IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,697,022
Granted Patent B2
US 12,697,022 · App. 19/410,291 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

Visual field systems and methods for glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring by implementing adaptive map perimetry via head-mounted displays

Inventors: Lama Al-Aswad (Philadelphia, PA); Iván Marín-Franch (Atarfe, ES)
Assignee: ENVISION HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES INC.
A61B3/0025A61B3/005A61B3/024A61B3/113
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,697,022
App. No.
19/410,291
Filed
Dec 5, 2025
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Examiner
DINH, JACK
Art Unit
2872
USPC
351/224
Abstract

A system may include a headset device and an average hill of vision model (HoV) and may generate an eye difference estimate relative to reference data for an average healthy eye obtained from a normative dataset. The eye difference estimate indicates a difference in overall sensitivity or general height and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity relative to the reference data. The system may generate an individualized HoV model based on the eye difference estimate and the average HoV model, display, on the headset device, a respective stimulus at a plurality of test locations, store responses to the stimulus, and analyze the responses to determine a respective sensitivity value at each of the plurality of test locations. The system may determine total-deviation values by subtracting the respective sensitivity value from a corresponding value of the individualized HoV model, analyze the total-deviation values, and provide feedback based on the analysis.

Claims (69)

1 . A visual field analysis (VFA) system configured for automatically assessing visual field testing, the VFA system comprising:

a headset device comprising a display screen positioned proximate to, or within a viewable distance from a user's eyes, the headset device communicatively coupled to one or more processors;

an average hill of vision model (HoV) saved in a computer memory; and

computing instructions stored on the computer memory and, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

generate an eye difference estimate for a test subject relative to reference data for an average healthy eye obtained from a normative dataset, the eye difference estimate indicating a difference in (1) overall sensitivity or general height (GH) and (2) the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity (distance from the fovea) relative to the reference data;

generate an individualized HoV model based on the eye difference estimate and the average HoV model;

display, on the headset device, a respective stimulus to the test subject at a plurality of test locations;

store in computer memory responses of the test subject to the respective stimulus displayed at the plurality of test locations;

analyze the responses to determine a respective sensitivity value for the test subject at each of the plurality of test locations;

determine total-deviation values for the test subject by subtracting the respective sensitivity value for each of the plurality of test locations from a corresponding value of the individualized HoV model;

analyze the total-deviation values; and

provide feedback to the test subject based on the analysis.

2 . The VFA system of claim 1 wherein to generate the eye difference estimate the computing instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

determine a set of preliminary test locations;

display, on the headset device, a visual psychophysics algorithm at the set of preliminary test location to obtain preliminary sensitivities; and

determine the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity of the eye difference estimate based on the preliminary sensitivities.

3 . The VFA system of claim 1 wherein to generate the eye difference estimate the computing instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

generate initial estimates of the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity;

obtain interim responses of the test subject to the respective stimulus displayed at the plurality of test locations

analyze the interim responses to adjust the initial estimates of the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity and obtain confidence intervals;

adjust levels of the respective stimulus displayed on the headset device based on the adjusted initial estimates to obtain respective sensitivity value for the test subject at each of the plurality of test locations; and

determine the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity of the eye difference estimate based on the respective sensitivity value for the test subject at each of the plurality of test locations.

4 . The VFA system of claim 3 wherein the initial estimates include one or more of age-corrected mean normal values, values generated from analysis of one or more previous visual field tests, or values from a preliminary test administered to the test subject.

5 . The VFA system of claim 1 wherein the responses of the test subject to the respective stimulus displayed at the plurality of test locations comprise a visual field and to generate the eye difference estimate the computing instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

identify points in the visual field that are damaged;

remove the damaged points from the visual field;

analyze the remaining points within the visual field to generate the eye difference estimate and fit the individualized HoV model.

6 . The VFA system of claim 5 wherein one of a least-squares algorithm, maximum-likelihood algorithm, Bayesian algorithm, or Machine Learning algorithm are used to generate the eye difference estimate and fit the individualized HoV model.

7 . The VFA system of claim 1 wherein the average HoV model includes a combination of an intercept/age model, an eccentricity model, and a visual field asymmetry model.

8 . The VFA system of claim 7 wherein the intercept model describes a theoretical sensitivity of a 0-year-old patient at the center of vision (fovea).

9 . The VFA system of claim 7 wherein the age model documents eccentricity-dependent differences in age as a function of an subject age and distance from fovea (eccentricity).

10 . The VFA system of claim 7 wherein the eccentricity model documents linear decay of sensitivity with eccentricity.

11 . The VFA system of claim 7 wherein the visual field asymmetry model documents asymmetries between superior and inferior and nasal and temporal parts of a visual field using Zernike polynomials.

12 . A visual field analysis (VFA) method for automatically assessing visual field testing, the VFA method comprising:

generating an eye difference estimate for a test subject relative to reference data for an average healthy eye obtained from a normative dataset, the eye difference estimate indicating a difference in (1) overall sensitivity or general height (GH) and (2) the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity (distance from the fovea) relative to the reference data;

generating an individualized HoV model based on the eye difference estimate and an average HoV model saved in a computer memory;

displaying, on a headset device, a respective stimulus to the test subject at a plurality of test locations, wherein the headset device comprises a display screen positioned proximate to, or within a viewable distance from a user's eyes;

storing in computer memory responses of the test subject to the respective stimulus displayed at the plurality of test locations;

analyzing the responses to determine a respective sensitivity value for the test subject at each of the plurality of test locations;

determining total-deviation values for the test subject by subtracting the respective sensitivity value for each of the plurality of test locations from a corresponding value of the individualized HoV model;

analyzing the total-deviation values; and

providing feedback to the test subject based on the analysis.

13 . The VFA method of claim 12 wherein to generating the eye difference estimate includes:

determining a set of preliminary test locations;

displaying, on the headset device, a visual psychophysics algorithm at the set of preliminary test location to obtain preliminary sensitivities; and

determining the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity of the eye difference estimate based on the preliminary sensitivities.

14 . The VFA method of claim 12 wherein to generating the eye difference estimate includes:

generating initial estimates of the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity;

obtaining interim responses of the test subject to the respective stimulus displayed at the plurality of test locations

analyzing the interim responses to adjust the initial estimates of the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity and obtain confidence intervals;

adjusting levels of the respective stimulus displayed on the headset device based on the adjusted initial estimates to obtain respective sensitivity value for the test subject at each of the plurality of test locations; and

determining the overall sensitivity or GH and the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity of the eye difference estimate based on the respective sensitivity value for the test subject at each of the plurality of test locations.

15 . The VFA method of claim 14 wherein the initial estimates include one or more of age-corrected mean normal values, values generated from analysis of one or more previous visual field tests, or values from a preliminary test administered to the test subject.

16 . The VFA method of claim 12 wherein the responses of the test subject to generating the eye difference estimate includes:

identifying points in the visual field that are damaged;

removing the damaged points from the visual field;

analyzing the remaining points within the visual field to generate the eye difference estimate and fit the individualized HoV model.

17 . The VFA method of claim 16 wherein one of a least-squares algorithm, maximum-likelihood algorithm, Bayesian algorithm, or Machine Learning algorithm are used to generate the eye difference estimate and fit the individualized HoV model.

18 . The VFA method of claim 12 wherein the average HoV model includes a combination of an intercept/age model, an eccentricity model, and a visual field asymmetry model.

19 . A tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions for automatically assessing visual field testing, that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to:

generate an eye difference estimate for a test subject relative to reference data for an average healthy eye obtained from a normative dataset, the eye difference estimate indicating a difference in (1) overall sensitivity or general height (GH) and (2) the rate of sensitivity decay with eccentricity (distance from the fovea) relative to the reference data;

generate an individualized HoV model based on the eye difference estimate and an average HoV model saved in a computer memory;

display, on a headset device, a respective stimulus to the test subject at a plurality of test locations, wherein the headset device comprises a display screen positioned proximate to, or within a viewable distance from a user's eyes;

store in computer memory responses of the test subject to the respective stimulus displayed at the plurality of test locations;

analyze the responses to determine a respective sensitivity value for the test subject at each of the plurality of test locations;

determine total-deviation values for the test subject by subtracting the respective sensitivity value for each of the plurality of test locations from a corresponding value of the individualized HoV model;

analyze the total-deviation values; and

provide feedback to the test subject based on the analysis.

20 . The tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 19 wherein the average HoV model includes a combination of an intercept/age model, an eccentricity model, and a visual field asymmetry model.

Continuity (4)
Continuation PCTUS2024062113 · Dec 27, 2024
Provisional Application 63673383 · Jul 19, 2024
Provisional Application 63615945 · Dec 29, 2023
Related Publication 20260083317A1 · Mar 26, 2026
References Cited (44)
US 6494578B1 · Plummer et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 11311188B2 · Hooriani et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20110194075A1 · Weleber et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20190150727A1 · Blaha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190231184A1 · Alawa · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190298166A1 · Smith et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20230284899A1 · Warburton et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230404385A1 · Kurz · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9001290A1 · 1990 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018107108A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Asman et al., Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices, Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)., 70(5):679-86 (Oct. 1992). [cited by applicant]
Blumenthal et al., Misleading statistical calculations in far-advanced glaucomatous visual field loss, Ophthalmology, 110(1):196-200 (Jan. 2003). [cited by applicant]
Bryan et al., Robust and censored modeling and prediction of progression in glaucomatous visual fields, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 54(10):6694-700 (Oct. 2013). [cited by applicant]
Drance et al., [Early defects in the visual field in glaucoma (author's transl)], Klin Monbl Augenheilkd., 173(4):519-23. Fruhe Gesichtsfeldausfalle bei Glaukomerkrankung (Oct. 1978). [cited by applicant]
Erler et al., Optimizing structure-function relationship by maximizing correspondence between glaucomatous visual fields and mathematical retinal nerve fiber models, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 55(4):2350-7 (Apr. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Gardiner et al., The Effect of Limiting the Range of Perimetric Sensitivities on Pointwise Assessment of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 57(1): 288-294 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Held, Chapter 5 Computing Voronoi diagrams. In: Held M, ed. On the Computational Geometry of Pocket Machining. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1991:63-88. [cited by applicant]
Hermann et al., Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101, Acta Ophthalmol., 86(4):446-55 (Jun. 2008). [cited by applicant]
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2024/062108, International Search Report and Written Opinion, date of mailing Mar. 5, 2025. [cited by applicant]
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2024/062110, International Search Report and Written Opinion, date of mailing Mar. 5, 2025. [cited by applicant]
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2024/062113, International Search Report and Written Opinion, date of mailing Mar. 6, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Jansonius et al., A mathematical description of nerve fiber bundle trajectories and their variability in the human retina, Vision Research, 49(17): 2157-2163 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Jansonius et al., A mathematical model for describing the retinal nerve fiber bundle trajectories in the human eye: Average course, variability, and influence of refraction, optic disc size and optic disc position, Expe… [cited by applicant]
Jansonius et al., Erratum to “A mathematical description of nerve fiber bundle trajectories and their variability in the human retina” [Vision Research 49(17) (2009) 2157--2163], Vision Research, 50: 1501 (2010). [cited by applicant]
King et al., An approach towards automated custom static perimetry, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 64(8):5111 (2023). [cited by applicant]
King-Smith et al., Efficient and unbiased modifications of the Quest threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation, Vision Res., 34(7):885-912 (Apr. 1994). [cited by applicant]
Kucur et al., A deep learning approach to automatic detection of early glaucoma from visual fields, PLoS One, 13(11):e0206081 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Marin-Franch et al., A novel strategy for the estimation of the general height of the visual field in patients with glaucoma, Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol., 252(5):801-9 (May 2014). [cited by applicant]
Marin-Franch et al., Analysis of global and focal loss in glaucoma progression, Rome, Italy: World Glaucoma Congress, 681-682 (2023). [cited by applicant]
Marin-Franch et al., The Open Perimetry Initiative: A framework for cross-platform development for the new generation of portable perimeters, J Vis., 22(5):1 (Apr. 2022). [cited by applicant]
Marin-Franch et al., The visualFields package: a tool for analysis and visualization of visual fields, J Vis., 13(4): 10 (Mar. 2013). [cited by applicant]
Marin-Franch et al., Using high-density perimetry to explore new approaches for characterizing visual field defects, Vision Res., 210:108259 (Sep. 2023). [cited by applicant]
Marin-Franch et al., Visual field progression in glaucoma: Comparison between PoPLR and Answers, Translational Vision Science and Technology, 10(14):13:1-7 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Montesano et al., A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer, Ophthalmology, 126(2):242-251 (Feb. 2019). [cited by applicant]
O'Leary et al., Visual field progression in glaucoma: estimating the overall significance of deterioration with permutation analyses of pointwise linear regression (PoPLR), Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science… [cited by applicant]
Peracha et al., Assessing the Reliability of Humphrey Visual Field Testing in an Urban Population, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 54(15):3920-3920 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Rao et al., Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma, JAMA Ophthalmol., 133(1):40-4 (Jan. 2015). [cited by applicant]
Sloan, Area and luminance of test object as variables in examination of the visual field by projection perimetry, Vision Research, 1(1):121-IN2 (1961). [cited by applicant]
Turpin et al., Improving Personalized Structure to Function Mapping From Optic Nerve Head to Visual Field, Translational Vision Science and Technology, 10(1): 19 (2021). [cited by applicant]
Turpin et al., The Open Perimetry Interface: An enabling tool for clinical visual psychophysics, Journal of Vision, 12(11):22 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Wall et al., The Effective Dynamic Ranges for Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression With Standard Automated Perimetry and Stimulus Sizes {III} and {V}, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 59(1): 439-445 (201… [cited by applicant]
Watson et al., Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method, Perception & Psychophysics, 33(2):113-120 (1983). [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., Frequency of Testing to Detect Visual Field Progression Derived Using a Longitudinal Cohort of Glaucoma Patients, Ophthalmology, 124(6):786-792 (Jun. 2017). [cited by applicant]
Zemborain et al., Test of a Retinal Nerve Fiber Bundle Trajectory Model Using EyesWith Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy, Translational Vision Science and Technology, 11(7): 7 (2022). [cited by applicant]