IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,702,084
Granted Patent B2
US 12,702,084 · App. 18/729,401 · Granted Aug 11, 2026

System and method for defining a work region boundary for use by an autonomous grounds care vehicle

Inventors: Derek R. Curd (Longmont, CO); Jeremy J. Tate (Beatrice, NE); Justin L. Pryor (Beatrice, NE); William J. Krause (Boulder, CO); Weston M. Lewis (Lincoln, NE)
Assignee: THE TORO COMPANY
A01D34/008A01D2101/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,702,084
App. No.
18/729,401
Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Granted
Aug 11, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3669
USPC
701/23
Abstract

Systems and methods of defining a boundary of a work region are provided. The work region may be an area in which an autonomous vehicle (e.g., mower) may operate after boundary definition. The vehicle may initially be moved along a path around a work region, and geographic locations periodically recorded. Upon approaching an earlier geographic location, a controller associated with the vehicle may close the boundary (to form an enclosed area) upon sensing return or proximity to the earlier geographic location.

Claims (47)

1 . A method of defining a boundary of a work region, comprising:

moving a vehicle along a path around a work region, wherein the vehicle is associated with a detection zone that is defined by a predetermined size and that is positioned relative to the vehicle;

recording a geographical location at each of a plurality of vehicle positions as the vehicle traverses the path;

sensing exiting of recorded geographical locations from the detection zone of the vehicle in response to the detection zone passing beyond the recorded geographical locations;

flagging recorded geographical locations that exit the detection zone as being candidate geographical locations for closing a boundary of the work region;

sensing return of the vehicle to a candidate geographical location in response to the candidate geographical location falling within the detection zone; and

closing the boundary of the work region in response to sensing return of the vehicle to the candidate geographical location.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein a geometric center of the detection zone is located at approximately a center of the vehicle.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the detection zone is biased forward of a mid-point of the vehicle towards a front end of the vehicle.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the detection zone is located proximate a cutting deck attached to the vehicle.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

the vehicle comprises an implement towed by the vehicle; and

the detection zone is positioned between a mid-point of the vehicle and a mid-point of the implement.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein closing the boundary comprises automatically closing the boundary in response to sensing return of the vehicle to the eligible geographical location.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein closing the boundary comprises issuing a notification via a user interface in response to sensing return of the vehicle to the eligible geographical location, the notification requesting user action to manually close the boundary.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

repeating the method to define a boundary of an exclusion zone within the boundary of the work region;

automatically determining that the exclusion zone falls within the boundary of the work region; and

autonomously operating the vehicle within the boundary of the work region while avoiding the exclusion zone.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising defining the boundary by the eligible geographical location and additional geographical locations recorded as the vehicle traversed the path away from the eligible geographical location and back to the eligible geographical location.

10 . A system for defining a boundary of a work region, comprising:

a vehicle configured to traverse a path around a work region;

a positioning sensor supported by the vehicle; and

a controller supported by the vehicle and operably coupled to the positioning sensor, the controller configured to:

record a geographical location at each of a plurality of vehicle positions as the vehicle traverses the path, wherein the vehicle is associated with a detection zone that is defined by a predetermined size and that is positioned relative to the vehicle;

sense exiting of recorded geographical locations from the detection zone of the vehicle in response to the detection zone passing beyond the recorded geographical locations;

flag the recorded geographical locations that exit the detection zone as being candidate geographical locations for boundary closure;

sense return of the vehicle to a candidate geographical location in response to the candidate geographical location falling within the detection zone; and

close a boundary of the work region in response to sensing return of the vehicle to the candidate geographical location.

11 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein the vehicle comprises either: a grounds care vehicle comprising a grounds care implement and operable in an autonomous mode; or a survey vehicle.

12 . The system according to claim 10 , comprising a user interface operably coupled to the controller, the user interface configured to receive a user command to initiate defining of the boundary.

13 . The system according to claim 10 , comprising a user interface operably coupled to the controller, the user interface configured to one or both of visually and audibly communicate status of defining the boundary.

14 . The system according to claim 10 , comprising a user interface operably coupled to the controller, wherein the user interface is a component of the vehicle, or is a component of a separate electronic device communicatively coupled to the controller.

15 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein a geometric center of the detection zone is located at approximately a center of the vehicle.

16 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein:

the vehicle comprises a front end and a rear end; and

the detection zone is biased forward of a mid-point of the vehicle towards the front end.

17 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein the detection zone is located proximate a cutting deck of the vehicle.

18 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein:

the vehicle comprises a grounds care implement towed by the vehicle; and

the detection zone is positioned between a mid-point of the vehicle and a mid-point of the implement.

19 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein the predetermined size of the detection zone is larger than the size of the vehicle.

20 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein the predetermined size of the detection zone corresponds to a width of the vehicle or a radius of the vehicle.

21 . The system according to claim 10 , wherein the controller is configured to autonomously work the work region within the boundary using a grounds care implement.

22 . The system according to claim 21 , wherein the grounds care implement comprises one of a cutting deck, an aerator, a snow clearing implement, a fertilizing implement, and a weed management implement.

23 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the size of the detection zone is different than a size of a sensing zone of a non-contact obstacle detection sensor of the vehicle.

24 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising a non-contact obstacle detection sensor, wherein the size of the detection zone is different than a sensing zone of the non-contact obstacle detection sensor of the vehicle.

Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 63354302 · Jun 22, 2022
Provisional Application 63337675 · May 3, 2022
Provisional Application 63310427 · Feb 15, 2022
Related Publication 20250098569A1 · Mar 27, 2025
References Cited (59)
US 6255793B1 · Peless et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6677938B1 · Maynard · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7085624B2 · Aldred · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7116660B2 · Sindhu et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8019475B2 · Kuroda · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8428776B2 · Letsky · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8706297B2 · Letsky · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9497901B2 · Willgert · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10029368B2 · Wolowelsky et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10338602B2 · Grufman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10405488B2 · Kamfors et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10442083B2 · Wolowelsky et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10485164B2 · Letsky · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10598793B2 · Öhrlund et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10649466B2 · Holmström et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10806075B2 · Grufman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11334082B2 · Frick et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11351670B2 · Wolowelsky et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11439058B2 · Letsky · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11835343B1 · Ebrahimi Afrouzi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20020156556A1 · Ruffner · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030030398A1 · Jacobs et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20070085373A1 · Watanabe · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080027591A1 · Lenser et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080039974A1 · Sandin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090002163A1 · Farrington et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090044370A1 · Won et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090054069A1 · Calnan, III et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090143912A1 · Wang et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090198375A1 · Kanayama · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090282642A1 · Batchelder et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100082193A1 · Chiappetta · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110153136A1 · Anderson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110184605A1 · Neff · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138246A1 · Gutmann et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140222197A1 · Letsky · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160205341A1 · Hollander et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170225678A1 · Bariant et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170364090A1 · Grufman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180255704A1 · Kamfors · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200045880A1 · Letsky · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200094825A1 · Kato · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200154632A1 · Chen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200267896A1 · Ingvalson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220129006A1 · Vishnu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220324112A1 · Wolowelsky et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230320274A1 · Vandike · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 2390746A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 3557359A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3633410A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002181560A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0120260A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014027946A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015072897A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021110311A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Detecting Loop Closure with Scene Sequences, “Detecting Loop Closure with Scene Sequences | International Journal of Computer Vision | Springer Nâ”; (Year: 2007). [cited by examiner]
Batavia et al., “Autonomous coverage operations in semi-structures outdoor environments” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, Sep. 30-Oct. 4, 2002 available online … [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2023/012896, dated May 25, 2023 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2023/012896, dated Aug. 20, 2024 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]