IP Library Granted Patent US 12,683,031
Granted Patent B1
US 12,683,031 · App. 18/774,070 · Granted Jul 14, 2026

Systems and methods for training a model to predict survival time for a patient

Inventors: Andrew H. Beck (Brookline, MA); Aditya Khosla (Lexington, MA)
Assignee: PathAI, Inc.
G16H50/30G06F16/5866G06F18/214G06F18/2193G06N5/046G06T7/0014G06T7/194G06V10/764G06V10/82G16H10/20G16H50/20G16H50/50G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30004
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,683,031
App. No.
18/774,070
Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Granted
Jul 14, 2026
Kind
B1
Art Unit
2649
USPC
382/128
Abstract

In some aspects, the described systems and methods provide for a method for training a model to predict survival time for a patient. The method includes accessing annotated pathology images associated with a first group of patients in a clinical trial. Each of the annotated pathology images is associated with survival data for a respective patient. Each of the annotated pathology images includes an annotation describing a tissue characteristic category for a portion of the image. Values for one or more features are extracted from each of the annotated pathology images. A model is trained based on the survival data and the extracted values for the features. The trained model is stored on a storage device.

Claims (46)

1 . A method, comprising:

determining whether a trained model accurately identifies a subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from an experimental treatment compared to a standard treatment or a control treatment, wherein the determining comprises:

processing, using the trained model, a first plurality of values for a plurality of features extracted from a first plurality of annotated prostate images associated with a first group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for prostate cancer patients in the first group of prostate cancer patients, wherein the first group of prostate cancer patients belongs to an experimental treatment group of a randomized controlled clinical trial;

processing, using the trained model, a second plurality of values for the plurality of features extracted from a second plurality of annotated prostate images associated with a second group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for prostate cancer patients in the second group, wherein the second group of prostate cancer patients belongs to a control treatment group of the randomized controlled clinical trial; and

determining whether the trained model accurately identifies a subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from the experimental treatment compared to the standard treatment or the control treatment based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group and the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the second group.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the trained model accurately identifies the subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from the experimental treatment compared to the standard treatment or the control treatment further comprises performing subset survival analyses using respective predicted survival data from the experimental treatment group and the control treatment group.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting, based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group, a subset of the first group that responded to the experimental treatment.

4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

selecting, based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group, a subset of the plurality of features indicative of the subset of the first group of prostate cancer patients that responded to the experimental treatment.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

processing, using the trained model, a third plurality of values for the plurality of features extracted from a third plurality of annotated pathology images associated with a third group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the third group, wherein the third group belongs to a treatment group in another clinical trial; and

selecting a subset of the third group that are expected to respond to treatment.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of features are selected from a group consisting of area of epithelium, area of stroma, area of necrosis, area of cancer cells, area of macrophages, area of lymphocytes, number of mitotic figures, average nuclear grade, average distance between fibroblasts and lymphocytes, average distance between immunohistochemistry-positive macrophages and cancer cells, standard deviation of nuclear grade, average distance between blood vessels and tumor cells.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the trained model includes one or more of a generalized linear model, a random forest, a support vector machine, and a gradient boosted tree.

8 . A system, comprising:

at least one computer hardware processor; and

at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one computer hardware processor, cause the at least one computer hardware processor to perform:

determining whether a trained model accurately identifies a subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from an experimental treatment compared to a standard treatment or a control treatment, wherein the determining comprises:

processing, using the trained model, a first plurality of values for a plurality of features extracted from a first plurality of annotated prostate images associated with a first group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for prostate cancer patients in the first group of prostate cancer patients, wherein the first group of prostate cancer patients belongs to an experimental treatment group of a randomized controlled clinical trial;

processing, using the trained model, a second plurality of values for the plurality of features extracted from a second plurality of annotated prostate images associated with a second group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for prostate cancer patients in the second group, wherein the second group of prostate cancer patients belongs to a control treatment group of the randomized controlled clinical trial; and

determining whether the trained model accurately identifies a subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from the experimental treatment compared to the standard treatment or the control treatment based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group and the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the second group.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein determining whether the trained model accurately identifies the subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from the experimental treatment compared to the standard treatment or the control treatment further comprises performing subset survival analyses using respective predicted survival data from the experimental treatment group and the control treatment group.

10 . The system of claim 8 , further comprising:

selecting, based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group, a subset of the first group that responded to the experimental treatment.

11 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising:

selecting, based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group, a subset of the plurality of features indicative of the subset of the first group of prostate cancer patients that responded to the experimental treatment.

12 . The system of claim 8 , further comprising:

processing, using the trained model, a third plurality of values for the plurality of features extracted from a third plurality of annotated pathology images associated with a third group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the third group, wherein the third group belongs to a treatment group in another clinical trial; and

selecting a subset of the third group that are expected to respond to treatment.

13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of features are selected from a group consisting of area of epithelium, area of stroma, area of necrosis, area of cancer cells, area of macrophages, area of lymphocytes, number of mitotic figures, average nuclear grade, average distance between fibroblasts and lymphocytes, average distance between immunohistochemistry-positive macrophages and cancer cells, standard deviation of nuclear grade, average distance between blood vessels and tumor cells.

14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the trained model includes one or more of a generalized linear model, a random forest, a support vector machine, and a gradient boosted tree.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing processor-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one computer hardware processor, cause the at least one computer hardware processor to perform:

determining whether a trained model accurately identifies a subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from an experimental treatment compared to a standard treatment or a control treatment, wherein the determining comprises:

processing, using the trained model, a first plurality of values for a plurality of features extracted from a first plurality of annotated prostate images associated with a first group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for prostate cancer patients in the first group of prostate cancer patients, wherein the first group of prostate cancer patients belongs to an experimental treatment group of a randomized controlled clinical trial;

processing, using the trained model, a second plurality of values for the plurality of features extracted from a second plurality of annotated prostate images associated with a second group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for prostate cancer patients in the second group, wherein the second group of prostate cancer patients belongs to a control treatment group of the randomized controlled clinical trial; and

determining whether the trained model accurately identifies a subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from the experimental treatment compared to the standard treatment or the control treatment based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group and the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the second group.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein determining whether the trained model accurately identifies the subset of prostate cancer patients that is likely to benefit from the experimental treatment compared to the standard treatment or the control treatment further comprises performing subset survival analyses using respective predicted survival data from the experimental treatment group and the control treatment group.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , further comprising:

selecting, based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group, a subset of the first group that responded to the experimental treatment.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , further comprising:

selecting, based on the predicted survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the first group, a subset of the plurality of features indicative of the subset of the first group of prostate cancer patients that responded to the experimental treatment.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , further comprising:

processing, using the trained model, a third plurality of values for the plurality of features extracted from a third plurality of annotated pathology images associated with a third group of prostate cancer patients, to predict survival data for the prostate cancer patients in the third group, wherein the third group belongs to a treatment group in another clinical trial; and

selecting a subset of the third group that are expected to respond to treatment.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of features are selected from a group consisting of area of epithelium, area of stroma, area of necrosis, area of cancer cells, area of macrophages, area of lymphocytes, number of mitotic figures, average nuclear grade, average distance between fibroblasts and lymphocytes, average distance between immunohistochemistry-positive macrophages and cancer cells, standard deviation of nuclear grade, average distance between blood vessels and tumor cells.

Assignments (2)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 28, 2026
From: ORBIMED ROYALTY & CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES IV, LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: PATHAI, INC.
Reel/Frame 075427/0613 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 7, 2025
From: BECK, ANDREW H.; KHOSLA, ADITYA
To: PATHAI, INC.
Reel/Frame 071049/0300 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 18320382 · May 19, 2023
Continuation 17328057 · May 24, 2021
Continuation 16857079 · Apr 23, 2020
Continuation 16001836 · Jun 6, 2018
Provisional Application 62515772 · Jun 6, 2017
Provisional Application 62515779 · Jun 6, 2017
Provisional Application 62515795 · Jun 6, 2017
References Cited (38)
US 9031306B2 · Parvin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10121245B2 · Chen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10275891B2 · Jalali et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10650520B1 · Beck et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10650929B1 · Beck et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11017532B1 · Beck et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11080855B1 · Beck et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11195279B1 · Beck et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11657505B1 · Beck et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11908139B1 · Beck et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12073948B1 · Beck et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20100088264A1 · Teverovskiy · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130230230A1 · Ajemba et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130294676A1 · Parvin et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150110381A1 · Parvin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150247149A1 · Feldstein et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150254493A1 · Madabhushi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160192889A1 · Koutsouleris et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160314580A1 · Lloyd et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170270239A1 · Grafstrom · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170270666A1 · Barnes · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170309021A1 · Barnes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170357844A1 · Comaniciu · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180004905A1 · Szeto · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180365824A1 · Yuh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190180153A1 · Buckler et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190183429A1 · Sung et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190384047A1 · Johnson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014140070A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014140085A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Popovici et al., Joint analysis of histopathology image features and gene expression in breast cancer. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. 17:209. 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., Large scale tissue histopathology image classification, segmentation, and visualization via deep convolutional activation features. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017. 18:281. 17 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nature Communications. Aug. 16, 2016. 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Beck et al., Systemic Analysis of Breast Cancer Morphology Uncovers Stromal Features Associated with Survival. Science Translational Medicine. Nov. 9, 2011;3(108):1-12. [cited by applicant]
Gurcan et al., Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;2:147-71. [cited by applicant]
Litjens et al., A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. Diagnostic Image Analysis Group. Radboud University Medical Center. Mijmegen, The Netherlands. Jun. 4, 2017; 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Madabhushi et al., Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities. Medical Image Analysis. 2016;33:170-5. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancer. Jun. 18, 2016; 6 pages. [Last accessed Jul. 13, 2018 from http://camelyon16.grand-challenge.org.]. [cited by applicant]