IP Library Granted Patent US 12,642,639
Granted Patent B2
US 12,642,639 · App. 17/691,716 · Granted Jun 2, 2026

Modular stent device for multiple vessels and method

Inventors: Keith Perkins (Santa Rosa, CA); Zachary Borglin (Santa Rosa, CA); Mathew A. Haggard (Santa Rosa, CA)
Assignee: Medtronic Vascular, Inc.
A61F2/06A61F2/07A61F2/856A61F2/954A61F2002/067A61F2250/0098
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,642,639
App. No.
17/691,716
Granted
Jun 2, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The techniques of this disclosure generally relate to modular stent device and method of deploying the same. The method includes introducing a delivery system including the modular stent device via supra aortic access. The delivery system is advanced into the ascending aorta. Once positioned, the modular stent device is deployed from the delivery system such that an artery leg of the modular stent device engages the brachiocephalic artery and a bypass gate engages the aorta, wherein the artery leg partially collapses the bypass gate. The artery leg has a greater radial force than the bypass gate such that the artery leg remains un-collapsed and opened. Accordingly, blood flow through the artery leg and perfusion of the brachiocephalic artery and preservation of blood flow to cerebral territories including the brain is insured.

Claims (47)

1 . An assembly comprising:

a modular stent device comprising:

a main body having a proximal end and a distal end, the main body having a main body diameter extending from the proximal end to the distal end of the main body;

a bypass gate having a proximal end and a distal end, the bypass gate continuously extending distally from the distal end of the main body;

an artery leg having a proximal end and a distal end, the artery leg having an artery leg diameter extending from the proximal end to the distal end of the artery leg, the artery leg extending distally from the distal end of the main body; and

a transition region where the main body meets the bypass gate and the artery leg,

wherein the proximal ends of the bypass gate and the artery leg contact in the transition region, the proximal end of the bypass gate and the distal end of the main body contact in the transition region, the proximal end of the artery leg and the distal end of the main body contact in the transition region radially opposite the contact of the proximal end of the bypass gate and the distal end of the main body in the transition region,

wherein the modular stent device continuously extends distally from the proximal end of the main body to the distal end of the bypass gate or the artery leg,

wherein the artery leg has a greater radial force than a radial force of the bypass gate,

wherein the main body has a first longitudinal axis, the bypass gate has a second longitudinal axis, and the artery leg has a third longitudinal axis, the first, second, and third longitudinal axes are parallel with one another when the modular stent device is in a relaxed configuration,

wherein a length of the artery leg is less than a length of the bypass gate.

2 . The assembly of claim 1 wherein the length of the artery leg is measured along the third longitudinal axis, and the length of the bypass gate is measured along the second longitudinal axis.

3 . The assembly of claim 1 further comprising a radiopaque marker in line with the artery leg.

4 . The assembly of claim 1 further comprising a tip capture mechanism to control proximal deployment accuracy of the main body.

5 . The assembly of claim 1 wherein the main body has a main body diameter, the bypass gate has a bypass gate diameter, the main body diameter being greater than the bypass gate diameter and the artery leg diameter together at the transition region.

6 . The assembly of claim 5 wherein the bypass gate and the artery leg are located within an imaginary cylinder defined by the main body extended in a distal direction at the transition region.

7 . The assembly of claim 5 wherein the bypass gate diameter is greater than the artery leg diameter at the transition region.

8 . The assembly of claim 1 wherein stents of the artery leg have a greater radial force than stents of the bypass gate.

9 . The assembly of claim 1 wherein the bypass gate is configured to collapse relative to the artery leg.

10 . The assembly of claim 1 further comprising a tube graft coupled to the bypass gate and extending distally therefrom.

11 . The assembly of claim 1 further comprising a proximal cuff coupled to the main body and extending proximally therefrom.

12 . The assembly of claim 1 wherein the transition region includes a radiopaque marker.

13 . The assembly of claim 1 , wherein the bypass gate and the artery leg continuously extend distally from the distal end of the main body.

14 . The assembly of claim 1 , wherein the main body flares at a proximal end thereof.

15 . The assembly of claim 1 , wherein the bypass gate flares at a distal end thereof and the artery leg flares at a distal end thereof.

16 . An assembly comprising:

a modular stent device comprising:

a main body having a proximal end and a distal end, the distal end of the main body having a circular profile;

a bypass gate having a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end of the bypass gate having a circular profile, the bypass gate continuously extending distally from the distal end of the main body;

an artery leg having a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end of the artery leg having a circular profile, the artery leg having an artery leg diameter extending from the proximal end to the distal end of the artery leg, the artery leg extending distally from the distal end of the main body; and

a transition region where the main body meets the bypass gate and the artery leg to form a first transition region surface and a second transition region surface spaced apart from the first transition region surface, the first transition region surface bounded by a first portion of the circular profile of the distal end of the main body, a first portion of the circular profile of the proximal end of the bypass gate, and a first portion of the circular profile of the proximal end of the artery leg, the second transition region surface bounded by a second portion of the circular profile of the distal end of the main body, a second portion of the circular profile of the proximal end of the bypass gate, and a second portion of the circular profile of the proximal end of the artery leg, the first portions of the circular profiles of the distal end of the main body and the proximal ends of the bypass gate and the artery leg are different than the second portions of the circular profiles of the distal end of the main body and the proximal ends of the bypass gate and the artery leg,

wherein the modular stent device continuously extends distally from the proximal end of the main body to the distal end of the bypass gate or the artery leg,

wherein the artery leg has a greater radial force than a radial force of the bypass gate,

wherein the main body has a first longitudinal axis, the bypass gate has a second longitudinal axis, and the artery leg has a third longitudinal axis, the first, second, and third longitudinal axes are parallel with one another when the modular stent device is in a relaxed configuration,

wherein a length of the artery leg is less than a length of the bypass gate.

17 . The assembly of claim 16 wherein the bypass gate flares at a distal end thereof.

18 . The assembly of claim 16 wherein the main body flares at a proximal end thereof.

19 . The assembly of claim 16 wherein the bypass gate flares at a distal end thereof and the main body flares at a proximal end thereof.

20 . An assembly comprising:

a modular stent device comprising:

a main body having a proximal end and a distal end;

a bypass gate having a proximal end and a distal end, the bypass gate continuously extending distally from the distal end of the main body to the distal end of the bypass gate without bifurcation, the bypass gate having a bypass gate diameter; and

an artery leg having a proximal end and a distal end, the artery leg continuously extending distally from the distal end of the main body to the distal end of the artery leg without bifurcation, the artery leg having an artery leg diameter; and

a transition region where the main body meets the bypass gate and the artery leg to form a closed transition region surface bounded by a bounding portion of the distal end of the main body, and the proximal ends of the bypass gate, and the artery leg, the bounding portion includes a main body/bypass gate contacting region where the distal end of the main body contacts the proximal end of the bypass gate, a bypass gate/artery leg contacting region where the proximal end of the bypass gate contacts the proximal end of the artery leg, and an artery leg/main body contacting region where the proximal end of the artery leg contacts the distal end of the main body, the main body/bypass gate, bypass gate/artery leg, and artery leg/main body contacting regions radially align,

wherein the artery leg has a greater radial force than a radial force of the bypass gate,

wherein the main body has a first longitudinal axis, the bypass gate has a second longitudinal axis, and the artery leg has a third longitudinal axis, the first, second, and third longitudinal axes are parallel with one another when the modular stent device is in a relaxed configuration,

wherein a length of the artery leg is less than a length of the bypass gate.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2022
From: PERKINS, KEITH; BORGLIN, ZACHARY; HAGGARD, MATHEW A.
To: MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 059230/0175 →
Continuity (3)
Division 16367889 · Mar 28, 2019
Provisional Application 62687087 · Jun 19, 2018
Related Publication 20220192814A1 · Jun 23, 2022
References Cited (96)
US 6102940A · Robichon et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6641606B2 · Ouriel et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6723116B2 · Taheri · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6814752B1 · Chuter · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7267685B2 · Butaric et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8545549B2 · Hartley et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8702791B2 · Kelly · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8734504B2 · Kelly · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9011517B2 · Hartley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9101456B2 · Hartley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9283068B2 · Kelly · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9393102B2 · Kelly · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9592112B2 · Arbefeuille et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9839542B2 · Bruszewski et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9861505B2 · Khoury · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9949818B2 · Kelly · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9980832B2 · Kelly · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9993330B2 · Roeder · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10231822B2 · Hartley · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20020058986A1 · Landau et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020099441A1 · Dehdashtian · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030130720A1 · Depalma et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030229389A1 · Escano · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040117003A1 · Ouriel et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050010277A1 · Chuter · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050102018A1 · Carpenter et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060155363A1 · LaDuca et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060184228A1 · Khoury · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070168013A1 · Douglas · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070250154A1 · Greenberg et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080097578A1 · Erickson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080114441A1 · Rust · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080147173A1 · Mciff et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090043373A1 · Arnault De La Menardiere et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090125100A1 · Mead · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090306763A1 · Roeder et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100100168A1 · Chuter et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110196477A1 · Ganesan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110238160A1 · Molony · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120123527A1 · Isch · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120271401A1 · Bruszewski et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130013050A1 · Shalev et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130013052A1 · Christiansen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130274861A1 · Kelly · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172064A1 · Kelly · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140316513A1 · Tang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160278910A1 · Kelly · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160287376A1 · Kelly · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160324626A1 · Kelly · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160367353A1 · Kelly · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170296324A1 · Argentine · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170319359A1 · Mehta · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170340461A1 · Varga · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180071077A1 · Argentine et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180153677A1 · Perkins et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180235786A1 · Kelly · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180243076A1 · Greenberg et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180325653A1 · Kelly · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190380851A1 · Bertini et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 2525742B1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 2574306A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 3448313B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014163957A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019245624A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office Communication in Application No. 19 719 684.3, mailed Oct. 18, 2023, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/502,462, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Single Multibranch Stent Device Assembly and Method”, filed Jul. 3, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/554,813, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Modular Multibranch Stent Assembly and Method”, filed Aug. 29, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/585,722, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Docking Graft for Placement of Parallel Distally Extending Grafts Assembly and Method”, filed Sep. 27, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/585,768, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Supra Aortic Access Trifurcated Modular Stent Assembly and Method”, filed Sep. 27, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/527,769, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Modular Multibranch Stent Assembly and Method”, filed Jul. 31, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/554,803, of Ashish Dhawan et al., titled “Use of Multiple Charged Ionic Compounds Derived From Polyamines for Waste Water Clarification”, filed Aug. 29, 2019. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2020/023170, The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Jun. 30, 2020, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2020/023176, The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Jun. 19, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2020/039169, The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Oct. 5, 2020, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2020/044833, The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Nov. 16, 2020, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US2019/024676, Jun. 17, 2019, pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
M. Lachat, “Nexus aortic arch stentgraft: Mid-term results”, Leipzig Interventional Course 2017, UniversitatsSpital Zurich, Jan. 24-27, 2017, pp. 1-30, www.leipzig-interventional-course.com. [cited by applicant]
Jae Woong Lim et al., “Totally endocascular aortic arch repair by branched stent graft placement”, Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Dec. 2015, pp. 279-282, vol. 1, No. 4. [cited by applicant]
N. Anthony Lee, Md., “The Bolton Medical Branched Thoracic Stent-Graft”, Sponsored by Bolton Medical, Inc., pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Michael D. Dake et al., “Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis: Early Case Experience and the Clinical Trial”, Supplement to Endovascular Today, Mar. 2017, pp. 21-24, vol. 16, No. 3. [cited by applicant]
Augusto D'Onofrio et al., “Endovascular treatment of aortic arch aneurysm with a single-branched double-stage stent graft”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Jul. 11, 2017, pp. e75-e77, vol. 154, No. 5. [cited by applicant]
Joseph Anderson, “Complete endovascular debranching of the aortic arch: A report of two cases”, Vascular, Jul. 11, 2014, pp. 1-7, http://vas.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/07/11/1708538114542174, SAGE Publications. [cited by applicant]
Ciro Ferrer et al., “Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with double inner branched thoracic stent graft: the Bolton perspective”, The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Aug. 2018, pp. 547-553, vol. 59 No. 4. [cited by applicant]
Stephan Haulon et al., “Global experience with an inner branched arch endograft”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014, pp. 1709-1716, vol. 148 No. 4. [cited by applicant]
Chen Huang et al., “Application of Unibody Single-Branch Endografts in Stanford Type B Dissections with Primary Entry Tear Adjacent to the Left Subclavian Artery: A Computed TomographyeBased Planning Study”, Annals for … [cited by applicant]
Himanshu J. Patel et al., “Branched Endovascular Therapy of the Distal Aortic Arch: Preliminary Results of the Feasibility Multicenter Trial of the Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis”, Branched Aortic Arch Tevar Trial,… [cited by applicant]
Vincent Riambau et al., “Application of the Bolton Relay Device for Thoracic Endografting In or Near the Aortic Arch”, Aorta, Feb. 2015, pp. 16-24, vol. 3 Issue 1, Science International Corp., http://aorta.scienceintern… [cited by applicant]
R. Spear et al., “Editor's Choice e Subsequent Results for Arch Aneurysm Repair with Inner Branched Endografts”, Arch Aneurysm Endovascular Repair, Dec. 8, 2015, pp. 380-385, European Society for Vascular Surgery, Elsev… [cited by applicant]
R. Spear et al., “Complex endovascular repair of postdissection arch and thoracoabdominal aneurysms”, Society for Vascular Surgery, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Sep. 5, 2017, pp. 1-8, Elsevier Inc. [cited by applicant]
R. Spear et al., “Total Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease Using an Arch Endograft With 3 Inner Branches”, Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 2017, pp. 534-538, vol. 24(4), Sage Publications. [cited by applicant]
Zhong Gao Wang, “Single-Branch Endograft for Treating Stanford Type B Aortic Dissections With Entry Tears in Proximity to the Left Subclavian Artery”, J Endovasc Ther, 2005, pp. 588-593, International Society of Endovas… [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 62/430,218, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Modular Aortic Arch Prosthetic Assembly and Method of Use Thereof”, filed Dec. 5, 2016. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 62/687,087, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Modular Stent Device for Multiple Vessels”, filed Jun. 19, 2018. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/830,221, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Modular Aortic Arch Prosthetic Assembly and Method of Use Thereof”, filed Dec. 4, 2017. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/367,906, of Keith Perkins et al., titled “Supra Aortic Access Modular Stent Assembly and Method”, filed Mar. 28, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/367,922, of Keith Perkins et al., titlled “Femoral Aortic Access Modular Stent Assembly and Method”, filed Mar. 28, 2019. [cited by applicant]