IP Library Granted Patent US 12,654,031
Granted Patent B2
US 12,654,031 · App. 18/681,084 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation and improvement

Inventors: Erik Traneus (Uppsala, SE); Lars Glimelius (Stockholm, SE); Erik Engwall (Hagersten, SE); Elias Coniavitis (Stockholm, SE)
Assignee: Raysearch Laboratories AB
A61N5/103G16H20/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,654,031
App. No.
18/681,084
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A radiotherapy treatment plan may be evaluated based on a combination of two or more metrics, by the steps of simulating the result of delivery of the plan, obtaining values from the simulation for at least a first and a second metric, performing a multivariate analysis of the values and determining a quality of the plan based on the result of the multivariate analysis. The metrics may include at least one of dose, LET, track ends, RBE, alpha/beta ratio and statistical uncertainty of the plan.

Claims (19)

1 . A computer-based method of evaluating a radiotherapy treatment plan, comprising:

simulating a predicted result of delivery of the plan to obtain per-voxel for at least a first and a second metric for a treatment volume, wherein the first metric is related to dose, and wherein the second metric is one of the following: LET, dirty dose, track ends, RBE, alpha/beta ratio, and statistical uncertainty;

analyzing the obtained per-voxel values, the analyzing including segmenting the treatment volume by defining a first interval for the first metric and a second interval for the second metric, and assigning to a segment the voxels whose values for both metrics fall within the respective intervals;

evaluating a quality of the plan by comparing at least one condition expressed in terms of the voxel segmentation to a corresponding clinical goal; and

in response to the evaluation, performing a workflow action selected from: delivering radiation therapy in accordance with the plan to a patient, modifying the plan, and discarding the plan.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein presenting a visual representation includes:

visualizing the identified voxels in an image.

3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising identifying in the image the voxels associated with a user-selected region.

4 . A non-transitory computer program product, comprising a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions being executable by a processor to cause the processor to perform the method of claim 1 .

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the analyzing further comprises generating, from the per-voxel values, a two-dimensional volume histogram that represents a distribution of voxel counts over intervalizations of the first and second metrics; and

the evaluating comprises comparing at least one condition expressed in terms of the two-dimensional volume histogram to the clinical goal.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the clinical goal specifies a limit on a proportion of voxels within a defined interval pair of the two-dimensional volume histogram.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying the plan comprises repeating the simulation with increased accuracy when statistical uncertainty exceeds a threshold in a clinically relevant region.

8 . A computer system comprising a processor and a program memory, the program memory containing instructions that when executed by the processor causes the processor to perform a method of evaluating a radiotherapy treatment plan including the following steps:

simulating a predicted result of delivery of the plan to obtain per-voxel values for at least a first and a second metric for a treatment volume, wherein the first metric is related to dose, and wherein the second metric is one of the following: LET, dirty dose, track ends, RBE, alpha/beta ratio, and statistical uncertainty;

analyzing the obtained per-voxel values, the analyzing including segmenting the treatment volume by defining a first interval for the first metric and a second interval for the second metric, and assigning to a segment the voxels whose values for both metrics fall within the respective intervals;

evaluating a quality of the plan by comparing at least one condition expressed in terms of the voxel segmentation to a corresponding clinical goal; and

in response to the evaluation, performing a workflow action selected from: delivering radiation therapy in accordance with the plan to a patient, modifying the plan, and discarding the plan.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 4, 2024
From: TRANEUS, ERIK; GLIMELIUS, LARS; ENGWALL, ERIK; CONIAVITIS, ELIAS
To: RAYSEARCH LABORATORIES AB (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 066341/0440 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 21191208 · Aug 13, 2021 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250121208A1 · Apr 17, 2025
References Cited (23)
US 10328282B2 · An · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10549121B2 · Wu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 12083358B2 · Bengtsson · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20190076671A1 · Willcut · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190255354A1 · Nordström · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190329072A1 · Magro · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190336790A1 · Traneus et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210220671A1 · Eriksson · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230144962A1 · Andersson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240091558A1 · Traneus · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240379211A1 · Voet · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 111921098A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3228357A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3326694A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013248133A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016046683A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Chris McIntosh and Thomas G Purdie, “Voxel-based dose prediction with multi-patient atlas selection for automated radiotherapy treatment planning”, Dec. 20, 2017, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 62, No. 2. (Year: 20… [cited by examiner]
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Sep. 16, 2022, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, Netherlands. [cited by applicant]
Santos Tania et al: “Evaluaiton of the complexity of treatment plans from a national IMRT/VMAT aud it—Towards a plan complexity score”, Physica Medica, Acta Medica Edizioni E Congressi, Rome, IT, vo 1. 70, Jan. 23, 2020… [cited by applicant]
Vandewouw Marlee M et al: “Robotic path-finding in inverse treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery with continuousdose delivery”, Medical Physics, AIP, Melville, NY, US, vol. 43, No. 8, Jul. 15, 2016 (Jul. 15, … [cited by applicant]
Office action dated Sep. 11, 2024 from the European Patent Office, Munich, Germany. [cited by applicant]
Office action dated Nov. 25, 2025 in corresponding Japanese application No. 2024-517391, Japanese Patent Office, Tokyo, Japan. [cited by applicant]
1 Office Action in corresponding Chinese application No. 202280035512.4, Chinese Patent Office, Beijing, China. [cited by applicant]