IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,739,133
Granted Patent B1
US 12,739,133 · App. 19/534,674 · Granted Sep 15, 2026

Systems and methods for the staged dissemination and verifiable contemporaneous release of electronic data

Inventor: Eric Schneider (Hallandale Beach, FL)
H04L9/3247H04L9/0825
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,739,133
App. No.
19/534,674
Granted
Sep 15, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system and method for the synchronized release of electronic data are disclosed. A staging package comprising an encrypted payload and a verification hash is distributed to a plurality of listening nodes at a first time (T 1 ). The listening nodes stage the payload in an inert state. At a second time (T 2 ), a decryption key is broadcast, enabling the nodes to locally transform the encrypted payload into transformed data and verify its integrity via a bit-level match against the verification hash. In certain embodiments, a listening node apparatus comprises a secure processing environment configured to generate hardware-attested proofs of staging as a prerequisite for transformation. A distribution authority may further utilize a global state engine to programmatically gate access or transactions based on the compliance status of individual nodes, ensuring that the local transformation occurs contemporaneously across the network and according to a coordinated release schedule.

Claims (58)

1 . A system for synchronized release of electronic data, comprising:

a memory storing an encrypted payload and a verification hash derived from an unencrypted version of the encrypted payload;

a processor in communication with the memory and a network interface, the processor configured to:

distribute, at a first time, a staging package to a plurality of listening nodes, the staging package comprising the encrypted payload and the verification hash;

receive a cryptographically signed receipt from one or more listening nodes of the plurality of listening nodes, the cryptographically signed receipt providing cryptographic evidence of confirmed possession of the staging package prior to a second time; and

broadcast, at the second time, a decryption key to the plurality of listening nodes, the second time subsequent to the first time;

wherein the decryption key enables the plurality of listening nodes to locally perform a transformation of the encrypted payload into transformed data and verify an integrity of the transformed data via a bit-level match against the verification hash.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the staging package further comprises an attested metadata block including an authoritative identity record, and wherein the transformation of the encrypted payload is further conditioned upon successful verification of the authoritative identity record against a persistent public record.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to broadcast a revocation signal prior to the second time, wherein the revocation signal is configured to programmatically inhibit the transformation of the encrypted payload by an update to a status registry required for key activation.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the plurality of listening nodes are configured to execute a verifiable delay function (VDF) upon receipt of the decryption key, the VDF configured to define a sequential computational duration required to reveal the transformed data, to normalize revelation timing across the plurality of listening nodes regardless of network latency.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the second time is defined by a verifiable time-stamped pulse from a distributed beacon, and the plurality of listening nodes are configured to execute the local transformation within a millisecond-range window of said pulse.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the local transformation and the integrity verification are performed as an atomic operation, such that the transformed data is deleted from volatile memory if the bit-level match against the verification hash fails.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more listening nodes of the plurality of listening nodes are configured to transmit a cryptographically signed receipt of the staging package prior to the second time as a prerequisite for receipt of the decryption key at the second time.

8 . A listening node apparatus for synchronized transformation of electronic data, comprising:

a network interface configured to receive a staging package at or after a first time and a decryption key at a second time;

a secure processing environment comprising a secure processor and a secure memory, the secure processing environment configured to:

generate and transmit, via the network interface, a cryptographically signed receipt that provides cryptographic evidence of confirmed possession of the staging package prior to the second time, the second time subsequent to the first time;

stage an encrypted payload from the staging package in an inert state;

transform the encrypted payload into transformed data using the decryption key; and

render the transformed data only upon a successful bit-level match against a verification hash received at or after the first time.

9 . The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the secure processing environment is further configured to execute a verifiable delay function (VDF) to enforce a sequential computational duration, to render the transformed data at a precise temporal offset from the second time.

10 . The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the secure processing environment is configured to utilize a subscriber-specific metadata nonce to generate a uniquely watermarked version of the transformed data.

11 . The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the decryption key is a multiparty threshold key reconstructed from a plurality of independent shards, and wherein the secure processing environment is configured to utilize a probabilistic uniqueness filter to verify the plurality of independent shards against a registry of active release events.

12 . The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the listening node is configured to generate a hardware-attested proof of staging only upon a successful bit-level match of the encrypted payload against a second verification hash derived from the encrypted payload in the inert state.

13 . A computer-implemented method for synchronized release of electronic data, the method comprising:

receiving, at a listening node, an encrypted payload, a verification hash, and a release schedule at or after a first time;

generating and transmitting, via a network interface, a cryptographically signed receipt providing cryptographic evidence of confirmed possession of the encrypted payload prior to a second time, the second time subsequent to the first time;

staging the encrypted payload in local memory in an inert state according to the release schedule;

receiving a release signal comprising a decryption key at a second time defined by the release schedule; and

transitioning the encrypted payload from the inert state to a transformed state at the listening node in response to the release signal, wherein the transitioning is performed locally without further retrieval from a distribution server, and wherein the transformed state is verified via a bit-level match against the verification hash received at or after the first time.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the local memory is a hardware-secured edge-node cache configured to purge the encrypted payload if the transition to the transformed state fails a bit-level integrity check.

15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the listening node verifies the release schedule and the release signal against a notarized record on a distributed ledger.

16 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising verifying the decryption key against a pre-committed cryptographic witness received at the first time, the pre-committed cryptographic witness providing a verifiable proof that the decryption key corresponds to the encrypted payload.

17 . A computer-implemented method for secure preparation of a synchronized data release, the method comprising:

generating, at an originator node, a verification hash derived from an unencrypted version of a data object;

encrypting the data object using a cryptographic key corresponding to a decryption key to generate an encrypted payload;

preparing a release signal comprising the decryption key;

assembling a staging package comprising the encrypted payload, the verification hash, and a release schedule;

transmitting, at a first time, the staging package for arrival at a plurality of listening nodes;

receiving a cryptographically signed receipt from one or more listening nodes of the plurality of listening nodes, the cryptographically signed receipt providing cryptographic evidence of confirmed possession of the staging package prior to a second time; and

programmatically restricting a broadcast of the release signal until the second time defined by the release schedule, the second time subsequent to the first time.

18 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising generating a verification manifest for inclusion in the staging package, the verification manifest defining a unique mathematical relationship between the verification hash and a plurality of secondary hashes corresponding to at least one of a plurality of different file formats of the data object.

19 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising executing a pre-commitment step prior to the first time by recording the verification hash and an associated timestamp on a persistent public ledger, providing a verifiable proof of the data object's entropy and existence prior to distribution.

20 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the transmitting of the staging package further comprises routing the staging package through a distribution authority, the distribution authority configured to function as a neutral intermediary that caches the encrypted payload and performs a synchronized broadcast of the release signal to the plurality of listening nodes at the second time.

21 . The method of claim 20 , further comprising transmitting a revocation signal to the distribution authority prior to the second time, the revocation signal configured to update a status registry that programmatically inhibits use of the decryption key.

22 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the transmitting of the staging package is performed via at least one of a persistent WebSocket and gRPC uplink, enabling a sub-millisecond transition from the staging package transmission to the transmission of the release signal.

23 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising injecting forensic metadata into the staging package, the forensic metadata defining at least one of authorized geographic and network-based coordinates required for the plurality of listening nodes to execute a decryption of the encrypted payload.

24 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising generating a plurality of independent key shards from the decryption key and distributing the independent key shards to a plurality of distinct entities, such that the decryption key is only reconstructible at the second time upon a threshold release of the independent key shards.

25 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

receiving, at a distribution authority, a plurality of hardware-attested receipts from a corresponding plurality of listening nodes;

validating the plurality of hardware-attested receipts against a hardware authority registry to confirm the legitimacy of a secure processing environment for each corresponding listening node;

generating a distribution whitelist comprising a subset of the plurality of listening nodes from which a valid hardware-attested receipt was received prior to a specified cut-off time; and

encapsulating the decryption key within a plurality of unique cryptographic wrappers corresponding to the listening nodes on the distribution whitelist, such that the release signal is programmatically rendered unusable by any node excluded from said distribution whitelist.

26 . The method of claim 25 , wherein the staging package further comprises an attested metadata block including a challenge-response nonce, and wherein generating the hardware-attested receipt comprises utilizing the secure processing environment to sign the challenge-response nonce, thereby providing cryptographic evidence that the staging of the encrypted payload is concurrent with the release schedule.

27 . The method of claim 25 , further comprising transmitting a compliance status of the plurality of listening nodes to a global state engine and enforcing, via the global state engine, a state-transition gate that programmatically invalidates at least one of a transaction and a state-change originating from a listening node identified by the compliance status as failing to provide a valid hardware-attested receipt prior to the second time.

28 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising cryptographically tethering the release signal to a verified domain name of the originator node via a persistent public record in a provenance registry, such that the plurality of listening nodes can independently authenticate the origin of the release signal at the second time.

29 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising generating a subscriber-specific metadata nonce for each of the plurality of listening nodes and performing a deterministic synthesis of the decryption key and the subscriber-specific metadata nonce to enable each listening node to generate a uniquely watermarked version of the data object upon decryption.

30 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the originator node and the distribution authority are a single integrated logical entity, such that the originator node directly manages the withholding and subsequent broadcast of the release signal to the plurality of listening nodes.

References Cited (12)
US 6442549B1 · Schneider · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 9171289B2 · Kraft et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11556962B2 · Choi · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20070192127A1 · McInnis · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100088521A1 · Koplow · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110197237A1 · Turner · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120316888A1 · Stacey · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150161121A1 · Alvarez · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160283746A1 · Boshoff · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180006828A1 · Deguchi · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190279321A1 · Sheets et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20250260565A1 · Abdelsamie · 2025 [cited by examiner]