IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,703,478
Granted Patent B2
US 12,703,478 · App. 19/058,597 · Granted Aug 11, 2026

Deployable wings for an aircraft

Inventors: Mark Plecnik (South Bend, IN); Sam Patrick O'Connor (South Bend, IN); Aravind Baskar (South Bend, IN); James Joo (Dayton, OH)
Assignees: University of Notre Dame du Lac; Government of the United States as Represented by the Secretary of The Air Force
B64C3/56
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,703,478
App. No.
19/058,597
Filed
Feb 20, 2025
Granted
Aug 11, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3647
USPC
244/49
Abstract

An apparatus for deploying the wings of a movable-wing aircraft includes a spherical four-bar mechanism. The spherical four-bar mechanism has a first bar to which a first wing is attached, a second bar to which a second wing is attached, a third, movable bar rotatably or movably linking the first bar to the second bar at a first respective point on each bar, and a fourth bar grounding the first and second bar at a second respective point on each bar. The spherical four-bar mechanism may be mathematically optimized for space, size, and movement by a system of kinematic equations to allow the first and second wing to open at substantially the same time without colliding with one another. The wings of the aircraft may further include a mid-wing hinge with a movable stiffening spar to allow the wings to fold to a more compact size during storage.

Claims (56)

1 . An apparatus for deploying wings of an aircraft, comprising:

a closed-loop mechanism comprising:

a first member;

a second member rotatably connected to the first member about a first rotational axis;

a third member rotatably connected to the first member about a second rotational axis; and

a fourth member pivotally connected to both the second member and the third member, wherein the fourth member kinematically constrains rotational movement of the second member and the third member in a nonlinear motion profile;

a first wing operatively connected to the second member; and

a second wing operatively connected to the third member,

wherein rotation of the second member and the third member in the nonlinear motion profile causes rotational deployment of the first wing and the second wing of the aircraft in accordance with the nonlinear motion profile.

2 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the deployment rotation of the wings is symmetric.

3 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the deployment rotation of the wings is asymmetric.

4 . The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a deployment actuator operatively connected to at least one member of the closed-loop mechanism;

wherein the deployment actuator causes a coordinated rotation of the second member and the third member via kinematic constraints of the fourth member of the closed-loop mechanism, thereby rotating the first wing and the second wing into a deployed position according to the nonlinear motion profile.

5 . The apparatus of claim 4 , further comprising a hinge flap;

wherein the first wing and the second wing meet at a mating profile, and rotation of the first wing and the second wing into the deployed position also moves the hinge flap over the mating profile.

6 . The apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the deployment actuator is any one of a shape memory alloy, motor, hydraulic piston, thermally actuated piston, a thermo-electrically activated piston, or electromagnetic piston and the deployment actuator comprises any one of an elastic member or a pulley.

7 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first wing and the second wing each further comprise:

a first wing segment;

a second wing segment; and

a mid-wing hinge connecting the first wing segment and the second wing segment, wherein the mid-wing hinge is configured to allow the first wing segment to fold relative to the second wing segment in a non-deployed position.

8 . The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein the first wing and the second wing each further comprise a movable spar configured to move from a first position within the first wing segment or the second wing segment to a second position spanning the first wing segment and the second wing segment.

9 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the nonlinear motion profile is determined through an approximate kinematic synthesis process using polynomial homotopy continuation to prevent collisions between the first wing and the second wing during deployment.

10 . The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the approximate kinematic synthesis process determines the nonlinear motion profile constrained by at least one predefined ground pivot location.

11 . An apparatus for deploying wings of an aircraft, comprising:

a spherical four-bar mechanism comprising:

a first member;

a second member rotatably connected to the first member;

a third member rotatably connected to the first member; and

a fourth member pivotally connected to both the second member and the third member;

a first wing operatively connected to the second member at a first point;

a second wing operatively connected to the third member at a second point;

a deployment actuator operatively connected to the fourth member of the spherical four-bar mechanism;

wherein the deployment actuator moves the fourth member of the spherical four-bar mechanism according to a nonlinear motion profile, in turn rotating the second member and the third member of the spherical four-bar mechanism, thereby rotating the first wing and the second wing into a deployed position whereby the first point and the second point meet at a mating profile; and

a hinge flap, wherein rotation of the first wing and the second wing into the deployed position also moves the hinge flap over the mating profile.

12 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the deployment actuator comprises any one of an elastic member or a pulley.

13 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the deployment actuator is any one of a shape memory alloy, motor, hydraulic piston, thermally actuated piston, thermo-electrically activated piston, or electromagnetic piston.

14 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the first wing and the second wing each further comprise;

a first wing segment;

a second wing segment; and

a mid-wing hinge connecting the first wing segment and the second wing segment, wherein the mid-wing hinge is configured to allow the first wing segment to fold relative to the second wing segment in a non-deployed position.

15 . The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the first wing and the second wing each further comprise a movable spar configured to move from a first position within the first wing segment or the second wing segment to a second position spanning the first wing segment and the second wing segment.

16 . The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the nonlinear motion profile is determined through an approximate kinematic synthesis process using polynomial homotopy continuation to prevent collisions between the first wing and the second wing during deployment.

17 . A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform operations comprising:

determining kinematic constraints of a closed-loop mechanism, the closed-loop mechanism comprising:

a first member;

a second member rotatably connected to the first member;

a third member rotatably connected to the first member; and

a fourth member pivotally connected to the second member and the third member such that the fourth member kinematically constrains rotation motion of the second member and the third member;

generating a motion profile based on geometric parameters of a first wing and a second wing and the kinematic constraints of the closed-loop mechanism, wherein:

each wing is coupled to a respective member of the closed-loop mechanism;

the motion profile defines a synchronized deployment trajectory for the first wing and the second wing; and

the motion profile includes a deviation from a target trajectory; and

optimizing the geometric parameters and the kinematic constraints by minimizing the deviation of the motion profile from the target trajectory.

18 . The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein generating the motion profile is through an approximate kinematic synthesis process using polynomial homotopy continuation to prevent collisions between the first wing and the second wing during deployment.

19 . The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 18 , wherein the approximate kinematic synthesis process generates the motion profile constrained by at least one predefined ground pivot location.

20 . The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein optimizing the geometric parameters and the kinematic constraints account for at least one of mechanical interference between the first wing and the second wing, force used to actuate the closed-loop mechanism, and deployment timing constraints.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2026
From: PLECNIK, MARK; O’CONNOR, SAM PATRICK; BASKAR, ARAVIND
To: UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC
Reel/Frame 074684/0983 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2025
From: JOO, JAMES
To: GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
Reel/Frame 070437/0807 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63555696 · Feb 20, 2024
Related Publication 20250289560A1 · Sep 18, 2025
References Cited (23)
US 8304703B2 · Hong · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 12202600B1 · Foskey · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20120280080A1 · Lubenow · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20200079492A1 · Noskowicz · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20240182154A1 · Gleason-Chapell · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Alizade, Rasim and Gezgin, Erkin. “Synthesis of Function Generating Spherical Four Bar Mechanism for the Six Independent Parameters.” Mechanism and Machine Theory vol. 46 No. 9 (2011): pp. 1316-1326. DOI 10.1016/j.mechm… [cited by applicant]
Alizade, Rasim I. and Kilit, Özgür. “Analytical Synthesis of Function Generating Spherical Four-Bar Mechanism for the Five Precision Points.” Mechanism and Machine Theory vol. 40 No. 7 (2005): pp. 863-878. DOI.1016/j.me… [cited by applicant]
Baskar, Aravind and Plecnik, Mark. “Synthesis of Six-bar Timed Curve Generators of Stephenson-type Using Random Monodromy Loops.” Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics vol. 13 No. 1 (2020). DOI 10.1115/1.4047871. [cited by applicant]
Baskar, Aravind, Plecnik, Mark and Hauenstein, Jonathan D. “Computing Saddle Graphs via Homotopy Continuation for the Approximate Synthesis of Mechanisms.” Mechanism and Machine Theory vol. 176 (2022): p. 104932. DOI 10… [cited by applicant]
Bates, Daniel J., Hauenstein, Jonathan D., Sommese, Andrew J. and Wampler, Charles W. “Bertini: Software for Numerical Algebraic Geometry” (2006). DOI 10.7274/R0H41PB5. [cited by applicant]
Cervantes-Sánchez, J. Jesús, Gracia, Luis, Rico-Martínez, José M., Medellín-Castillo, Hugo I. and González-Galván, Emilio J. “A Novel and Efficient Kinematic Synthesis Approach of the Spherical 4R Function Generator for… [cited by applicant]
Farhang, K. and Zargar, Y. S. “Design of Spherical 4R Mechanisms: Function Generation for the Entire Motion Cycle.” Journal of Mechanical Design vol. 121 No. 4 (1999): pp. 521-528. DOI 10.1115/1.2829492. [cited by applicant]
Freudenstein, Ferdinand. “An Analytical Approach to the Design of Four-Link Mechanisms.” Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers vol. 76 No. 3 (2022): pp. 483-489. DOI 10.1115/1.4014881. [cited by applicant]
Hartenberg, Richard S. and Denavit, Jacques. Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages. McGraw-Hill, New York, Chapter 12 (1964). [cited by applicant]
Jiawei, Wang, Xiyuan, Cheng, Shiqi, Wen, Xiang, Li, Ying, Zhang and Duanling, Li. “The Algebraic Solution to the Spherical 4R Function Generator for Six Precision Points.” 2019 IEEE 9th Annual International Conference o… [cited by applicant]
Lakshminarayana, K. “On the Synthesis of the Spherical Four-Bar.” Mechanism and Machine Theory vol. 7 No. 1 (1972): pp. 63-69. DOI 10.1016/0094-114X(72)90017-1. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Zheng and Angeles, Jorge. “Least-Square Optimization of Planar and Spherical Four-Bar Function Generator Under Mobility Constraints.” Journal of Mechanical Design vol. 114 No. 4 (1992): pp. 569-573. DOI 10.1115/1.2… [cited by applicant]
Morgan, Alexander P. and Sommese, Andrew “Coefficient-Parameter Polynomial Continuation.” Applied Mathematics and Computation vol. 29 No. 2 (1989): pp. 123-160. DOI 10.1016/0096-3003(89)90099-4. [cited by applicant]
Rao, Singiresu S. and Ambekar, A. G. “Optimum Design of Spherical 4-R Function Generating Mechanisms.” Mechanism and Machine Theoryvol. 9No. 3 (1974): pp. 405-410. DOI 10.1016/0094-114X(74)90023-8. [cited by applicant]
Roth, Bernard. “Finite-Position Theory Applied to Mechanism Synthesis.” Journal of Applied Mechanics vol. 34 No. 3 (1967): pp. 599-605. DOI 10.1115/1.3607749. [cited by applicant]
Sancibrián, Ramon, de-Juan, Ana, Garcia, Pablo, Fernández, Alfonso and Viadero Rueda, Fernando. “Optimal Synthesis of Function Generating Spherical and RSSR Mechanisms.” 12th IFToMM World Congress. 2007. Besançon, Franc… [cited by applicant]
Watanabe, Katsumi. “Approximate Synthesis of Spherical Four-Bar Mechanisms.” Bulletin of JSME vol. 13 No. 58 (1970): pp. 607-615. DOI 10.1299/jsme1958.13.607. [cited by applicant]
Zimmerman, John R. “Four-Precision-Point Synthesis of the Spherical Four-Bar Function Generator.” Journal of Mechanisms vol. 2 No. 2 (1967): pp. 133-139. DOI 10.1016/0022-2569(67)90035-3. [cited by applicant]