IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,181,302
Granted Patent B2
US 7,181,302 · App. 10/678,297 · Granted Feb 20, 2007

Method and system for network-based, distributed, real-time command and control of an enterprise

Assignee: Meta Command Systems, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,181,302
App. No.
10/678,297
Granted
Feb 20, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems of controlling an enterprise and for providing a control architecture. In some embodiments, a multiple level business model is used to define business processes, and control, regulate, or synchronize those processes. Actual processes are generally executed at lower levels, while control of the processes is carried out one level higher. At an echelon two levels higher, coordination of the processes based on objectives and available shared assets is carried out. A fourth level may be used to provide planning and development, and a fifth level may be used to set the objectives of an enterprise or enterprise unit. Implementation of this model provides control and monitoring of value production, performance measurement, and timely exchange of information and instructions.

Claims (50)

1. A method of creating an enterprise control architecture, the method comprising:

establishing five echelons of control, a first echelon, a second echelon, a third echelon, a fourth echelon, and a fifth echelon, each echelon having an one or more objects, the first echelon having an object that encapsulates a production process, the second echelon having an object that provides control over the production process, the third echelon having an object that coordinates processes executed at the first echelon in light of enterprise objectives, the fourth echelon having an object that provides planning and development functions, the fifth echelon having an object that provides supervisory control and that determines the enterprise objectives; and

connecting each of the five echelons with a plurality of control links.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

configuring each object of the first echelon such that each object may include an information port.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

configuring the third echelon to include an object that audits performance of processes at the first echelon.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

dividing an enterprise into multiple levels and, for each level, establishing five echelons of control as claimed in claim 1 .

5. A method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

dividing a system into multiples levels, and for each level, establishing five echelons of control as claimed in claim 1 .

6. A method creating an enterprise control architecture, the method comprising:

dividing a system into multiple levels,

for each level, establishing five echelons of control, a first echelon, a second echelon, a third echelon, a fourth echelon, and a fifth echelon, each echelon having an one or more objects, the first echelon having an object that encapsulates a production process, the second echelon having an object that provides control over the production process, the third echelon having an object that coordinates processes executed at the first echelon in light of enterprise objectives, the fourth echelon having an object that provides planning and development functions, the fifth echelon having an object that provides supervisory control and that determines the enterprise objectives;

configuring each object of the first echelon such that each object may include an information ports;

configuring the third echelon to include an object that audits performance of processes at the first echelon; and

connecting each of the five echelons with a plurality of control links.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the first echelon has an object that encapsulates a supply chain process and a second object that encapsulates an asset chain process.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the first object operates according to a first transform function.

9. A method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the transform function is y a k,1 (t+dt)= ka k,1 II k,1 [x a k,1 (t)].

10. A method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the second object operates according to a second transform function.

11. A method as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the transform function is y s k,1 (t+dt)= ks k,1 Φ k,1 [x s k,1 (t)].

12. An enterprise control system comprising

a plurality of value production units connected in an addressable grid, each production unit having

a first echelon, a second echelon, a third echelon, a fourth echelon, and a fifth echelon, each echelon having an one or more objects, the first echelon having an object that encapsulates a production process and that includes an information port, the second echelon having an object that provides control over the production process, the third echelon having an object that coordinates processes executed at the first echelon in light of enterprise objectives and an object that audits performance of processes at the first echelon, the fourth echelon having an object that provides planning and development functions, the fifth echelon having an object that provides supervisory control and that determines the enterprise objectives; and

a plurality of control links connecting each of the five echelons.

13. A system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the first echelon has an object that encapsulates a supply chain process and a second object that encapsulates an asset chain process.

14. A system as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the first object operates according to a first transform function.

15. A system as claimed in claim 14 , wherein the transform function is y a k,1 (t+dt)= ka k,1 II k,1 [x a k,1 (t)].

16. A system as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the second object operates according to a second transform function.

17. A system as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the transform function is y s k,1 (t+dt)= ks k,1 Φ k,1 [x s k,1 (t)].

18. A system as claimed in claim 14 , further comprising:

a router configured to control communications between at least some of the plurality of value production units.

19. A method of network-based, real-time command and control of an enterprise, the method comprising:

providing a communications network;

providing an interface for connecting to the network;

providing an application interface for connecting to an enterprise application;

providing one or more value production units, each value production unit having four full-duplex ports;

providing a router to dynamically create connections between the one or more value production units;

providing one or more enterprise process controls, at least some of the one or more enterprise process controls coupled to at least some of the one or more value production units; and

providing at least one enterprise management interface.

20. A system of network-based, real-time command and control of an enterprise, the system comprising:

an enterprise operating system having an interface layer, a performance measurement layer, a process control layer, and a performance management layer;

one or more value production units, each value production unit having four full-duplex ports and interfaced with the performance measurement layer of the enterprise operating system; and

a router to dynamically create connections between the one or more value production units.

21. An enterprise operating system comprising:

a network interface layer configured to support one or more virtual machine services and one or more application interfaces;

a performance measurement layer configured to support one or more value production processes;

a process control layer configured to support one or more supervisory processes; and

a management interface layer including configured to support one or more enterprise management interfaces.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 28, 2006
From: ECHELON 4 CORPORATION
To: META COMMAND SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 018687/0662 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2004
From: BAYNE, JAY S.
To: ECHELON 4 CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015591/0518 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20050075914A1 · Apr 7, 2005