IP Library Granted Patent US 12,656,769
Granted Patent B2
US 12,656,769 · App. 17/797,348 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Prediction apparatus, prediction method, and program

Inventors: Masahiro Haitsuka (Tokyo, JP); Hidetoshi Kozono (Tokyo, JP); Fumihiro Miyoshi (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: DAICEL CORPORATION
G05B23/0264G05B23/024
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,656,769
App. No.
17/797,348
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

To improve prediction accuracy of a process including a reaction in a chemical plant. A prediction apparatus includes a process data processing unit that performs a predetermined processing process on process data obtained from a chemical plant, and a prediction model generation unit that generates a prediction model having learned features of the process data obtained from the chemical plant, on the basis of causality information that defines a combination of first process data and second process data or a value corresponding to the second process data among the process data obtained from the chemical plant or the process data processed by the process data processing unit. The first process data is used as an explanatory variable. The second process data or the value corresponding to the second process data is used as a response variable. Furthermore, the process data processing unit obtains a value corresponding to a reaction rate of a processing target in a predetermined period by using the process data.

Claims (32)

1 . A prediction apparatus including:

a process data processing unit configured to perform a predetermined processing process on process data obtained from a chemical plant;

a prediction model generation unit configured to generate a prediction model having learned features of the process data obtained from the chemical plant, on the basis of causality information that defines a combination of first process data and second process data or a value corresponding to the second process data among the process data obtained from the chemical plant or the process data processed by the process data processing unit, the first process data being used as an explanatory variable, the second process data or the value corresponding to the second process data being used as a response variable; and

a quality prediction unit configured to calculate a predicted value by using the prediction model and to output the predicted value,

wherein

the process data processing unit obtains a value corresponding to a reaction rate of a processing target in a predetermined period by using the process data including a temperature in a corresponding step representing the predetermined interval in a stage, and

the value corresponding to the reaction rate is an integral value of the reaction rate.

2 . The prediction apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the value corresponding to the reaction rate is calculated by using an Arrhenius equation, and a frequency factor and activation energy of a reaction rate constant are determined according to a type of chemical reaction and a processing target in the chemical plant.

3 . The prediction apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the process data processing unit further obtains an integral value, a differential value, an average value, a maximum value, or a minimum value of the process data in a predetermined period, or an instantaneous value of the process data at a predetermined time point according to a type of the process data.

4 . The prediction apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the prediction model has a hierarchical structure including a plurality of prediction equations, and includes a second prediction equation in which a predicted value calculated by a first prediction equation is included as an explanatory variable.

5 . The prediction apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein

the value corresponding to the second process data is a value obtained by sampling a plurality of second process data by a sample size reduction method, and

the prediction model generation unit generates the prediction model by correlating a range of acquisition timing of the first process data with calculation timing of the value corresponding to the second process data in the chemical plant, on the basis of a residence time of the processing target in the chemical plant.

6 . The prediction apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein

the chemical plant performs a batch stage of sequentially processing a processing target on a transaction-to-transaction basis using a predetermined transaction and a subsequent continuous stage of continuously processing the processing target, and

the prediction model generation unit generates the prediction model by correlating a range of completion timing of the batch stage and the calculation timing of the value corresponding to the second process data on the basis of the residence time of the processing target in the chemical plant.

7 . A prediction method performed by a prediction apparatus, the prediction method comprising:

performing a predetermined processing process on process data obtained from a chemical plant;

generating a prediction model having learned features of the process data obtained from the chemical plant, on the basis of causality information that defines a combination of first process data and second process data or a value corresponding to the second process among the process data obtained from the chemical plant or the process data processed in the performing of the predetermined processing process, the first process data being used as an explanatory variable, the second process data or the value corresponding to the second process being used as a response variable; and

calculating a predicted value by using the prediction model, and

outputting the predicted value,

wherein

in the performing of the predetermined processing process, a value corresponding to a reaction rate of a processing target in a predetermined period is obtained by using the process data including a temperature in a corresponding step representing the predetermined interval in a stage, and

the value corresponding to the reaction rate is an integral value rate of the reaction rate.

8 . A non-transitory storage medium storing a program that causes a computer to:

perform a predetermined processing process on process data obtained from a chemical plant;

generate a prediction model having learned features of the process data obtained from the chemical plant, on the basis of causality information that defines a combination of first process data and second data or a value corresponding to the second process data among the process data obtained from the chemical plant or the process data processed in the performing of the predetermined processing process, the first process data being used as an explanatory variable, the second process data or the value corresponding to the second process data being used as a response variable; and

calculate a predicted value by using the prediction model, and

output the predicted value,

wherein

in the performing of the predetermined processing process, a value corresponding to a reaction rate of a processing target in a predetermined period is obtained by using the process data data including a temperature in a corresponding step representing the predetermined interval in a stage, and

the value corresponding to the reaction rate is an integral value rate of the reaction rate.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2022
From: HAITSUKA, MASAHIRO; KOZONO, HIDETOSHI; MIYOSHI, FUMIHIRO
To: DAICEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 060717/0630 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2020-017475 · Feb 4, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230057943A1 · Feb 23, 2023
References Cited (54)
US 5062066A · Scher et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 9760933B1 · Cai · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10970651B1 · Barker · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20020049625A1 · Kilambi · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030120361A1 · Anderson · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20060210444A1 · Asano · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20090012631A1 · Fuller · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090192745A1 · Kamath · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120290104A1 · Holt · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130111878A1 · Pachner · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130256113A1 · Tumiatti · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130297549A1 · Yano · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140217036A1 · Bremer · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160364456A1 · Trenchard · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180081350A1 · Seki · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180285766A1 · Shen · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190101908A1 · Park · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190188584A1 · Rao · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190198136A1 · Hou · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190258234A1 · Kaye · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190331656A1 · Chaum · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190347590A1 · Rajasekaran · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190358601A1 · Kern · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190392360A1 · Kweon · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200096993A1 · Cella · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200272974A1 · Sato · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210069361A1 · Schmidt-Bleker · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210088986A1 · Furuichi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210139390A1 · Fukubayashi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210201079A1 · Watanabe · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210338552A1 · Ujimoto · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220148114A1 · Bingham · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220198284A1 · Inaba · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230104043A1 · Ferraro · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240085878A1 · Schneider · 2024 [cited by examiner]
JP 2001106703A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001325582A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003526856A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 200920787A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 201158102A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 5751045B2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018120343A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 6477423B2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 201974969A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012093483A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018009643A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2021/004168, dated Apr. 27, 2021, with an English translation. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2021/004168, dated Apr. 27, 2021, with an English translation. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21751321.7, dated Feb. 6, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Caputo et al., “Parametric and neural methods for cost estimation of process vessels,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 112, 2008, pp. 934-954. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21750645.0, dated Jan. 30, 2024. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/JP2021/004179, dated Apr. 13, 2021, with English translation. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/797,343, dated Sep. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2021/004179, dated Apr. 13, 2021, with English translation. [cited by applicant]