IP Library Granted Patent US 7,486,839
Granted Patent B2
US 7,486,839 · App. 10/880,329 · Granted Feb 3, 2009

Efficient method for MR image reconstruction using coil sensitivity encoding

Assignee: Case Western Reserve University
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,486,839
App. No.
10/880,329
Granted
Feb 3, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) has demonstrated potential for significant scan time reduction using multiple receiver channels. SENSE reconstruction algorithms for non-uniformly sampled data proposed to date require relatively high computational demands. A Projection Onto Convex Sets (POCS)-based SENSE reconstruction method (POCSENSE) has been recently proposed as an efficient reconstruction technique in rectilinear sampling schemes. POCSENSE is an iterative algorithm with a few constraints imposed on the acquired data sets at each iteration. Although POCSENSE can be readily performed on rectilinearly acquired k-space data, it is difficult to apply to non-uniformly acquired k-space data. Iterative Next Neighbor re-Gridding (INNG) algorithm is a recently proposed new reconstruction method for non-uniformly sampled k-space data. The POCSENSE algorithm can be extended to non-rectilinear sampling schemes by using the INNG algorithm. The resulting algorithm (POCSENSINNG) is an efficient SENSE reconstruction algorithm for non-uniformly sampled k-space data, taking into account coil sensitivities.

Claims (29)

1. A method, comprising:

acquiring non-rectilinearly sampled k-space data from a set of magnetic resonance (MR) coils having a set of coil sensitivity profiles;

distributing the non-rectilinearly sampled k-space data onto a first resealed matrix having a first scaling factor, where the distributing is performed without using a density compensation function (DCF) and without using a singular value decomposition (SVD) regularization parameter adjustment;

reconstructing subsets of a first MR image from the first resealed matrix by applying a basic Iterative Next Neighbor Gridding (INNG) process to subsets of the first resealed matrix;

selectively zeroing portions of the subsets of the first MR image;

building the first MR image from the subsets of the first MR image;

placing the first MR image in a second rescaled matrix having a second scaling factor;

modifying the non-rectilinearly sampled k-space data into modified k-space data based, at least in part, on the set of coil sensitivity profiles and sensitivity encoding (SENSE);

distributing the modified k-space data onto the second rescaled matrix, where the distributing is performed without using a DCF, the second scaling factor being larger than the first scaling factor;

reconstructing subsets of a second MR image from the second rescaled matrix by applying the basic INNG process to subsets of the second rescaled matrix;

selectively zeroing portions of the subsets of the second MR image;

building the second MR image from the subsets of the second MR image; and

displaying the second MR image.

2. The method of claim 1 , including:

placing the second MR image in a third rescaled matrix having a third scaling factor, the third scaling factor being greater than the second scaling factor;

re-modifying the non-rectilinearly sampled k-space data into re-modified k-space data based, at least in part, on the set of coil sensitivity profiles and sensitivity encoding (SENSE);

distributing the re-modified k-space data onto the third rescaled matrix, where the distributing is performed without using a DCF;

reconstructing subsets of a third MR image from the third rescaled matrix by applying the basic INNG process to subsets of the third rescaled matrix;

selectively zeroing portions of the subsets of the third MR image;

building the third MR image from the subsets of the third MR image; and

displaying the third MR image.

3. The method of claim 2 , including:

placing the third MR image in a fourth rescaled matrix having a fourth scaling factor, the fourth scaling factor being larger than the third scaling factor;

distributing the re-modified k-space data onto the fourth rescaled matrix, where the distributing is performed without using a DCF;

reconstructing subsets of a fourth MR image from the fourth rescaled matrix by applying the basic INNG process to subsets of the fourth rescaled matrix;

selectively zeroing portions of the subsets of the fourth MR image;

building the fourth MR image from the subsets of the fourth MR image; and

displaying the fourth MR image.

4. The method of claim 1 , where distributing the non-rectilinearly sampled k-space data includes determining a location to place a data value by rounding off an original k-space co-ordinate after multiplying by a scale factor.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2005
From: MORIGUCHI, HISAMOTO; DUERK, JEFFREY L.
To: CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 016671/0154 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 6048321900 · Jun 27, 2003
Provisional Application 6048582300 · Jul 8, 2003
Related Publication 20050058368A1 · Mar 17, 2005