IP Library Granted Patent US 12,646,151
Granted Patent B2
US 12,646,151 · App. 18/267,606 · Granted Jun 2, 2026

Methods and systems for flexible denoising of images using disentangled feature representation field

Inventors: Xin Wang (Belmont, NY); Saifeng Liu (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
G06T5/70G06T7/0002G06T7/10G06V10/44G16H30/40G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30168
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,646,151
App. No.
18/267,606
Granted
Jun 2, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method are provided for denoising images. A standard image module is configured to generate a standard anatomy feature and a standard noise feature from a standard image and reconstruct the standard image from the standard anatomy feature and the standard noise feature. A reduced quality image module is configured to generate a reduced quality anatomy feature and a reduced quality noise feature from a reduced quality image, and reconstruct the reduced quality image from the reduced quality anatomy feature and the reduced quality noise feature. A loss calculation module is provided for calculating loss metrics at least partially based on a comparison between 1) the reconstructed standard image and the standard image, and 2) the reconstructed reduced quality image and the reduced quality image. Upon providing the standard image module with the reduced quality anatomy feature, the standard image module outputs a reconstructed standard transfer image.

Claims (42)

1 . A system for denoising medical images, comprising:

a standard image module configured to generate a standard anatomy feature and a standard noise feature from a standard image, and reconstruct the standard image from the standard anatomy feature and the standard noise feature;

a reduced quality image module configured to generate a reduced quality anatomy feature and a reduced quality noise feature from a reduced quality image, and reconstruct the reduced quality image from the reduced quality anatomy feature and the reduced quality noise feature;

a loss calculation module configured to calculate loss metrics comprising (i) a first reconstruction loss based at least in part on a comparison between the reconstructed standard image and the standard image; and (ii) a second reconstruction loss based at least in part on a comparison between the reconstructed reduced quality image and the reduced quality image, wherein the first reconstruction loss and the second reconstruction loss are computed independently of each other and are not cross-compared;

wherein the loss metrics are used for tuning the standard image module and the reduced quality image module using machine learning, wherein when the standard image module is provided with the reduced quality anatomy feature, the standard image module outputs a reconstructed standard transfer image that comprises the reduced quality anatomy feature and a noise level lower than that represented by the reduced quality noise feature, and wherein the loss calculation module comprises a standard anatomy encoder and is further configured to calculate a loss metric for the standard anatomy encoder based on a comparison between the standard anatomy feature and segmentation labels for the standard image.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the standard image module comprises a standard noise encoder, and a standard generator, and wherein upon receipt of the standard image, the standard anatomy encoder outputs the standard anatomy feature, the standard noise encoder outputs the standard noise feature, and the standard generator reconstructs the standard image from the standard anatomy feature and the standard noise feature;

the reduced quality image module comprises a reduced quality anatomy encoder, a reduced quality noise encoder, and a reduced quality generator, and wherein upon receipt of the reduced quality image, the reduced quality anatomy encoder outputs the reduced quality anatomy feature, the reduced quality noise encoder outputs the reduced quality noise feature, and the reduced quality generator reconstructs the reduced quality image from the reduced quality anatomy feature and the reduced quality noise feature;

wherein the loss calculation module calculates a loss metric for the standard generator at least partially based on the comparison between the reconstructed standard image and the standard image;

wherein the loss calculation module calculates a loss metric for the reduced quality generator at least partially based on the comparison between the reconstructed reduced quality image and the reduced quality image;

and

wherein the loss calculation module calculates a loss metric for the reduced quality anatomy encoder based on a comparison with the output of the standard anatomy encoder.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the loss metric for the reduced quality anatomy encoder is an adversarial loss metric.

4 . The system of claim 1 further comprising a segmentation network, and wherein a segmentation mask for the reconstructed standard image is evaluated based on a comparison with segmentation labels for the standard image.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein when the reduced quality generator is provided with a standard anatomy feature, the reduced quality generator outputs a reconstructed reduced quality transfer image that comprises the standard anatomy features and a noise level higher than that represented by the standard noise feature, and wherein a segmentation mask for the reduced quality transfer image is evaluated based on a comparison with the segmentation labels for the standard image.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein a loss metric for the standard transfer image is evaluated based on a comparison with a standard image reconstruction, and wherein the loss metric for the standard transfer image is an adversarial loss metric.

7 . The system of claim 1 wherein the standard image module and the reduced quality image module are trained simultaneously.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the standard image module is trained prior to the training of the reduced quality image module, and wherein values for variables developed while training the standard image module are held constant during training of the reduced quality image module.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein after training the standard image module and the reduced quality image module, the system further trains the standard generator while holding constant values for the standard anatomy encoder, the standard noise encoder, and the reduced quality anatomy encoder.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the standard anatomy feature and the reduced quality anatomy feature each correspond to a single anatomical structure.

11 . A method for denoising medical images, comprising:

generating, by a standard image module, a standard anatomy feature and a standard noise feature from a standard image;

reconstructing, by a standard image module, the standard image from the standard anatomy feature and the standard noise feature;

generating, by a reduced quality image module, a reduced quality anatomy feature and a reduced quality noise feature from a reduced quality image;

reconstructing, by the reduced quality image module, the reduced quality image from the reduced quality anatomy feature and the reduced quality noise feature; and

calculating, by a loss calculation module, loss metrics comprising (i) a first reconstruction loss based at least in part on a comparison between the reconstructed standard image and the standard image; and (ii) a second reconstruction loss based at least in part on a comparison between the reconstructed reduced quality image and the reduced quality image, wherein the first reconstruction loss and the second reconstruction loss are computed independently of each other and are not cross-compared;

wherein the loss metrics are used for tuning the standard image module and the reduced quality image module using machine learning, wherein when the standard image module is provided with the reduced quality anatomy feature, the standard image module outputs a reconstructed standard transfer image that comprises the reduced quality anatomy feature and a noise level lower than that represented by the reduced quality noise feature, and wherein the loss calculation module comprises a standard anatomy encoder and is further configured to calculate a loss metric for the standard anatomy encoder based on a comparison between the standard anatomy feature and segmentation labels for the standard image.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein:

the standard image module comprises a standard noise encoder, and a standard generator, and wherein upon receipt of the standard image, the standard anatomy encoder outputs the standard anatomy feature, the standard noise encoder outputs the standard noise feature, and the standard generator reconstructs the standard image from the standard anatomy feature and the standard noise feature;

the reduced quality image module comprises a reduced quality anatomy encoder, a reduced quality noise encoder, and a reduced quality generator, and wherein upon receipt of the reduced quality image, the reduced quality anatomy encoder outputs the reduced quality anatomy feature, the reduced quality noise encoder outputs the reduced quality noise feature, and the reduced quality generator reconstructs the reduced quality image from the reduced quality anatomy feature and the reduced quality noise feature;

wherein the loss calculation module calculates a loss metric for the standard generator at least partially based on the comparison between the reconstructed standard image and the standard image;

wherein the loss calculation module calculates a loss metric for the reduced quality generator at least partially based on the comparison between the reconstructed reduced quality image and the reduced quality image;

and

wherein the loss calculation module calculates a loss metric for the reduced quality anatomy encoder based on a comparison with the output of the standard anatomy encoder.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the loss metric for the reduced quality anatomy encoder is an adversarial loss metric.

14 . The method of claim 11 further comprising generating a segmentation mask for the reconstructed standard image at a segmentation network and evaluating the segmentation mask based on a comparison with segmentation labels for the standard image.

15 . The method of claim 14 wherein, upon providing the reduced quality generator with a standard anatomy feature, the reduced quality generator outputs a reconstructed reduced quality transfer image, the reduced quality transfer image including the standard anatomy features and a noise level higher than that represented by the standard noise feature, and wherein a segmentation mask for the reduced quality transfer image is evaluated based on a comparison with the segmentation labels for the standard image.

16 . The method of claim 11 , wherein a loss metric for the standard transfer image is evaluated based on a comparison with a standard image reconstruction, and wherein the loss metric for the standard transfer image is an adversarial loss metric.

17 . The method of claim 11 wherein the standard image module and the reduced quality image module are trained simultaneously.

18 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the standard image module is trained prior to the training of the reduced quality image module, and wherein values for variables developed while training the standard image module are held constant during training of the reduced quality image module.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein after training the standard image module and the reduced quality image module, the method further trains the standard generator while holding constant values for the standard anatomy encoder, the standard noise encoder, and the reduced quality anatomy encoder.

20 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the standard anatomy feature and the reduced quality anatomy feature each correspond to a single anatomical structure.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2023
From: WANG, XIN; LIU, SAIFENG
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 063962/0564 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63127424 · Dec 18, 2020
Related Publication 20240104700A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (13)
US 10949951B2 · Tang · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11030723B2 · Kamio · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11501438B2 · Xu · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11983846B2 · Dangi · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20150254850A1 · Jorgensen · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160071245A1 · Bergner · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200175662A1 · Wang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
JP 2020166814A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report, International application No. PCT/EP2021/084465, Feb. 22, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Huang Yongqiang et al: “Noise-Powered Disentangled Representation for Unsupervised Speckle Reduction of Optical Coherence Tomography Images”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE, USA, vol. 40, No. 10, Dec. 16, 20… [cited by applicant]
Zhang Zizhao et al: “Translating and Segmenting Multimodal Medical vols. with Cycle- and Shape- Consistency Generative Adversarial Network”, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, Jun… [cited by applicant]
Shizuo Kaji et al: “Overview of image-to-image translation by use of deep neural networks: denoising, super-resolution, modality conversion, and reconstruction in medical imaging”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library,… [cited by applicant]
Zhang R. et al., “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric”, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, p. 586-595. [cited by applicant]