IP Library Granted Patent US 12,675,026
Granted Patent B1
US 12,675,026 · App. 17/709,230 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

Dynamical decoupling of wells for an energy gap protected qubit

Inventors: Harald Esko Jakob Putterman (Malibu, CA); Joseph Kramer Iverson (Pasadena, CA); Liang Jiang (Chicago, IL); Fernando Brandao (Pasadena, CA); Kyungjoo Noh (Pasadena, CA); Oskar Jon Painter (Sierra Madre, CA); Qian Xu (Chicago, IL)
Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc.
G02F3/00G06N10/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,675,026
App. No.
17/709,230
Filed
Mar 30, 2022
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B1
Art Unit
2851
USPC
716/100
Abstract

Selective frequency dissipation is implemented that enables cooling of energy gap protected qubits such that excited energy states resulting from heating or other undesired processes are returned to a lower excited energy state or a ground state manifold, thus reducing the probability of errors. Also, the selective frequency dissipation inhibits leakage from the energy gap protected qubits when in the ground state. Additionally or alternatively, Hamiltonian engineering by inducing parity rotations is implemented to decouple the wells of the energy gap protected qubit to further reduce errors when leakage does happen.

Claims (55)

1 . A system comprising:

quantum hardware configured to:

prepare protected ground states of an energy gap protected qubit;

stabilize the ground states of a ground state manifold of a Hamiltonian for the energy gap protected qubit; and

undergo pulse sequences inducing rotations or oscillations to suppress tunneling between non-protected excited states of an oscillator mode used to encode the energy gap protected qubit,

wherein the pulse sequences reduce a probability of a bit-flip error occurring in the energy gap protected qubit.

2 . The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a drive, wherein:

the pulse sequences are applied via the drive; and

the drive is a pulsed drive.

3 . The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a drive, wherein:

the pulse sequences are applied via the drive; and

the drive is a continuous pulsed drive.

4 . The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a drive, wherein:

the pulse sequences are applied via the drive; and

the drive is configured to reduce the probability of the bit-flip error occurring in the energy gap protected qubit.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the quantum hardware is further configured to implement a resonator, wherein:

the resonator comprises the energy gap protected qubit and a drive; and

the pulse sequences are applied via the drive.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the quantum hardware is further configured to implement:

a decay channel, wherein:

dissipation is permitted from the energy gap protected qubit via the decay channel at frequencies at which the system moves from a higher excited energy state of the non-protected excited states to a lower energy state, wherein the lower energy state is the ground state manifold or an intermediate excited energy state of the non-protected excited states; and

emission of photons is restricted from the energy gap protected qubit via the decay channel at a frequency of the ground state manifold.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the energy gap protected qubit is a Kerr cat qubit.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the pulse sequences inducing rotations are pulse sequences inducing parity or Z rotations.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the energy gap protected qubit is configured to encode more than two levels of quantum information.

10 . A method of stabilizing an energy gap protected qubit, the method comprising:

preparing protected ground states of an energy gap protected qubit;

stabilizing the ground states of a ground state manifold of a Hamiltonian for the energy gap protected qubit; and

applying a drive that induces rotations or oscillations to suppress tunneling between non-protected excited states of a mode used to encode the energy gap protected qubit,

wherein the drive is configured to reduce a probability of a bit-flip error occurring in the energy gap protected qubit.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the drive suppresses tunneling via targeting one or more reductions of effective tunneling coefficients (χ n ) in the Hamiltonian defined for the energy gap protected qubit.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the drive is a continuous drive configured to reduce the probability of the bit-flip error occurring in the energy gap protected qubit.

13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the energy gap protected qubit is a cat qubit.

14 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the energy gap protected qubit is a Kerr cat qubit.

15 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the drive is a pulsed drive configured to reduce the probability of the bit-flip error occurring in the energy gap protected qubit.

16 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

dissipating photons via a decay channel, wherein:

dissipation is permitted from the energy gap protected qubit via the decay channel at frequencies at which the oscillator mode moves from a higher excited energy state of the non-protected excited states to a lower energy state, wherein the lower energy state is the ground state manifold or an intermediate excited energy state of the non-protected excited states; and

emission of photons is restricted from the energy gap protected qubit via the decay channel at a frequency of the ground state manifold.

17 . One or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media storing program instructions, that when executed cause:

preparation of protected ground states of an energy gap protected qubit;

stabilization of the ground states of a ground state manifold of a Hamiltonian for the energy gap protected qubit; and

application of a drive that induces rotations or oscillations to suppress tunneling between non-protected excited states of a mode used to encode the energy gap protected qubit

wherein the drive is configured to reduce a probability of a bit-flip error occurring in the energy gap protected qubit.

18 . The one or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media of claim 17 , wherein the program instructions, when executed on or across one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

configure the drive as a continuous drive that reduces the probability of the bit-flip error occurring in the energy gap protected qubit.

19 . The one or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media of claim 17 , wherein the program instructions, when executed on or across one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

configure the drive as a pulsed drive that emits pulse sequences such that the pulse sequences suppress leakage out of a code space defined by the energy gap protected qubit.

20 . The one or more non-transitory, computer-readable, storage media of claim 17 , wherein the program instructions, when executed on or across the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to:

dissipate photons via a decay channel, wherein:

dissipation is permitted from the energy gap protected qubit via the decay channel at frequencies at which the oscillator mode moves from a higher excited energy state of the non-protected excited states to a lower energy state, wherein the lower energy state is the ground state manifold or an intermediate excited energy state of the non-protected excited states; and

emission of photons is restricted from the energy gap protected qubit via the decay channel at a frequency of the ground state manifold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2022
From: PUTTERMAN, HARALD ESKO JAKOB; IVERSON, JOSEPH KRAMER; JIANG, LIANG; BRANDAO, FERNANDO; NOH, KYUNGJOO; PAINTER, OSKAR JON; XU, QIAN
To: AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 059640/0329 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 63217239 · Jun 30, 2021
References Cited (41)
US 10229365B2 · Fuechsle · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20180232654A1 · Epstein · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180341874A1 · Puri · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200242208A1 · Daraeizadeh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210125096A1 · Puri · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210126652A1 · Delfosse · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210258079A1 · Lauer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210342161A1 · Lauer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230267360A1 · Dzurak · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240119337A1 · Xu · 2024 [cited by examiner]
F. Arute, et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor”, Nature 574, pp. 505-510 (2019). [cited by applicant]
P. W. Shor, “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring”, in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1994), pp. 124-134. [cited by applicant]
S. Lloyd, “Universal quantum simulators”, Science vol. 273, No. 5278, pp. 1073-1078, (1996). [cited by applicant]
D. Gottesman, “An Introduction to Quantum Error Correction and Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation”, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:0904.2557 (2009), arXiv:0904.2557 [quantph], pp.… [cited by applicant]
A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, “Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation”, © 2012 American Physical Society, Physical Review A 86, 032324 (2012), pp. 1-48. [cited by applicant]
J. Koch, et al., “Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box”, © 2007 American Physical Society, Physical Review A 76, 042319 (2007), pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]
J. A. Schreier, et al., “Suppressing charge noise decoherence in superconducting charge qubits”, © 2008 American Physical Society, Physical Review B 77, 180502 (2008), pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
L. Egan, et al., “Fault-Tolerant Operation of a Quantum Error-Correction Code”, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2009.11482 (2020), arXiv:2009.11482 [quant-ph], pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, “Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping”, Physical Review A, vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 2631-2634 (1999). [cited by applicant]
H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, “Efficient quantum computation using coherent states”, © 2002 The American Physical Society, Physical Review A, vol. 65, 042305 (2002), pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
M. Mirrahimi, et al., “Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation”, © 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd and Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft, New Journal of Physics 16, 045014 (2014) pp.… [cited by applicant]
S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, “Engineering the quantum states of light in a kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving”, npj Quantum Information 3, Article 18 (2017), pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Repetition Cat Qubits for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation, Physical Review X 9, 041053 (2019), arXiv e-print arXiv:1904.09474, pp. 1-23. [cited by applicant]
S. Puri, et al, “Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits”, Science Advances 6, 10.1126/sciadv.aay5901 (2020), pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
D. K. Tuckett, S. D. Bartlett, and S. T. Flammia, “Ultrahigh error threshold for surface codes with biased noise”, © 2018 American Physical Society, Physical Review Letters 120, 050505 (2018), pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
D. K. Tuckett, et al, “Tailoring surface codes for-highly biased noise”, Chapter 3, Physical Review X 9, 041031 (2019), pp. 53-251. [cited by applicant]
D. K. Tuckett, et al., “Fault-tolerant thresholds for the surface code in excess of 5% under biased noise”, Pphysical Review Letters 124, 130501 (2020), arXiv e-print arXiv:1907.02554, pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
C. Chamberland, et al., “Building a fault-tolerant quantum computer using concatenated cat codes”, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2012.04108 (2020), arXiv:2012.04108 [quant-ph], pp. 1-118. [cited by applicant]
J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, “Error rates and resource overheads of repetition cat qubits”, Physical Review A 103, 042413 (2021), arXiv e-print arXiv:2009.10756, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
J. P. Bonilla Ataides, et al, “The XZZX Surface Code”, Nature Communications 12, 2172 (2021), arXiv eprint: arXiv:2009.07851, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
A. S. Darmawan, et al., “Practical quantum error correctio with the XZZX code and Kerr-cat qubits”, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2104.09539 (2021), arXiv:2104.09539 [quant-ph], pp. 1-21. [cited by applicant]
Z. Leghtas, et al., “Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss”, Science vol. 347, pp. 853-857 (Feb. 20, 2015). [cited by applicant]
S. Touzard, et al., “Coherent Oscillations inside a Quantum Manifold Stabilized by Dissipation”, Published by the American Physical Society, Physical Review X 8, 021005 (2018), pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
R. Lescanne, et al., “Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator”, Nature Physics 16, 509 (2020), arXiv e-print: arXiv:1907.11729v1 [quant-ph] Jul. 26, 2019, pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]
A. Grimm, et al., “The Kerr-Cat Qubit: Stabilization, Readout, and Gates”, Nature 584, 205 (2020), arXiv e-print: arXiv:1907.12131v2 [quant-ph] Aug. 18, 2020, pp. 1-24. [cited by applicant]
Q. Xu, J. K. Iverson, F. G. S. L. Brandao, and L. Jiang, “Engineering fast bias-preserving gates on stabilized cat qubits”, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2105.13908 (2021), arXiv:2105.13908 [quant-ph], pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]
S. Puri, et al., “Stabilized Cat in Driven Nonlinear Cavity: A Fault-Tolerant Error Syndrome Detector”, Physical Review X 9, 041009 (2019), arXiv e-print: arXiv:1807.09334v1 [quant-ph] , pp. 1-22. [cited by applicant]
V. S. Ferreira, et al., “Collapse and Revival of an Artificial Atom Coupled to a Structured Photonic Reservoir”, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2001.03240 (2020), arXiv:2001.03240 [quant-ph], pp. 1-19. [cited by applicant]
F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, “Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems”, Physical Review A 85, 032111 (2012), arXiv e-print: arXiv:1112.2806v2 [quant-ph], pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Fernando G.S.L. et al, “Colored Kerr cat qubits”, dated Jun. 29, 2021, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/364,813, filed Jun. 30, 2021, Putterman, et al. [cited by applicant]