mouse variable and human constant region sequences”, Nature, vol. 314, pp. 452-454 (1985). [cited by applicant]
Tomlinson et al., “The structural repertoire of the human Vk domain”, EMBO J., vol. 14 (18), pp. 4628-4638 (1995). [cited by applicant]
Treisman, R. “The SRE: a growth factor response transcriptional regulator, Seminars in Cancer Biol.,” 1(1):47-58 (1990). [cited by applicant]
Tseng, C. C. et al., “Postprandial stimulation of insulin release by glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Effect of a specific glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor antagonist in the rat,”… [cited by applicant]
Van Den Bremer, E. T. J. et al., “Human IgG is produced in a pro-form that requires clipping of C-terminal lysines for maximal complement activation,” mAbs, 7(4):672-680 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Vidarsson, G. et al., “lgG subclasses and allotypes: from structure to effector functions,” Front. Immunol., 5:1-17 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Yadav et al., “Establishing a Link Between Amino Acid Sequences and Self-Associating and Viscoelastic Behavior of Two Closely Related Monoclonal Antibodies”, Pharm Res., vol. 28 (7), pp. 1750-1764 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Yadav et al., “The Influence of Charge Distribution on Self-Association and Viscosity Behavior of Monoclonal Antibody Solutions”, Mol. Pharmaceutics, vol. 9, pp. 791-802 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Yadav et al., Viscosity Behavior of High-Concentration Monoclonal Antibody Solutions: Correlation with Interaction Parameter and Electroviscous Effects, J. Pharm Sci. (2012), 101(3):998-1011. [cited by applicant]
Chilean Application No. 201900835, Office Action (Aug. 23, 2021). [cited by applicant]
Chilean Application No. 201900835, Office Action (Feb. 15, 2021). [cited by applicant]
Eurasian Application No. 201990837, Office Action (Mar. 26, 2021). [cited by applicant]
European Application No. 17794111.9, Office Action (Aug. 27, 2021). [cited by applicant]
Geoghegan, J.C. et al., Mitigation of reversible self-association and viscosity in a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody by rational, structure-guided Fv engineering. MAbs, Apr. 6, 2016, vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 941-950. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Application No. 2019-516945, Office Action (Sep. 21, 2021). [cited by applicant]
JP Application 2019516945 Office Action (Jun. 7, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Nichols, P. et al., Rational design of viscosity reducing mutants of a monoclonal antibody: Hydrophobic versus electrostatic inter-molecular interactions. MAbs, Jan. 14, 2015, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 212-230. [cited by applicant]
Singaporean Application No. 11201902880Q, Written Opinion (Jul 7, 2020). [cited by applicant]