IP Library Granted Patent US 12,699,154
Granted Patent B2
US 12,699,154 · App. 18/709,322 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

Quantum magnetic field receiving device

Inventors: Francesco Giazotto (Pisa, IT); Petar B. Atanackovic (Henley Beach, AU); Giuseppe Carlo Tettamanzi (Beulah Park, AU); Isaac Nakone (Redwood Park, AU)
Assignees: THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE; Franzesco Giazotto; Petar B. Atanackovic
G01R33/0354
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,699,154
App. No.
18/709,322
Filed
May 10, 2024
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2852
USPC
324/248
Abstract

A quantum magnetic field receiving device includes a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) or a superconducting quantum interference filter (SQIF) and an electrostatic gating circuit configured to apply electrostatic fields to Josephson Junctions of the SQUID or SQIF.

Claims (30)

1 . A quantum magnetic field receiving device comprising:

a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) including:

a superconducting loop including a first arm spaced apart from a second arm;

a first Josephson Junction in the first arm;

a second Josephson Junction in the second arm;

a third arm electrically connecting the first arm and the second arm; and

a third Josephson Junction in the third arm, wherein each of the three Josephson Junctions has a junction material; and

an electrostatic gating circuit configured to apply a first electrostatic field to the first Josephson Junction and a second electrostatic field to the second Josephson Junction,

wherein a first critical supercurrent of the junction material of the first Josephson Junction is tuneable by applying the first electrostatic field to the junction material effected by a first gate voltage provided by the electrostatic gating circuit and a second critical supercurrent of the junction material of the second Josephson Junction is tuneable by applying the second electrostatic field to the junction material effected by a second gate voltage provided by the electrostatic gating circuit, and

wherein the first critical supercurrent is tuned to based on the second supercurrent to improve linearity of magnetic flux-to-voltage response of the quantum magnetic field receiving device,

wherein the first and the second critical supercurrent are tuned relative to a third critical supercurrent of the junction material of the third Josephson Junction, and

wherein the third critical supercurrent of the junction material of the third Josephson Junction is tuneable by applying a third electrostatic field to the junction material effected by a third gate voltage provided by the electrostatic gating circuit.

2 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 1 , wherein the SQUID is a Bi-SQUID.

3 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 1 wherein the ratio of the first and the second critical supercurrent to the third critical supercurrent is 0.5 to 1.5.

4 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 1 , wherein an inductance in the first arm is tuned by the electrostatic gating circuit to substantially equal an inductance in the second arm.

5 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 1 , wherein an inductance in the first arm and an inductance in the second arm is tuned by the electrostatic gating circuit to optimise a Spurious Free Dynamic Range of the quantum magnetic field receiving device.

6 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 5 , wherein an optimised value of the Spurious Free Dynamic Range resulting from the tuning by the electrostatic gating circuit improves linearity of the magnetic flux-to-voltage response of the quantum magnetic field receiving device above 100 dB.

7 . A quantum magnetic field receiving device comprising:

a superconducting quantum interference filter (SQIF) including:

two or more superconducting loops, each including a first arm spaced apart from a second arm, wherein a second arm of a first superconducting loop forms a first arm of a second superconducting loop;

a first Josephson Junction in the first arm of the first superconducting loop;

a second Josephson Junction in the second arm of the first superconducting loop which forms the first arm of the second superconducting loop; and

a third Josephson Junction in the second arm of second superconducting loop,

wherein each of the first, second and third Josephson Junctions has a junction material; and

an electrostatic gating circuit configured to apply a first electrostatic field to the first Josephson Junction, a second electrostatic field to the second Josephson Junction, and a third electrostatic field to the third Josephson Junction,

wherein a first critical supercurrent of the junction material of the first Josephson Junction is tuneable by applying the first electrostatic field to the junction material effected by a first gate voltage provided by the electrostatic gating circuit and a second critical supercurrent of the junction material of the second Josephson Junction is tuneable by applying the second electrostatic field to the junction material effected by a second gate voltage provided by the electrostatic gating circuit and a third critical supercurrent of the junction material of the third Josephson Junction is tuneable by applying the third electrostatic field to the junction material effected by a third gate voltage provided by the electrostatic gating circuit, and

wherein the first, second and third critical supercurrents are tuned relative to each other to improve linearity of magnetic flux-to-voltage response of the quantum magnetic field receiving device.

8 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 7 , wherein an inductance in the first arm of the first superconducting loop is tuned by the electrostatic gating circuit based on an inductance in the second arm of the first superconducting loop.

9 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 7 , wherein an inductance in the first arm and an inductance in the second arm is tuned by the electrostatic gating circuit to optimise a Spurious Free Dynamic Range of the quantum magnetic field receiving device.

10 . The quantum magnetic field receiving device of claim 9 , wherein an optimised value of the Spurious Free Dynamic Range resulting from the tuning by the electrostatic gating circuit improves linearity of the magnetic flux-to-voltage response of the quantum magnetic field receiving device above 100 dB.

Assignments (4)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 2, 2026
From: THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
To: ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 075843/0344 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2025
From: TETTAMANZI, GIUSEPPE CARLO; NAKONE, ISAAC; GIAZOTTO, FRANCESCO; ATANACKOVIC, PETAR B.
To: THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE; ATANACKOVIC, PETAR; GIAZOTTO, FRANCESCO
Reel/Frame 070132/0244 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2024
From: TETTAMANZI, GIUSEPPE CARLO; NAKONE, ISAAC
To: THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
Reel/Frame 069158/0261 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2024
From: GIAZOTTO, FRANCESCO
To: GIAZOTTO, FRANCESCO
Reel/Frame 069158/0007 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2021903616 · Nov 11, 2021 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250044380A1 · Feb 6, 2025
References Cited (13)
US 4902908A · Harada · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 9097751B1 · Longhini · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190288177A1 · Fong et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Komev, V. K., et al., ‘Bi-SQUID: designforapplications’, 2020, Superconductor Science and Technology 33.11: 113001. [cited by applicant]
Berggren, S., et al., ‘Effects of spread in critical currents for series-and parallel-coupled arrays of SQUIDs and Bi-SQUIDs’,'2014, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 25.3: 1600304. [cited by applicant]
Volkov, AF., et al., ‘Effect of gate voltage on critical current in controllable superconductor-normal-metal-superconductor Josephson junctions’, 1996, Physical Review B 53.22: 15162. [cited by applicant]
Golokolenov, I., et al., On the origin of the controversial electrostatic field effect in superconductors, 2021, Nature communications 12.1, pp. 1-7 (published May 12, 2021). [cited by applicant]
Monteiro, AM. R. V. L., et al., ‘Side gate tunable Josephsonjunctions at the LaA1O3/SrTiO3 interface’, 2017, Nano letters 17.2, pp. 715-720. [cited by applicant]
Paolucci, F., et al., ‘Field-Effect Control of Metallic Superconducting Systems’,2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.1272lv2. [cited by applicant]
Li, T., et al., ‘Scalable, tunable josephsonjunctions and DC SQUIDs based on CVD graphene’, 2019, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 29. 5: 1101004. [cited by applicant]
De Simoni, G., et al., ‘Gate-control of the current-flux relation of a Josephson quantum interferometer based on proxirnitized metallic nanojuntions’, 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03572v2 (published Jun. 8, 2021). [cited by applicant]
Korney_ V. K.. ct al.. ‘Bi-SQUID: a novel lincarization method for de SQUID voltage response’. 2009. Superconductor Science and Technology 22.11: 114011. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to PCT/AU2022/051343 dated Jan. 24, 2023. [cited by applicant]