IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,676,026
Granted Patent B1
US 12,676,026 · App. 17/957,317 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

Partial image search

Inventors: Georges Abou-Rjeili (Montreal, CA); Artem Voronin (Montreal, CA)
Assignee: Jumio Corporation
G06V40/394G06V10/761G06V30/413G06V40/33H04L9/3236
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,676,026
App. No.
17/957,317
Filed
Sep 30, 2022
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B1
Art Unit
2674
USPC
382/119
Abstract

The disclosure includes a system and method for partial image search including receiving, using one or more processors, an input image representing a first image of an identification document; preprocessing, using the one or more processors, the input image; determining, using the one or more processors, a signature based on the preprocessed image; obtaining, using the one or more processors, information associated with other images, the information associated with the other images including signatures associated with the other images; and determining, using the one or more processors, whether the input image is similar to one or more of the other images based at least in part on their respective signatures.

Claims (48)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving, using one or more processors, an input image representing a first image of an identification document;

preprocessing, using the one or more processors, the input image, wherein preprocessing the input image includes segmenting the input image into a document portion and a background portion, the document portion representing the identification document in the input image, and the background portion representing a surrounding of the identification document in the input image and nonoverlapping with the document portion;

determining, using the one or more processors, at least one signature based on the preprocessed input image, wherein the at least one signature includes one or more of:

a first signature determined by applying a first set of hash functions to the document portion resulting in a first set of hashes and concatenating the first set of hashes, the first signature including the concatenated first set of hashes, and

a second signature determined by applying a second set of hash functions to the background portion resulting in a second set of hashes and concatenating the second set of hashes, the second signature including the concatenated second set of hashes;

obtaining, using the one or more processors, information associated with other images, the information associated with the other images including signatures associated with the other images;

determining, using the one or more processors, a set of hash-based similarity measures between one or more of:

the concatenated first set of hashes associated with the document portion of the input image and concatenated hashes included in signatures associated with document portions of the other images, and

the concatenated second set of hashes associated with the background portion of the input image and concatenated hashes included in signatures associated with background portions of the other images; and

determining, using the one or more processors, whether one or more of (1) the document portion of the input image is similar to another document portion in the other images and (2) the background portion of the input image is similar to another background portion in the other images, wherein similarity is determined based at least in part on a hash-based similarity measure between concatenated hashes included in their respective signatures.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein preprocessing the input image includes:

rectifying the input image; and

applying one or more transforms.

3 . The method of claim 1 further comprising one or more of:

rejecting the input image, flagging the input image as fraudulent, subjecting a user to additional verification, subjecting the user to a higher level of scrutiny, rejecting the user, subjecting a user request to additional verification, subjecting the user request to a higher level of scrutiny, and rejecting the user request.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of hash functions includes one or more of an average hash function, a perceptual hash function, a difference hash function, and a perceptual hash function; and the second set of hash functions includes one or more of the average hash function, the perceptual hash function, the difference hash function, and the perceptual hash function.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of hash-based similarity measures includes a cosine similarity.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein determining whether the input image is similar to one or more of the other images is based at least in part on the cosine similarity between their respective concatenated hashes satisfying a threshold.

7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein determining whether the input image is similar to one or more of the other images is based at least in part on the cosine similarity between their respective concatenated hashes and a set of other features, wherein the other features include one or more of a number of similar other images and a subtype associated with the identification document in the input image.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of hash-based similarity measures includes a hamming distance.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the set of hash-based similarity measures is based on a machine learning model.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the machine learning model is based on a random forest or neural network.

11 . A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

a memory, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to:

receive an input image representing a first image of an identification document;

preprocess the input image, wherein preprocessing the input image includes segmenting the input image into a document portion and a background portion, the document portion representing the identification document in the input image, and the background portion representing a surrounding of the identification document in the input image and nonoverlapping with the document portion;

determine at least one signature based on the preprocessed input image, wherein the at least one signature includes one or more of:

a first signature by applying a first set of hash functions to document portion resulting in a first set of hashes and concatenating the first set of hashes, the first signature including the concatenated first set of hashes, and

a second signature determined by applying a second set of hash functions to the background portion resulting in a second set of hashes and concatenating the second set of hashes, the second signature including the concatenated second set of hashes;

obtain information associated with other images, the information associated with the other images including signatures associated with the other images;

determine a set of hash-based similarity measures between one or more of:

the concatenated first set of hashes associated with the document portion of the input image and concatenated hashes included in signatures associated with document portions of the other images, and

the concatenated second set of hashes associated with the background portion of the input image and concatenated hashes included in signatures associated with background portions of the other images; and

determine whether one or more of (1) the background document portion of the input image is similar to another document portion in the other images and (2) the background portion of the input image is similar to another background portion in the other images, wherein similarity is determined based at least in part on a hash-based similarity measure between concatenated sets of hashes included in their respective signatures.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions for preprocessing the input image further cause the one or more processors to:

rectify the input image; and

apply one or more transforms.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to one or more of:

reject the input image, flag the input image as fraudulent, subject a user to additional verification, subject the user to a higher level of scrutiny, reject the user, subject a user request to additional verification, subject the user request to a higher level of scrutiny, and reject the user request.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first set of hash functions includes one or more of an average hash function, a perceptual hash function, a difference hash function, and a perceptual hash function; and the second set of hash functions includes one or more of the average hash function, the perceptual hash function, the difference hash function, and the perceptual hash function.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the set of hash-based similarity measures includes a cosine similarity.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein determining whether the input image is similar to one or more of the other images is based at least in part on the cosine similarity between their respective concatenated hashes satisfying a threshold.

17 . The system of claim 15 , wherein determining whether the input image is similar to one or more of the other images is based at least in part on the cosine similarity between their respective concatenated hashes and a set of other features, wherein the other features include one or more of a number of similar other images and a subtype associated with the identification document in the input image.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the set of hash-based similarity measures includes a hamming distance.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein determining the set of hash-based similarity measures is based on a machine learning model.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the machine learning model is based on a random forest or neural network.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2022
From: ABOU-RJEILI, GEORGES; VORONIN, ARTEM
To: JUMIO CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061656/0928 →
References Cited (171)
US 4897814A · Clark · 1990 [cited by examiner]
US 5425110A · Spitz · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5544255A · Smithies · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 5668897A · Stolfo · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 5748780A · Stolfo · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5838814A · Moore · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 6363162B1 · Moed · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 7040539B1 · Stover · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7831531B1 · Baluja · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8326761B1 · Hecht · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8352494B1 · Badoiu · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8886648B1 · Procopio · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8910032B2 · Graves · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9135517B1 · Adams · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9836591B2 · John et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10320807B2 · Khan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10628702B1 · Gerstner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11144752B1 · Castelblanco et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11416562B1 · Gruhl · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11593439B1 · Avadhani · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11625954B2 · Kwak et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11715102B2 · Edwards · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11900755B1 · Bueche, Jr. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12197483B1 · Shmukler et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12387512B1 · Sureka et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20020064305A1 · Taylor · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030172066A1 · Cooper · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030229637A1 · Baxter et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040155877A1 · Hong · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20060026156A1 · Zuleba · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060041506A1 · Mason · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060124726A1 · Kotovich · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060164682A1 · Lev · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070078846A1 · Gulli · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070086628A1 · Fuchs · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070116328A1 · Sablak · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070150387A1 · Seubert et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070256010A1 · Blackmon et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080065630A1 · Luo · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080149713A1 · Brundage · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090060396A1 · Blessan · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090152357A1 · Lei et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090261158A1 · Lawson · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100027896A1 · Geva · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110057040A1 · Jones · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110128360A1 · Hatzav et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130129159A1 · Huijgens et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140002872A1 · Cook · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140046954A1 · Maclean et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140161326A1 · Ganong et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100590A1 · Robinson · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150242592A1 · Weiss · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150341370A1 · Khan · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160005050A1 · Teman · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160098399A1 · Casperson · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160210450A1 · Su · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170161375A1 · Stoica · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170193285A1 · Negi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170277945A1 · Budihal · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170322932A1 · Deschenes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170337449A1 · Hamada · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170351909A1 · Kaehler · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180060874A1 · Kelts et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180075090A1 · Knight · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180186164A1 · Wu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180204113A1 · Galron · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180293461A1 · Le Borgne · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180300296A1 · Ziraknejad · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180373859A1 · Ganong · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190035431A1 · Attorre · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190205686A1 · Mayer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190272549A1 · Mossoba · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190278986A1 · Nepomniachtchi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184201A1 · Kaehler · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200304650A1 · Roach · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200342600A1 · Sjöstrand · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200366671A1 · Larson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210075788A1 · Pasterk et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210124919A1 · Balakrishnan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210174016A1 · Fox et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210248401A1 · Timoshenko et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210259660A1 · Bharat · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210307841A1 · Buch · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210320801A1 · Wyss · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210326461A1 · Paul et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210326629A1 · Slattery · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220028086A1 · Woodard · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220058660A1 · Ivanov · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220114456A1 · Nouri et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220180113A1 · Patel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220182430A1 · Bennett-James · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220385880A1 · Nims · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230013380A1 · Choi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230017185A1 · Cheong et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230083000A1 · Fujimoto et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230113148A1 · Zlotnick · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230129350A1 · Bryan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230143239A1 · Yusuf et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230196628A1 · Bischoff · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230298031A1 · Drapeau et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230421602A1 · Boyer · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240046686A1 · Ye et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240193970A1 · Hsu et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240202294A1 · Yogerst et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240205239A1 · Bonev et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240411982A1 · Malanga et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250005950A1 · Eren · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250218226A1 · Marshalkin · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250225527A1 · Jiang et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
AU 2018100581A4 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
MY 192715A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022015948A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“7 Best Face Morph Apps 2024 (Morph Two Faces Together).” ContentMaverickscom, Content Mavericks, 2024, contentmavericks.com/best-face-morph-app/. 2024 Web. 25 pgs. 2024. [cited by applicant]
“Levenshtein Distance.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, Dec. 23, 2023, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance. Web. 6 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
“New Method Detects Deepfake Videos with up to 99% Accuracy.” News, May 3, 2022, news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/05/03/new-method-detects-deepfake-videos-99-accuracy. Web. 3 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Aslam, Asra, et al., May 15, 2019, Depth-Map Generation using Pixel Matching in Stereoscopic Pair of Images, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.03471.pdf, 5 pgs. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Bassil, Youssef, and Mohammad Alwani. “Context-Sensitive Spelling Correction Using Google Web 1T 5-Gram Information.” Computer and Information Science (Toronto), vol. 5, No. 3, 2012, p. 37. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Bassil, Youssef, and Mohammad Alwani. “OCR Post-Processing Error Correction Algorithm Using Google Online Spelling Suggestion.” ArXiv.org, 2012, pp. arXiv.org, 2012. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Benalcazar, Daniel, et al. “Synthetic ID Card Image Generation for Improving Presentation Attack Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, 2023, pp. 1814-1824. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Canada Passport Phot Security Features, Canada.ca, Government of Canada (Dec. 20, 2022) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/canadian-passports/photos.html#photo, webpage 11 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Casado, Constantino Alvarez, et al. “Real-time Face Alignment: Evaluation Methods, Training Strategies and Implementation Optimization.” Journal of Real-time Image Processing 18.6 (2021): 2239-2267. Web. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Deepswap.AI, “Deepswap—Best Face and Video Edit Tools Online.” DeepSwap AI, www.deepswap.ai/?utm_source=bing&cp_id=441169896&msclkid=eb76125c4d531cf9797e77325a694067. Accessed Dec. 2023. Web. 11 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
DEVCODEF1 Editors, Using LLMS for OCR text proofreading: A guide for software developers. Dev Code F1. May 26, 2023, <https://devcodef1.com/news/1007434/llms-for-ocr-text-proofreading> Web. 3 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Edge Detection Using OpenCV, LearnOpenCV.com, (2023) https://learnopencv.com/edge-detection-using-opencv/, webpage. 10 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Elsayed, M et al. “A New Method for Full Reference Image Blur Measure.” International Journal of Simulation: Systems Science and Technology V19 N1 (Feb. 1, 2018): 7.1-7.5 2018 https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.19.01.7. 2… [cited by applicant]
Faceshape. “Face Morphing Simulator—Morph Two Faces Together.” Face Morphing Simulator—Morph Two Faces Together, www.faceshape.com/face-morph. (2022) Web. 2 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Fadilpašić, Sead. “Deepfake Fraud Attacks Are Hitting More and More Businesses.” TechRadar, TechRadar Pro, Feb. 24, 2023, www.techradar.com/news/deepfake-fraud-attacks-are-hitting-more-and-more-businesses. Accessed Jan.… [cited by applicant]
Github, Use Llama2 to Improve the Accuracy of Tesseract OCR. GitHub. (n.d.). https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/llama2_aided_tesseract> Web. Last updated Aug. 2, 2023. 3 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Help Net Security. “Detecting Face Morphing: A Simple Guide to Countering Complex Identity Fraud.” Help Net Security, Mar. 16, 2023, www.helpnetsecurity.com/2023/03/20/facial-morphing-technology/. Web. 5 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Hu, Yifei, et al. “Misspelling Correction with Pre-Trained Contextual Language Model.” ArXiv.org, 2021, pp. arXiv.org, 2021. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Kaspersky Secure Futures Editors, DevCodeF1. “Using LLMS for OCR Text Proofreading: A Guide for Software Developers.” Dev Code F1, DevCodeF1.Com—Software Developer News and Knowledge Base, May 26, 2023, devcodef1.com/ne… [cited by applicant]
Kramer, Robin S. S., et al. “Face Morphing Attacks: Investigating Detection with Humans and Computers.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, p. 28. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kumar, Varun. “14 Best Deepfake Apps and Tools in 2024.” RankRed, Jan. 1, 2024, www.rankred.com/best-deepfake-apps-tools/. Web. 22 pgs. 2024. [cited by applicant]
Lee, Jung-Hun, et al. “Deep Learning-Based Context-Sensitive Spelling Typing Error Correction.” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 152565-152578. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Zhaoxiang, et al. “Facial Pose Estimation by Deep Learning from Label Distributions.” (2019). Web. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW), 9 pgs. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lowphansirkul, Lalita, et al. “WangchanBERTa: Pretraining Transformer-Based Thai Language Models.” ArXiv.org, 2021, pp. arXiv.org, 2021. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Luo, Yinhui et al. “A Review of Homography Estimation: Advances and Challenges.” Electronics 2023 pp. 4977-4977. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/24/4977 2023. [cited by applicant]
Lyu, Siwei, “Detecting 'deepfake' Videos in the Blink of an Eye.” The Conversation, Sep. 15, 2022, theconversation.com/detecting-deepfake-videos-in-the-blink-of-an-eye-101072. Web. 4 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Mazaheri, Ghazal et al. “2022 Ieee/Cvf Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (Wacv).” Detection and Localization of Facial Expression Manipulations IEEE 2022 pp. 2773-2783 2022. [cited by applicant]
Nightingale, Sophie J., et al. “Perceptual and Computational Detection of Face Morphing.” Journal of Vision (Charlottesville, Va.), vol. 21, No. 3, 2021, p. 4. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Passport Photo Specifications., Government of Canada (2015) https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/migration/ircc/english/pdf/pub/pass-photo-spec-eng.pdf, 5 pgs. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Picsi.AI, “Create Realistic Face Morphs” Picsi.AI, InsightFace, 2023, www.picsi.ai/. Web. 8 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, A. (2021, Nov. 16). OCR passports with opencv and Tesseract. PylmageSearch. <https://pyimagesearch.com/2021/12/01/ocr-passports-with-opencv-and-tesseract/> Web. 24 pgs. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, Adrian, “OpenCV Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for blur detection in images and video streams.” PylmageSearch.com, Jun. 15, 2020, webpage, 21 pgs. https://pyimagesearch.com/2020/06/15/opencv-fast-fourier-transf… [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, Adrian, Blur Detection with OpenCV PyImageSearch.com, Sept. 7, 2015, https://pyimagesearch.com/2015/09/07/blur-detection-with-opencv/, webpage, 13 pgs. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Sadeghzadeh, Arezoo, et al., “Pose-invariant face recognition based on matching the occlusion free regions aligned by 3D generic model.” IET Computer Vision, Aug. 2020, vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 177-287. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schulz, Daniel, et al., “Identify Documents Image Quality Assessment.” European Association for Signal Processing, Proceedings 2022 pp. 1017-1021. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Seibold, C., et al., “Detection of Face Morphing Attacks by Deep Learning.” Digital Forensics and Watermarking. IWDW (2017). Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol. 10431. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3… [cited by applicant]
Shokat, Sana, et al. “Analysis and Evaluation of Braille to Text Conversion Methods.” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1-14. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Shokat, Sana, et al. “Characterization of English Braille Patterns Using Automated Tools and RICA Based Feature Extraction Methods.” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 22, No. 5, 2022, p. 1836. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Tesseract-OCR, Improving the Quality of the Output Github.com, Tesseract User Manual v. 5.x, 9 pgs, updated Dec. 5, 2023. Web. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Times, Global. “Tencent Launches Large Language Model ‘Hunyuan’ amid Global Generative Ai Frenzy.” Global Times,Sep. 7, 2023, www.globaltimes.cn/page/202309/1297761.shtml. 6 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Youtube, YouTube, “Morphing Identity: A real-time face morphing system to transforming face identity.” May 15, 2021, Cybernetic Humanity Studio. https://youtu.be/ahKxwaJ3k_U?si=kp4G4wFa8IAsGNLY 2021. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Erhu, et al. “Forgery Detection for Perforated Number in Security Document by Analysing the Perforated Holes.” The Imaging Science Journal 65.1 (2017): 40-48. Web. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Zhao, Jian et al. “2018 Ieee/Cvf Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.” Towards Pose Invariant Face Recognition in the Wild IEEE 2018 pp. 2207-2216. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Di Guardo, Fabrizio. “Facemask-a Real-Time Face Morphing Tool.” Medium, Level Up Coding, May 2, 2023, levelup.gitconnected.com/facemask-a-real-time-face-morphing-tool-5b343591a237. May 2, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Face Landmark Detection Guide | Google Ai Edge | Google AI for Developers.” Google, ai.google.dev/edge/mediapipe/solutions/vision/face_landmarker. [cited by applicant]
“Image Segmentation Guide | Google Ai Edge | Google AI for Developers.” Google, ai.google.dev/edge/mediapipe/solutions/vision/image_segmenter. [cited by applicant]
Kirillov, Alexander et al. “Segment Anything.” 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Oct. 1, 2023, doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00371. Oct. 1, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Large Language and Vision Assistant.” LLaVA, llava-vl.github.io/. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Haotian, et al. “Visual Instruction Tuning.” 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 11, 2023, arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08485. Dec. 11, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Llava 1.6—a Hugging Face Space by Liuhaotian.” LLaVA 1.6—a Hugging Face Space by Liuhaotian, huggingface.co/spaces/liuhaotian/LLaVA-1.6. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Xin, et al. “Attribute-Aware Implicit Modality Alignment for Text Attribute Person Search.” Arxiv.Org, Jun. 6, 2024. Jun. 6, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Zhe, et al. “Attribute-guided Transformer for Robust Person Re-identification.” IET Computer Vision, vol. 17, No. 8, Jun. 23, 2023, pp. 977-992, doi:10.1049/cvi2.12215. Jun. 23, 2023. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/86219 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Dec. 28, 2023, date of mailing May 23, 2024, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/79821 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Nov. 15, 2023, date of mailing Apr. 4, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US2024/048525 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Sep. 26, 2024, date of mailing Nov. 27, 2024, 10 pages. 2024. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/79511 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Nov. 13, 2023, date of mailing Mar. 4, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US24/62269 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Dec. 30, 2024, date of mailing Mar. 7, 2025, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huang, Jing, et al. “A multiplexed network for end-to-end, multilingual OCR.” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2021. (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Hai, et al. “Neural machine translation with BERT forpost-OCR error detection and correction.” Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries in 2020. 2020. (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]