IP Library Granted Patent US 12,697,726
Granted Patent B2
US 12,697,726 · App. 18/733,673 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

Safety and control enhancement in tele-operated physical human-robot interactions

Inventors: Yuhan Hu (Santa Clara, CA); Rana Soltani Zarrin (Los Gatos, CA)
Assignee: Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
B25J9/1674A61B34/35A61B34/74A61B34/76B25J13/081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,697,726
App. No.
18/733,673
Filed
Jun 4, 2024
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3656
USPC
700/264
Abstract

An electronic device and a method for safety and control enhancement in tele-operated physical human-robot interactions. The electronic device receives robot capability parameters, touch parameters, and control parameters to control physical interaction of the human machine interactions (HMI) device. The electronic device controls the physical interaction of the HMI device based on the robot capability parameters, the touch parameters, and the control parameters. The electronic device determines a physical response of the user, based on the control of the physical interaction of the HMI device and determines safety metrics of the user, based on the physical response, the robot capability parameters, and the touch parameters. The electronic device determines control metrics associated with an operator, based on the robot capability parameters, and the control parameters. The electronic device controls the physical interaction of the HMI device further based on the control metrics and the safety metrics.

Claims (50)

1 . An electronic device, comprising:

circuitry configured to:

receive robot capability parameters associated with a human-machine interaction (HMI) device;

receive touch parameters associated with a physical-interaction of the HMI device and a user;

receive control parameters associated with an operator of the HMI device to control the physical-interaction of the HMI device;

control the physical interaction of the HMI device based on the received robot capability parameters, the received touch parameters, and the received control parameters;

determine a physical response of the user, based on the control of the physical interaction of the HMI device;

determine safety metrics associated with the user, based on the determined physical response, the received robot capability parameters, and the received touch parameters;

determine control metrics associated with the operator, based on the received robot capability parameters, and the received control parameters; and

control the physical interaction of the HMI device, further based on the determined safety metrics and the determined control metrics, wherein the circuitry is further configured to execute a co-design evaluation procedure comprising at least two iterations, wherein each iteration includes:

(i) receiving one or more subjective metrics indicating a perceived safety or perceived comfort of the user with respect to the physical interaction;

(ii) receiving one or more objective metrics indicative of the physical response of the user captured by one or more sensors during the physical interaction; and

(iii) updating at least one of the touch parameters or the control parameters for a subsequent iteration based on the subjective metrics and the objective metrics.

2 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the robot capability parameters associated with the HMI device includes at least one of: a form factor parameter of the HMI device, a level of autonomy of the HMI device, or a degree of freedom of the HMI device.

3 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the touch parameters include at least one of: an orientation of the HMI device, a speed of a part of the HMI device, a force applied by the HMI device, a time duration for an operation of the HMI device, or a contact zone between the HMI device and the user.

4 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the control parameters associated with the operator include at least one of: operator-control freedom parameters associated with the HMI device, a touch-based feedback from the patient, or a user interface control associated with the operator.

5 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the determined safety metrics associated with the user includes at least one of: a trust level of the user associated with the HMI device, a comfort level of the user associated with the HMI device, or a safety level of the user associated with the HMI device.

6 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the physical response of the user includes at least one of: a body movement of the user, a gaze of the user, a verbal response of the user, or a facial response of the user.

7 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the control metrics include at least one of: a physical load on the operator, a mental load on the operator, a level of control of operator, a level of awareness of the operator, or a task performance by the HMI device.

8 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the circuitry is further configured to: receive user-background parameters associated with the user, wherein the received user-background parameters include at least one of: a physical condition of the user, an age of the user, a gender of the user, or an ethnicity of the user.

9 . The electronic device according to claim 8 , wherein the received user-background parameters are correlated with a trust level of the user associated with the HMI device.

10 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the circuitry is further configured to: receive operator-background parameters associated with the operator, wherein the received operator-background parameters include at least one of: an identity of the operator, a type of operation of the operator, a gender of the operator, and a relationship between a patient and the operator.

11 . The electronic device according to claim 10 , wherein the received operator-background parameters are correlated with a trust level of the user associated with the HMI device.

12 . The electronic device according to claim 1 , wherein the circuitry is further configured to: determine first communication metrics associated with the user and the HMI device; and determine second communication metrics associated with the user and the operator, wherein a trust level of the user of the HMI device is correlated with the determined first communication metrics and the determined second communication metrics.

13 . A method, comprising:

in an electronic device:

receiving robot capability parameters associated with a human-machine interaction (HMI) device;

receiving touch parameters associated with a physical interaction of the HMI device and a user;

receiving control parameters associated with an operator of the HMI device to control the physical interaction of the HMI device;

controlling the physical interaction of the HMI device based on the received robot capability parameters, the received touch parameters, and the received control parameters;

determining a physical response of the user, based on the control of the physical interaction of the HMI device;

determining safety metrics associated with the user, based on the determined physical response, the received robot capability parameters, and the received touch parameters;

determining control metrics associated with the operator, based on the received robot capability parameters, and the received control parameters; and

controlling the physical interaction of the HMI device, further based on the determined safety metrics and the determined control metrics; and

executing a co-design evaluation procedure comprising at least two iterations, wherein each iteration includes: receiving one or more subjective metrics indicating a perceived safety or perceived comfort of the user with respect to the physical interaction; receiving one or more objective metrics indicative of the physical response of the user captured by one or more sensors during the physical interaction; and updating at least one of the touch parameters or the control parameters for a subsequent iteration based on the subjective metrics and the objective metrics.

14 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein the robot capability parameters associated with the HMI device includes at least one of: a form factor parameter of the HMI device, a level of autonomy of the HMI device, or a degree of freedom of the HMI device.

15 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein the touch parameters include at least one of: an orientation of the HMI device, a speed of a part of the HMI device, a force applied by the HMI device, a time duration for an operation of the HMI device, or a contact zone between the HMI device and the user.

16 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein the control parameters associated with the operator include at least one of: operator-control freedom parameters associated with the HMI device, a touch-based feedback from the patient, or a user interface control associated with the operator.

17 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein the determined safety metrics associated with the user includes at least one of: a trust level of the user associated with the HMI device, a comfort level of the user associated with the HMI device, or a safety level of the user associated with the HMI device.

18 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein the physical response of the user includes at least one of: a body movement of the user, a gaze of the user, a verbal response of the user, or a facial response of the user.

19 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein the control metrics include at least one of: a physical load on the operator, a mental load on the operator, a level of control of operator, a level of awareness of the operator, or a task performance by the HMI device.

20 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon, computer-executable instructions that when executed by an electronic device, causes the electronic device to execute operations, the operations comprising:

receiving robot capability parameters associated with a human-machine interaction (HMI) device;

receiving touch parameters associated with a physical interaction of the HMI device and a user;

receiving control parameters associated with an operator of the HMI device to control the physical interaction of the HMI device;

controlling the physical interaction of the HMI device based on the received robot capability parameters, the received touch parameters, and the received control parameters;

determining a physical response of the user, based on the control of the physical interaction of the HMI device;

determining safety metrics associated with the user, based on the determined physical response, the received robot capability parameters, and the received touch parameters;

determining control metrics associated with the operator, based on the received robot capability parameters, and the received control parameters; and

controlling the physical interaction of the HMI device, further based on the determined safety metrics and the determined control metrics, wherein the operations further comprise executing a co-design evaluation procedure comprising at least two iterations, wherein each iteration includes: receiving one or more subjective metrics indicating a perceived safety or perceived comfort of the user with respect to the physical interaction; receiving one or more objective metrics indicative of the physical response of the user captured by one or more sensors during the physical interaction; and updating at least one of the touch parameters or the control parameters for a subsequent iteration based on the subjective metrics and the objective metrics.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2024
From: HU, YUHAN; ZARRIN, RANA SOLTANI
To: HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 067619/0175 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63564897 · Mar 13, 2024
Related Publication 20250289142A1 · Sep 18, 2025
References Cited (48)
US 10185598B2 · Wang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11197799B2 · Tian · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11472028B2 · Laftchiev · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11526159B2 · Mcgregor · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 12271582B2 · Zhao · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20110118752A1 · Itkowitz · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110118753A1 · Itkowitz · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140100491A1 · Hu · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140150806A1 · Hu · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150314454A1 · Breazeal · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160151917A1 · Faridi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160193732A1 · Breazeal · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160199977A1 · Breazeal · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160238040A1 · Gallo · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160299796A1 · Wang · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180081439A1 · Daniels · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180104542A1 · Kwon · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180250086A1 · Grubbs · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200121556A1 · Tian · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210085558A1 · Shin · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210170590A1 · Laftchiev · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210255611A1 · McGregor · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220354597A1 · Kaouk · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230064632A1 · Mcgregor · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230347210A1 · McInturf · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230414430A1 · Godlasky · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240025034A1 · Lachenmayr · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240086049A1 · Zhao · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240122783A1 · Blankenship · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Akalin et al, “Do you feel safe with your robot? Factors influencing perceived safety in human-robot interaction based on subjective and objective measures”; 2022, Elsevier. ScienceDirect Int Journal of Human-Computer S… [cited by examiner]
Airosa, et al., “Tactile massage as part of the caring act: A qualitative study in short-term emergency wards”, Qualitative Research, Journal of Holistic Nursing, Sep. 16, 2015, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cocksedge, et al., “Touch in primary care consultations: qualitative investigation of doctors' and patients' perceptions”, British Journal of General Practice, Apr. 2013, 08 pages. [cited by applicant]
Connor, et al., “Intentional comfort touch a conceptual model”, Journal of Holistic Nursing, 2009, pp. 127-135. [cited by applicant]
Figma, 2023, URL: https://www.figma.com/. [cited by applicant]
Haddadin, et al., “Requirements for safe robots: Measurements, analysis and new insights”, The International Journal of Robotics Research, Aug. 20, 2009, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Haddadin, et al., “The Franka Emika Robot: A Reference Platform for Robotics Research and Education”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 29, Issue: 2, Jun. 2022, pp. 46-64. [cited by applicant]
Hamad, et al., “A Concise Overview of Safety Aspects in Human-Robot Interaction”, arXiv, Safety Aspects in Human-Robot Interaction, Sep. 18, 2023, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hollinger, et al., “Factors influencing the perception of touch by elderly nursing home residents and their health caregivers”, International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 30, Issue 5, Oct. 1993, pp. 445-461. [cited by applicant]
Law, et al., “A touching connection: how observing robotic touch can affect human trust in a robot”, International Journal of Social Robotics, Jan. 5, 2021, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
O'Lynn, et al., “How Should I Touch You?: A Qualitative Study of Attitudes on Intimate Touch in Nursing Care”, The American Journal of Nursing, 2011, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pedrazza, et al., “Variables of Individual Difference and the Experience of Touch in Nursing”, Western Journal of Nursing Research, 2018, pp. 1614-1637. [cited by applicant]
Pedrazza, et al., “Development and Initial Validation of the Nurses' Comfort With Touch Scale”, Springer Publishing Company, 2015, pp. 364-378. [cited by applicant]
Qbrobotics, qb SoftHand2 Research, 2023, URL: https://qbrobotics.com/product/qb-softhand-2-research/. [cited by applicant]
Pirkko Routasalo, “Physical touch in nursing studies: a literature review”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Dec. 25, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Thompson, et al., “Social factors in human-robot interaction”, In Human-robot interactions in future military operations CRC Press, 2016, pp. 67-82. [cited by applicant]
Erp, et al., “How to touch humans: Guidelines for social agents and robots that can touch”, In 2013 humaine association 4conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, IEEE, 2013, pp. 780-785. [cited by applicant]
Willemse, et al., “Social Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Robot-Initiated Touches can Induce Positive Responses without Extensive Prior Bonding”, International Journal of Social Robotics, Nov. 8, 2018, pp. 285-304. [cited by applicant]
Yohanan, et al., “The role of affective touch in human-robot interaction: Human intent and expectations in touching the haptic creature”, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2012, pp. 163-180. [cited by applicant]