IP Library Granted Patent US 7,181,380
Granted Patent B2
US 7,181,380 · App. 10/324,940 · Granted Feb 20, 2007

System and process for optimal selection of hydrocarbon well completion type and design

Assignees: Geomechanics International, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,181,380
App. No.
10/324,940
Granted
Feb 20, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A process to determine optimal completion type and design prior to drilling of a hydrocarbon producing well utilizing information from hydrocarbon recovery modeling such as reservoir, geo-mechanical, and material modeling over the production life of the well. An embodiment of the process includes obtaining information regarding pore pressure depletion, stress magnitudes and orientations, and strength of rock formation from hydrocarbon recovery modeling to determine optimum well completion design including the selection of a completion type, trajectory, and location. Additionally, the process may also consider probable failure mechanisms and identified completion requirements, and their corresponding effect on completion options.

Claims (53)

1. A process for selecting well completion design before drilling a proposed well comprising:

considering hydrocarbon recovery models relating to a proposed well;

determining completion design for desired hydrocarbon recovery over the life of the proposed well; and

storing the completion design in a computer readable medium;

wherein considering the hydrocarbon recovery models comprises determining the effect of pore pressure depletion on well production over the life of the well.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrocarbon recovery models comprise a geo-mechanical model.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrocarbon recovery models comprise a reservoir model.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrocarbon recovery models comprise a material model.

5. The process of claim 1 further comprising considering the impact on well completion given the determined effect of pore pressure depletion on well production over the life of the well.

6. The process of claim 5 further comprising identifying completion options based on the determined effect of pore pressure depletion on well production over the life of the well.

7. The process of claim 1 wherein considering the hydrocarbon recovery models comprises determining the probable failure mechanism for the proposed well.

8. The process of claim 7 further comprising considering the effect of the determined probable failure mechanism on well production.

9. The process of claim 8 further comprising identifying completion options based on the determined probable failure mechanism for the proposed well.

10. The process of claim 1 wherein considering the hydrocarbon recovery models comprises identifying completion requirements.

11. The process of claim 10 further comprising determining the effect of identified completion requirements on well completion.

12. The process of claim 11 further comprising identifying completion options based on the determined effect of identified completion requirements.

13. The process of claim 1 further comprising selecting optimum completion design for hydrocarbon recovery over the expected life of the proposed well.

14. The process of claim 1 wherein determining completion design comprises selecting a completion type.

15. The process of claim 1 wherein determining completion design comprises selecting a completion trajectory.

16. The process of claim 1 wherein determining completion design comprises selecting a completion location.

17. The process of claim 1 further comprising drilling and completing the well based on determination of completion design.

18. The process of claim 17 further comprising updating information used in the hydrocarbon recovery models based on data obtained during drilling and completion of the well.

19. The process of claim 18 further comprising repeating the process for each new proposed well.

20. A process for selecting well completion design before drilling a proposed well comprising:

considering hydrocarbon recovery models relating to a proposed well;

determining completion design for desired hydrocarbon recovery over the life of the proposed well; and

storing the completion design in a computer readable medium;

wherein considering the hydrocarbon recovery models comprises determining the effect of pore pressure depletion on the hydrocarbon recovery models and the corresponding effect on predicted well production.

21. A process for selecting well completion design before drilling a proposed well comprising:

considering hydrocarbon recovery models relating to a proposed well;

determining completion design for desired hydrocarbon recovery over the life of the proposed well; and

storing the completion design in a computer readable medium;

wherein the hydrocarbon recovery models provide information regarding pore pressure depletion, stress magnitudes and orientations, and strength of rock formation.

22. Computer-readable media tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by a computer to perform a process for selecting well completion design before drilling a proposed well, the process comprising:

considering hydrocarbon recovery models relating to a proposed well;

determining completion design for desired hydrocarbon recovery over the life of the proposed well; and

storing the completion design in a computer readable medium;

wherein the hydrocarbon recovery models provide information regarding pore pressure depletion, stress magnitudes and orientations, or strength of rock formation.

23. Computer-readable media tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by a computer to perform a process for selecting well completion design before drilling a proposed well, the process comprising:

considering hydrocarbon recovery models relating to a proposed well;

determining completion design for desired hydrocarbon reconvey over the life of the proposed well; and

storing the completion design in a computer readable medium;

wherein considering the hydrocarbon recovery models comprises determining the effect of pore pressure depletion on well production over the life of the well.

24. The media of claim 23 wherein the hydrocarbon recovery models comprise a geo-mechanical model, a reservoir model, or a material model.

25. The media of claim 23 further comprising identifying completion options based on the determined effect of pore pressure depletion on well production over the life of the well.

26. The media of claim 23 wherein considering the hydrocarbon recovery models comprises determining the probable failure mechanism for the proposed well.

27. The media of claim 26 further comprising identifying completion options based on the determined probable failure mechanism for the proposed well.

28. The media of claim 23 wherein considering the hydrocarbon recovery models comprises determining the effect of identified completion requirements on well completion.

29. The media of claim 28 further comprising identifying completion options based on the determined effect of identified completion requirements.

30. The media of claim 23 further comprising selecting optimum completion design for hydrocarbon recovery over the expected life of the proposed well.

31. The media of claim 23 wherein determining completion design comprises selecting a completion type, trajectory, or location.

32. The media of claim 23 further comprising updating information used in the hydrocarbon recovery models.

33. A process for the consideration of hydrocarbon recovery models in the selection of well completion before drilling the well comprising evaluating the hydrocarbon recovery models based on pore pressure depletion over the life of the well, and storing the hydrocarbon recovery models in a computer readable medium.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 28, 2007
From: DUSTERHOFT, RONALD G.
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 018944/0212 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 1, 2006
From: MOOS, DANIEL; ZOBACK, MARK DAVID; RITTER, DONALD; BRUDY, MARTIN
To: GEOMECHANICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 018041/0309 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20040122640A1 · Jun 24, 2004