IP Library Granted Patent US 7,460,948
Granted Patent B2
US 7,460,948 · App. 11/372,721 · Granted Dec 2, 2008

Traffic notification system for reporting traffic anomalies based on historical probe vehicle data

Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,460,948
App. No.
11/372,721
Granted
Dec 2, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for determining and communicating a traffic anomaly at a point to at least one receiving vehicle includes a traffic information center and at least one probe device. Each probe device is configured to determine and store within an on-board database a current value of a condition at the point during each of a plurality of trips, so as to build a history of condition values. The probe device is further configured to compare the current value to the historic values during each trip, and selectively transmit notification of an anomalous value to the center.

Claims (36)

1. A traffic information system for determining and communicating a traffic anomaly to at least one receiving vehicle, said system comprising:

a traffic information center configured to determine and transmit an alert to at least one receiving vehicle; and

at least one probe device communicatively coupled to the center, and configured to determine a current value of a traffic condition at a point during each of a plurality of trips, and store the current values in an on-board database, so as to build a history of condition values;

said at least one probe device being further configured to compare each current value to the history of condition values, so as to determine a condition discrepancy during each trip, and transmit a notification to the center, only when the discrepancy is greater than a pre-determined discrepancy threshold,

said center being further configured to generate the alert based upon the notification.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1 ,

said probe device being configured to store the current value only upon receipt of a command from a user, so as to selectively build the history.

3. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a plurality of current values for a plurality of points are periodically determined during a trip.

4. The system as claimed in claim 3 , wherein said period interval is between 1 to 10 seconds.

5. The system as claimed in claim 3 , wherein a plurality of condition discrepancies are determined and compared to the threshold over a period window, and the notification is transmitted when each discrepancy is greater than the threshold.

6. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the probe device is a probe vehicle, the center transmits the alert to a plurality of receiving vehicles that includes the probe vehicle, and the probe vehicle is further configured to sequentially receive the alert, determine a subsequent current value and discrepancy, compare the subsequent discrepancy to the alert, so as to determine a condition alert status, and to suppress a subsequent transmission of the notification depending upon the condition alert status, during a trip.

7. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the center is further configured to cooperatively determine the alert based upon a plurality of notifications from a plurality of probe devices.

8. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the condition discrepancy is determined as a function of the absolute difference between the current value and the average of the historic values.

9. They system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the condition discrepancy is determined as a function of the statistical deviation of the historic values.

10. The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein each probe device is a probe vehicle, and configured to determine at least one condition parameter selected from the group consisting of a general time, general location, general heading, the day of the week, current or expected weather conditions, and the occurrence of a construction, accident, or sporting event.

11. The system as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the speed of the probe vehicle at the general time, general position, and heading is determined.

12. The system as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the discrepancy threshold is fifteen miles-per-hour.

13. The system as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the probe vehicle includes a GPS receiver, the center and probe vehicle are cooperatively configured to locate the point relative to a map database, and the center is further configured to communicate the alert only to the receiving vehicles located within a predetermined area relative to the point.

14. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein an intermediary probe station is communicatively coupled to the probe device and center, and configured to receive the notification from the device and transmit it towards the center.

15. The system as claimed in claim 14 , wherein each probe device is a probe vehicle, and the probe station is configured to communicate with a plurality of probe vehicles using SMS communication.

16. The system as claimed in claim 14 , wherein each probe device is a probe vehicle, and the probe station is configured to communicate with a plurality of probe vehicles using a DSRC system.

17. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the center is communicatively coupled to said at least one receiving vehicle and probe device by broadcast technology or through cellular data channels.

18. A traffic information system for determining and communicating a traffic anomaly to a remote location, said system comprising:

at least one probe device configured to determine a current value of a condition at a point, during each of a plurality of trips, and store the current values in an on-board database, so as to build a history of condition values,

said at least one probe device being further configured to compare the current value to the history of condition values, so as to determine a condition discrepancy during each trip, and transmit a notification to the remote location, only when the discrepancy is greater than a pre-determined discrepancy threshold; and

a monitoring device located at the remote location, communicatively coupled to the probe device, and configured to generate a humanly perceptible signal upon receipt of the notification.

19. A traffic control system for communicating a traffic anomaly to at least one receiving vehicle upon a link, said system comprising:

a traffic information center including a map database presenting a plurality of pre-defined links; and

at least one probe vehicle communicatively coupled to the center, and configured to determine a current value of a condition at a point, during each of a plurality of trips, and store the current values in an on-board database, so as to present a history of condition values,

said at least one probe vehicle being further configured to compare the current value to the history of condition values, so as to determine a condition discrepancy during each trip, and transmit a notification to the center, only when the discrepancy is greater than a pre-determined discrepancy threshold,

said center being further configured to generate an alert based upon the notification, to determine the position of the point upon the map database, and to transmit the alert to said at least one receiving vehicle, when said position is located within a predetermined area relative to the link.

20. The system as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the probe vehicle is configured to autonomously suppress the transmission of the notification, when the position is within a predetermined traffic interruption zone.

21. The system as claimed in claim 20 , wherein the zone is autonomously determined by the probe vehicle, and is based on the standard of deviation of the historic values.

22. The system as claimed in claim 20 , wherein the probe vehicle is further configured to suppress the determination of the current value, only when the position is within the zone and a predetermined action is performed.

23. The system as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the predetermined action is the application of a minimum brake force, actuation of a turn signal, or the minimum rotation of the steering wheel.

24. The system as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the probe vehicle stores a copy of the map database, determines the position of the point relative thereto, and transmits the notification and the current relative position to the center, when the discrepancy is greater than the pre-determined discrepancy threshold.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034184/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025327/0041 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025314/0901 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0587 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0093 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0142 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023127/0402 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0519 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022553/0493 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0448 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CUSTOMER NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 017583 FRAME 0975. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE CUSTOMER NUMBER ON ORIGINAL TRANSMITTAL LETTER APPEARS AS 002861. THE CORRECT CUSTOMER NUMBER IS 00286.. Recorded Jun 6, 2006
From: VAN BUER, DARREL J.; DAO, SON K.; DAI, XIAOWEN; JOHNSON, RICHARD A.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 017727/0156 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 5, 2006
From: VAN BUER, DARREL J.; DAO, SON K.; DAI, XIAOWEN; JOHNSON, RICHARD A.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 017583/0975 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070213922A1 · Sep 13, 2007