IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,702,496
Granted Patent B2
US 12,702,496 · App. 18/342,974 · Granted Aug 11, 2026

Systems and methods for assessing tissue remodeling

Inventors: Catherine M. Shachaf (Los Gatos, CA); Amit Shachaf (Los Gatos, CA); Kevin Manbeck (Los Gatos, CA)
Assignee: Orlucent, Inc.
A61B34/25A61B5/0035A61B5/0071A61B5/0077A61B5/444A61B5/7275G16H50/30A61B2034/107A61B2090/373
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,702,496
App. No.
18/342,974
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Granted
Aug 11, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3681
USPC
705/2
Abstract

A method for assessing tissue remodeling risk is provided. The method comprises (a) obtaining a plurality of images of a target region of a subject's skin, wherein the plurality of images comprises (1) a set of visible light images and (2) a set of fluorescent images; (b) processing the plurality of images to determine an optimal image pair for the target region, wherein the optimal image pair comprises: (i) a first visible light image selected from (1), and (ii) a first fluorescent image selected from (2); (c) generating an assessment of the target region based at least on the optimal image pair; and (d) displaying on a graphical user interface the assessment, the optimal image pair, and a schematic showing a location of the target region on the subject's body, wherein the assessment is indicative of a probability of tissue remodeling at the target region.

Claims (33)

1 . A method for assessing tissue remodeling risk, comprising:

(a) collecting a plurality of images of a lesion located in a target region of a subject's skin, wherein the plurality of images comprises (1) a set of visible light images of the lesion and (2) a set of fluorescent images of the lesion, wherein a fluorescent marker is configured to provide fluorescence when bound to one or more biomarkers associated with tissue remodeling; and

(b) using at least one processor and a non-transitory computer readable storage medium encoded with a computer program:

(I) processing the plurality of images to determine an optimal image pair for the target region, wherein the optimal image pair comprises: (i) a visible light image selected from (1), and (ii) a fluorescent image selected from (2), wherein the optimal image pair is determined automatically using the at least one processor based on (i) a position of the lesion within each of the set of visible light images and each of the set of fluorescent images, (ii) a degree of similarity or correlation between each of the set of visible light images and each of the set of fluorescent images, and (iii) a focus quality of each of the set of visible light images and each of the set of fluorescent images, wherein the visible light image comprises a first set of visual characteristics, wherein the fluorescent image comprises a second set of visual characteristics, wherein at least a portion of the second set of visual characteristics is not visible in the first set of visual characteristics, and wherein at least a portion of the first set of visual characteristics is not visible in the second set of visual characteristics;

(II) segmenting the visible light image to identify a border of the lesion, wherein the segmenting of the visible light image comprises converting the visible light image into an intensity image;

(III) adding the border of the lesion identified from the visible light image to the fluorescent image based on a location of the fluorescent marker;

(IV) generating an assessment of the target region based at least on the optimal image pair, wherein the generating of the assessment of the target region comprises evaluating an aggregate score for the optimal image pair,

wherein the aggregate score comprises a visible score for the visible light image and a fluorescent score for the fluorescent image, wherein the visible score is based on a first set of metrics associated with the first set of visual characteristics in the visible light image, wherein the first set of metrics comprises one or more of the following: size, shape, volume, color, or surface texture of the lesion and its surrounding area, wherein the fluorescent score is based on a second set of metrics associated with the second set of visual characteristics in the fluorescent image, and wherein the second set of metrics comprises one or more of the following: size, shape, area or extent of tissue remodeling, pixel intensity, fluorescence intensity, patterns or texture in the target region beneath the subject's skin and surrounding the lesion,

wherein the visible score comprises one or more measures of asymmetry, border irregularity, color variegation, and diameter of the lesion based at least in part on the border of the lesion identified by the segmenting in (II), and

wherein the fluorescent score comprises one or more measures of intensity and texture of fluorescence in the fluorescent image based at least in part on the border of the lesion added to the fluorescent image in (III); and

(V) displaying on a graphical user interface the assessment, the optimal image pair, and a schematic showing a location of the target region on the subject's body, wherein the assessment of the target region is indicative of a probability of tissue remodeling at the target region.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the lesion comprises a mole on the subject's skin.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the visible light image and the fluorescent image are selected to be complementary or matching with each other.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the first set of visual characteristics is associated with the mole and the skin of the subject, and wherein the second set of visual characteristics is associated with underlying tissue beneath the skin and surrounding the mole.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimal image pair is a first optimal image pair, and wherein after (I) and prior to (IV) the method further comprises:

displaying an option on the graphical user interface to a user, wherein the option permits the user to accept or reject the first optimal image pair; and

receiving an input from the user in response to the option displayed on the graphical user interface.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

processing the plurality of images to determine a second optimal image pair for the target region when the input is indicative of the user rejecting the first optimal image pair, wherein the second optimal image pair is different from the first optimal image pair.

7 . The method of claim 5 , comprising: continuing with (IV) and (V) when the input is indicative of the user accepting the first optimal image pair.

8 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

processing the plurality of images to determine a plurality of other optimal image pairs for the target region when the input is indicative of the user rejecting the first optimal image pair; and

displaying the plurality of other optimal image pairs on the graphical user interface.

9 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the probability of tissue remodeling is associated with a probability of development of melanoma in the mole, and wherein the assessment is useable to determine a clinical diagnosis or course of action based on the probability of development of melanoma in the mole.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the segmenting of the visible light image is used to generate the first set of metrics.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the visible light image and the fluorescent image are adjusted and aligned to a set of coordinates within the optimal image pair.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: comparing the optimal image pair to one or more reference images.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the one or more reference images comprise a reference image pair.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the reference image pair comprises (1) a visible light reference image that is not from the set of visible light images and (2) a fluorescent reference image that is not from the set of fluorescent images.

15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the optimal image pair comprises fiducials, and wherein the reference image pair does not comprise fiducials.

16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the optimal image pair comprises a first set of fiducials that are located at a predefined location and/or orientation relative to the lesion, and wherein the reference image pair comprises a set of fiducials that are located near a boundary of each reference image within the reference image pair.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating of the assessment of the probability of tissue remodeling is performed automatically by the at least one processor.

18 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising segmenting the fluorescent image, wherein the segmenting of the fluorescent image is used to generate the second set of metrics, and wherein the segmenting of the fluorescent image comprises segmenting the fluorescent image into a plurality of zones surrounding the target region.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2023
From: SHACHAF, CATHARINE M.; SHACHAF, AMIT; MANBECK, KEVIN
To: ORLUCENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 064799/0505 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2021065470 · Dec 29, 2021
Provisional Application 63132979 · Dec 31, 2020
Related Publication 20240173084A1 · May 30, 2024
References Cited (149)
US 4239390A · Scherer · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4560252A · Mori · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4786813A · Svanberg et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4870484A · Sonehara · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5094531A · Garner et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5432876A · Appeldorn et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5536814A · Ruoslahti et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5650135A · Contag et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5686300A · Berndt · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5699798A · Hochman et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5717959A · Tokunaga · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5759996A · Cheng et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5798805A · Ooi et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5836872A · Kenet et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5981478A · Ruoslahti et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6091983A · Alfano et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6284223B1 · Luiken · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6512236B2 · Seville · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6627446B1 · Roach et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6748259B1 · Benaron et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6748529B2 · Smith · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6863650B1 · Irion · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7139598B2 · Hull et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7365844B2 · Richards-Kortum et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7371364B2 · Li et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7561287B1 · Antonacci et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7564550B2 · Yaroslavsky et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7720532B2 · Hashimshony et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7842466B1 · Kim et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8642009B2 · Shachaf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10165976B2 · Shachaf et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10531824B2 · Shachaf et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11185278B2 · Shachaf et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20020058864A1 · Mansfield et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040057094A1 · Olszak et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040220100A1 · Waugh et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050026181A1 · Davis et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050059034A1 · Tyler et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050118640A1 · Kureshy et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050136177A1 · Hesse · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050265606A1 · Nakamura · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060127946A1 · Montagu et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060148028A1 · Noda et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060227325A1 · Rulison et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070020181A1 · Workman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070255169A1 · Hashimshony et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080032328A1 · Cline et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080267882A1 · Chen et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080272312A1 · Tuschel · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080317325A1 · Ortyn et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090130650A1 · Tan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090253991A1 · Balas et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090273447A1 · Selker et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090297450A1 · Ruoslahti et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100042004A1 · Dhawan · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100121156A1 · Yoo · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100185064A1 · Bandic · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100204064A1 · Cho · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100214430A1 · De Boer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100322862A1 · Ruoslahti et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110009163A1 · Fletcher et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110021908A1 · Lee et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110059016A1 · Ramanujam et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110064658A1 · Scherz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110065899A1 · Kon et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110085974A1 · Chung et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110104075A1 · Dmochowski et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110117025A1 · Dacosta et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110117028A1 · Zharov · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110165075A1 · Rajopadhye et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110217207A1 · Fujimoto et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110264209A1 · Wiechmann et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110278554A1 · Ma et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110294543A1 · Lapstun et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120068855A1 · Matsumura et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120083005A1 · Malecki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120083761A1 · Malecki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120093730A1 · Malecki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120123205A1 · Nie et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120330284A1 · Hyde et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130100272A1 · Price et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140348410A1 · Grunkin · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140350395A1 · Shachaf · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170049380A1 · Shachaf et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190113423A1 · Goodman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190307391A1 · Shachaf · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200049599A1 · Alexander et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200121245A1 · Barclay · 2020 [cited by examiner]
AU 6374098B2 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
AU 728668B2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
CN 1799067A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 102099671A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 103168242A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 110088804A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 0927045B1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003513735A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011133366A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011521237A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015505051A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019521829A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9013091A1 · 1990 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9710507A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9809155A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0125399A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0125410A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO02080771A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO03067230A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005020794A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005034926A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005034926A3 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005072622A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005077065A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006083986A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006083986A3 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006083986A9 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011072401A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011112559A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018087984A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022147090A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Anikijenko, Peter, et al. In Vivo Detection of Small Subsurface Melanomas in Athymic Mice Using Noninvasive Fiber Optic Confocal Imaging. The Society for Investigative Dermatology, vol. 117, 1142-1448 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Balch, Charles M., et al. Final Version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 19, 3635-3648 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Breslow, Alexander. Thickness, Cross-Sectional Areas and Depth of Invasion in the Prognosis of Cutaneous Melanoma. Annals of Surgery, vol. 172, 902-908 (1970). [cited by applicant]
Bussau, L.J., et al. Fibre optic confocal imaging (FOCI) of keratinocytes, blood vessels and nerves in hairless mouse skin in vivo. Journal of Anatomy, vol. 192, 187-194 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Cai, Weibo, et al. Multimodality tumor imaging targeting integrin αvβ3. BioTechniques, vol. 39, 14-25 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Carmeliet, Peter, et al. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature, vol. 407, 249-257 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Chatziioannou, Arlon F. Instrumentation for Molecular Imaging in Preclinical Research: Micro-PET and Micro-SPECT. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 2, 533-536 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Danhier, Fabienne, et al. RGD-Based Strategies to Target Alpha(v) Beta(3) Integrin in Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis. Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 9, 2961-2973 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Ellis, Lee M., et al. Synopsis of Angiogenesis Inhibitors in Oncology. Oncology, vol. 16, 14-22 (2002). [cited by applicant]
EP 21916399.5 Extended European Search Report dated May 7, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Folkman, J., et al. Tumor Angiogenesis: Effect on Tumor Growth and Immunity. Fundamental Aspects of Neoplasia, 401-412 (1975). [cited by applicant]
Folkman, Judah. Tumor Angiogenesis: Therapeutic Implications. The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 285, 1182-1186 (1971). [cited by applicant]
Gaertner, F.C., et al. Radiolabelled RGD peptides for imaging and therapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 39, S126-S138 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Haubner, Roland, et al. Noninvasive Imaging of alpha(v)beta(3) Integrin Expression Using 18F-labeled RGD-containing Glycopeptide and Positron Emission Tomography. American Association for Cancer Research, vol. 61, 1781-… [cited by applicant]
Hauser, Peter C., et al. A solid-state instrument for fluorescence chemical sensors using a blue light-emitting diode of high intensity. Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 6, 1081-1085 (1995). [cited by applicant]
Heasley, Diane D., et al. Pathology of Malignant Melanoma, The Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 76, 1223-1255 (1996). [cited by applicant]
Kollias, Nikiforos, et al. Optical Non-Invasive Approaches to Diagnosis of Skin Diseases. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 7, 64-75 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Lakowicz, Joseph R. Instrumentation for Fluorescence Spectroscopy In Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 3rd Edition, 19-27 and 32-36 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Lange, Norbert. Controlled Drug Delivery in Photodynamic Therapy and Fluorescence-Based Diagnosis of Cancer. Handbook of Biomedical Fluorescence, Chapter 16, 563-635 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Matsumoto, Keiichi, et al. Performance Characteristics of a New 3-Dimensional Continuous-Emission and Spiral-Transmission High-Sensitivity and High-Resolution PET Camera Evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 Standard. Journ… [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2021/065470 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 1, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Richter, A., et al. Comparison of Fluorescent Tag DNA Labeling Methods Used for Expression Analysis by DNA Microarrays. BioTechniques, vol. 33, 620-628 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Rosenthal, Eben L., et al. Use of fluorescent labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody to image head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 6, 1230-1238 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Schmieder, Anne H., et al. Molecular MR Imaging of Melanoma Angiogenesis with Alpha(v)Beta(3)-Targeted Paramagnetic Nanoparticles. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 53, 621-627 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Srivastava, Anurag, et al. Neovascularization in Human Cutaneous Melanoma: A Quantitative Morphological and Doppler Ultrasound Study. European Journal of Cancer & Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, 1205-1209 (1986). [cited by applicant]
Suihko, Christian, et al. Fluorescence fibre-optic confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: microscope and fluorophores. Skin Research and Technology, vol. 11, 254-67 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Swindle, Lucinda D., et al. View of Normal Human Skin In Vivo as Observed Using Fluorescent Fiber-Optic Confocal Microscopic Imaging. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 121, 706-712 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Van Dam, Gooitzen M., et al. Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-α targeting: first in-human results. Nature Medicine, vol. 17, 1315-1319 (2011). [cited by applicant]
CN202180094945.2 Office Action with Search Report dated Mar. 19, 2026. [cited by applicant]
EP21916399.5 Communication Pursuant To Article 94(3) dated Mar. 12, 2026. [cited by applicant]