IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,291,999
Granted Patent B2
US 7,291,999 · App. 11/565,012 · Granted Nov 6, 2007

System and method for diagnosing a controller in a limited rotation motor system

Assignee: GSI Group Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,291,999
App. No.
11/565,012
Granted
Nov 6, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of analyzing a limited rotation motor system is disclosed. The method includes the step of providing a motor control frequency domain signal that is representative of a frequency domain representation of the motor control signal responsive to a first digital signal that is representative of a motor control signal. The method also includes the step of providing a position detection frequency domain signal that is representative of a frequency domain representation of the position detection signal responsive to a second digital signal that is representative of a position detection signal. The system further includes the steps of identifying a representation of the frequency response of the limited rotation motor responsive to the position detection frequency domain signal and the motor control frequency domain signals, and comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response to identify an error condition with respect to the limited rotation motor system.

Claims (29)

1. A method of analyzing a limited rotation motor system, said method comprising the steps of:

providing a motor control frequency domain signal that is representative of a frequency domain representation of a motor control signal responsive to a first digital signal that is representative of the motor control signal;

providing a position detection frequency domain signal that is representative of a frequency domain representation of a position detection signal responsive to a second digital signal that is representative of the position detection signal;

identifying a representation of the frequency response of the limited rotation motor responsive to the motor control frequency domain signal and the position detection frequency domain signal; and

comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response to identify an error condition with respect to the limited rotation motor system.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said step of providing a motor control frequency domain signal and said step of providing a position detection frequency domain signal each involve performing a Fast Fourier Transform.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said representation of the frequency response includes a ratio of the position detection frequency domain signal and the motor control frequency domain signal.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said ratio is provided by the position detection frequency domain signal divided by the motor control frequency domain signal.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves comparing a low frequency range of the frequency response with the prior frequency response.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing a failed bearing error signal that is indicative of whether a bearing is at risk of failing.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves comparing a mid frequency range of the frequency response with the prior frequency response.

8. The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing a torque constant error signal that is indicative of a change in torque constant of the limited rotation motor.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing an asymmetry error signal that is indicative of whether the range of movement of a rotor shaft of the limited rotation motor is not symmetrical with respect to the torque constant.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said limited rotation motor system includes a proportional, integral, derivative controller.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing corrective signals to the proportional, integral, derivative controller.

12. A method of analyzing a limited rotation motor system, said method comprising the steps of:

providing a motor control frequency domain sequence that is representative of a frequency domain representation of a motor control signal for a plurality of frequencies responsive to a first digital signal that is representative of the motor control signal using a first Fast Fourier Transform;

providing a position detection frequency domain sequence that is representative of a frequency domain representation of a position detection signal for the plurality of frequencies responsive to a second digital signal that is representative of the position detection signal using a second Fast Fourier Transform;

identifying a representation of the frequency response for the plurality of frequencies of the limited rotation motor responsive to the motor control frequency domain signal and the position detection frequency domain signal; and

comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response to identify an error condition with respect to the limited rotation motor system.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 , wherein said representation of the frequency response includes a ratio of the position detection frequency domain signal and the motor control frequency domain signal.

14. The method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein said ratio is provided by the position detection frequency domain signal divided by the motor control frequency domain signal.

15. The method as claimed in claim 12 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves compares a low frequency range of the frequency response with the prior frequency response.

16. The method as claimed in claim 15 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing a failed bearing error signal that is indicative of whether a bearing is at risk of failing.

17. The method as claimed in claim 12 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves comparing a mid frequency range of the frequency response with the prior frequency response.

18. The method as claimed in claim 17 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing a torque constant error signal that is indicative of a change in torque constant of the limited rotation motor.

19. The method as claimed in claim 12 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing an asymmetry error signal that is indicative of whether the range of movement of a rotor shaft of the limited rotation motor is not symmetrical with respect to the torque constant.

20. The method as claimed in claim 12 , wherein said limited rotation motor system includes a proportional, integral, derivative controller.

21. The method as claimed in claim 20 , wherein said step of comparing the representation of the frequency response with a previously recorded representation of a prior frequency response involves providing corrective signals to the proportional, integral, derivative controller.

Assignments (9)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 19, 2017
From: CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: NOVANTA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 043919/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2016
From: CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: GSI GROUP CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 037513/0367 →
RELEASE Recorded Oct 26, 2011
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
To: GSI GROUP INC.; GSI GROUP CORPORATION; MES INTERNATIONAL INC.; EXCEL TECHNOLOGY INC.; CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY INC.; CONTINUUM ELECTRO-OPTICS INC.; CONTROL LASER CORPORATION (D/B/A BAUBLYS CONTROL LASER); THE OPTICAL CORPORATION; PHOTO RESEARCH INC.; QUANTRONIX CORPORATION; SYNRAD INC.; MICROE SYSTEMS CORP.
Reel/Frame 027127/0368 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 26, 2011
From: GSI GROUP INC.; GSI GROUP CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 027128/0763 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 29, 2010
From: GSI GROUP INC.; GSI GROUP CORPORATION; MES INTERNATIONAL INC.; EXCEL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; CAMBRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.; CONTINUUM ELECTRO-OPTICS, INC.; CONTROL LASER CORPORATION (D/B/A BAUBLYS CONTROL LASER); THE OPTICAL CORPORATION; PHOTO RESEARCH, INC.; QUANTRONIX CORPORATION; SYNRAD, INC.; MICROE SYSTEMS CORP.
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 024755/0537 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO VOID THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 018522/0385 Recorded Apr 30, 2010
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: BARROWS, COREY K.; IADANZA, JOSEPH A.; NOWAK, EDWARD J.; STOUT, DOUGLAS W.; STYDUHAR, MARK S.
Reel/Frame 024312/0905 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2006
From: HUANG, YUHONG
To: GSI LUMONICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 018567/0188 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 30, 2006
From: GSI LUMONICS CORPORATION
To: GSI GROUP CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 018567/0353 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2006
From: BARROWS, COREY K.; IADANZA, JOSEPH A.; NOWAK, EDWARD J.; STOUT, DOUGLAS W.; STYDUHAR, MARK S.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 018522/0385 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 1104033200 · Jan 21, 2005
Provisional Application 6061396200 · Sep 28, 2004
Provisional Application 6057525500 · May 28, 2004
Provisional Application 6053884200 · Jan 23, 2004
Related Publication 20070089500A1 · Apr 26, 2007