IP Library › Granted Patent US 6,923,050
Granted Patent B2
US 6,923,050 · App. 10/460,007 · Granted Aug 2, 2005

Automatic control method, usable in particular for maintaining the slip of a tire at an optimum level

Assignee: Michelin Recherche et Technique S.A.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,923,050
App. No.
10/460,007
Granted
Aug 2, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

An automatic control method is provided for a phenomenon in which a parameter Y varies as a function of a parameter X according to a course exhibiting a rise, an extremum and a fall, in which the value of the parameter X is automatically controlled to maintain the value of a parameter Y at an optimum value, including the following steps. Estimations or measurements (X i , Y i ) are determined for at least one pair of values in a coordinate system having an origin. Corresponding values are determined for the slope α i of the straight line passing through the origin and through (X i , Y i ). Coefficients A p are calculated by direct calculation or by a regression from a sufficient number of pairs with (α i , X i ) so as to model a variation curve α i =f(X i , A p ). A target value X Target is calculated by using a predetermined Invariant “Invt”. In addition, applications relating to the testing and the functioning of the tires on a vehicle are provided, for example for controlling the grip on braking, with Y being the coefficient of friction and X being the slip of the tire under torque.

Claims (431)

1. A method for testing a tire in terms of slip comprising the following steps:

(a) causing the tire to roll on a selected ground;

(b) applying a predetermined load F Z1 to the tire;

(c) applying a predetermined slip to the tire;

(d) measuring or estimating the longitudinal force F X1 of the tire;

(e) calculating a value of the coefficient of friction μ 1 =F X1 /F Z1 ;

(f) repeating the previous steps for calculating at least one other value “i” of the coefficient of friction μ i for at least one other pair “i” of stresses F Xi /F Zi and measuring the associated slip G i ;

(g) determining for each of the calculated values of the coefficient of friction the slope α i of the straight line passing through the origin and through (G i , μ i );

(h) calculating coefficients A p by direct calculation or by an appropriate regression from a sufficient number of pairs with (α i , G i ) so as to model a variation curve α i =f(G i , A p ); and

(i) calculating an optimum slip enabling a predetermined value of the coefficient of friction G Opt to be attained, by using a predetermined Invariant “Invt”.

2. A test method according to claim 1 , in which the Invariant is determined as follows:

Invt

=

μ

G

⁢

(

G

max

)

μ

G

⁢

(

p

·

G

max

)

,

with p having a positive value less than 1.

3. A test method according to claim 1 , in which the Invariant “Invt” is used as an adjustment parameter to refine the method.

4. A method for testing a tire in terms of drift comprising the following steps:

(a) causing the tire to roll on the ground;

(b) applying a predetermined load F Z1 to the tire;

(c) applying a predetermined drift angle δ i to the tire, such that the tire remains below the grip limit, and measuring or estimating the drift thrust F i corresponding to said drift angle δ i ;

(d) repeating the previous steps for calculating at least one other pair “i of values (δ i , F i );

(e) determining the corresponding values of the slope α i of the straight line passing through the origin and through (δ i , F i );

(f) calculating coefficients A p by direct calculation or by an appropriate regression from a sufficient number of pairs (α i , δ i ) so as to model a variation curve α i =f(δ i , A p ); and

(g) calculating a value of the drift angle δ Opt by using a predetermined Invariant “Invt”.

5. A test method according to claim 4 , in which the Invariant is determined as follows:

Invt

=

F

δ

⁢

(

δ

Opt

)

F

δ

⁢

(

p

·

δ

Opt

)

,

with p having a positive value less than 1.

6. A test method according to claim 4 , in which the Invariant “Invt” is used as an adjustment parameter to refine the method.

7. A test method according to claim 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , or 5 , in which the coefficients A p are calculated by a regression chosen from the group consisting of a linear regression and an exponential regression.

8. A test method according to claim 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , or 5 , for automatically controlling the drift angle δ of a tire, in which the value of p is between 0.25 and 0.75.

9. A test method according to claim 2 , or 5 , for automatically controlling the drift angle δ of a tire in which p is 0.5.

10. A test method according to claim 2 , in which two particular coefficients A p , the coefficients A and B, are calculated by the following linear regression, applied to “n” measured or estimated points (G i , μ i ):

A

Lin

=

n

·

∑

G

·

α

-

∑

G

·

∑

α

n

·

∑

G

2

-

(

∑

G

)

2

,

⁢

B

Lin

=

∑

α

·

∑

G

2

-

∑

G

·

α

·

∑

G

n

·

∑

G

2

-

(

∑

G

)

2

.

11. A test method according to claim 2 , in which two particular coefficients A p , the coefficients A and B, are calculated by the following exponential regression, applied to “n” measured or estimated points (G i , μ i ):

A

Exp

=

n

·

∑

G

·

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

-

∑

G

·

∑

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

n

·

∑

G

2

-

(

∑

G

)

2

,

B

Exp

=

∑

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

·

∑

G

2

-

∑

G

·

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

·

∑

G

n

·

∑

G

2

-

(

∑

G

)

2

.

12. A test method according to claim 10 , in which G Opt is calculated as follows:

G

Opt

=

-

B

Lin

A

Lin

·

1

-

Invt

1

-

p

·

Invt

,

with α =A Lin ·G+B Lin

13. A test method according to claim 11 , in which G Opt is calculated as follows:

G

Opt

=

Ln

⁡

(

Invt

)

p

·

A

Exp

,

with

⁢

⁢

α

=

ⅇ

A

Exp

·

G

+

B

Exp

.

14. A test method according to claim 10 , in which in addition the value of μ corresponding to G Opt is determined as follows:

μ=μ Coeff — lin ·G Opt ·( A Lin ·G Opt +B Lin )

15. A test method according to claim 11 , in which in addition μ max is determined as follows:

μ max =μ Coeff — exp ·G Opt ·e A Exp ·G Opt +A Exp

16. A test method according to claim 4 , in which two particular coefficients A p , the coefficients A and B, are calculated by the following linear regression, applied to “n” measured or estimated points (δ i , F i ):

A

Lin

=

n

·

∑

δ

·

α

-

∑

δ

·

∑

α

n

·

∑

δ

2

-

(

∑

δ

)

2

,

⁢

B

Lin

=

∑

α

·

∑

δ

2

-

∑

δ

·

α

·

∑

δ

n

·

∑

δ

2

-

(

∑

δ

)

2

.

17. A test method according to claim 4 , in which two particular coefficients A p , the coefficients A and B, are calculated by the following exponential regression, applied to “n” measured or estimated points (δ i , F i ):

A

Exp

=

n

·

∑

δ

·

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

-

∑

δ

·

∑

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

n

·

∑

δ

2

-

(

∑

δ

)

2

,

B

Exp

=

∑

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

-

∑

δ

2

-

∑

δ

·

Ln

⁡

(

α

)

·

∑

δ

n

·

∑

δ

2

-

(

∑

δ

)

2

.

18. A test method according to claim 16 , which δ Opt is calculated as follows:

δ

Opt

=

-

B

Lin

A

Lin

·

1

-

Invt

1

-

p

·

Invt

,

with α= A Lin ·δ+B Lin

19. A test method according to claim 17 , in which δ Opt is calculated as follows:

δ

Opt

=

Ln

⁡

(

Invt

)

p

·

A

Exp

,

with

⁢

⁢

α

=

ⅇ

A

Exp

·

δ

+

B

Exp

.

20. A test method according to claim 18 , in which in addition F Target is determined as follows:

F Target =F Coeff — lin ·δ Opt ·( A Lin ·δ Opt +B Lin )

21. A test method according to claim 19 , in which in addition F Target is determined as follows:

F Target =F Coeff — exp ·δ Opt ·e A Exp ·δ Opt +B Exp

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 26, 2003
From: LEVY, GEORGES; FANGEAT, NICOLAS
To: MICHELIN RECHERCHE ET TECHNIQUE S.A.
Reel/Frame 014424/0348 →
Priority Claims (2)
FR 02 07399 · Jun 13, 2002 · national
FR 02 09629 · Jul 29, 2002 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20040024514A1 · Feb 5, 2004