IP Library Granted Patent US 12,640,235
Granted Patent B2
US 12,640,235 · App. 17/874,158 · Granted May 26, 2026

Splicing site classification using neural networks

Inventors: Kishore Jaganathan (San Francisco, CA); Kai-how Farh (San Mateo, CA); Jeremy Francis McRae (Hayward, CA); Sofia Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou (Redwood City, CA)
Assignee: Illumina, Inc.
G16B40/20G06N3/0464G06N3/048G06N3/084G16B20/00G16B30/00G16B40/00G16B50/00G06F18/24
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,640,235
App. No.
17/874,158
Granted
May 26, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The technology disclosed relates to splice site prediction and aberrant splicing detection. In particular, it relates to a splice site predictor that includes a convolutional neural network trained on training examples of donor splice sites, acceptor splice sites, and non-splicing sites. An input stage of the convolutional neural network feeds an input sequence of nucleotides for evaluation of target nucleotides in the input sequence. An output stage of the convolutional neural network translates analysis by the convolutional neural network into classification scores for likelihoods that each of the target nucleotides is a donor splice site, an acceptor splice site, and a non-splicing site.

Claims (31)

1 . A system comprising a splice site predictor and at least one processor coupled to memory for running the splice site predictor, the system further comprising:

a convolutional neural network trained on training examples of donor splice sites, acceptor splice sites, and non-splicing sites;

an input stage of the convolutional neural network that feeds an input sequence of nucleotides for evaluation of target nucleotides in the input sequence; and

an output stage of the convolutional neural network that translates convolutions of the input sequence performed by the convolutional neural network into classification scores indicating respective probabilities of each of the target nucleotides being a donor splice site, an acceptor splice site, and a non-splicing site.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the convolutional neural network is parameterized by a number of convolution layers, a number of convolution filters, and a number of subsampling layers.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the convolutional neural network includes one or more fully-connected layers and a terminal classification layer.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the convolutional neural network includes dimensionality altering layers that reshape spatial and feature dimensions of a preceding input.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the convolutional neural network is parameterized by a number of residual blocks, a number of skip connections, and a number of residual connections, wherein each residual block comprises at least one batch normalization layer, at least one rectified linear unit (ReLU) layer, at least one dimensionality altering layer, and at least one residual connection, and wherein each residual block comprises two batch normalization layers, two ReLU non-linearity layers, two dimensionality altering layers, and one residual connection.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the training examples include at least 50,000 training examples of donor sites, at least 50,000 training examples of acceptor sites, and at least 100,000 training examples of non-occurrence sites.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein each of the training examples is a target base sequence having at least one target base flanked by at least 20 bases on each side.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the convolutional neural network batch-wise evaluates the training examples during an epoch.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the training examples are randomly sampled into batches, wherein each batch has a predetermined batch size.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the convolutional neural network iterates evaluation of the training examples over 10 epochs.

11 . A system comprising Aan aberrant splicing detector and at least one processor coupled to memory for running the aberrant splicing detector, the system further comprising:

a convolutional neural network trained to classify target nucleotides in an input sequence and assign, based on convolutions of the input sequence, splice site scores indicating respective probabilities of each of the target nucleotides being a donor splice site, an acceptor splice site, and a non-splicing site; and

a classifier configured to process a reference sequence and a variant sequence through convolutions of the convolutional neural network to (i) produce splice site scores indicating respective probabilities of each target nucleotide in the reference sequence and in the variant sequence being a donor splice site, an acceptor splice site, and a non-splicing site, and (ii) determine, based on the splice site scores for the reference sequence and the variant sequence, whether a variant that generated the variant sequence causes aberrant splicing and is therefore pathogenic.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the classifier determines whether the variant is pathogenic based on differences between splice site scores of corresponding target nucleotides in the reference sequence and in the variant sequence.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the differences in the splice site scores are determined position-wise between the corresponding target nucleotides in the reference sequence and the variant sequence.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein, for at least one target nucleotide position, a global maximum difference in the splice site scores is above a predetermined threshold, further configured to classify the variant as causing aberrant splicing and therefore pathogenic.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein, for at least one target nucleotide position, a global maximum difference in the splice site scores is below a predetermined threshold, further configured to classify the variant as not causing aberrant splicing and therefore benign.

16 . The system of claim 11 , further configured to identify variants that cause autism spectrum disorder.

17 . The system of claim 11 , further configured to identify variants that cause developmental delay disorder.

18 . A computer-implemented method of detecting genomic variants that cause aberrant splicing, comprising:

processing, by at least one processor, a reference sequence through convolutions of a convolutional neural network trained to detect differential splicing patterns in a target sub-sequence of an input sequence by generating classification scores indicating respective probabilities of each nucleotide in the target sub-sequence being a donor splice site, an acceptor splice site, and a non-splicing site;

based on the processing of the reference sequence, detecting a first differential splicing pattern in a reference target sub-sequence by generating classification scores indicating respective probabilities of each nucleotide in the reference target sub-sequence being a donor splice site, an acceptor splice site, and a non-splicing site;

processing, by the at least one processor, a variant sequence through convolutions of the convolutional neural network, wherein the variant sequence and the reference sequence differ by at least one variant nucleotide located in a variant target sub-sequence;

based on the processing of the variant sequence, detecting a second differential splicing pattern in the variant target sub-sequence by generating classification scores indicating respective probabilities of each nucleotide in the variant target sub-sequence being a donor splice site, an acceptor splice site, and a non-splicing site;

determining, by the at least one processor, a difference between the first differential splicing pattern and the second differential splicing pattern by comparing, on a nucleotide-by-nucleotide basis, classification scores of the reference target sub-sequence and the variant target sub-sequence; and

based on the difference being above a predetermined threshold, classifying the at least one variant nucleotide as causing aberrant splicing and therefore pathogenic.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 18 , wherein a differential splicing pattern identifies positional distribution of occurrence of splicing events in a target sub-sequence.

20 . The computer-implemented method of claim 19 , wherein the splicing events include at least one of cryptic splicing, exon skipping, mutually exclusive exons, alternative donor site, alternative acceptor site, and intron retention.

Assignments (2)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF THIRD INVENTOR PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 60630 FRAME 406. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 18, 2025
From: JAGANATHAN, KISHORE; FARH, KAI-HOW; MCRAE, JEREMY FRANCIS; PANAGIOTOPOULOU, SOFIA KYRIAZOPOULOU
To: ILLUMINA, INC.
Reel/Frame 073941/0301 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2022
From: JAGANATHAN, KISHORE; FARH, KAI-HOW; MCREA, JEREMY FRANCIS; KYRIAZOPOULOU PANAGIOTOPOULOU, SOFIA
To: ILLUMINA, INC.
Reel/Frame 060630/0406 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 16160984 · Oct 15, 2018
Provisional Application 62726158 · Aug 31, 2018
Provisional Application 62573135 · Oct 16, 2017
Provisional Application 62573125 · Oct 16, 2017
Provisional Application 62573131 · Oct 16, 2017
Related Publication 20240013856A1 · Jan 11, 2024
References Cited (202)
US 6767720B1 · Van Roy et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 10002313B2 · Vaca Castano · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10068557B1 · Engel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10185803B2 · Frey · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10423861B2 · Gao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10572996B2 · Eurèn · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10944767B2 · Goswami · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11183286B2 · Yelensky et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11488009B2 · Jaganathan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11837324B2 · Jaganathan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040067514A1 · Tabska · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20140199698A1 · Rogan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160357903A1 · Shendure et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160364522A1 · Frey · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160364532A1 · Honeycutt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160371431A1 · Haque · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170169315A1 · Vaca Castano · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170356976A1 · Shapiro · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170372471A1 · Eurèn · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180075343A1 · van den Oord · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180107927A1 · Frey · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190114391A1 · Jaganathan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190114547A1 · Jaganathan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190197401A1 · Jaganathan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190346442A1 · Carr et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200143205A1 · Yao · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20240013856A1 · Jaganathan · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CA 2894317 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CA 2894317A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 107194341A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
JP 2008027244 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008027244A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009184245A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
RU 2371735 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
RU 2371735C2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
RU 2429529C2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005050160 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005050160A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008134720A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016145516 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016145516A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016201564 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016201564A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
“Splice Site Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks” by Øystein Johansen, Tom Ryen, Trygve Eftesøl, Thomas Kjosmoen, and Peter Ruoff, University of Stavanger, Norway, F. Masulli, R. Tagliaferri, and G.M. Verkhivker… [cited by examiner]
Kelley et al., “Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks”, 2016, Genome Res. 2016 26; pp. 990-999. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Ardlie, Kristin G., et al. “The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans.” The GTEx Consortium, Science vol. 348, 6235 (2015): 648-60. doi:10.1126/science.1262110. [cited by applicant]
Piqueras, Autoregressive model based on a deep CNN for audio generation, Master of Science Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, dated Mar. 2017, 58 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wu, Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks, LAMDA Group, National Key Lab for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, dated May 1, 2017, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Libbrecht et al., Machine learning in genetics and genomics, Nature Review Genetics, vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 321-332, dated Jun. 2015, 30 pages. [cited by applicant]
Amit et al., Differential GC Content between Exons and Introns Establishes Distinct Strategies of Splice-Site Recognition, Cell Reports 1, pp. 543-556, dated May 31, 2012, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Andersson et al., Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications, Genome Research, dated Aug. 17, 2009, 36 pages. [cited by applicant]
Azad et al., flowVS: channel-specific variance stabilization in flow cytometry, BMC Bioinformatics vol. 17, No. 291, dated 2016, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Barash et al., Deciphering the splicing code, Nature, vol. 465, dated May 6, 2010, pp. 53-59, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Berget et al., Exon recognition in vertebrate splicing, Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, No. 6, dated Feb. 10, 1995, pp. 2411-2414, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Blencowe et al., Alternative Splicing: New Insights from Global Analyses. Cell, vol. 126, dated Jul. 14, 2006, 37-47. [cited by applicant]
Boerkoel et al., Leaky splicing mutation in the acid maltase gene is associated with delayed onset of glycogenosis type II, American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 56, dated Jan. 9, 1995, pp. 887-897, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Boyd et al., Accuracy at the Top, In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), vol. 25, dated 2012, pp. 953-961, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cooper et al., RNA and Disease, Cell 136, pp. 777-793, dated Feb. 20, 2009, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cramer et al., Functional association between promoter structure and transcript alternative splicing, Proceedings of National Academy of Science, Genetics, vol. 94, pp. 11456-11460, dated Oct. 1997. [cited by applicant]
Cummings et al., Improving genetic diagnosis in Mendelian disease with transcriptome sequencing, Science Translational Medicine, vol. 9, No. 386, doi:10.1126/scitranslmed aal5209, dated Apr. 19, 2017, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
De Rubeis et al., Synaptic, transcriptional and chromatin genes disrupted in autism, Nature, vol. 515, No. 7526, pp. 209-215, dated Nov. 13, 2014, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., De novo insertions and deletions of predominantly paternal origin are associated with autism spectrum disorder. Cell Reports 9, pp. 16-23, dated Oct. 9, 2014, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ernst et al., Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types, Nature, vol. 473, No. 7345, pp. 43-49, dated May 5, 2011, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fairbrother et al., Predictive identification of exonic splicing enhancers in human genes, Science, vol. 297, pp. 1007-1013, dated Aug. 9, 2002, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Finkel et al., Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 377, No. 18, 1723-1732, dated Nov. 2, 2017, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fitzgerald et al., Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders, Nature, vol. 519, No. 7542, pp. 223-228, doi:10.1038/nature14135, dated Mar. 12, 2015, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gelfman et al., DNA-methylation effect on cotranscriptional splicing is dependent on GC architecture of the exon-intron structure, Genome Research, vol. 23, dated 2013, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Glorot et al., Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) in Proceedings of Machine Le… [cited by applicant]
Gouya, L., Puy, H., Robreau, A.-M., Bourgeois, M., Lamoril, J., Silva, V. Da, Grandchamp, B., and Deybach, J.-C. (2002). The penetrance of dominant erythropoietic protoporphyria is modulated by expression of wildtype FE… [cited by applicant]
Graubert, T.A., Shen, D., Ding, L., Okeyo-Owuor, T., Lunn, C.L., Shao, J., Krysiak, K., Harris, C.C., Koboldt, D.C., Larson, D.E., et al. (2012). Recurrent mutations in the U2AF1 splicing factor in myelodysplastic syndr… [cited by applicant]
Harrow, J., Frankish, A., Gonzalez, J.M., Tapanari, E., Diekhans, M., Kokocinski, F., Aken, B.L., Barrell, D., Zadissa, A., Searle, S., et al. (2012). GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Projec… [cited by applicant]
He et al., Identity mappings in deep residual networks, In European Conference on Computer Vision, arXiv:1603.05027v3, dated Jul. 25, 2016, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Herring et al., Unsupervised Trajectory Analysis of Single-Cell RNA-Seq and Imaging Data Reveals Alternative Tuft Cell Origins in the Gut, Cell Systems, vol. 5, dated Jan. 24, 2018, pp. 37-51. [cited by applicant]
Hoffman et al., Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation, Nature Methods, vol. 9, No. 5, dated May 2012, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Iossifov et al., The contribution of de novo coding mutations to autism spectrum disorder, Nature, vol. 515, dated Nov. 13, 2014, pp. 216-221. (doi:10.1038/nature13908). [cited by applicant]
Irimia et al., A highly conserved program of neuronal microexons is misregulated in autistic brains, Cell 159, dated Dec. 18, 2014, pp. 1511-1523. [cited by applicant]
Jonkers et al., Genome-wide dynamics of Pol II elongation and its interplay with promoter proximal pausing, chromatin, and exons. eLife, dated 2014, doi: 10.7554/eLife.02407, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jung et al., Intron retention is a widespread mechanism of tumor-suppressor inactivation, Nature Genetics, vol. 47, No. 11, dated Nov. 2015, pp. 1242-1248. [cited by applicant]
Kasowski et al., Extensive variation in chromatin states across humans, Science, vol. 342, dated Nov. 8, 2013, 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
Katz et al., Analysis and design of RNA sequencing experiments for identifying isoform regulation, Nature Methods, vol. 7, No. 12, dated Dec. 2010, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Keren et al., Alternative splicing and evolution: Diversification, exon definition and function, Nature Reviews—Genetics, vol. 11, dated May 2010, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kosmicki et al., Refining the role of de novo protein-truncating variants in neurodevelopmental disorders by using population reference samples, Nature Genetics, vol. 49, No. 4, dated Apr. 2017, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kremer et al., Genetic diagnosis of Mendelian disorders via RNA sequencing, Nature Communications, vol. 8, dated Jun. 12, 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Krishnamoorthy et al., A more powerful test for comparing two Poisson means, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol. 119, dated 2004, pp. 23-35. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., Clinical Exome Sequencing for Genetic Identification of Rare Mendelian Disorders. Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), vol. 312, No. 18, dated Oct. 18, 2014, pp. 1880-1887. [cited by applicant]
Lek et al., Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans, Nature, vol. 536, dated Aug. 18, 2016, pp. 285-291. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Annotation-free quantification of RNA splicing using LeafCutter, Nature Genetics, vol. 50, dated Jan. 2018, pp. 151-158. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., RBFOX and PTBP1 proteins regulate the alternative splicing of micro-exons in human brain transcripts, Genome Research, vol. 25, dated 2015, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Lonsdale et al., The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, Nature Genetics, vol. 45, No. 6, dated Jun. 2013, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Luco et al., Epigenetics in Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing, Cell 144, dated Jan. 7, 2011, pp. 16-26. [cited by applicant]
Luco et al., Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science, vol. 327, dated Feb. 19, 2010, pp. 996-1000. [cited by applicant]
Maurano et al., Systematic Localization of Common Disease-Associated Variation in Regulatory DNA, Science, vol. 337, dated Sep. 7, 2012, pp. 1190-1195. [cited by applicant]
McRae et al., Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders, Nature, vol. 542, dated Feb. 23, 2017, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Monroe et al., Effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing and costs of the traditional diagnostic trajectory in children with intellectual disability, Genetics in Medicine, vol. 18, No. 9, dated Sep. 2016, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Neale et al., Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders, Nature, vol. 485, No. 7397, doi:10.1038/nature11011, dated Apr. 4, 2012,13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Goodfellow et al., Deep Learning, Chapter 9 Convolutional Networks, dated 2016, 41 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gu et al., Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networks, arXiv:1512.07108v5 [cs.CV], dated Jan. 5, 2017, 37 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., Densely Connected Convolutional Networks, arXiv:1608.06993v4 [cs.CV], dated Aug. 27, 2017, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Leung et al., Deep learning of the tissue-regulated splicing code, Bioinformatics, vol. 30, dated 2014, oo 121-129, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Leung et al., Inference of the Human Polyadenylation Code, bioRxiv doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/130591, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Leung et al., Machine Learning in Genomic Medicine: A Review of Computational Problems and Data Sets, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, No. 1, dated Jan. 2016, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Park et al., Deep Learning for Regulatory Genomics, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 33, No. 8, dated Aug. 2015, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Srivastava et al., Highway Networks, arXiv:1505.00387v2 [cs.LG], dated Nov. 3, 2015, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Szegedy et al., Going deeper with convolutions, arXiv:1409.4842v1 [cs.CV], dated Sep. 17, 2014, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Van den Oord et al., WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio, arXiv:1609.03499v2 [cs.SD], dated Sep. 19, 2016, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wolterink et al., Dilated Convolutional Neural Networks for Cardiovascular MR Segmentation in Congenital Heart Disease, arXiv:1704.03669v1 [cs.CV], dated Apr. 12, 2017, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yue et al., Deep Learning for Genomics: A Concise Overview, arXiv:1802.00810v2 [q-bio.GN], dated May 8, 2018, 40 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yuen et al., Genome wide characteristics of de novo mutations in autism, Genomic Medicine, vol. 1, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutions, arXiv:1511.07122v3 [cs.CV], dated Apr. 30, 2016, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xiong et al, “The human splicing code reveals new insights into the genetic determinants of disease”, Science, vol. 347, No. 6218, Dec. 18, 2014 (Dec. 18, 2014), pp. 1254806-1254806. [cited by applicant]
Jian et al., In silico prediction of splice altering single nucleotide variants in the human genome, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, No. 22, dated Nov. 21, 2014, pp. 13534-13544. [cited by applicant]
Houdayer et al., Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, Human Mutation, vol. 33, No. 8, dated May 11, 2012, pp.… [cited by applicant]
Ioffe et al., Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training, arXiv:1502.03167v3 [cs.LG], dated Mar. 2, 2015, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Alom, et. al. ,“The History Began from AlexNet A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Approaches”, 2018, 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
Louadi, et. al. ,“Deep Splicing Code Classifying Alternative Splicing Events Using Deep Learning”, Genes, vol. 10, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Degroeve, et. al. ,“SpliceMachine: predicting splice sites from high dimensional local context representations”, Nov. 25, 2004, 7pages. [cited by applicant]
Dvinge, et. al., “RNA splicing factors as oncoproteins and tumour suppressors”, Nature Reviews—Cancer, dated Jun. 10, 2016, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gupta, et. al., “Dilated Convolutions for Modeling Long Distance Genomic Dependencies”, arXiv:1710.01278v1 [q-bio. GN], Oct. 3, 2017, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xiong, et. al.,“Bayesian prediction of tissue regulated splicing using RNA sequence and cellular context”, Jul. 29, 2011, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zuallaert, et. al.,“SpliceRover: Interpretable convolutional neural networks for improved splice site prediction”, Jun. 21, 2018, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zuallaert et al., Supplemental Materials for SpliceRover: Interpretable convolutional neural networks for improved splice site prediction, vol. 16, No. 5, dated Jun. 21, 2018, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “DeepSplice: Deep classification of novel splice junctions revealed by RNA-seq.” In 2016 IEEE International conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 330-333. IEEE, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Hebsgaard et al., Splice site prediction in [cited by applicant]
Sonnenburg et al., “New methods for splice site recognition.” In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 329-336. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Lanchantin, Deep Motif Dashboard: Visualizing and Understanding Genomic Sequences Using Deep Neural Networks, Oct. 18, 2016, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen LC et al, Deeplab—Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, Atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. Apr. 27, 2017;40(4):834-48. … [cited by applicant]
Jimenez et al., “DeepSite: protein-binding site predictor using 3D-convolutional neural networks”, May 31, 2017, Bioinformatics, 33(19), 2017, pp. 3036-3042. (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., DNA-Level Splice Junction Prediction using Deep Recurrent Neural Networks, dated Dec. 16, 2015, arXiv:1512.05135v1, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Johansen et al. Splice Site Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence Methods for Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, 5th International Meeting, CIBB 2008, Vietri sul Mare, Italy, Oct. 3-4, 2… [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., iSS PC Identifying Splicing Sites via Physical-Chemical Properties Using Deep Sparse Auto-Encoder, Scientific Reports Online, dated Aug. 5, 2017, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xueqiu Jian et al., In Silico Tools for Splicing Defect Prediction, a Survey from the Viewpoint of End Users, Genetics in Medicine, dated Dec. 12, 2011, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Neelam Goel et al., An improved method for splice site prediction in DNA sequences using support vector machines, Science Direct—Procedia Computer Science, dated Dec. 2015, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Akhtar et al., Signal Processing in Sequence Analysis: Advances in Eukaryotic Gene Prediction, 2008, pp. 310-321. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Characterization and predicition of alternative splice sites, Gene 366, dated 2006, pp. 219-227. [cited by applicant]
Ke Zhang et al., Residual Networks of Residual Networks: Multilvel Residual Networks, IEEE, vol. 14, No. 8, Aug. 2016, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tongfan Guan et al., Atrous Faster R-CNN for Small Scale Object Detection, 2017 2nd Intl Conference on Multimedia and Image Processing, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Close et al., DBIRD complex integrates alternative mRNA splicing with RNA polymerase II transcript elongation, Nature, vol. 484, No. 7394, pp. 386-389, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Padgett, R.A. (2012). New connections between splicing and human disease. Trends Genet. 28, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pertea et al., GeneSplicer: a new computational method for splice site prediction, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, No. 5, dated Jan. 3, 2001, pp. 1185-1190. [cited by applicant]
Reed et al., The role of the mammalian branchpoint sequence in pre-mRNA splicing, Genes and Development, vol. 2, dated Aug. 1988, pp. 1268-1276. [cited by applicant]
Reese et al., Improved splice site detection in Genie, Journal of Computational Biology, DOI:10.1145/267521.267766, vol. 4, dated Feb. 1997, 42 pages. [cited by applicant]
Robinson et al., Autism spectrum disorder severity reflects the average contribution of de novo and familial influences, Proceedings of National Academy of Science, vol. 111, No. 42, pp. 15161-15165. [cited by applicant]
Samocha et al., A framework for the interpretation of de novo variation in human disease, Nature Genetics, vol. 46, No. 9, dated Sep. 2014, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sanders et al., Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder Genomic Architecture and Biology from 71 Risk Loci, Neuron, vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 1215-1233, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sanders et al., De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism—with Supplementary Information. Nature, vol. 485, dated May 10, 2012, 53 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sanz et al., A high proportion of DNA variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is associated with aberrant splicing in breast/ovarian cancer patients, Clinical Cancer Researc, vol. 16, No. 6, dated Mar. 15, 2010, pp. 1957-1967. [cited by applicant]
Schwartz et al., Chromatin organization marks exon-intron structure, Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 16, No. 9, dated Sep. 2009, 7 pages. [doi:10.1038/nsmb.1659]. [cited by applicant]
Scotti et al., RNA mis-splicing in disease, Nature Review Genetics, vol. 17, dated Jan. 2016, pp. 19-32. [cited by applicant]
Su et al., A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol, 2014, 32, 36 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shirai et al., Mutant U2AF1 Expression Alters Hematopoiesis and Pre-mRNA Splicing In Vivo, Cancer Cell, vol. 27, dated May 11, 2015, pp. 631-643. [cited by applicant]
Shukla et al., CTCF-promoted RNA polymerase II pausing links DNA methylation to splicing, Nature, vol. 479, dated Nov. 3, 2011, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Soemedi et al., Pathogenic variants that alter protein code often disrupt splicing. Nature Genetics, vol. 49, No. 6, dated Jun. 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Spies et al., Biased chromatin signatures around polyadenylation sites and exons, Molecular Cell, vol. 36, dated Oct. 23, 2009, pp. 245-254. [cited by applicant]
Stark et al., A prospective evaluation of whole-exome sequencing as a first-tier molecular test in infants with suspected monogenic disorders. Genetics in Medicine, vol. 18, No. 11, dated Nov. 2016, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supek et al., Synonymous mutations frequently act as driver mutations in human cancers, Cell, vol. 156, dated Mar. 13, 2014, pp. 1324-1335. [cited by applicant]
Tennessen et al., Evolution and Functional Impact of Rare Coding Variation from Deep Sequencing of Human Exomes, Science, vol. 337, No. 6090, dated Jul. 6, 2012, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Welter et al., The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans, Science, vol. 348, Issue 6235, dated May 8, 2015, pp. 648-660. [DOI: 10.1126/science.1262110]. [cited by applicant]
Tilgner et al., Deep sequencing of subcellular RNA fractions shows splicing to be predominantly co-transcriptional in the human genome but inefficient for IncRNAs, Genome Research, vol. 22, dated Feb. 2012, pp. 1616-162… [cited by applicant]
Tilgner et al., Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition, Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 16, No. 9, dated Sep. 2009, pp. 996-1001. [cited by applicant]
Trujillano et al., Clinical exome sequencing: Results from 2819 samples reflecting 1000 families, European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 25, dated 2016, 176-182. [cited by applicant]
Turner et al., Genome Sequencing of Autism-Affected Families Reveals Disruption of Putative Noncoding Regulatory DNA, The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 98, dated Jan. 7, 2016, pp. 58-74. [cited by applicant]
Ule et al., CLIP Identifies Nova-Regulated RNA Networks in the Brain, Science, vol. 302, dated Nov. 14, 2003, pp. 1212-1215. [cited by applicant]
Veloso et al., Rate of elongation by RNA polymerase II is associated with specific gene features and epigenetic modifications, Genome Research, vol. 24, dated Apr. 8, 2014, pp. 896-905. [doi:10.1101/gr.171405.113]. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes, Nature, vol. 456, No. 7221, dated Nov. 27, 2008, pp. 470-476. [doi:10.1038/nature07509]. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Splicing in disease: disruption of the splicing code and the decoding machinery, Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 8, dated Oct. 2007, pp. 749-761. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Splicing regulation: from a parts list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code, RNA, vol. 14, No. 5, dated 2008, pp. 802-813. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Systematic identification and analysis of exonic splicing silencers, Cell, vol. 119, dated Dec. 17, 2004, pp. 831-845. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., OLego: Fast and sensitive mapping of spliced mRNA-Seq reads using small seeds, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, No. 10, pp. 5149-5163. [doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt216]. [cited by applicant]
Farh et al., Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants, Nature, vol. 518, No. 7539, pp. 337-343, doi: 10.1038/nature13835, dated Feb. 19, 2015, 41 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gelfman et al., Changes in exon-intron structure during vertebrate evolution affect the splicing pattern of exons, Genome Research, vol. 22, pp. 35-50, dated 2012, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
He et al., Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), arXiv:1512.03385v1, dated Dec. 10, 2015,12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jha et al., Integrative deep models for alternative splicing, Bioinformatics, vol. 33, pp. 274-282, dated 2017. [cited by applicant]
Kingma et al., Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, arXiv:1412.6980v9 [cs.LG], dated Jan. 30, 2017, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Licatalosi et al., Splicing Regulation in Neurologic Disease, Neuron 52, pp. 93-101, dated Oct. 5, 2006, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
McLaren et al., The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor, Genome Biology, vol. 17, No. 122, DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4, dated 2016, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shrikumar et al., Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 70, arXiv:1704.02685v1 [cs.CV], 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tan et al., Diagnostic impact and cost-effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing for ambulant children with suspected monogenic conditions, JAMA Pediatrics, vol. 171, No. 9, pp. 855-862. [cited by applicant]
Yang, et al., “Molecular Findings Among Patients Referred for Clinical Whole-Exome Sequencing”, Nov. 12, 2014, JAMA 312, 1870-1879. [cited by applicant]
Yeo et al., Maximum Entropy Modeling of Short Sequence Motifs with Applications to RNA Splicing Signals, Journal of Computational Biology, vol. 11, dated 2004, pp. 377-394. [cited by applicant]
Yoshida et al., Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia, Nature, vol. 478, dated Oct. 6, 2011, pp. 64-69. [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model, Nature Methods, vol. 12, No. 10, dated Oct. 2015, pp. 931-934. [DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3547]. [cited by applicant]
Alipanahi et al., Predicting the Sequence Specificities of DNA and RNA Binding Proteins by Deep Learning, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 33, No. 8, dated Aug. 2015, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Angermueller et al., Accurate Prediction of Single Cell DNA Methylation States Using Deep Learning, bioRxiv doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/055715, dated May 27, 2016, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Angermueller et al., Deep Learning for Computational Biology, Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 12, No. 878, 2016, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Arik et al., Deep Voice: Real-time Neural Text-to-Speech, arXiv:1702.07825v2 [cs.CL], dated Mar. 7, 2017, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ching et al., Opportunities and Obstacles for Deep Learning in Biology and Medicine, bioRxiv doi : https://doi.org/10.1101/142760, dated Jan. 19, 2018,123 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ching et al., Opportunities and Obstacles for Deep Learning in Biology and Medicine, Journal of Royal Society Interface, vol. 15, dated May 26, 2017, 47 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,978, filed Oct. 15, 2018, US-2019-0114547-A1, Apr. 18, 2019, Allowed. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,980, filed Oct. 15, 2018, US-2019-0114391-A1, Apr. 18, 2019, Pending. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2018/055915, Oct. 15, 2018, WO2019/079198, Apr. 25, 2019, Nationalized. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2018/055919, Oct. 15, 2018, WO2019/079200, Apr. 25, 2019, Nationalized. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2018/055923, Oct. 15, 2018, WO2019/079202, Apr. 25, 2019, Nationalized. [cited by applicant]
Rajapakse et al; IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 2, No. 2, Apr.-Jun. 2005. [cited by applicant]
Xiong et al_ The human splicing code reveals new insights into the genetic determinants of disease Jan. 9, 2015 _ 20pgs. [cited by applicant]
Angermueller et al. Deep Learning for Computational Biology, Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 12, No. 878, 16pgs, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Close, P., East, P., Dirac-Svejstrup, A.B., Hartmann, H., Heron, M., Maslen, S., Chariot, A., Soding, J., Skehel, M., and Svejslrup, J.Q. Dbird complex integrates alternative mRNA splicing with RNA polymerase Il transcr… [cited by applicant]
Robinson, E.B., Samocha, K.E., Kosmicki, J.A., McGrath, L., Neale, B.M., Perlis, R.H., and Daly, M.J. Autism spectrum disorder severity reflects the average contribution of de novo and familial influences. Proc. Natl. A… [cited by applicant]
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., and Kundaje, A. Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 70, 9 pages. (2017). [cited by applicant]
Tan, T.Y., Dillon, O.J., Stark, Z., Schofield, D., Alam, K., Shrestha, R., Chong, B., Phelan, D., Brett, G.R., Creed, E., et al. Diagnostic impact and cost-effectiveness of whole-exome sequencing for ambulant children w… [cited by applicant]
Wu, J., Anczukow, 0., Krainer, A.R., Zhang, M.Q., and Zhang, C. OLego: Fast and sensitive mapping of spliced mRNA-Seq reads using small seeds. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 5149-5163 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Xueqiu Jian et al., In Silico Prediction of Splice-altering Single Nucleotide Variants in the Human Genome, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, No. 22, pp. 13534-13544, Nov. 21, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Brunak, Soren et al. Prediction of Human mRNA Donor and Acceptor Sites from the DNA Sequence, 1991, pp. 49-65 (Year: 1991). [cited by applicant]