IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,391,305
Granted Patent B2
US 7,391,305 · App. 10/569,071 · Granted Jun 24, 2008

Driver warning device

Assignee: Robert Bosch GmbH
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,391,305
App. No.
10/569,071
Granted
Jun 24, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A driver warning device which serves to warn the driver when a safety-critical condition of the vehicle is reached. A warning is issued only if such issuance is to take place in accordance with a user profile. This avoids unnecessary warnings from being issued to a driver, which could reduce the acceptance of the warning system on the part of the driver.

Claims (44)

1. A driver warning device comprising:

a detection unit for detecting conditions of at least one of: i) a vehicle, and ii) a driver of the vehicle; and

a warning unit for issuing warnings to the driver when a safety-critical condition of the at least one of the vehicle and the driver is reached, a limit value for a safety-critical condition of the at least one of the vehicle and the driver being determined as a function of a user profile which contains data collected during a previous driving trip;

wherein the warning unit reduces a degree of warning when it is recognized that the driver is intentionally driving in a manner that triggers the safety-critical condition.

2. The device as recited in claim 1 , wherein limit values for safety-critical conditions of the at least one of the vehicle and the driver are stored in the user profile.

3. The device as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

an evaluation unit configured to determine a safety-critical limit value by comparing at least one of vehicle and driver conditions stored in the user profile to at least one of vehicle and driver conditions recorded during a predetermined period of time prior to a time of evaluation.

4. The device as recited in claim 3 , further comprising:

a unit configured to change an associated safety-control limit if at least one of acceleration values and RPM values is above a predetermined limit.

5. The device as recited in claim 3 , further comprising:

a unit which changes an associated safety-control limit if a distance from vehicles ahead are below a predetermined limit.

6. The device as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

a feedback unit configured to determine a driver reaction to a warning and to adapt the user profile as a function of whether there was a reaction to the warning.

7. The device as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

an interface configured to supply the user profile to the device.

8. The device as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

a control unit configured to select a stored user profile.

9. The device as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

a control unit configured to set up a new user profile.

10. The device as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

a memory unit to store user profiles for different drivers of the vehicle.

11. The device as recited in claim 1 , wherein the device is connected via a data bus to a plurality of sensors to detect conditions of the at least one of the vehicle and the driver.

12. A driver warning method, comprising:

detecting conditions of at least one of a vehicle and driver of the vehicle;

issuing a warning to the driver when a safety-critical condition of the at least one of the vehicle and the driver is reached;

determining a limit value for the safety-critical condition as a function of a stored user profile which contains data collected during a previous driving trip;

recognizing that the driver is intentionally driving in a manner that triggers the safety-critical condition; and

reducing a degree of warning after the intentional driving is recognized.

13. The method as recited in claim 12 , further comprising:

adapting the user profile as a function of at least one of vehicle conditions, driver conditions, and a driver input.

14. The method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the adapting includes deactivating warnings.

15. The method as recited in claim 12 , further comprising:

recognizing that the safety-critical limit value deviates from past safety-critical values;

identifying similar deviations that have occurred during past driving trips; and

after the identification of similar deviations, modifying the user profile to correspond to the deviating safety-critical limit value.

16. The method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the recognition of intentional driving results from a simultaneous occurrence of a plurality of safety-critical conditions.

17. The method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the reduction occurs only after the driver has repeatedly ignored previous warnings.

18. The device as recited in claim 3 , wherein the predetermined time period corresponds to the previous driving trip.

19. The device as recited in claim 3 , wherein the evaluation unit modifies the user profile to correspond to a safety-critical limit value that deviates from past safety-critical limit values contained in the user profile, the modification occurring after the evaluation unit identifies similar deviations that have occurred during past driving trips.

20. The device as recited in claim 1 , wherein the recognition of intentional driving results from a simultaneous occurrence of a plurality of safety-critical conditions.

21. A driver warning device comprising:

a detection unit for detecting conditions of at least one of: i) a vehicle, and ii) a driver of the vehicle;

a warning unit for issuing warnings to the driver when a safety-critical condition of the at least one of the vehicle and the driver is reached, a limit value for a safety-critical condition of the at least one of the vehicle and the driver being determined as a function of a user profile; and

a feedback unit configured to determine a driver reaction to a warning and to adapt the user profile as a function of whether there was a reaction to the warning.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 19, 2008
From: KNOLL, PETER; ENGELSBERG, ANDREAS; MANSTETTEN, DIETRICH; KUSSMANN, HOLGER; KROEHNERT, ANDRE; PLACKE, LARS; STOERZEL, MARC; SCHWEIGER, ULRICH; EISENLAUER, STEPHAN
To: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Reel/Frame 020965/0556 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 103 39 647 · Aug 28, 2003 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070013498A1 · Jan 18, 2007