IP Library Granted Patent US 12,708,327
Granted Patent B2
US 12,708,327 · App. 18/408,135 · Granted Aug 18, 2026

Method and system to compute hemodynamic parameters

Inventors: Thierry Galas (Cherisy, FR); Theo Champion (Paris, FR); Charly Emmanuel Girot (Paris, FR)
Assignee: GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
A61B5/7267A61B5/02028A61B5/026G06T5/60G16H30/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,708,327
App. No.
18/408,135
Filed
Jan 9, 2024
Granted
Aug 18, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3797
USPC
600/407
Abstract

Methods and systems are described herein for hemodynamic parameter estimation. In certain embodiments, a set of perfusion data is acquired for a region of interest using an imaging system. An artery signal is obtained from the set of perfusion data. A tissue signal is obtained from the set of perfusion data. The artery signal and the tissue signal are provided as inputs to one or more neural networks to determine one or more hemodynamic parameters for the region of interest. The one or more neural networks are trained using one or more synthetic data.

Claims (41)

1 . A method, comprising:

acquiring a set of perfusion data for a region of interest using an imaging system;

obtaining an artery signal from the set of perfusion data;

obtaining a tissue signal from the set of perfusion data; and

providing the artery signal and the tissue signal to serve as inputs to one or more neural networks to determine one or more hemodynamic parameters for the region of interest, wherein the one or more neural networks are trained using modified synthetic tissue data generated based on one or more synthetic data modified or combined with one or more clinical perfusion data, wherein training the one or more neural networks comprises:

generating a set of synthetic residual impulse functions for the region of interest based on a defined ground truth model;

obtaining a training artery signal from a training set of perfusion data;

generating a modified synthetic tissue signal based on the set of synthetic residual impulse functions and the training artery signal; and

training the one or more neural networks using a signal generated using the modified synthetic tissue signal and the training artery signal, wherein a loss is used as a bias for training the one or more neural networks, and wherein the loss is determined based on a comparison of an estimated residual impulse function output from the one or more neural networks and a first set of parameters derived from the estimated residual impulse function with the set of synthetic residual impulse functions and a second set of parameters derived from the set of synthetic residual impulse functions.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of perfusion data comprises at least one of computed tomography (CT) perfusion data, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion data, positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion data, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) data, or ultrasound imaging data.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more synthetic data are generated based on the defined ground truth model.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the tissue signal is a convolution of the artery signal and a residual impulse function of the region of interest, and wherein the one or more hemodynamic parameters are determined from the residual impulse function.

5 . The method of claim 1 , comprising correcting non-idealities in the set of perfusion data based on output from the one or more neural networks.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more hemodynamic parameters comprise at least one of a blood flow (BF), a blood volume (BV), a mean transit time (MTT), or a time to maximum (TMAX).

7 . A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

memory, accessible by the one or more processors, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving a set of perfusion data acquired using an imaging system to image a region of interest;

obtaining an artery signal from the set of perfusion data;

obtaining a tissue signal from the set of perfusion data; and

providing the artery signal and the tissue signal to serve as inputs to one or more neural networks to determine one or more hemodynamic parameters for the region of interest, wherein the one or more neural networks are trained using modified synthetic tissue data generated based on one or more synthetic data modified or combined with one or more clinical perfusion data, wherein training the one or more neural networks comprises:

generating a set of synthetic residual impulse functions for the region of interest based on a defined ground truth model;

obtaining a training artery signal from a training set of perfusion data;

generating a modified synthetic tissue signal based on the set of synthetic residual impulse functions and the training artery signal; and

training the one or more neural networks using a signal generated using the modified synthetic tissue signal and the training artery signal, wherein a regularization is used in a bias used for the training of the one or more neural networks, and wherein the regularization is associated with characteristics of an estimated residual impulse function output from the one or more neural networks.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the set of perfusion data comprises at least one of computed tomography (CT) perfusion data, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion data, positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion data, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) data, or ultrasound imaging data.

9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more synthetic data are generated based on the defined ground truth model.

10 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the tissue signal is a convolution of the artery signal and a residual impulse function of the region of interest, and wherein the one or more hemodynamic parameters are determined from the residual impulse function.

11 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more neural networks are trained to correct image non-idealities in the set of perfusion data.

12 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more hemodynamic parameters comprise at least one of a blood flow (BF), a blood volume (BV), a mean transit time (MTT), or a time to maximum (TMAX).

13 . A method for training one or more neural networks, comprising:

generating a set of synthetic residual impulse functions for a region of interest based on a defined ground truth model;

obtaining an artery signal from a set of perfusion data;

generating a modified synthetic tissue signal based on the set of synthetic residual impulse functions and the artery signal; and

training the one or more neural networks using a signal generated using the modified synthetic tissue signal and the artery signal, wherein a loss is used as a bias for the training of the one or more neural networks and wherein the loss is determined based on a comparison of an estimated residual impulse function output from the one or more neural networks and a first set of parameters derived from the estimated residual impulse function with the set of synthetic residual impulse functions and a second set of parameters derived from the set of synthetic residual impulse functions.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the modified synthetic tissue signal comprises a perturbation related to perturbating of the perfusion data.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the perturbation is associated with registration errors or with acquisition errors.

16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the set of perfusion data comprises at least one of computed tomography (CT) perfusion data, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion data, positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion data, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) data, or ultrasound imaging data.

17 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the first set of parameters comprises a first set of hemodynamic parameters and the second set of parameters comprises a second set of hemodynamic parameters.

18 . The method of claim 13 , wherein a regularization is used in a bias used for the training of the one or more neural networks, and wherein the regularization is associated with characteristics of the estimated residual impulse function.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the regularization comprises a second order of differentiation of the estimated residual impulse function.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 10, 2024
From: GALAS, THIERRY; CHAMPION, THEO; GIROT, CHARLY EMMANUEL
To: GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
Reel/Frame 066077/0574 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250221670A1 · Jul 10, 2025
References Cited (55)
US 6898453B2 · Lee · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7580737B2 · Wintermark et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8908939B2 · Bredno · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9949650B2 · Edic et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10034614B2 · Edic et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10186056B2 · Senzig et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10674986B2 · Venugopal et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10964017B2 · Pack · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11744472B2 · Zhao et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12288328B2 · Anzai · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20110229003A1 · Yang · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120141005A1 · Djeridane · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20150272448A1 · Fonte · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160148372A1 · Itu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160166209A1 · Itu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170220760A1 · Fonte · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170325770A1 · Edic et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180153495A1 · Itu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180303351A1 · Mestha et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190001001A1 · Fitzgerald et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190150764A1 · Arnold · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200297219A1 · Mitra et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133960A1 · Vaz · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220082647A1 · Sharma · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220175332A1 · Haase · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230142152A1 · Venugopal et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230144624A1 · Venugopal et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230253110A1 · Scannell · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240062061A1 · Bone · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240193767A1 · Moulton · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240221151A1 · De La Rosa · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250221670A1 · Galas · 2025 [cited by examiner]
CN 116361650A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 1537824A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 0057777A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020150512A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Lawrence et al., “An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation”, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 18, Issue 12, Dec. 1998, pp. 13… [cited by applicant]
Koh et al., “The Inclusion of Capillary Distribution in the Adiabatic Tissue Homogeneity Model of Blood Flow”, Phys Med Biol. May 2001; 46(5):1519-38. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/5/313. [cited by applicant]
Cuenod et al., “Perfusion and Vascular Permeability: Basic Concepts and Measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI”, Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (2013), 94, 1187-1204. [cited by applicant]
Kenneth L. Zierler, M.D., “Theoretical Basis of Indicator-Dilution Methods for Measuring Flow and Volume”, Circulation Research, vol. X, Mar. 1962, http://ahajournals.org on Dec. 15, 2023, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
L. Axel, “Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis”, Radiology, vol. 137, No. 3, Dec. 1, 1980, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
I.J. Fox, M.D., “History and Developmental Aspects of the Indicator-Dilution Technic”, http://ahajournals.org on Dec. 15, 2023, University of Minnesota, Circulation Research, vol. X, Mar. 1962, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Johnson, et al., “A model for capillary exchange”, American Journal of Physiology, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.6.1299, Published Online: Jun. 1, 1966, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cenic et al., “Dynamic CT Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow: A Validation Study”, AJNR, Am J Neuroradiol 20:63-73, Jan. 1999, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cenic et al., “A CT Method to Measure Hemodynamics in Brain Tumors: Validation and Application of Cerebral Blood Flow Maps”, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000, 21 (3) 462-470, https://www.ajnr.org/content/21/3/462, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Purdie et al., “Functional CT imaging of angiogenesis in rabbit VX2 soft-tissue tumour”, IOPscience, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 46, No. 12, Nov. 1, 2001, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/46/12/307, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aaron So et al., “Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences”, European Radiology, Cardiac, Published: Sep. 21, 2011, 22, 3… [cited by applicant]
Aaron So et al., “Quantitative myocardial perfusion measurement using CT Perfusion: a validation study in a porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction”, Published: Jul. 29, 2011, 28, 1237-1248 (2012), 11 pa… [cited by applicant]
Stewart et al., “Hepatic perfusion in a tumor model using DCE-CT: an accuracy and precision study”, IOPscience, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 53, No. 16, Published Jul. 24, 2008, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/53/16/003, 5… [cited by applicant]
Kudo et al., “Differences in CT Perfusion Maps Generated by Different Commercial Software: Quantitative Analysis by Using Identical Source Data of Acute Stroke Patients”, Radiology, vol. 254, No. 1, Dec. 14, 2009, https… [cited by applicant]
Kudo et al., “Accuracy and Reliability Assessment of CT and MR Perfusion Analysis Software Using a Digital Phantom”, Radiology, vol. 267, No. 1, Apr. 1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112618, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Boutelier et al., “Bayesian Hemodynamic Parameter Estimation by Bolus Tracking Perfusion Weighted Imaging”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 31, Issue: 7, Jul. 2012, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/616536… [cited by applicant]
CN116361650 Machine Translation; 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
EP application 24221472.4 filed Dec. 19, 2024—extended Search Report issued May 9, 2025; 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/134,774 filed Apr. 14, 2023, Venugopal. [cited by applicant]