IP Library Granted Patent US 7,729,261
Granted Patent B2
US 7,729,261 · App. 10/914,170 · Granted Jun 1, 2010

Forwarding of network traffic in respect of differentiated restricted transit network nodes

Assignee: Alcatel Lucent
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,729,261
App. No.
10/914,170
Granted
Jun 1, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

There is provided a method of forwarding a traffic flow in a communications network having at least one network node for which network traffic is selectively prevented from transiting the network node. The method includes the step of selecting a specified category of network traffic that is to be prevented from transiting the network node. The method also includes the step of determining a path within the network for forwarding the traffic flow, whereby the network node is excluded for transit in establishing the path where the traffic flow is identified with the specified category of network traffic.

Claims (46)

1. A method of using policy routing in conjunction with restricted transit to forward network traffic in a communications network having a plurality of peer network nodes, the method comprising:

receiving, in a network node, a nodal Information Group (IG) message generated by an advertising node to advertise a differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node to the plurality of peer network nodes, wherein the nodal IG message comprises:

a flag that indicates whether a restricted transit status is enabled or disabled for the advertising node, and

an exception list that lists policy tags associated with predetermined categories of the network traffic that are permitted to transit the advertising node when the restricted transit status is enabled for the advertising node,

wherein the exception list and the flag define the differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node;

receiving a policy-based path setup request for the network traffic;

determining whether the policy-based path setup request involves at least one of the predetermined categories of the network traffic;

generating paths for the network traffic that take into account the at least one of the predetermined categories of the network traffic and the differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node; and

wherein the differentiated restricted transit status permits SVC connections to traverse the advertising node but prohibits SPVC connections.

2. A method of using policy routing in conjunction with restricted transit to forward network traffic in a communications network having a plurality of peer network nodes, the method comprising:

receiving, in a network node, a nodal Information Group (IG) message generated by an advertising node to advertise a differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node to the plurality of peel″ network nodes, wherein the nodal IG message comprises:

a flag that indicates whether a restricted transit status is enabled or disabled for the advertising node, and

a definition list that lists policy tags associated with predetermined categories of the network traffic that are not permitted to transit the

advertising node when the restricted transit status is enabled for the advertising node, wherein the definition list and the flag define the differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node;

receiving a policy-based path setup request for the network traffic;

determining whether the policy-based path setup request involves at least one of the predetermined categories of the network traffic;

generating paths for the network traffic that take into account the at least one of the predetermined categories of the network traffic and the differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node; and

wherein the differentiated restricted transit status permits SVC connections to traverse the advertising node but prohibits SPVC connections.

3. A method of using policy routing in conjunction with restricted transit to forward network traffic in a communications network having a plurality of peer network nodes, the method comprising:

receiving, in a network node, a nodal Information Group (IG) message generated by an advertising node to advertise a differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node to the plurality of peer network nodes, wherein the nodal IG message comprises:

a flag that indicates whether a restricted transit status is enabled or disabled for the advertising node,

a first restricted transit list that lists policy tags associated with predetermined categories of the network traffic that are permitted to transit the advertising node when the restricted transit status is enabled for the advertising node,

a second restricted transit list that lists policy tags associated with predetermined categories of the network traffic that are permitted to transit the advertising node when the restricted transit status is disabled for the advertising node, wherein the first restricted transit list, the second restricted transit list, and the flag define the differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node;

receiving a policy-based path setup request for the network traffic;

determining whether the policy-based path setup request involves at least one of the predetermined categories of the network traffic;

generating paths for the network traffic that take into account the at least one of the predetermined categories of the network traffic and the differentiated restricted transit status of the advertising node; and

wherein the differentiated restricted transit status permits SVC connections to traverse the advertising node but prohibits SPVC connections.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the exception list comprises a Network Element identifier list and a Resource Partition list.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the definition list comprises a Network Element identifier list and a Resource Partition list.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one of the first restricted transit list and the second restricted transit list comprises a Network Element identifier list and a Resource Partition list.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the communications network is a Virtual Backbone Network operating according to the PNNI protocol.

8. The method of claim 2 , wherein the communications network is a Virtual Backbone Network operating according to the PNNI protocol.

9. The method of claim 3 , wherein the communications network is a Virtual Backbone Network operating according to the PNNI protocol.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

modifying the nodal JIG message at any desired time to advertise a different policy-based routing criterion.

11. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

modifying the nodal IG message at any desired time to advertise a different policy-based routing criterion.

12. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

modifying the nodal IG message at any desired time to advertise a different policy-based routing criterion.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

using the exception list to recognize and override the restricted transit status of the advertising node.

14. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

using the definition list to recognize and comply with the restricted transit status of the advertising node.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined categories of the network traffic are not permitted to transit the advertising node when the restricted transit status is disabled for the advertising node.

16. The method of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined categories of the network traffic are not permitted to transit the advertising node when the restricted transit status is disabled for the advertising node.

17. The method of claim 3 , wherein the predetermined categories of the network traffic are not permitted to transit the advertising node when the restricted transit status is disabled for the advertising node.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2021
From: TERRIER SSC, LLC
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056526/0093 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OT WSOU TERRIER HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056990/0081 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2019
From: OCO OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, L.P. (F/K/A OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND LP
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 049246/0405 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2019
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: BP FUNDING TRUST, SERIES SPL-VI
Reel/Frame 049235/0068 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2017
From: ALCATEL LUCENT
To: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 044000/0053 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2017
From: WSOU INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: OMEGA CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, LP
Reel/Frame 043966/0574 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2014
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 033868/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 30, 2013
From: ALCATEL LUCENT
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Reel/Frame 029821/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 11, 2010
From: ALCATEL
To: ALCATEL LUCENT
Reel/Frame 024214/0812 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 10, 2004
From: RAJSIC, CARL; SHAKER, MAGED EDWARD
To: ALCATEL
Reel/Frame 015673/0518 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20060034171A1 · Feb 16, 2006