IP Library Granted Patent US 12,657,640
Granted Patent B2
US 12,657,640 · App. 17/106,694 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Computerized network system for conducting remote, virtual mediation proceedings

Inventor: Beatrice T. O'Brien (Short Hills, NJ)
Assignee: BJUSTCOIN IP HOLDING LLC
G06Q50/182H04L9/0618H04L9/3247H04N7/152H04L9/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,657,640
App. No.
17/106,694
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computerized network system is configured to enable a mediator to conduct remote, virtual proceedings between two or more adverse parties. Each of the adverse parties participate in the proceedings through a Party App, while the mediator uses a Mediator App. A network connection connects the parties and the mediator to a system server and a system database. Virtual mediation proceedings are conducted in multiple virtual meeting rooms, and all non-private communications and documents are tracked by a blockchain process and stored in the system database.

Claims (33)

1 . A computerized network system for conducting a remote, virtual mediation proceeding conducted by a mediator to resolve a dispute between two or more adverse parties, the network system comprising:

a network system software, comprising a system database, a server software, a downloadable native Party App, for use by the adverse parties, a downloadable Attorney App, for use by adverse attorneys who represent the adverse parties, and a web-based Mediation App, for use by the mediator in conducting the mediation proceeding, and wherein the Party App and the Attorney App link to the Mediation App;

system hardware, comprising party pc devices, used by the adverse parties, attorney pc devices, used by the adverse attorneys, mediator pc devices, used by the mediator, and a system server, wherein the party pc devices run the Party App linked to the Mediation App, the attorney pc devices run the Attorney App with a link to the Mediation App, the mediator pc devices run the Mediation App, and the system server runs the server software, and wherein the system hardware is interconnected through a network connection;

wherein the Mediation App identifies the mediation proceeding by a unique alpha-numerical case number and assigns a sequential session number to a mediation session of the mediation proceeding;

wherein the Mediation App configures multiple virtual mediation rooms, comprising a Mediator's Room, assigned to the mediator, and multiple Party Rooms, assigned to each of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys;

wherein the Mediation App is configured to enable the mediator to schedule the mediation session and to invite the adverse parties and the adverse attorneys to participate in the mediation session, through the Party App and the Attorney App, by signing into the Mediation App through the system server, using the case number and the sequential session number;

wherein the Mediation App assigns one of the Party Rooms to each of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys; and

wherein the Mediation App includes a video-conferencing software, which is configured to enable the mediator to conduct one or more virtual joint conferences with two or more of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys in the Mediator's Room, and which is configured to enable the mediator to conduct one or more virtual private conferences with one of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys in the Party Room assigned to said adverse party;

wherein the video-conferencing software is configured to enable real-time sharing of multiple mediation documents between and among the adverse parties, the adverse attorneys and the mediator, and is configured to enable real-time drafting and editing of the mediation documents by the adverse parties, the adverse attorneys and/or the mediator;

wherein the network system software is configured to implement a blockchain process, which generates an immutable record of the mediation documents and of the virtual joint conferences conducted by the mediator, and which stores the immutable record in the system database; and

wherein the video-conferencing software, in the course of one of the virtual joint conferences, is configured to enable any of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys to conduct private discussions among themselves and/or with one or more other of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys and/or with the mediator, and wherein the immutable record generated by the blockchain process excludes the private discussions.

2 . The computerized network system according to claim 1 , wherein the Mediation App is configured to enable the mediator to elicit and receive from one or more of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys a verbal consent authorizing the mediator to present a settlement initiative to other adverse parties and their adverse attorneys, and wherein the blockchain process tracks and stores each verbal consent in the system database.

3 . The computerized network system according to claim 2 , wherein the Mediation App is configured to enable the adverse parties to electronically sign final versions of the mediation documents, and to enable the mediator to electronically attest electronic signatures of the adverse parties.

4 . A method of conducting the remote, virtual mediation proceeding to resolve the dispute between the two or more adverse parties, the method comprising the following steps:

(a) providing the computerized network system according to claim 1 ;

(b) selection by the adverse parties of the mediator;

(c) the mediator using the video-conferencing software to conduct a first virtual joint conference, in which all of the adverse parties and adverse attorneys participate, and in which each adverse party shares an initial position document that sets forth a settlement proposal of said adverse party;

(d) the mediator using the video-conferencing software to conduct a series of interim virtual private conferences with each of the adverse parties, in which interim virtual private conferences the mediator and the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys discuss modifications to the settlement proposals toward reaching a mutually acceptable settlement agreement;

(e) the mediator using the video-conferencing software to conduct a series of interim virtual joint conferences, in which some or all of the adverse parties and adverse attorneys participate in discussions of modifications to the settlement proposals toward reaching the mutually acceptable settlement agreement; and

(f) the mediator using the video-conferencing software and the network system software to conduct a final virtual joint conference, in which all of the adverse parties and adverse attorneys participate, and in which the settlement agreement is reduced to a final settlement document, which is electronically signed by all the adverse parties and electronically attested by the mediator.

5 . A system for conducting a remote virtual mediation proceeding comprising:

network system software that includes: a mediation app for use by a mediator during a virtual mediation proceeding; a party app for use by adverse parties during the virtual mediation proceeding; an attorney app for use by attorneys during the virtual mediation proceeding; and

system hardware comprising: a server configured to execute the mediation app; party devices that execute the party app; attorney devices that execute the attorney app;

wherein:

the server, the party devices, and the attorney devices are interconnected through a network connection;

the mediation app configures multiple virtual mediation rooms comprising a virtual mediator room assigned to the mediator and multiple virtual party rooms, each of which is assigned an adverse party and one or more attorney associated with the adverse party;

the mediation app permits the mediator to establish a virtual mediation session that enables the adverse parties and the adverse attorneys to participate in the virtual mediation session through the party app and the attorney app;

the mediation app is configured to assign a first one of the adverse parties and their attorneys to a first virtual party room;

the mediation app is configured to assign a second one of the adverse parties and their attorneys to a second virtual party room;

the mediation app includes video-conferencing software, which enables the mediator to conduct one or more virtual joint conferences with the adverse parties and their attorneys in the virtual mediator room, and enables the mediator to conduct one or more virtual private conferences with one of the adverse parties and their attorneys in one of the virtual party rooms;

wherein the mediation app identifies the virtual mediation proceeding by a unique alpha-numerical case number and assigns a sequential session number to the virtual mediation session of the virtual mediation proceeding;

the network system software is configured to implement a blockchain process, which generates an immutable record for the virtual joint conferences conducted by the mediator; and

wherein the video-conferencing software, in the course of one of the virtual joint conferences, is configured to enable any of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys to conduct private discussions among themselves and/or with one or more other of the adverse parties and their adverse attorneys and/or with the mediator, and wherein the immutable record generated by the blockchain process excludes the private discussions.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2025
From: JUSTLAW LLC
To: BJUSTCOIN IP HOLDING LLC
Reel/Frame 070435/0384 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2024
From: O'BRIEN, BEATRICE T.
To: JUSTLAW LLC
Reel/Frame 067619/0847 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation In Part 16244720 · Jan 10, 2019
Continuation In Part 16041070 · Jul 20, 2018
Provisional Application 62668496 · May 8, 2018
Provisional Application 62632718 · Feb 20, 2018
Provisional Application 62629354 · Feb 12, 2018
Provisional Application 62596192 · Dec 8, 2017
Related Publication 20210082068A1 · Mar 18, 2021
References Cited (29)
US 7249114B2 · Burchetta et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7251607B1 · Veschi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7529679B1 · Pomerance · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 11270300B1 · Vijayaraghavan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20020007362A1 · Collins et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020035480A1 · Gordon · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20040030603A1 · Grundfest · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040138900A1 · Read · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20060176365A1 · Reisch · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20080126266A1 · Burchetta et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100131328A1 · DeLugas · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20120198357A1 · Tozzi · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130046700A1 · Vilosny · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130144754A1 · Moser · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130339256A1 · Shroff · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140379589A1 · Ratcliffe · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160027134A1 · Alvarado · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170148118A1 · Fuller · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190102848A1 · Egenthal · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200334772A1 · Gorodeisky · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210049717A1 · Li · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20250126202A1 · Nahamoo · 2025 [cited by examiner]
Goodman, Joseph, “The Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Dispute Resolution: An Assessment of Cyber-Mediation Web Sites”, Journal of Internet Law, vol. 9, No. 11, May 2006 (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]
Sela, Ayelet, “Can Computers Be Fair? How Automated and Human-Powered Online Dispute Resolution Affect Procedural Justice in Mediation and Arbitration”, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, vol. 33:1 2018 (Year: 20… [cited by examiner]
Allen et al, “The Governance of Blockchain Dispute Resolution”, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, vol. 25:75 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Hornle, Julia, “Online Dispute Resolution: The Emperor's New Clothes?”, International Review of Law Computers & Technology, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 27-37, 2003 (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
Bastress, Robert et al., “Taking The Lawyer's Craft Into Virtual Space: Computer-Mediated Interviewing, Counseling, and Negotiating”, Clinical Law Review, vol. 10:115, 2003 (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
Hickey, Will, “Using Blockchain for Immutable Mediation and Autonomous Governance”, Technology & Digital Governance, Harvardkennedyschoolreview.com, vol. 19, pp. 143-147, 2019 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Protopsaltou, Dimitris et al., “Taking the Fourth Party Further? Considering a Shared Virtual Workspace for Arbitration”, Information & Communications Technology Law, vol. 15, No. 2, Jun. 2006 (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]